The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Lance Welton Archive
THE NEW DARK AGE ADVANCES: Trans-Narcissists Try to Cancel Prof. J. Michael Bailey’s Findings On “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria”
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

See also: AFTER NASHVILLE, FACE IT: “Transgenders” Are Nuts. “Transphobia” is Rational. And Joe Biden Is An Idiot

A serious scholarly study by a world expert in his field is under threat of being Cancelled. If the scheme unfolds according to plan, it will be declared scientifically and ethically flawed, forcibly withdrawn from an academic journal and expunged from the official scientific record. Why? Because it dares to explore empirically the actual causes of transsexuality. And trans-activists really, really, don’t like that—it punctures their delusions.

As I reported a few weeks ago, transsexuality, in the majority of cases, does not involve being “born into the wrong body.” Autogynophilous transsexuality, which develops during adolescence, involves males being intensely sexually aroused by, and obsessed with, the idea of themselves as a female. Such males will, for example, only be able to successfully have sex with their wives if they imagine that they are their wives having sex with them, as documented in the 2013 book Men Trapped in Men’s Bodies: Narratives of Autogynephilic Transsexualism, by researcher Anne Lawrence, a psychologist who specializes in sexology and transsexuality and is herself an autogynephilous transwoman.

Unsurprisingly, in that this kind of transsexuality involves being sexually aroused by yourself, it strongly correlates with Narcissistic Personality Disorder [The frequency of personality disorders in patients with gender identity disorder, by A. Meybodi et al., Medicine Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2014].

These fundamentally broken and paranoid people, who cope with the world by developing this feeling that they are perfect, crave and demand adoration and respect. When they do not get what they want—such as absolute, unquestioned acceptance that they really are women—they descend into “Narcissistic Rage” and try to destroy that which triggers their core feelings that they are worthless and will be abandoned.

This was documented, also by Anne Lawrence, in the angry reactions of trans-activists to Prof. J. Michael Bailey’s 2003 book, The Man Who Would Be Queen: The Science of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism. As she summarized the trans attack on Bailey:

They included orchestration of charges of professional misconduct against Bailey, filed with Northwestern University and the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation; attempts to turn Bailey’s colleagues against him; attacks directed against Bailey’s children; and efforts to discredit or silence nearly anyone who openly supported him … Bailey’s opponents intended not only to discredit Bailey’s book, but also to destroy its author.

[Shame and Narcissistic Rage in Autogynephilic Transsexualism, by Anne Lawrence, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2008]

Well, Bailey would not be silenced, so they’re at it again.

On April 20th, Bailey tweeted, “Woke-academic attempt to cancel our new article on Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria. Read it while you can!”

The article in question, Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria: Parent Reports on 1655 Possible Cases,” by Suzanne Diaz and J. Michael Bailey, was published in Archives of Sexual Research as recently as March 29th.

In effect, it demonstrates something trans-activists really don’t want to hear, as it undermines their quasi-religious belief that they have been “born into the wrong body”: that there is a “New Anorexia” among teenage girls, “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria,” which spreads via social contagion. And, further, the more mentally ill the teenage girls are, the more likely they are to acquire it. And those who acquire it become even more mentally ill.

Teenage girls with pre-existing mental health problems, inevitably younger than boys who start to experience Gender Dysphoria, declare themselves to be “non-binary” or to be “boys ”according to Diaz and Bailey. About 75% of cases are female-to-male and 65% of the females, but only 28% of the males, “socially transition.”

The parents feel pressured, including by clinicians, to accept their daughters’ fantasy as reality. But their daughters’ mental health rapidly deteriorates after they transition.

The key point: These girls do not “medically transition.“ In effect, in a society in which victimhood status and transgenderism are promoted, they deal with various teenage anxieties by adopting a transgender identity, which then spreads through their peer group.

This fits with findings by the remarkable Canadian researcher Eric Kaufmann (see VDARE.com references, here, here and here, etc.) that there is a rapid increase in young women identifying as “LGBT”—but little increase in homosexual behavior. It is merely an identity and status issue in a leftist, pro-LGBT world [Born This Way? The Rise of LGBT as a Social and Political Identity, Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology, 2022].

The more mentally unstable they are, the more likely they are to takes things further: “Youths with a history of mental health issues were especially likely to have taken steps to socially and medically transition.”

This is absolutely not what trans-activists want to hear. So, needless to say, it has triggered their Narcissistic Rage. The International Academy of Sexual Behavior, which is associated with Archives of Sexual Research, and is “increasingly Woke,” according to Bailey, is, apparently, “incensed by ethical and scientific issues” in his journal article, which was based around interviews with parents of those suffering from Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria.

Bailey added that, “The critics could write letters to the editor (or do their own research). But no, that would allow rapid onset gender dysphoria (ROGD) to be discussed in polite company.”

Naturally, Bailey’s preemptive strike against the cancellation of his study has set off a Twitter storm, both opposing and defending him.

Woke archaeologist Scott MacEachern declared: “Methodologically and ethically, this is one of the worst articles that I have seen in a very long time. Congratulations: you‘ve placed transphobia on the same academic level as ‘scientific racism.’”

He added that: “As for IRB approval, none of this went through any human subjects process, either for the parents… or the children/adolescents in question—whose life information is actually being used here. I’ll bet the university in question declined to certify the study!”

And he nitpicked about the teenage sample having “above average intelligence.”

Reassuringly, many psychologists have leapt to Bailey’s defense. Psychologist Dr. Chris Ferguson tweeted: “That the IASR is even looking into this is a disgrace. If people have critiques of the original article, let them publish their critiques in comment/reply. Science can’t maintain integrity with this constant censorship of unpopular ideas.”

Even maverick public intellectual Jordan Peterson, notoriously something of a squish, retweeted the possibly about to be cancelled article, seemingly as an act of solidarity.

This new attempt to destroy Bailey and his research on the causes of transgenderism only underlines that point which Anne Lawrence made with regard to Narcissistic Rage.

Transsexuals would like us to believe that their central “issue” is being born into the wrong body. In reality, their “gender dysphoria” is but the tip of an iceberg which is, many cases, extreme Narcissistic Personality Disorder combined with aspects of autism, which make them obsessive, easily sexually aroused and, so, likely to develop sexual fetishes, as Ray Blanchard argued three decades ago [Varieties of Autogynephilia and Their Relationship to Gender Dysphoria, by Ray Blanchard, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1993].

These are, to use Anne Lawrence’s term, “Men Trapped In Men’s Bodies: profoundly psychologically disturbed men, who are sexually aroused by, and obsessed by, the idea of themselves as females and who, being Narcissists, require everyone to bow down before them; to “accept” them as what they say they are and treat them as such, as though they are dictatorial “Queens.”

The result is the spread of their ideology to emotionally unstable, insecure, teenage girls, such as that teenage “anorexia”—in a society obsessed with beauty—has morphed into Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria, in a society obsessed with victimhood, which accords status to the sexually “marginalized.”

People with serious personality disorders have escaped from the asylum and are directing the sane, or relatively sane, towards their selfish desires.

The attempted cancellation of Bailey’s paper is yet another example of this—and of the descent of science into a New Dark Age.

Lance Welton [email him] is the pen name of a freelance journalist living in New York.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 7 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The American Psychiatric Association removed transgenderism as a mental disorder just 10 years ago, and it’s difficult to pretend this wasn’t the product of politics, justified in the name of “human rights,” rather than evidence.

    Read: ‘Gender Identity Disorder’ got downgraded to ‘Gender Dysphoria’.

    One of the earliest crackdowns on free speech online came in 2012, when Tumblr banned discussions of anorexia.
    […]
    Obesity, too, is said to be a disease, like anorexia. However, when it comes to anorexia, affirming the disease is harmful. When it comes to obesity, shaming the disease is harmful.

    Source: https://www.amren.com/features/2023/04/the-theology-of-deconstruction/
    .
    .
    .

    Interestingly, maybe even homosexuality is a disorder!

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2023/01/homosexuality-is-a-mental-illness/

  2. Notsofast says:

    someday the current policy of allowing puberty blockers and surgical “cures” to minors we’ll be viewed with the same horror, we now feel for full frontal lobotomies. they’re not going to be happy until they can sew us all together like the human centipede.

    • Agree: MarkU
  3. MarkU says:

    Transitioning into another gender is a ridiculous notion, it really is that simple. If you are born with at least one Y chromosome you are male, if you weren’t you are female.

    There are a very few individuals who, owing to a hormonal screw-up in the womb, develop the wrong genitalia for their gender, those people can claim with some justification that they were born into the wrong body. If those individuals want surgery so that their genitalia is compatible with their chromosomes that is fair enough. Even in those cases they are not ‘transitioning’ from one sex to another, that would require some extreme form of gene therapy, yet to be invented.

    It is common knowledge that the hormonal changes associated with puberty, typically result in emotional disturbances (aka dysphoria) and it is also commonly known that they eventually grow out of it. The only medical treatment that seems even vaguely appropriate would be mood stabilisers (I’m not advocating that btw) so why are they using puberty blockers and surgery?

    1) It generates revenue for clinics specialising in genital surgery.
    2) It results in sterility thus keeping the population lower.
    3) It generates controversy, another type of identity politics to divide us with.
    4) The assertion of state power, establishing that the state can override parental control of their offspring.

    I think that last motivation is the most worrying, it is an early step towards the abolition of the family unit. How long before children are confiscated from their parents at birth and brought up by the state? (it would be much easier to indoctrinate them) I know that families are often somewhat dysfunctional but surely all but the most abusive families are going to be better than the George Soros equivalent of the Hitler youth.

  4. This article falls squarely into the category of: The Inmates Are Running The Asylum. Only now the asylum is society wide and sane people are the ones being harassed, vilified and attacked by the crazies who now run the show. How long until we are mass incarcerated “for our own good”.

  5. Alrenous says: • Website

    On the other hand, the mentally ill reacting to their illness by sterilizing themselves is eugenic. If they commit suicide it’s stochastic euthanasia.

    Sure you can make a case that effectively sterilizing a child at five with Frankenstein surgeries is immoral, but what’s worse is letting them reproduce, which will only multiply the misery. Should teachers be able to sterilize a kid without the parent’s knowledge? Parents shouldn’t be sending their kids to school, so this is merely a just punishment for heinous sins.

    Likewise women’s sports is some kind of abomination, and having them all driven out by cross-dressing men or castrati would very much be a good thing. I’m not against a quick pick-up beach volleyball game or whatever. Mens sana in corpore sano. However, women should never join a spectator sport or competitive team.

    “Fun” fact from Bailey’s book: almost all gays are bottoms.
    Gays don’t like other gays. They want to have sex with men, not fags. The personal ads for gays skew 1000:1 bottoms, because they want to be penetrated, not do the penetrating. Confining them in a gay ghetto with each other is not kind or compassionate.

    Reminder that normies shouldn’t even be aware that being penetrated is a thing men can do. I shouldn’t come up in conversation, it shouldn’t come up in fiction or the news, and it absolutely should not come up during worship. They won’t think of it on their own, and thank the heavens.
    Having Chinese-style censorship for all male homosexual acts would be a wonderful thing (except for the gays, of course, but if you want to sacrifice the 98.5% for the 1.5%, you’re probably atrociously evil.)

    • Troll: VinnyVette
  6. Yesterday was the 90th anniversary of the infamous Nazi students book burnings.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_book_burnings

    It’s a little know fact that the Nazi student book burnings began by targeting the very same corruption of German youth that we face now.

    The standard narrative most commonly portrays the book burnings as an irrational, hate-filled Nazi reaction to what they considered to be degenerate Jewish art and literature, with the books of the big Jewish icons such as Marx, Freud, Einstein et al, most commonly cited as being burned, simply because of German anti-semitism.

    What is often omitted from the narrative is one of the real reasons why the book burnings occurred. Four days earlier on May 6, the first book burning took place at the Institute of Sexology, which had been setup by the Jewish homosexual, Magnus Hirschfeld to promote equality for homosexuals and transsexuals.

    As explained here by the Holocaust Memorial Day trust :
    https://www.hmd.org.uk/resource/6-may-1933-looting-of-the-institute-of-sexology/

    Here we are, 90 years later, being force fed the very same trans ideology …

    Come a long way haven’t we?

  7. I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your blog.
    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come
    here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme?

    Great work!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Lance Welton Comments via RSS