RSS
When Tucker Carlson and Darryl Cooper discussed the Second World War in September, Cooper named Winston Churchill as the “chief villain”, condemned the legacy of the war and attributed the present state of Britain to it. Pro-Churchill historians reacted: Niall Ferguson and Victor Davis Hanson (and the author and columnist Sohrab Amari) at Bari Weiss’ Free Press; Ferguson in conversation with Ben Shapiro; Andrew Roberts in a series of interviews; Ferguson, Hanson and Roberts together at the Hoover Institution.
The historians, though they regarded Cooper as unscholarly, stooped to respond due to the enormity of Carlson’s audience. The conversation’s view count on X is nearly 35 million. The wide interest and the reaction should both have been expected. The war, nearly eight decades past, continues to be the main justification for a political consensus of which most faux conservatives, including Roberts, Ferguson and Hanson, are adherents, and in which it is mandatory for Britons and other people of European descent to submit to being reduced to despised minorities in their ancestral lands. Advocacy for whites is likened to ‘Nazism’, which is the ultimate evil. Following the example of Churchill, who followed that of Disraeli, the same people treat advocacy for Jews as obviously necessary and laudable. The Churchillian version of the history of 1933–45 is the basis of post-war anti-fascism, the ideology of the pro-Jewish, anti-White regimes that control Britain, the USA, Canada, France, Germany and nearly every other white country. For Cooper and Carlson to say or imply this to an audience of tens of millions did indeed warrant a defence of the crucial narrative; this was especially so as X has permitted a large degree of free discussion since Elon Musk’s purchase of the site in 2022, an act which itself repudiated the authoritarian demands of the Jewish advocacy groups for whom “the guilt of the Holocaust” is an asset.
Cooper and the historians’ dispute is over what is true but also over who should rule. People on both sides of the debate agreed that the pro-Churchill history of the Second World War constitutes, in Cooper’s phrase, the “founding mythology of the… current global order.” Cooper stated that “The post-World War II order is really defined by the fact that after Nuremberg, it became effectively illegal in the West to be genuinely right wing…”, to which Niall Ferguson responded: “The only right-wing parties that are illegal in Europe today are Nazi parties. And the only people who regard the Nuremberg war crimes trials as a “sacrificial ritual”—Cooper again—are Nazis.” Ferguson was side-stepping a true statement: it did become effectively illegal to be genuinely right-wing. In all but a few insignificant instances, that is what ‘Nazi’ has meant since the war. Anti-fascism is a collaboration of the ‘centre right’ with the left against everyone else; it is an acid test to distinguish the real right from the fake. It is also a pretext for ruling elites to act against those they rule. In politics it is approvingly called the cordon sanitaire, the disease being ‘the far right’, or white people attempting to organise and defend themselves. The aim of anti-fascism is to render them defenceless. Refuting its historical justification is thus an existential imperative for whites, just as maintaining it is for the present regime.
Ferguson spoke approvingly to Ben Shapiro of the “emergence of multi-racial societies”, i.e., the presence of foreign races in large and growing numbers in white countries (not Israel), as though it were not brought about intentionally by politicians and activists. He objected to the following:
Carlson: “If Churchill is a hero, how come there are British girls begging for drugs on the streets of London and London is not majority-English now?”
Cooper: “The people who formulated the version of history that considers Churchill a hero, they like London the way it is now.”
Carlson: “But that’s not victory, that’s the worst kind of defeat, is it not?”
Cooper: “If you’re an English person who cares about England, it is.”
Ferguson accuses them of implying that “some terrible degradation has happened to Britain because of immigration”. He grants that “They don’t quite go right into Great Replacement theory” but, still, “that’s clearly where the conversation is heading by the end”. Andrew Roberts agrees that it was “a racist rant”. Ferguson warns that the Nazis emerged as a reaction against the formation of multi-ethnic societies in the previous century and informs us that “We can’t unmake the multi-cultural societies that have evolved since Churchill’s death”, as though infeasibility is his real objection. One could hardly disagree that the “worst possible way to react to the emergence of multi-racial societies is racial policies that aspire not just to forced resettlement but to genocide”, but racial policies that effect resettlement without genocide would obviously be the best possible way to react, if only those with the will had the power.
Sohrab Amari appears to see clearly how historical narrative relates to power. He warns us against “the Barbarian Right”, which, he explains, has
“a revulsion for the mildly egalitarian conservatism that took hold across the West in the postwar period. That conservatism made its peace with the civil rights movement and marginalized Jew-haters. The barbarians cannot stand the resulting state of affairs, since it has meant granting the grubby demands of the ‘dysgenic’ many. … Therefore, they feel compelled to attack what they see as the founding ‘mythology’ of the postwar world…”
Cooper and Carlson deserve some gratitude for provoking the defenders of the “resulting state of affairs” to be so plain about their allegiance.
Andrew Roberts, responding to Aaron McLean’s suggestion that “the Second World War, its contemporary understanding, and Churchill’s iconic status form a kind of founding mythology for our current world”, said, “Yes. Absolutely. Thank God it does”. He cited the legacy of anti-appeasement, anti-totalitarianism, anti-isolationism, and standing up for small nations against invasion by larger neighbors, asserting that “we should be thankful” to Churchill for it. Perhaps Baron Roberts has more reason to be thankful than most. At any rate, his answer accurately identified nearly all the foreign policy components of Amari’s “mildly egalitarian conservatism,” only omitting unconditional support for Israel. Of the places ‘egalitarian conservatives’ identify as suitable objects of military intervention, including Gaza, the populations are invited to move to White countries to accelerate Ferguson’s “emergence”. Authentic conservatives like Patrick Buchanan and Joseph Sobran perceived decades ago that advocates of invasion tended also to be those of invitation; they were condemned and excluded as anti-Semites by the likes of John Lukacs, a comrade of Lord Roberts, for straying outside the cordon. That the same charge, anti-Semitism, is levelled at all opponents of immigration into the West tells its own story.
Britain, in Victor Davis Hanson’s words, “went to war on the principle of a third-party nation’s territorial integrity”. As Hanson says, Britain “saw World War II through from the first day to the very last” and, “of the victorious Big Three, … alone foresaw well before the war that it would likely end any cataclysmic war strategically diminished, its empire gone, and without its centuries-long global stature.” While for Hanson this is laudatory, he describes what made the war a triumphant, ascendant moment for the left: the complete abandonment of British interests by British leaders.
Ferguson says that while AJP Taylor called Churchill the saviour of his nation, he was inclined to credit him with saving the whole of the West or even the world. The ‘Nazi menace’ must have been terrible indeed, as, in delivering us from it, and from our own “Barbarian” tendencies, our saviours have shamelessly afflicted us with Rotherham and Rochdale, where British girls are lured into “granting the grubby demands of the ‘dysgenic’ many” thanks to ‘egalitarian conservatives’ “making peace”, and laws, with the “civil rights movement”. That movement, really a network of anti-white activists, went under the name ‘race relations’ in Britain and was instigated primarily by Anthony Lester and Richard Stone, neither of whom, recalling Cooper’s allusion, was “an English person” or “care[d] about England”. Both were strongly-identifying Jews, as is Bari Weiss, organiser of the anti-Cooper reaction, who sees Cooper and Carlson’s remarks as part of “the war on our history”. The Churchillian telling is, indeed, her history, the one that convinces Whites to submit to the demands of her kind and the decline of their own: ‘anything but Nazism’. The more whites become aware of its speciousness, the less they yield. Bravo, Cooper.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thank you. Fundamental thoughts, explaining what led our world astray. Daring to fight the foundations of false world views and the downfall of the civilized world
===
Make Western Civilization great again! Dishonesty was its downfall! Honesty can fix it.
https://4HONESTY.com
TOTAL HONESTY, and intolerance for deception, can change the world for the better. One simple rule! Honesty is the #1 necessity for a modern scientific society
PC deception and lies are the CAUSE for the downfall of Western civilization. Total honesty and full disclosure are the antidote.
Leftist dishonesty has corrupted social sciences1, journalism, and has brainwashed entire populations. Thus dishonesty has perverted elections2, and caused great harm.
Do not take my word for this! Let us study the evidence, without “racism” and “sexism” taboos, without repression of factually true #HateFacts, without restrictions on #TrueSpeech.
The problem, as I see it, is that “historians” fail to see that National Socialism and Fascism were not “right” to begin with. Authoritarian, yes, but so is/was Bolshevism and Stalinism as is full blown dog-eat-dog capitalism, which is disguised by the mysterious (i.e. manipulated) market forces. Flawed, yes, but every political/economic theory is flawed in some way. Both National Socialism and Fascism improved the working conditions of “the masses”. Both were opposed to usury. In some cases, industries deemed important to the national well-being were nationalized. Last time I checked, that wasn’t “right wing”.
Churchill was a Judeophile and deeply in debt. The bankers got the war they wanted.
When our own government, toward the end of the war, hired Frankfurt School Jew commies to concoct a narrative to demonize Hitler in order to justify our insane involvement in the war and the massacre of Germans including murdering a million POW’s, the history was never going to be truthful. How foolish we were to swallow a story where Joe Stalin saved civilization.
>they regarded Cooper as unscholarly
In one of his talks many years ago, David Irving said ‘scholarly’ history works like this: a bunch of professors read each other’s books, then recommend the same books to their students — this goes on year after year, and generation after generation — given the publishing imperative in academia, over the years there may be new books, but there isn’t much new in these new books.
For a ‘multi-racial society’ to ’emerge’, a nation must be destroyed — men like Ferguson could never build a nation, but they will watch one be destroyed rather than risk their sinecures.
Britain’s most famous World War II historian is shown in this short video denouncing Churchill as an arrogant, selfish, bumbling, alcoholic, psychopath whose actions destroyed Europe and the British Empire.
Video Link
Cooper is right. In spades. The historians have reputations to protect (and at the same time, to exploit).
A multi-racial society is not and can never be a nation.
Kemi Badenoch is the logical outcome of Churchillian Policy. A gap tooth Nig running the Tory Party.
“Both National Socialism and Fascism improved the working conditions of “the masses”. Both were opposed to usury.”
Being opposed to usury is why they were crushed.
Yep. Always follow the money.
Not only WW2 was a disaster for Europe but now they have been defeated again with the Ukraine war.
There was unrest at an Audi plant in Brussels over its closure slated for February 2025.
What I cannot understand is why Sholz and all the other American puppets aren’t swinging from lamp posts?
Maybe they will when the enormity of the gamble on Ukraine has being digested by Germans and other Europeans, maybe we will see a huge shift of Europeans out of Europe like post WW2?
The Ukraine war is a disaster for Europe, the U.S has already, in spirit, dusted off their hands and moved on leaving Europe to pick up the pieces.
The European only has themselves to blame, they never removed the occupier post WW2, Russia went.
If Russia wanted to conquer all Europe wouldn’t they have stayed and continued to drive West? Europe was once a prize possession due to its industrialization…now its future is dim as a Disney World attraction for wealthy Asians.
Curious to see how the debate unfolds, since there will surely be one in 2025 based on a well crafted argument, not just a few sentences.
Diversity is (((our))) greatest strength.
Video Link
Churchill was a drunken “crypto-ju” hell bent on destroying a Christian rival in Germany. Keep in mind Bismarck brought Germany together as a nation in the late 19th century and was clearly surpassing the jUK by the time Churchill and co. started WW1. A typical ju assassination “started” the war and Germany made the mistake of taking the bait and mobilizing with typical German efficiency which gave the appearance of them ” starting” the war. Churchill (ju) continued his Disraeli (ju) zio program into WW2 to finish the job of destroying Germany and establishing the zio-parasite in the Holy Land. History needs to be re-told, not repeated!
Disney Attraction? With all them Nigs and Islamist there I don’t see anyone lining up to live in Europe, that part of the world is no more, all because people won’t fight back.
I agree with your comments and conclusion, but you might want to consider the following refinement of the usury concept :
Hope it helps.
The blind spots in the postwar narrative, such as Operation Paperclip and the USSR vs USA body count it took to defeat the Nazis, are too big to hide or last much longer. Very helpful article, so fascinating to be at the hinge point in the slowmo decline of the postwar Anglo-Zionist Empire.
And without the “antisemitism” taboo.
Yes, you is correct. TRUTH is what is
needed.
Controversy equalizes fools and the wise,
and the fools know it. They smile and smile,
and lie all the while. They get the attention,
a reputation, and now a daze , even sympathy.
The problem is, they hate… science.
They are simply too stupid.
It’s easier to believe, than to inquire.
The nature of envy is that they have a chance to be
Rich, but none at all to be smart.
And if they want to get to their or keep their tenure, they better tow the line on what the University policy is on each and every subject – We’ll assume this – from reading BS from some of them. In other words, if you work where the Corporations, US Gov., Jewish billionaires/ lobbies etc. donate to the Institutes, you are going to go along with their narrative/politics or lose your job, as we saw with those Lady Uni presidents that got sucker punched with the anti- semitic scam. That was the tip of the Iceberg – right Doc Barrett ?
Look at how many non jews in the Gov., tow the line and cut America’s throat – thousands.
Skimming this article confirms my decision, at the age of 19 or so, not to become a historian – although I was too slow and hesitant to change my degree course to something else. I very much regret not having chosen STEM at 13 – I was too young and stupid to see that history was a lousy choice for the exact reason I chose to specialise in it: that all you have to do is read some books, form an opinion, and write. I was over 70 before I even came across David Irving’s work, which makes the best sense to me now. If I had become a professional historian I would have had a choice of becoming a systematic liar and getting what Mr Irving got.
By the way, WW2 was merely the second half, so to speak, of the single World War. Churchill and the British-American bankers were largely responsible for that, too. After Versailles, it was obvious that Germany would reopen the issue as soon as it had grown a new generation of young men. Sir Edward Grey is a name that should be uttered only together with curses and reproach.
The only important question is why, after nearly a century of something like peace, WW1 blew up. Reading the statements of those responsible for it is a ghastly, hair-raising experience. Perhaps summed up by “It’ll be over by Christmas”.
There are no nations anywhere then.
Churchill played his role pretty well and reigned in style. In the European theatre Britain‘s contribution was limited anyway. 4 years of bombing civilians and waiting for the Americans, while the main focus was on defending Egypt and the Middle East and trying to rip the french dominions off. Other prime ministers would have done pretty much the same.
WW2 birthed all sorts of “mythologies”.
The first couple of Americans I read on this subject started off with a statement to the effect that “When Churchill declared war on Germany in 1939 …”. I laughed at such stupidity and ignorance.
And I speak as someone who is not a worshipper of Churchill.
Thanks, Morgan Jones.
Those of us who have made our own enquiries into the devastation of the first half of the disastrous “Jewish Century” salute this further move towards historical Truth. It used to be the road less travelled, but no longer.
Propagandists/”Court Historians” such as Niall Ferguson are on the way to being discredited. This also applies to the Russian “Great Patriotic War” narrative, Mr Putin. It is a matter of validated testimony that NS Germans restored Orthodox churches which the judeo-bolsheviks had destroyed, for example, as well as Op.Barbarossa preventing a “Ghengis Khan” invasion of Europe. Europeans of the time recognised that judeo-bolshevism was the danger, not National Socialism or Fascism and joined the fight in great numbers. Even patriotic Russians joined the fight against the evil that was killing their great Nation. Take note, please, Mr Putin.
Thanks for the continued emergence of Truth against entrenched talmudists and their disgraceful and shameless dupes is due in many quarters. Not least to people like David Irving, the many persecuted for “holocaust denial”, and our own Ron Unz here.
“Truth Will Out”.
Anglos are the villain of history, alongside their Jewish masters. There is really no reason that the various peoples of the world should allow Anglos to continue existing. I have yet to see any convincing arguments for why Anglos should not all be executed and/or sterilized.
It is all a continuum, from at least the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-5, largely financed by Yakov Schiff, one of many points that people do not know was that a condition of Schiff’s support was to have Jewish communists propandize the Russian Ps.o.W.
That contributed to the failed 1905 ‘revolution’ in Russia, and then to the one in 1917.
Some years of peace after that, then the Balkan wars of the early tens of last century, follwed by what is called WWI.
To interpret 20th century history as WWI and WWII and industrial development is a big error. Really, everything from the Russo-Japanese war to the Vietnam war (U.S. episode)
is the same thing or repercussions of it, it is a continuum.
Some of the old Labour historians like A.J.P. Taylor and the marxist E.P. Thompson, both well worth reading, would not be acceptable now.
Still less David Irving. Irving is and was a genius, he left England for Germany to work as a common worker, learnt German well, then started to research history. He was highly regarded until Jews started to attack him in the 1980s.
My opinion is that, at the time, Jews were mainly attacking him for his writing on the 1956 uprising in Hungary against the very heavily Jewish government appointed for them by the U.S.S.R.
Hungarians won, Jews were deposed, but many Hungarians died in the process.
Many Jews hated him for that account.
Comparing Irving to Lippstadt, it is like valid content to an empty space.
We are near the end of 2024 now, but the Holocaust hoax is long after the ‘end of conflict’ in 1945 in Europe, really, much of the Holocaust myth was created in the late ’70s and ’80s, and largely based on translations of a pornography genre that is popular in Israel.
History is just aged propaganda. If you didn’t witness it yourself or have physical proof of something, then you should ignore it because you don’t know what happened; someone is telling you a story. That’s how the entire social sciences and humanities get away with bullshitting the population; by making up stories for which there is no actual proof.
The ‘church’ was the gov’t in ancient times. They made the laws and spread their propaganda to get the sheeple to obey. Then the warlords took over and became kings because they said so and the church was pushed aside but partnered with the warlords because the priests perform a service for them. The priests make the population compliant by purposely making them stupid starting at birth. The priest tells their ‘flock’ about a virgin birth and a three headed god in a serious tone and by repetition, the sheeple start believing in absolute nonsense, a requirement for eventual gov’t control.
Today, people believe all the gov’t bullshit about the necessity for hundreds of taxes, fees, fines and other ways of fleecing the ‘voters’ that approve of the system. Via propaganda and endless conditioning, people believe there’s a drug problem and gov’t needs to solve it. Decades of fighting a war on drugs has now produced synthetic drugs more powerful and deadly than natures opium and people still push for drug laws and a waste of their tax money because they have been made stupid by propaganda.
Via propaganda and conditioning, people praise the professional killers in the US military that murder and destroy around the globe and cause the general hatred of the US population around the world. Some day soon the Secretary of Defense will be some tattooed freak that wants another war. Oh wait, that just happened.
Via propaganda and conditioning, people stood in line like sheep to get a gov’t approved jab that turns out to be a poison slowly ruining their immune system. Any children born of vaxed parents will have damaged DNA. For decades, the evidence for autism being caused by childhood jabs has been whispered but because gov’t firmly denied complicity and is comprised of the finest people the country can produce /sarc, parents kept poisoning their children.
Most people can’t imagine surviving without a gov’t stealing from them and telling them how to live their lives. Other people, however, have thought about no gov’t and have come up with a way to do without all the theft and coercion but their writings are scoffed at without ever investigating what they discovered. People are trained to dismiss, out of hand, anything that even hints at reducing the control freaks influence in the society.
If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about answers.
Thomas Pynchon
Who really gives a shit about what happened during WW-II when you are letting the gov’t poison you today and giving them time to introduce a digital currency that will enslave you? Current events are preventing you from concentrating on the ongoing drive by the entire world’s ‘leaders’ to reintroduce feudalism and arguing over which POS started a war decades ago has no value.
In the postwar lionizing of Winston Churchill we forget that during his long political career his contemporaries widely distrusted him as a man who was of unstable temperament, unsound judgment, and of what one historian has called, “rhetorical (and also alcoholic) excess.” His record in public life was uniquely controversial, characterized by catastrophic blunders paid for dearly in human suffering, about which he cared nothing. Churchill was infamous for his aristocratic arrogance, and his patrician lack of empathy. In his rarified social circles, he never went into a shop, never rode on a bus, got lost the one and only time he attempted to navigate London’s Underground, and even as late as 1951, in classic upper class ignorance, he said most Britons lived pastorally “in cottage homes,” on the estates of aristocratic landowners as in centuries past.
Churchill’s mother, Jenny Jerome, was the daughter of a New York robber baron once known as “the king of Wall Street.” Her burning ambition was to see her feckless husband Lord Randolph Churchill become Prime Minister. She ignored her young son in the single-minded pursuit of this goal, which ended with Randolph’s premature death. It is appealing but unfortunately futile to speculate whether Winston’s obsessive need to draw the U.S. into his mad crusades against Germany was rooted in a subconscious yearning to be saved by the neglectful American mother who abandoned him in his boyhood.
Churchill perfected the use of mass terror-killing in the Third World, and brought this sinister expertise to the First World in his relentless air campaign against German civilians in the Second World War. He flatly refused to negotiate with a Germany that admired the British Empire, and sought an alliance with it as an ally in the coming struggle with the rising imperialist powers, the USA and the USSR, in the deadly race for global dominance.
Why? Because they won’t be allowed. Internal division is the hook for controlling them.
They probably would have post-1941, but I think the question is would they have done the same as Churchill pre-1941?
In 1940, Britain had catastrophically lost its continental gambit and had a reasonable peace offer on the table. Very little blood had been shed, compared to what was to come and to what had been in WWI. Yet Churchill steered the state, and with it the Empire, back into war, leading to apocalyptic war and eventually the current state of affairs. Was that a good decision? Seems like it should be a question to open debate.
In 1939, Britain was still enjoying the fruits of its Empire, though somewhat diminished by the cataclysm of WWI, when in cooperation with France the British government chose to declare a new war to prevent German reunification. The excuse was to defend Poland, but neither Britain nor France ever reached or directly aided Poland, and a few years later Churchill blithely handed Poland to mass murderer Stalin, so Poles and anyone else may be forgiven for asking not just about the quality of these decisions but also about their sincerity.
In 1938, another prime minister really did do something differently in acquiescing to German unification with other German-speakers, to mass acclaim from the British whose lives and livelihoods might otherwise be sacrificed in another war. Yet since WWII, that decision has been vilified as unspeakably wicked. Today we may wonder why, but the only permitted answer seems to be that Chamberlain and Britain should have started history’s biggest war a year earlier. Why?
Granted Churchill only became Prime Minister in 1940, but he was was very influential prior to that, functioning as the unofficial war wing of the Tory party. From 1939, Chamberlain was essentially acting as Churchill would, in order to fend off Churchill.
You are wrong. Europe survived the Thirty Years War, so it will survive Bolshevik Jews with their “communism through the back door” lunacy. All it will take is Adolph 2.0.
Professor Austin Joseph App, the first major American Holocaust denier, wrote shortly after the end of the war: “The mass theft, the expulsions, the maltreatment of nine million (as we knew a little later, in reality almost twice as many!) Germans is such a far-reaching crime that all real or alleged German (or Nazi) crimes seem small in comparison. For this, Germans must have a lively sense of guilt towards God; they need not feel guilty towards the “Big Three”. Every German who feels guilty towards the allies is a fool. Every American who expects that is a scoundrel.”
And one more thing you can do
Always call the mainstream media what it is
The Jewish Press.
There is no “Free Press”: the Press is under lockdown and still controlled by the Jews. If it were not, Cooper could have gone much further than he did: he would have flat out stated that the “Holocaust” narrative is a complete hoax. Cooper could not go that far because there is NO “Free Press”. We are all still under the Heel of the Jew, all slaves under the Empire of the Jews. That’s why practically all of us have to hide behind anonymous handles even here at TUR; and we can’t blame ourselves, for in many of our countries the penalty for “Holocaust Denial” is a prison sentence.
The fact that Cooper criticized Churchill as “the chief villain” of WWII was enough for the Jews to sound the alarms of their “Holocaust Denial” early-warning systems: that’s why they sent out a bunch of preemptive strike missiles before the potential denialists got anywhere close to actual, heretical denying. Puppets like Niall Ferguson, Victor Davis Hanson, Sohrab Amari, Bari Weiss, Ben Shapiro, and Andrew Roberts are merely that: preemptive Jew missiles attempting to bring down anyone who is merely aiming at the outer rings of the target, to prevent them getting anywhere near Holocaust Hoax bullseye. The Jews are operating an expensive Iron Holocaust Dome, but they might eventually run out of ammunition.
The Jews sense this looming menace from afar and they are justified in sensing this: for the Jews know that whosoever begins to question the official WWII narrative is actually chipping away at the edges of the foundation of Jewish power; and that person may eventually target its very center. Like the spokes on a wheel, all of the more peripheral Jew lies converge towards the greatest lie at the very center: the Great “Holocaust” Deception.
The Jews have spent billions constructing these almost impenetrable walls around their main narrative fortress — the Holohoax — and therefore are willing to spend millions more in damage control, should someone dare chip away at them, as Cooper did. The Jews still have billions more to protect their lies; and all we have, for now, is a sincere desire to know the truth. But, in the end, Truth will prevail.
It boils down to this
Our fake Jewish friends rule by deception everywhere except Palestine
In Palestine the Arabs have gotten a true taste of what it is like to live under open fake Jewish rule
The result, as all can see is that the Palestinians would rather die fighting by the 10s of thousands than accept this horrible fate
In the rest of the West our fake Jewish friends must rule from behind the scenes by deception.
This because, being just a large criminal gang, they have no real base, nobody likes them for themselves
That’s another reason our fake Jewish Friends like to deal with murdering torturing dictatorships
Because they skip the will of the citizens and just blackmail, bribe or extort the “leader”.
How to fight them?
Expose them and their shills
Do that by always calling the mainstream media the Jewish Press
“The barbarians cannot stand the resulting state of affairs, since it has meant granting the grubby demands of the ‘dysgenic’ many. … Therefore, they feel compelled to attack what they see as the founding ‘mythology’ of the postwar world…”
dysgenic
adjective
Of or pertaining to dysgenics.
Similar: cacogenic
Of or relating to, or causing degeneration or deterioration in offspring.
Pertaining to or causing degeneration in the offspring produced.
No shit motherfuckers.
Color me a fuck’n barbarian as I drive past thousands of watered down white boy stock under bridges in close proximity to fag parades, begging for dimes, hooked on drugs, helplessly hoping for succor from their nigger and Jew betters/apparatchiks who run the country and look down their runway sized noses at the men whose children they never see anymore who are progressively proselytized and neutered in schools while they themselves were emasculated and disenfranchised with deindustrialization, Wall Street “financing instruments”, calls to arms in foreign wars to save “democracy”, trips through Walter Reed, or, home in body bags, hanging on to life with cardboard signs that say “Help Please” and then at night lay their heads down on concrete under a statue of George Floyd to the sounds of Sam Smith in the distance.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=sam+smith+video+peeing&atb=v314-1&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DhYjHhqLSiN4
In that video, the inimitable Mr. Smith, proclaims to all, that he is “Not here to make friends”.
This is what passes for “culture” in our Jew dominated country.
America hates your guts white boy and wants you dead, dead, dead, or on your knees in front of a George Floyd statue, or, even better, in front of a newly created American God like Sam Smith.
We are being chopped up in a slow motion wood chipper and the silent screams from those jonesing shaking husks under those bridges will be you if the Jews who run this country get their way.
Niall Ferguson can be seen from two different angles: 1) his advocacy of Churchillan view emanates from the need to guarantee that his share of the good life stays intact lest by rocking the boat penury follows, and 2) his marriage to the Islamic apostate, Ayaan Hirsi Ali and their mixed race children who would perfectly fit into a multicultural society of London, England.
No intelligent person would work against his personal interests and he is no different and racial interests be damned as far as he is concerned.
read ‘No More Champagne’; WC was deeply in debt to Js virtually all his life; made no real effort to pay his debts.
Thanks to Elon X Musk, Tucker Carlson, Ron Unz and many others, historical facts are rapidly being uncovered, exposing peddlers of Jewish Hasbara and white discrimination in a time of mass replacement and degeneracy.
Nowhere in historical time have a great people been so humiliated, insulted, despised and betrayed than what Zionist jews have inflicted on global white populations. From London to Dublin, Dresden to Sweden, Ohio to Sydney, every white township is now saturated with darkened criminal waste from third world shitholes for the benefit of Blackrock Jews and their Zionist Bolshevik allies.
The time has come for all good men to become badass again. The future of a white race is dependent on you.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html
At the end of May 1945: Truman’s special envoy Joseph E. Davies wrote: “I frankly said – after hearing him (Churchill) rail so fiercely about the threat of Soviet domination and the spread of Communism, and after finding such a lack of confidence in the honesty of Soviet leadership – I wondered if he, the Prime Minister, would now like to explain to the world that he and England had made a mistake in not supporting Hitler; because, as I understood him, he was now advocating the doctrine which Hitler and Göbbels had proclaimed and repeated again and again in recent years”!
This interview with a Lithuanian Catholic historian says that Cooper’s understanding of world war II is completely naive and that the Germans were intent on killing and enslaving all Slavs not just Jews. If you favor Hitler, then at least realize what you are supporting:
Video Link
Nazi Germany relied on slave and conscript labor from other parts of Europe. They had no scruples about bringing in labor from other European countries or from countries outside Europe if they thought it necessary or desireable. Of course, they would have kept the foreigners under their boot in a brutal fashion, but it seems likely that having become the master race, Germans wouldn’t object to foreigners cleaning up after them and doing all their scutwork.
What made today’s London what it is? The pill and consumer society. Cheap, reliable contraception made the birth rate fall, and the cornucopia of goods on offer made people even less inclined to have children. With a declining native population, the country’s leaders welcomed cheap foreign labor. True, Britain could have gone the Japanese or South Korean route and kept the foreigners out, but having been the world’s greatest empire, they weren’t going to go that way.
What would have happened if the Germany won the war? In the short run it would have been brutal and ugly, but in the longer run? Masters of the Europe and the world, the next generation of Germans wasn’t going to be happy settling the plains to the east. They would want the riches that empire gave them. German women wouldn’t be permanently contented with medals for having lots of children. The next generation of women would want the experiences available to them in the cities. Great wealth and power cause something that could be called decadence. It was like that with Britain and France. It’s like that with the U.S. Why would Germany be any different?
People have the idea that if the side that lost the war won that things wouldn’t change, that the deeper currents of technological and social history would have had no effect. They think that we’d have avoided the problems we have today but they don’t consider the problems we would have had. Of course nobody can possibly foresee what those problems would be 80 years after a lost war, but problems there definitely would be, so stop pretending that everything would be hunky dory if the Nazis had prevailed.
https://www.vocabulary.com/articles/pardon-the-expression/toe-the-line-vs-tow-the-line/
I remember reading somewhere years ago that Churchill literally stole the work that became the 6 volume set “History of World War 2.”
The real author received no credit, and no payment for the set published under Churchill’s name.
Possibly two scenarios exist, first, the work was ghost written, and the author was never paid. Second, the work was presented to a publisher for review, and machinations devolved it to Churchill’s benefit.
The uselessness of current search engines to parse things renders them quite unhelpful for details.
Any takers?
https://www.washingtonindependentreviewofbooks.com/index.php/bookreview/churchills-shadow-the-life-and-afterlife-of-winston-churchill
Wow, a rare defeatist on UR
You sure don’t see that very often
I just want to thank you on behalf of those of us who forgot that resistance is useless and that slurping at the boot of the fake Jew is our fate and to get the fuck used to it.
Sometimes we forget.
.
BTW I vote to make you our leader.
Churchill was a war criminal, hard to argue that if you study WW2. From the wanton murder of French civilians to the bombing of Dresden and other cities, he proved himself a villain. But he’s not responsible for the massive flow of foreigners into Britain. DeGaulle isn’t at fault for the massive immigration into France and neither Roosevelt nor Truman can be blamed for what happened in America. It wasn’t WW2, it was the never-ending battle against communism and the idea that the West had to prove how good it was and how everyone was treated equally compared to the Reds. It was completely unnecessary, though it has driven down wages and created a long-term rift within the working class. The emerging brown underclass gets stupider every year, average IQs are dropping and will allow the wealthy to live in opulence for a little bit longer. Those 100 average IQ workers can be a little pesky. 85-90, easier to control. Though the machinery won’t run too well.
Good piece.
At a minimum, one would think the defenders of the orthodox interpretation of history could admit it all hasn’t worked out very well. As it is, in pretending that what has happened is good, they make it difficult for any thinking person to accept their view.
Surely we weren’t obliged to commit suicide? Couldn’t the war have been fought and won without the adoption of the whole ideology that has led us to where we are today? Accepting mass immigration did not logically follow from choosing to oppose Hitler.
What you wrote may be correct although I have never experienced such actions.
The part about bank loans and their collateral which I find REALLY objectionable is that the loan money is created out of thin air ie. it didn’t exist until the bank deposited it into the borrowers account.
Then the borrower takes this money and gives his house (for example) as collateral and pays interest to the bank for this money created out of thin air!
Should the borrower default on his loan the bank receives hard assets for its fictitious money.
Nice racket if you can get into it! No wonder the banks build the biggest buildings.
Prof. Ferguson probably lives outside the M-25 in a quiet leafy town in Oxfordshire, one where a few hundred culture enrichers have not yet been set up in the local inns and hotels. Windsor just got a big batch; I wonder if Charlie notices the enrichment.
If Kings George V and George VI we’re actually defenders of the faith, modern day Israel would be held in trust as Christian Holy Lands, with no displacement of the residents allowed.
The Brits have problems with boatloads of migrants showing up: First in Palestine, then Windrush, and now with the so-called “Small Boat Problem.” You’d be excused for thinking the only boats they were glad to sink in the last 150 years were those that carried their German cousins.
And yet he began a very promising career with the publication of his book The Pity of War, which deals with the lead up to WWI and the British stupidity in siding with France.
The tone of the book is definitely NOT pro German but, in my opinion, paints a believable scenario of those times.
Surely you have heard the homily: You are your brother’s keeper.
The National Socialists believed this because they improved the standard of living tremendously for the German working people, while the rest of the capitalist world was still mired in the Great Depression.
As to the rest of your nonsense: Why should prisoners not work but live off the working man’s taxes??
What the likes of you do not wish to understand is that prison/camp inmates had been convicted of a crime. And that such convicts should live for free during a fierce existential war is beyond belief.
the left? hahaha! brainwashed clown slave!
the politburo was judenrein by 1928. then kaganovich was added. then after stalin died, judenrein until dissolution. the nazis’ belief that the USSR was jewish was like WMD in iraq. saddam had had WMD in the recent past, but he had none by the time of invasion. the USSR power elite had been near judenrein for 14 years before barbarossa. EPIC “intelligence failure”.
meanwhile under capitalism…
of course this author means “the left” is the fake, gay, and retarded “left” of idpol doing the bidding of master, capital.
Ferguson was side-stepping a true statement: it did become effectively illegal to be genuinely right-wing.
only in the sense that fascism has something like a czar, a nationalistic autocrat. but stalin, even though a georgian, promoted “socialism in one country” and russification.
as goebbels said:
this author is tails on a coin where heads is trans BIPOC power.
sad.
Brilliantly rendered. Thank you.
Israelis can and do argue with a straight face that they have a truly multi-racial society in the sense that they have ingathered Jews from countries around the world and today you can find Israeli Jews of every shade of skin color from lily white to Mediterranean brown to darker brown and black. Indeed in today’s Israel those Jews most hostile to Palestinian interests are often from the darker more marginalized racial segments of the Jewish population.
that’s right, Chamberlain backstabbed Germany over Poland…..
but only to keep his job: because Jew-stooge Churchill and other Tory MP warmongers threatened to join up w Labor & Liberal MPs to collapse his regime if he didn’t declare war on Germany.
WC had a select committee of Oxford/Cambridge U. history students write most of “his” history of WW2. Each day or so he met with them and made whatever changes he wanted in the text.
the entire work, — authentic ( or not)– is a gigantic mea non culpa.
I wonder what supposed right leaning scholars like Hanson and Ferguson have to say about Ralph Raico’s chapter titled Rethinking Churchill in the book titled Great Wars and Great Leaders: A Libertarian Rebuttal published by the Mises Institute?
They are hypocrites who conduct a war on the Socratic search for the truth which at the end of the day they are supposed to represent.
It seems that suppressing other viewpoints and being a hagiographer comes with the territory when one becomes a bought and sold establishment historian.
At least William Buckley allowed differing views on Firing Line even if he did not agree with them. That was an America of a much different time. (Much can be said about his deviation from conservatism after he turned over National Review to James Burnham, but I am not going there now.)
Diversity is a horrible idea since racism is hard-wired into all of us. Makes perfect evolutionary sense for people to support close relatives and distrust those of a different race and thus not related to them.
Thank you!
You were allies of Stalin. The Bolshevik jewish communists had massacred 66 million Russian Christians ( Solzhenitsyn) but the USA and UK couldn’t gove a toss for the genocide of Christians. This dystopia is your reward. This is what you fought and died for.
The Irish chose to remain neutral in the war but they too now are being unjustly punished with national destruction for their refusal to side with the bankers.
After WWI, the Frankfurt School had been very open about the goals and objectives necessary to achieve world communism. Firstly, the destruction of the Catholic Church, achieved at Vatican II: secondly the destruction of the nation state through supranational organisations like the EEC and mass immigration and finally the destruction of the family through the decriminalisation of divorce, contraception and homosexual activity.
They have achieved all their objectives with the help of the British and American pasties. You deserve everything that’s coming to you.
Cooper is right because he sees World War Two from an American point of view. Any American with signiticant family roots in America (at least 150 years which is not that old considering that our European/AA presence is +400 years in North America) will tell you that the cultural fabric, confidence and cohesiveness began to wane post war. For American people the war was good for business but the cost was much too high. It destroyed a seasoned and loved American culture and existence.
Cooper’s detractors, on the other hand, are not American, and like most of the post 1965 hordes that migrated into our country, they will never really know the essence of the core American people and their American sensibility and historical context. They are defending a man (Churchill) who knew that Britain might not survive the war, and Britain’s only hope was to repeat 1918. Draw America into it. This is frustrating considering that Britain fought Germany to a standstill in the Battle of Britain.
Churchill got his wish and the American people lost their country. For any British historian to take the position that Churchill, and before him the British Foreign office, expanded a war unnecessarily, would obviously rankle American feelings considering the great intangible costs inflicted upon our nation. Frankly, eighty years later nobody really remembers or even cares. What’s done is done.
In the interview Ferguson, Roberts and VDH stress that the legitimacy of their opposition to Cooper’s thesis is bolstered by a formidable collection of 60 or so published books. Given the growing public awareness of “fake news” coupled with the demise of cable news programming, I think it would be best if the academic establishment did not dismiss Cooper entirely. The historical narrative might be more tenuous than many realize.
And now the native Irish ethnic stock is being over run and diluted by immigrants with no stake in the land or the people.
We literally have the *jewish* description of the Engineering of Auschwitz. So we *know* that’s false — turns out that the kinds of jews that would lie about those things don’t understand basic engineering/physics.
So we *know* that the jewish reading of the last 80 years is false.
Now, given that the holofrost is a complete hoax, you’re clearly correct: History is state-sponsored propaganda.
Lol. Since the holofrost is an obvious hoax, I’m not sure what a ‘Lex Fridman’ guest has to add to the conversation.
Hi, and thanks! I agree as far as it goes but you are missing a few critical elements or factors, as per the following:
There is no money
In a world obsessed with money the vast majority of people do not understand the first and most important thing about money, and that is that there is no money. A fiat-money system is by definition a no-money system.
What people are habituated to think of as money is / are in fact tangible and / or intangible-derivatives-of money. There are promises-to-pay money, there are orders-to-pay money, there are various kinds of evidence (negotiable / exchangeable-evidence-of-debt) that one party owes money to another party, and all of the accounts are denominated in money. But there is no money, only evidence-of-tangible-and-intangible-things that serve as money. Even nominal paper-money or currency / legal-tender is merely or in substance evidence that its issuer (normally a central-bank) owes money to the holder of it (and which cannot be assimilated / accounted-for otherwise).
In 1978, for example, and in reference to Bank of Canada notes / bills / Canadian currency, the Supreme Court was compelled by the facts of the case to observe and take judicial notice that (emphasis added):
“What is said to be an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money is itself money.” (Bank of Canada v. Bank of Montreal, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 1148 at page 1155).
Just as we could have a fully-functional otherwise-duplicate of the existing-system but denominated in unicorn-horns instead of dollars, pounds, euros, yen, rubles and yuan. There are no unicorn-horns in fact, but that does not matter because there doesn’t have to be.
More generally, virtually everything that serves or functions as money is in fact information about money. Money is an idea or intellectual concept that has no mass nor weight nor physical dimensions, and you cannot take a picture of it.
Gold is not money. Gold is gold. Silver is not money. Silver is silver. That’s the point. Both are superior to serve in lieu of money, but neither is money, per se. Properly identified and classified, an exchange of goods or property for gold or silver is an equity-exchange or barter-exchange (a true quid pro quo), and not a money / financial transaction at all.
The word money is first and foremost (or syntactically) an adjective / opinion / value-judgement and not a noun / fact, as in money (financial) asset (like a bond) versus real-capital asset (like a factory or a locomotive). Much of the private financial system is based on such noun-ification / objectification of adjectives and adverbs to falsely portray and present opinions as facts (e.g., legal-tender is money-paper (or monetized-paper) and not paper-money. And it is not debt-money but monetized-debt). I call the mirror-image-based obfuscation and deception process / effect cognitive-dyslexia.
But if there is no money, then how do banks loan money to borrowers?
They don’t. Forensically, by procedure / in-fact, the objective business of the nominal private banking system is credit-reinsurance (as per the following from a different work-in-progress):
___
Not money-lenders
Banks are not what you think they are. They are not money-lenders – they are credit-reinsurers, and they are asset-sinks. When you sign and deliver a promissory-note and mortgage you are underwriting and advancing real-estate-secured-credit to the bank.
The bank / banker receives and retains the financial and real-estate security / securities as a (minimum) 100%-premium for itself, and then returns or reinsures unsecured-credit back to you as an unsecured-deposit-credit that does not cost the bank anything material to produce.
The nominal money / credit for the alleged or pretended-loan does not even exist unless and until you underwrite-it by accepting the liability for it by agreeing that you owe it, normally under the promissory-note that is secured by the mortgage (and whether by separate-instrument / writing or embedded in the nominal-mortgage itself).
Most critically, by procedure, you then have to add or issue and underwrite the same amount again in the form of a signed-check / cheque (an order to pay money drawn on the bank, and which upon acceptance / delivery becomes a financial / money-asset of the bank) to the seller of the real-estate, who has to co-sign-it / endorse-it and deliver it back to the bank as a ratification of the otherwise recoverable-loss (in equity) of their property and legal-title to the bank in exchange for an unsecured-deposit-credit / unsecured-liability of the bank. Then the bank (merely) agrees that it owes the principal-amount (selling price) to the seller instead of to you.
The nominal mortgage is a de facto combination bill-of-sale that legally transfers all right, title, and interest in the property to the bank (and / or creates a trust in favour of the bank as beneficiary), plus an embedded repurchase-option that gives you the right to buy the property back from the bank by discharging / paying it all of the nominal-money (and discharging all of the other liabilities) required under all of the securities. When a bank forecloses, it is not foreclosing on the house and real-estate, because it already legally-owns the house and real-estate. The foreclosure is of the repurchase-option – sometimes referred to as a right of redemption (from the sin of debt) (and another example of cognitive-dyslexia).
The pretended-money-lender / banker arrives at the transaction with metaphoric empty-pockets, and yet leaves with all of the financial-securities from the income-pre-qualified lead-underwriter / pretended-borrower in one hand, and the legal-title to the market-value-pre-qualified-real-estate property (and the lead-underwriter’s seller-endorsed-check) from the seller in the other.
From the nominal bank’s / bankers’ (and its owners’) perspective there is only one material reality, and that is that pre-qualified-real-equity / secured-assets come in, and only unsecured-liabilities go out. They are real-asset-sinks, and they are unsecured-liability-kiters (kiting means to keep (financial) paper in the air). The penultimate in balanced-and-leveraged and systemic feedback-loops.
In Canada, there are some 100-plus banks / financial corporations / institutions (overwhelmingly private but also (and critically) including the Bank of Canada), that are members of Payments Canada, formerly the Canadian Payments Association. Properly labelled it would be called the Canadian Unsecured-Liability-Kiters Collective and Exchange.
And how does it manifest in practice? Does it work in real life?
Well, seventy-nine years ago, at the end of World War II, we here in Canada were fewer than 12 million people in possession of about one-tenth of the world’s broadly-defined diverse natural resources. Today we have an embarrassing level of widespread poverty and degradation, while a relative handful of (bank-owning) families, domestic and foreign, legally own most everything.
So how are you at putting two and two together?
Most every nation has a similar de facto law of financial-status apartheid (e.g., Canadian Payments Association Act) that establishes a privately-owned national financial-exchange-structure (in the form / guise / pretence of a clearinghouse) that allows the aggregate members of the designated master-class of legal-persons (e.g., privately-owned banks) to pay (discharge) their debts by merely agreeing that they owe them, while members of the subservient-class of legal persons (non-members or everyone else) must always both agree that they owe (under the promissory note (and which gratuitous / unconditional underwriting is the bank’s source of funds / capacity)), and that they will convert (re-pay or pay-again) at some later (maturity) date (under the same double-counting-by-definition promissory note (and triple-counting including the interest)).
Most briefly, the bank (unlawfully and illegally) creates two separate and distinct liabilities from the lead-underwriter’s promissory note and seller-endorsed cheque, respectively, while making it appear to the public and to the other parties that it has created only one liability to the lead-underwriter, which it then transfers or moves (by the endorsed check) to the seller.
In the meantime the bank disappears its double-counting / accounting fraud by converting it into pretended or nominal unrealized capital gains, and thus further avoids nominal taxation on its gains-in fact (i.e., it avoids nominal taxation by rolling-over its gains directly onto its balance sheet as nominal security so as to never show up as current / taxable income). At this point the ratcheting-device goes click.
The bottom-line is that the pretended money-lender / banker arrives at a nominal $1 million loan transaction with nothing, and yet leaves as the legal-owner of $3 million in fully capitalized and untaxed assets, and all offset by one new and unsecured $1 million liability (and that is itself then perpetually-kited).
Our global civilization is a continuing work-in-progress built upon that foundational financial-sleight-of-hand for over 300 years. It is naked fraud and utterly indefensible.
That is regardless why the estimated aggregate market value of all residential and commercial real-estate on Earth is currently the USD-equivalent of about $400 trillion ($400,000,000,000,000). It is almost by definition the aggregate interest-money that has been created and rolled forward on the residual perpetually-growing and cumulative half of all new monetized-debt that is systemically ignored or pretended not to exist (the de facto global private-system kiting-float).
At the leading edge of the interest-expansion-bubble, the market-value of the aggregate real-estate (and business / enterprise assets, etc.) is the money, and the money is the value of the real-estate and other real-assets.
That is why we cannot otherwise see the creeping takeover of everything by the financial-parasite class. Generation by generation it becomes more dominant and eventually all pervasive. It / They legally own everything while producing nothing that isn’t paid for in-fact by someone else’s (systemically defrauded / forfeited / stolen) equity.
If a family unit were to invest £1 million in 1694 and call it the Bank of England, then, at a real interest rate of 6% per annum, in 2024 the potential aggregate market value of the assets-rolled-forward would be £224 trillion.
The current global marketing campaign is telling us that “By 2030 you will own nothing, and you will be happy.” What the oligarchs don’t want to tell us directly is that they already legally own everything on Earth, and have likely done so for at least the last century. Given the pretended dynamics of the legal-fiction called interest – It is mathematically impossible for them not to own everything (or have the ability to instantly outbid and buy up whatever remains at any time). The deception also goes several layers deep, such that even those who believe that they are the legal-title holder to just about anything of substantive value, are in law the holder of a lease or sublease of the use-title or equity-title.
I listened to about 5 min. This idiot bases all his worthless blather on the assumption that the “Holocaust” happened and that Germans wanted to commit genocide on all the Slavs, Jews and Gypsies. These “scholars” have constructed a massive walled narrative city that they are commanded to defend down to the last court “historian”.
Confessions extracted under torture, millions of forged documents, fantastic and impossible “first hand” testimony be damned. Even thousands of new proofs that the narrative is just plain incorrect and the Nuremberg was a sham kangaroo trial cannot penetrate the walls of Judeo-Academia. The narrative must go on, just like the war in Ukraine.
Due to the massive crisis following 1929 Britain had all-party-governments from 1931 until 1945 led by conservatives from 1935 to 1945. All admins consisted of the usual suspects (Halifax etc). Baldwin dealt with the constitutional crisis 1936 that threatened monarchy. Chamberlain laid the foundation for the British engagement in World War 2 giving guarantees (Warszaw) and launching recruitment after the fall of Prague. All actions ensured an increasing pressure on Paris which is in the centre of British foreign policy in that era. Large british military operations east of France weren‘t an option as long as the french stayed out of the war and all major figures including Chamberlain and Churchill agreed on this. It‘s all about different sales propositions (dovish, hawkish) for the same policies.
A sizable number of people on this site keep the holocaust fresh in everyone’s mind by constantly talking about it. Let it die. Don’t mention it. The zionists win as long as their pet project has a hold on people’s attention.
No one can change the past so why keep discussing if it was reported correctly or not? Right now Israel is proving what kind of people zionists are in real time. The same people that are against the zionist project to control the world using fake money and gov’t muscle are the ones that elected Trump to help the zionists finish off their enemies in the ME; to empower the zionists.
The zionists got control due to their fraudulent currency system that every gov’t on the planet adopted willingly. It is the force that gov’t represents that keeps that phony currency system and the control that goes with it alive and functioning to the detriment of the people that vote to keep that gov’t alive. In essence, the people vote to keep the zionist system functioning simultaneous with denouncing ‘the jews’ and the control ‘the jews’ have. It’s funny if it wasn’t so stupid.
Decade after decade of voting in new actors and things don’t improve; they get progressively worse to the point that now the phony currency system is going digital to cement total control over people’s ability to survive. Once the currency goes digital, the oligarchy of scumbag jews, christians, atheists, faggots, trannies, obese, skinny, every race, etc will systematically kill off anyone not aligned with their program.
Digital currency will negate all the amendments not already defunct because of the power over life and death it provides while people keep talking about history they can’t change and has nothing to do with their future. It’s ‘the jews’ everyone laments while empowering gov’t to keep all manner of sociopath in power. Remove ‘the jews’ and nothing changes because it is the institution of gov’t that will always have some crew of sociopaths at the controls.
The enemy is the gov’t you vote to maintain and most people can’t or don’t want to recognize that.
It is the specific culture: Wealthy Anglo-Saxon Protestant. It means those who came out of the wars of Anglo ‘Reformation’ as the big winners.
In broad cultural terms, what the Reformation did for all Germanic peoples is free them to return to the base Germanic culture of endless pirating, perpetual going a -viking. The entire Reformation is built upon Judizing concepts= perhaps seen most easily by Luther declaring that the Jewish definitions of Scripture was the Old Testament and then was the way to read the New Testament. But Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a thoroughly Judaizing. murderously Judaizing heresy that began more defined by imperials ideas as it gained more power.
And that is WASP culture. Anglo-Zionist imperialism that never stops.
Right. Even if Germany had won, there’s no guarantee “the Sixties” wouldn’t have happened anyway.
In two generations Americans went from realists who lynched nigs to fantasists who kneel to them.
Who’s to say Germans wouldn’t have had a similar change of heart?
That is their punishment for having the temerity to remain neutral during the war. (((They))) never forget or forgive
The English and Americans fought and died for the communists; the destruction of European civilization and European peoples is the consequence.
Ever since the 8th century, the enemies of Christ have been using Muslims to destroy Catholic civilization.It took the Spanish seven hundred years to reconquer their country.
It was the Catholic Church and Catholic monarchs that organised the defence of Europe from numerous Muslim invasions.
The Pope invited Elizabeth I to help in the defence of Europe at the battle of Lepanto but she preferred to send her navy to join the Ottomans in plundering Spanish ships in the Mediterranean.
At the last great Siege of Vienna, the Hussites sided with the Ottomans .
Hilaire Beloc wrote that ‘The Faith is Europe and Europe is the Faith.’ When the Church denied the Faith at Vatican II, Europe’s fate was sealed.
The governments of the world did not adopt the fiat system ‘willingly’ .
For the English the ‘Glorious Revolution’ was necessary to replace the Catholic king who would not have agreed to a usurious central bank with a Protestant usurper. The French revolution replaced a Catholic monarch and the Russian revolution destroyed the Czar, whose grandfather, Alexander III had vowed never to allow a central bank on Russian soil. It took the first world war to destroy the European monarchies that would have impeded the establishment central banks.
Hitler’s sin was to close the central bank, nationalise the currency and transform Germany into an economic and industrial powerhouse in five years.
Hussein was assassinated because he wanted euros for his oil; Gaddafi, because he wanted to institute an alternative currency based on gold, the dinar.
After 9/11, the only two countries left in the Middle East without a Rothschild’s controlled central bank are Iran and Syria.
I suspect that Trump has been chosen to remedy that situation.
That the peasants got sick of the religious loonies running their lives is to be commended. That they didn’t burn down all the churches and hang the clergy was a mistake that will hopefully be corrected in future. That they then allowed themselves to be ruled by a different class of sociopaths is the tragedy of at least the last hundred years.
Wilson enthusiastically signed up for currency from nothing and later admitted his complicity for turning the country over to the bankers:
I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world – no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.
Woodrow Wilson
Did the next administration undo the damage? No! Every gov’t wants a central bank and fraudulent currency because that’s what gives them the power to cheat their own citizenry, their human farm animals.
The first world war set the stage and the pattern to be followed and it was the US that set that pattern. Every nation has a central bank and not one is even hinting at getting rid of it unless they can piggy back on someone else’s central bank and fraudulent currency.
It is the concept of a ‘national currency’ that is at the root of the problems facing the entire world. Currency at a mouse click funds all the wars and stupid projects. It’s what keeps politicians in the life style they’ve grown accustomed to and is why things can only get worse because people keep voting to keep the sociopaths of all stripes in power over them.
Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.
H. L. Mencken
It all started way before that with the Protestant Reformation, the legalisation of usury and the emancipation of the usurers.
After the so-called ‘ Glorious Revolution ‘ the Bank of England was established in 1694. On the same day they established modern democracy so that the citizens could not disown the debts contracted in their name by a so-called representative government with private bankers who conjured money out of thin air under the fractional reserve system. When usury was illegal many debtors refused to acknowledge their debts as there were no contracts to be enforced. Democracy was invented to overcome that.
They also introduced income tax so that the interest on these fictional, so-called debts was paid with real wealth, a product of work, the only source of real wealth. That is how the usurers have accumulated so much wealth that they can now impose their new world order.
And finally they banned the functioning of independent goldsmiths so that their fraudulent paper currency operation would have no competition.
The same reason for the second world war and the destruction of Hitler and Germany; the assassination of Kennedy because he wanted to emit a currency independent of the Federal Reserve and the assassination of Gadaffi who wanted to emit a currency based on gold, the dinar.
You American barbarians bombed Libya, which had a relatively high standard of living, back to the Stone Age as punishment. I’m sure the Libyan people are very happy with your intervention.
Your total ignorance of history is pathetic but expected.
The USA was in the hands of the usurers way before Wilson. I recommend reading ‘The Creature from Jekyll Island’ by Griffin or,if you don’t care to read, watch the documentary ‘The Money Masters’ which is on YouTube.
As for the nefarious effects of the Protestant Reformation on the standard of living of the English peasants, I highly recommend ‘ The History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland’ by William Cobbett as an antidote to your programming.
‘ Barren Metal, A History story of Capitalism as the conflict between capitalism and usury’ by E M Jones is another good, if dense, read.
I’m sure you Americans and English, willing slaves of the usurers, are looking forward to bombing Iran and Syria into submission to the central banking system.
I see you believe in the aged propaganda known as ‘history’, the stories invented by the writers of history, the oligarchy.
I’ll only go back as far as the creation of the ‘Fed’. The stories about usury and how the stupid christians gave away what became banking to the jews is something I pay no attention to. It happened so long ago that no one knows what happened and all the stories are just that, stories. Even if absolutely true, I don’t care.
I’ve given copies of The Creature from Jekyll Island as gifts to my stupid relatives and former friends before I became an expat. I knew it wouldn’t help them because it would require actual perusing of the pages which probably never happened but I at least tried to warn them. Griffin’s book is a good story and sounds plausible.
I don’t need a book or someone to tell me that banking as constituted today is a giant swindle; I’m well aware of that because I have first hand knowledge of the process. Please don’t confuse me with the typical US voter, costumed killer admirer and bible thumping 99 IQ halfwit. I left the US because I’m not in tune with murdering people in foreign lands and thanking the killers for their service.
I suspected strongly that 9/11 was going to turn the US into a totalitarian police state so I closed my business and left thereafter. I’ve been watching from a distance for nearly two decades and keep trying to warn this audience but with little success. Religion, gov’t schooling and a desire to be told how to live their lives has too strong a hold on the bulk of the US population. They just elected their orange jesus as proof of just how controlled their minds are.
You are correct, Churchill declared war on Germany long before 1939.
As early as 1935, long before he was prime minister of Britain, Churchill conspired with Roosevelt for war with Germany.
Realize that in 1933 already, newspaper headlines noted “Judea Declares War on Germany”! Huge rallies in New York City supported this declaration.
I smile contentedly watching the UK get flooded with Muslims. After all, the Brits and their “supa-smot” intelligence services fomented the wars that drove Muslims out of the Mideast homes as refugees.
Yo, Limeys: FAFO!
A 1,705 word “comment”? Mein dude: make editing your BFF.
Meanwhile I smile contentedly watching the UK get flooded with Muslims. After all, the Brits and their “supa-smot” intelligence services fomented the wars that drove Muslims out of the Mideast homes as refugees.
Yo, Limeys: FAFO!
You absolutely do others a favor, and serve humanity as a whole very well, by recommending this book.
Mentioning the typo in your quote of the subtitle because it provides the opportunity to highlight the fundamental worldly conflict in play today.
BARREN METAL
A HISTORY OF CAPITALISM AS THE CONFLICT BETWEEN LABOR AND USURY
“Labor” is human effort.
“Usury” is the diabolical exacting of profit generated solely by the mere passage of time.
Humans falter, can get sick or injured and all eventually die, but the passage of time is relentlessly unfailing.
Divine Son of God Jesus denounced Jew usury in his very first recorded public sermon, Luke 4:16-30, insisting on compliance with Torah rules of Deuteronomy 15 mandating debt forgiveness every seven years, but also expanding those borrower protections beyond the Torah to all of humanity, not just fellow Jews, and then expanding to non-Jews the Torah protection against all forms of usury. That’s why the Jews began their effort to kill him on the spot but initially failed. Jews continue rentlessly to this day to destroy Jesus’ redeeming work.
Search this Vatican post
for “remission of debts” and “led him to the cross.”
Unz Review contributor Michael Hudson‘s 2018 is the great edifier on this basic initiative of Jesus.
Comment-maker here Mefobills
expounds on this work of Hudson invaluably.
Unz Review contributor Andrew Anglin yesterday publicized
this Stew Peters documentary
wherein at 1:39:18-45 the Jew describes the source of all Jew power, usury.
Thus the motive for diabolical Jew hatred of Divine Jesus and his flock, particularly “whites” the descendants of “Christendom” as Europe for over a thousand years was called, The Holy Redeemer’s Divine opposition to satanic #JewU$ury.
Stew Peters documentary
wherein at 1:39:18-45 the Jew describes the source of all Jew power, usury, with these words which appear as subtitle on the screen:
churchill was jewish and in a way the martin luther king of britain – a dishonest, plagiarizing, morally reprehensive, mass murdering cretin. his sympathies were clearly against the english. the lies he told, and the machinations he created to bring britain and the united states into world war 2 were vile; his warm-up for the slaughter was gallipoli. screw him all to hell. roosevelt was no better and even worse.
jewish leaders have openly and bluntly stated that their goal is the annihilation of whites. why are the jews so focused on the whites – but no one else? once you answer that question, you know the implacable hatred the jew has for whites.
what most white imbeciles fail to understand is that both the republican and democrat parties embrace EVERYTHING of the Nazi party. And, no, the nazis did not have a final solution to kill the jews – what a moronic thought. hitler’s personal physician was a jew, and many held senior ranks in the german military.