The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
NYPD to Flood Central Park with Drones to Somehow “Fight Crime”
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Related: Utopia Closer Than Ever After NYC Puts Gun-Detecting Tech at Busy Subway Station

I didn’t realize Mayor Eric Adams loved tech so much.

Here I am learning that he’s a tech-lover, and I didn’t even know that.

New York Post:

Central Park frolickers could soon find themselves under Big Brother surveillance from NYPD drones flying above them, as the iconic green space struggles with a whopping crime increase.

Tech-loving Mayor Eric Adams on Tuesday floated the notion and also using nebulous other “new technology” to deal with a worrisome surge in sex crimes, assaults and robberies in Central Park — including an incident involving three teenage muggers targeting a trio of park-goers that very morning.

“I think with such a vast large area, we could do a better job in using drones to police the area from the sky,” Hizzoner said during his weekly news conference with reporters.

The NYPD, pressed for more details by The Post, forwarded previous testimony from a deputy commissioner on Capitol Hill in which the higher-up said the department would be testing drones to respond to ShotSpotter gun-detection alerts.

The Department anticipates drones to be operational at the Central Park Precinct in the coming weeks,” an e-mail from a rep said.

Okay, well.

Okay.

Are the drones going to drop hand-grenades, like in the Ukraine videos we all watch on Telegram?

Because if not, I don’t see what good these drones are going to do.

They are going to record the crimes?

The crimes are already recorded.

What good is video of a crime?

It’s not like the police are going to rush in as soon as they see a live drone feed of a crime. If anything they are going to be like “let’s keep our distance from that, we don’t want to end up like Derek Chauvin.”

But even if the cops were not scared to death to arrest blacks, here’s the thing: after people commit a crime, they run away. So unless the police are right near by, the video does not help at all, and if they’re right near by, they don’t need the video anyway.

This seems like a more of an excuse to do a dystopian, Half-Life type thing, where we just have drones flying everywhere watching people all the time.

Remember the drones in Half-Life 2, kids?

Kids these days.

The don’t even remember Half-Life 2.

They would know about Half-Life 3, if it were to ever be released, but Eric Adams will stop crime in New York before that happens.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 17 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. meamjojo says:

    Put machine guns on them!

  2. you own a phone and you’re worried about drones spying? pfft

  3. xyzxy says:

    One thing’s for sure…, due to the American Security Drone Act (I’m not making that up) these won’t be Chinese drones, but more expensive ‘made anywhere else but China’ drones.

    On the other hand, if some Chinese drones sneak through, we can read Zerohedge articles (sourced from Epoch Times) claiming that Chinese are spying on NYC blacks, for reasons only the inscrutable Chinese understand.

    Damn… where are the Chinese weather balloons when Eric Adams needs them?

    • Replies: @Chitnel
  4. Rich says:

    Someone in the city probably has a brother-in-law or cousin who sells drones, so this is a perfect setup for some kickbacks. Whenever seeing anything about NY, start with how a corrupt politician can make a buck and you’ll know why it’s getting done.

  5. Rayciss Drones, no doubt controlled by the shape-shifters who man staff the secret Israeli Moon Base.

  6. Maybe put tranquilizer darts in them, so the cops can just come and collect them.

    • Agree: meamjojo
  7. Notsofast says:

    this is just the beginning, soon they will have pack of robo k-9 units prowling the park.


    Video Link

    • Replies: @James of Africa
  8. @Notsofast

    I think bystanders won’t be able to resist becoming part of the action in a lot of countries. Robolynching? I would like to throw a brick or two at those things.

  9. Chitnel says:

    The US empire is the world’s premier shithole bc of its imbecilic people.

  10. Chitnel says:
    @xyzxy

    The drone act by the US. Yes.

    The americants focus on very important things…..

  11. Gore 2004 says:

    Stop and frisk is illegal and unconstitutional. No white person would want to be stopped and frisked by cops, so it should not happen to blacks and Latinos and Arabs.

    There needs to be other police technology and new strategies/tactics.

    Re-implementing stop and frisk will get cops killed by BLM and riots will ensue again.

    We don’t need that.

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Evan Drince
  12. anonymous[212] • Disclaimer says:
    @Gore 2004

    You’re an idiot. S&F is only “unconstititional” in the eyes of Jewish judges who believe there are “too many” black men in prison. As for white folks, after a year or so of seldom being found in possession unlawfully, they could rationally be exempted from the program, experience justifying a primary focus on jigs. But as I say, the predicate would be a rewiring of the Jewish brain.

  13. Drones won’t stop crime, but if we had them in Central Park back in 1989, the absurd narrative that Matteas Reyes was the sole attacker in the Trisha Meili rape would easily be debunked.

    Aww, what am I saying here? I must be deluded….. there are already several videos of confessions with details that could only have been known to someone who was there, and everybody STILL believes that the Central Park Five are “exonerated”.

  14. @Gore 2004

    You might actually be retarded.

    Stop and Frisk would rightly be concentrated in high-crime areas, which would not (and should not) affect whites too much. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with that, by the way. Police resources should be concentrated where they’re needed. Fish where the fish are, as they say.

    “Disparate Impact” is bullshit and we should make it a top priority to destroy is as a legal concept.

    • Replies: @Gore 2004
  15. Gore 2004 says:
    @Evan Drince

    I’m not a retard, I’m a realist.

    If you want America to still be standing in 10 years, dump S&F and keep it moving. Find new police tactics to control crime.

    If you want America to burn every summer and every White cop gunned down and murdered, continue with stop and frisk and tell me where America will look like in 2034 when businesses and corporations flee to Qatar and Kuwait.

  16. Over the past two years Mayor Adams has consulted Israeli tech companies regarding potential drone operations in NYC. I’m not sure which companies are actually producing them for the NYPD, but it’s possible they are Israeli or connected to Israel.

    New York City mayor says he wants to adopt Israeli drone tech for policing

  17. I see an increase in the number of rapes is a “100%” increase, when it goes from 0 to 2.

    Maybe this is how Maths is done in Central Park; I’m not sure.

    That is nonstandard (and totally strange); the usual way a “percent increase” is understood is The Change divided by the Starting Number, expressed as a percentage (i.e. x 100).

    A correct example is the change from 9 to 29, calculated as (29 – 9) / 9 = 222 %.

    It seems precision and consistency matter less to people all the time – some people anyway.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS