The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
PSA: If You End Up with a Dead Hooker in Your Hotel Room, CALL A LAWYER, DO NOT TALK to the COPS
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

I’ve been thinking about that story of that poor guy strangling that gross, old, overpriced hooker to death in Vegas, and I think I need to put out a PSA on what to do if you accidentally kill a hooker.

You do not want to talk to the police about anything. Do not say anything at all to them. Do not attempt to explain yourself.

You have to call 911 if she’s unresponsive, but you don’t have to explain to the 911 operator what happened. It will take a while for the ambulance to get there, and it will take the cops even longer. They’re probably going to assume it was an overdose, because hookers use a lot of drugs.

Before the cops get there, you need a criminal lawyer on the phone, telling them you’ve got a dead hooker in the room. No lawyer is going to tell you to talk to the police, so it doesn’t really matter if it’s a good lawyer. You can get a better one later. You just needs a lawyer to protect you from the police.

If you accidentally or even purposefully kill a hooker, it should not be a life sentence. If you choked her to death, there are very good arguments that it was consensual, which means it’s manslaughter, which is a whole lot lesser charge than murder. Even if you beat her to death, you’ve got arguments. People do BDSM with hookers. Even if you weren’t doing that, and you were just drunk and angry and decided to beat up the hooker for some reason, there are arguments.

This goes beyond “dead hooker in the hotel room” situations. It’s everything. Never talk to the cops, in any situation where you could be accused of a crime (even if you don’t think you have been accused of a crime, don’t talk to the cops). If you are poor, make them give you a state lawyer. The state lawyer will be garbage, but you can tell them “I’m not saying shit.” They can’t make you.

You don’t really have rights in a general sense in this country. Ironically, once you’ve been arrested and charged with a crime, you have more rights than at any other time, because there are so many people and so much money that are dependent on the court system, so criminal law has to have some rules. Civil law, not so much. But criminal law is the last system in the country that still sort of works. It doesn’t really work, but it works better than anything else in this country.

This also obviously applies if the feds show up at your house and ask you about something you posted on the internet:

  • “Am I being detained?”
  • “I want a lawyer.”

That’s it.

DO NOT EVER TALK TO THE COPS.

It’s about time to repost this:

Video Link

Watch it.

If you’ve watched it before, watch it again.

Have it drilled into your brain, because the natural response when you know you didn’t do anything wrong is to explain yourself. Actually, that’s the natural response even if you did do something wrong.

Whether you did something really wrong – like murder a hooker – or literally did nothing wrong – like post something racist on the internet – DO NOT EVER TALK TO THE COPS.

This could save you from decades in prison.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Judicial System, Police 
Hide 40 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I’ve always found it interesting that the classic “badge nigger” Miranda warning says anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. In other words, nothing you say can aid your cause. So there’s no point in saying a thing.

    • Agree: Sharonbaron
  2. Notsofast says:

    andrew sure has a lot of experience dealing with dead hookers. sounds like the first one, may have been accidental but he seems to have develop a taste for it, seeing how easy it is to beat the rap. hookers seem to be a natural target, for serial killers everywhere, might have something to do with a hatred for their mothers or women in general, or perhaps they just don’t want to pay for something, they feel, they should get for free.

    • Troll: Sharonbaron
    • Replies: @anonymous
  3. anon[213] • Disclaimer says:

    WTF is this garbage?

  4. fnn says:

    If you’re labeled “white supremacist” in the US you really have no rights whatsoever.There are guys still in prison today solely for fighting back against Antifa and black gangbangers at Charlottesville and the Tiki Torch trials are still ongoing. You might be safe in a small, backwater rural county if you never leave and you never catch the attention of the feds.

    In Virginia, a federal appeals court judge claims to believe that people he doesn’t like attempting to exercise their First Amendment rights is “outrageous misconduct”:
    https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/03/us/unite-the-right-victims-damages-reaj/index.html

    “Over two years ago, the jury used its $24 million punitive damages award to send an unmistakable message to the defendants and to the public about the outrageous misconduct that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia,” Diaz wrote in the 3-0 ruling. “While the law compels us to reduce the award, it’s long past time for that message to be delivered.”

    • Replies: @Sharonbaron
    , @TrumpWon
  5. @anon

    The idea is probably that this article should be read in conjunction with today’s article by Jared Taylor. The Blacks are aware that they are a targeted group, but Whites continue to support the Blue. The message here is that Whites are naive and should remember that they belong to a racial group that has enemies. The State loves to send White people to jail.

    • Replies: @kiwk
    , @Sharyn
    , @anonymous
  6. Jameson says:
    @anon

    He likes to be over the top provocative, but still tries to make a point in the process.

    Many people are very naive when it comes to talking to police, and even the FBI. It is not like you may have believed it was growing up any longer, even if you have done zero wrong, period, end of story, they may end up using whatever it is you say to them to destroy your life. Look at the 1/6 protesters, look at gun owners who use their gun in self-defense. Name, rank and serial number is all you should provide in most circumstances. They don’t know you from Adam, you have no idea what they have been told by others, whatever lies they may be inclined to believe, you just have no clue where they are really coming from. So stay quiet until you get fully up to speed and your lawyer advises you.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  7. Anonymous[148] • Disclaimer says:

    Former cop and Unz contributor Rockaboatus needs to weigh in on this topic. Anglin is correct, talking to law enforcement only inculpates but never exculpates.

    That YouTube video Anglin links to is a talk by a Harvard and Harvard Law grad who worked as a federal prosecutor before becoming a law professor. His bottomline: never, ever, ever talk with police even if you’re totally, completely innocent. And even if you’re an experienced defense lawyer.

    I also read somewhere that if you’re pulled over and suspected of DUI or DWI, never, ever agree to a search of your vehicle and never submit to either a sobriety test (aka, “the roadside olympics”) or breathalyzer. Agreeing to the aforementioned only makes the cops job easier and the prosecution of you easier but never helps you.

  8. How can he be charged with “sexual assault”? He paid her 2 grand, which she accepted, to have sex. She decided to raise her contracted rate after the fact. At most he should be charged with petty larceny.

  9. Anonymous[175] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    C’mon. Anglin found a good YouTube video that he liked and thinks it’d be very useful for the average citizen, especially someone who reads his columns, and wanted to share it in a humorous gonzo journalist way. Lighten up.

    • Thanks: Sharonbaron
  10. An important detail in the viral “Don’t talk to the police” video has been partly superseded by the Supreme Court, you now need to invoke your Sixth Amendment right to a lawyer to shut up if you’ve not yet been arrested. The guy who did the video wrote You Have the Right to Remain Innocent with the details.

    Also note it’s a standard trap the FBI uses if you flat out refuse to talk to them, obstruction of justice as I recall. They’re particularly dangerous because they refuse to record interviews, instead write up a FD-302 form with their recollection of it. This was used to persecute General Flynn after I forget who spent a month revising the Official version, at the time of the interview the guys doing it didn’t think he’d done anything wrong….

  11. @fnn

    Those poor kids in Charlottesville were only trying to save their jobs that they were losing. The Fed sent in Larpers And all kinds of shit to make bad optics for those kids. It all went down exactly how the government wanted.
    Andrew‘s essay on the matter was ruthless and awesome and he was right about every word.

  12. kiwk says:
    @Suetonious

    Blacks are a targeted group? How so? Many police departments are 1/2 black or more nowadays.

  13. @Jameson

    “They don’t know you from Adam, you have no idea what they have been told by others, whatever lies they may be inclined to believe, you just have no clue where they are really coming from.”

    “Every assistant D.A. in the Bronx, from the youngest Italian just out of St. John’s Law School to the oldest Irish bureau chief, who would be somebody like Bernie Fitzgibbon, who was forty-two, shared Captain Ahab’s mania for the Great White Defendant.

    For a start, it was not pleasant to go through life telling yourself, “What I do for a living is, I pack blacks and Latins off to jail.” Kramer had been raised as a liberal. In Jewish families like his, liberalism came with the Similac and the Mott’s apple juice and the Instamatic and Daddy’s grins in the evening. And even the Italians, like Ray Andriutti, and the Irish, like Jimmy Caughey, who were not exactly burdened with liberalism by their parents, couldn’t help but be affected by the mental atmosphere of the law schools, where, for one thing, there were so many Jewish faculty members. By the time you finished law school in the New York area, it was, well . . . impolite. … on the ordinary social level . . . to go around making jokes about the yoms. It wasn’t that it was morally wrong … It was that it was in bad taste. So it made the boys uneasy, this eternal prosecution of the blacks and Latins. ”

  14. Sharyn says:
    @Suetonious

    And even much worse, To war!!

  15. Jameson says:
    @kiwk

    Statistics show that blacks commit way more crime than whites, it isn’t even close. So just doing normal police work will result in more interactions with blacks, it is simply unavoidable. This spans across all types of crime, not just street crimes.

    Casper, WY has a black population of 0.317% and yet two perps named Dominique Antonio Richard Harris and Jarreth Joseflee Sabastian Plunkett, killed a white boy at the mall trying to protect his girlfriend from the two. Can’t find a picture of the perps but the names indicate non-white.

  16. Dennis Dale says: • Website
    @anon

    Something revealing your lack of a sense of humor, irony and literary awareness. In such cases as this you should not say anything, to avoid exposing yourself. You know, as if you’ve been found with a dead hooker.

  17. Do not talk to the police is advice that needs to be hammered home to people of my generation. We grew up on Dragnet and Andy of Mayberry. It’s not like that now–the police are not your friends and they are not on your side, although there may be individual officers who retain some level of objectivity. You don’t have to be hostile, but you need not answer questions and volunteering information, even if you think it’s exculpatory, borders on an act of madness in the present environment.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  18. anarchyst says:

    This is important!
    If you are involved in a self-defense situation and are being detained by police DEMAND TO BE TAKEN TO A HOSPITAL. The stress that you have undergone is a valid excuse. You will most likely have chest pains from the stress. Even if you do not have chest pains, you are still under extreme stress and will require medical evaluation.
    This will limit the questioning that police will attempt to make. This will “get them off your back” for a while and allow you to compose your thoughts. Lawyer up…
    Keep in mind that after a self-defense situation involving police officers, they get 72 hours in which to “formulate” their story unlike us ordinary citizens who will be questioned immediately after being detained. The same should be the case for us non-police citizens, but unfortunately it is not.
    Don’t forget that police are not your “friend” and will attempt to “trip you up”, getting you to make contradictory statements, especially in today’s anti-white atmosphere.
    In a self-defense situation the ultimate goal is to “stop the threat”, nothing more.

    • Thanks: Kolya Krassotkin
  19. @kiwk

    Blacks know blacks. They know their own racial group and they know their crime rates. You can call it racist if you want. I call it realistic.

  20. Pikachu says:

    @Andrew Anglin are you going to talk about how Lucas Gage was swatted multiple times?

  21. @kiwk

    Blacks are a targeted group? How so? Many police departments are 1/2 black or more nowadays.

    The Blacks themselves feel that they are a targeted group. More than two out of three believe that the prisons, courts, and police are all designed to oppress them. See the Taylor article link in original comment.

    • Replies: @mel belli
    , @Adam Birchdale
  22. tolona says:

    Free Matt Hale, a citizen of Pekin Illinois who is imprisoned wrongfully in MAX.. On the false testimony of an FBI informant. Whether you talk to them or not, they can set you up and put you in prison for years to make an example of, a whipping boy. Anglin should investigate the case of Matt Hale. He’s rotting in prison, not for anything he did, but for his beliefs. He exposed the Jews and called them out… If they could get their paws on A. Anglin he would be in the cell next to Matt Hale..

  23. anonymous[125] • Disclaimer says:
    @Notsofast

    If license plate readers had existed 35 years ago, you’d have never heard of the Green River Killer.

  24. anonymous[125] • Disclaimer says:
    @Suetonious

    The State loves to send White people to jail.

    Tom Wolfe made this point in The Bonfire of the Vanities with his coinage, “the great White defendant.” Steve Sailer has been reminding us of this for 20 years.

  25. mel belli says:
    @Suetonious

    Derek Chauvin was implementing the policies of a black Chief.

  26. Anonymous[838] • Disclaimer says:

    “(A)ny lawyer worth his salt will tell the suspect in no uncertain terms to make no statement to the police under any circumstances.”

    —Former United States Artorney General and Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49, 59 (1949) (concurring opinion)

    https://archive.org/details/you-have-the-right-to-remain-innocent-by-james-duane_202202/mode/2up

    • Replies: @fnn
  27. paddy o’eunuch with more of his “there’s such a thing as ‘the law’ and you can totes count on it when lawless ‘elites’ object to your peasant existence” fairy tales. plus: any guy hiring a hooker should go to jail where he’ll get more free sex than he can handle. it’s barely above watching any porn where a guy gets anything good. beta retards.

    if you’re talking to the cops at all you’re up shit creek. even if you’re the victim. fuck that…especially if you’re the victim. i worked at a liquor store many moons ago where some bitch midget with a knife bigger than his arm robbed us. i thought he was the biggest asshole i’d meet that day until the badge fags showed up. some little shit who resembled patton oswalt without the dashing good looks and strict diet gave me so much lip i almost ended up in jail for informing him of his mother’s whoreness.

    the one thing you got right is that you only need one word for a slight, tiny chance with these apes: “lawyer“. don’t say a single goddamn thing other than “LAWYER“. the law may be a fairy tale but a decent defense lawyer can be your private tinkerbell if you don’t submit to a plea deal.

  28. Mac_ says:

    Would argue that ‘lawyers are not ‘protection from cops, since at base most are same cabal, seventy percent lawyers/judges/state cons and ‘police or ‘sheriff dept’ cons. Each part of steering, subverting, destruction, while putting on a distraction front, with ‘media. Remember its the con cabal who concocted monotheism scheme, then ‘state and ‘courts scheme, so theyre seventy percent of those scrawling paper ‘law’, or using force, now to point they claim themselves and each other ‘immune’ from account, and assume to dictate ‘down’ everyone else’s ‘rights. Remember the word ‘attorney’ comes from a-torn, to turn over.

    The smiley cabal ‘lawyers/‘attorn-eys do what they can to drag out cases, drain money, cause more problems, and if have a supposed criminal situation, which the cons have made it so nearly anything is a crime, they do what they can to keep the scum from consequence, same time throw good or right people under the bus. Can search corrupt lawyers judges etc.

    So would agree don’t talk to cops – and not ‘lawyers either, as none of it should exist. Also should stop listening to psyop ‘sheriff dept’ cons doing bogus ‘murder’ stories so ignorants cling to subverters. Who, is the threat in face everyday, driving around in their ‘police cars, is threat, so people don’t stop in-migration ourselves, or shut down con ‘courts or ‘state cons, or saying ef off to ‘lockdown’ cons. Who ‘protects ‘court and ‘state cons. See scheme yet.

    We lived a milion years before any of it.
    Imporant to share the facts, turn off ‘tv, focus real life.

    Appreciate the article, and comments, and website.

  29. That might … might … still be true in the good ole USA, but in places like Blighty and Western Europe, your silence can legally be construed against you and be used for an inference of guilt.

    Given the USA often copies the worst policies of their enlightened European and Anglo betters, it won’t be long in coming to the USA, along with thought-crimes and pre-crimes.

  30. @kiwk

    This is true in many of the larger urban centers, like New York City and Los Angeles. That demographic fact reflects the fact that police departments are primarily political repression agencies , as opposed to forensic investigation/ enforcement agencies. Why else would they hire as half the badge welfare recipients the same two groups responsible for most urban crime in the United States, namely 80 IQ nigger and spic subhumans? Some have suggested that one way to diminish the threat posed to law abiding political dissidents by the criminal ” justice” system is to make a greater effort to recruit law enforcement into white nationalist circles, but I disagree with this. The white personnel in law enforcement agencies and prisons are very frequently the scum of the Earth themselves, and they will override any sympathies they may have with white nationalists as long as the politicians continue to dole out their taxpayer funded welfare checks and pension benefits.

  31. fnn says:
    @Anonymous

    From p.93 of the book you linked to:

    In the case of Salinas v. Texas, decided in 2013, the five most conservative justices on the court (the only five appointed by Republican presidents) held for the first time that the silence
    of a criminal suspect, at least if the suspect is not in custody, is logically relevant evidence that is admissible against the suspect at trial and may be used to help persuade the jury that the suspect is guilty! Those five members of the court agreed that the State of Texas was therefore within its rights to prove and argue that a young man named Genovevo Salinas was probably guilty of a crime because he remained silent when the police asked him a question about it.

    Incredibly, the Supreme Court was also persuaded to adopt this position by the supposedly liberal administration of President Barack Obama and the Department of Justice led by Attorney General Eric Holder (who, Obama later said, has “worked passionately to make sure our criminal justice system remains the best in the world”).’

    • Replies: @That Would Be Telling
  32. @fnn

    This is from the book I referred to by the “Don’t Talk to the Police” viral video lawyer, and the specific Supreme Court decision that forced him to modify his advice. If not in custody, you can’t depend on the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, you must delay questioning using your Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel (a lawyer) which puts off the danger. And is likely to be a less fraught situation, you’ll have time to prepare for it, I assume he’ll be able to shut down certain lines of questioning etc.

    • Thanks: Mike Conrad
  33. $2 grand for a hooker? I guess nothing has escaped inflation.

  34. cafe chairs says: • Website

    I believe everything composed made a great deal of sense.
    But, consider this, suppose you were to create a awesome headline?
    I mean, I don’t wish to tell you how to run your website, however what if you added a post title to maybe grab a person’s
    attention? I mean Michelle Malkin Archive – The Unz Review is a little plain. You could peek at Yahoo’s home page and see
    how they write article titles to grab viewers interested.
    You might try adding a video or a pic or two to grab people interested about everything’ve got to say.
    Just my opinion, it could bring your website a little livelier.

  35. There are rare cases where you should talk to the cops. If you’re say in a bar, and some guy attacks you and you kill him. When the cops show up you will want them to get the names of witnesses, and if you refuse to speak to the cops they will say hell with you.

  36. @Suetonious

    The statement was about reality, not beliefs. Racist, idiotic blacks believing they’re victimised doesn’t make it so. In fact, White criminals are more likely to be arrested, charged and convicted than black criminals – Whites are targeted by police, the legal system, politicians, the media, etc.

  37. amzn.to says: • Website

    Wonderful post but I was wanting to know if you could
    write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very grateful if
    you could elaborate a little bit more. Thanks!

    • Replies: @Jameson
  38. anon[203] • Disclaimer says:

    call Tom Hagan

  39. TrumpWon says:
    @fnn

    I’ve long held the opinion that judicial activism should be punishable by death. Unless there is some sort of spectacular deterrent against judges doing this, and only incentives, why/how could it stop?

    They also have probably committed offenses that carry the death penalty (a strong case to be made that jurors and court staff can also be guilty of these offenses). Look up 18 USC 242. “Deprivation of civil rights under color of authority.” If arrest is involved, and the entire prosecution is illegitimate, then the death penalty comes into play.

    I think that’s how we can legally plant all these malicious aggressive Bolsheviks and white-haters. We should at least be socializing the idea that they deserve it, because they so clearly do. The evidence is incontrovertible.

  40. Jameson says:
    @amzn.to

    Can’t be too specific, the po-po could be viewing.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS