The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewHua Bin Archive
A Creative Proposal to Balance China US Trade
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Regardless what we think of Trump’s tariff war, the trade imbalance between China and the US is indeed substantial and unsustainable in the long term.

In typical Trump fashion, when he talks about trade, he chooses to cherry pick and talk only about the merchandise trade where the US runs a trillion dollar trade deficit with nearly all major economies.

He conveniently neglects to mention the equally massive service trade SURPLUS the US runs with the rest of the world, including China. This includes digital trade, intellectual property rights, financial services, business services, media and entertainment, tourism, education, and more.

Of course, it is easier to paint the US as a “victim” of global trade if the focus is solely on merchandise trade. The case against global trade gets diluted, even entirely negated, when one looks at the full spectrum of trade and how the US benefits disproportionately from the service trade and runs the world’s largest service trade surplus. But fairness is never the goal here.

The intellectual dishonesty is not limited to the skewered view of trade but also extends to the avoidance of a deeper discussion of the structural reason behind US merchandise trade deficit.

As is well known, the US has been deindustrializing since 1950s as its manufacturing job peaked in late 40s (37% of total employment) and the economy started to move towards a consumption and service based economy.

By 1971, less than 25% of US employment was in manufacturing. By 2000, it fell to 13% and today manufacturing employment hovers around 9% (more or less so for a decade).

Although NAFTA (1994) and China’s entry into WTO (2001) are regularly invoked as key events driving deindustrialization, the US manufacturing employment and GDP contribution has been on a smooth downward trend since 1945. By the time China ramped up manufacturing in mid 2000s, deindustrialization was completed and the US was already a service-based economy. You can refer to the many books on the subject published before 2010. A short list here –

  • America’s Rustbelt: The Economic and Social Effects of Deindustrialization (1987)
  • Beyond Rust: Metropolitan Pittsburgh and the Fate of Industrial America (1989)
  • The End of Detroit: How the Big Three Lost Their Grip on the American Car Market (2003)
  • The Betrayal of Work: How Low-Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans (2005)
  • The Great Divergence: America’s Growing Inequality Crisis (2007)

There are many reasons behind the deindustrialization of the US economy –

  • Finance, tech, and healthcare have risen. The FIRE sector (finance, insurance, and real estate) is an ever bigger part of the economy; tech sector has boomed; and healthcare industry has ballooned (now accounting for 18% total GDP). Together with retail, media, entertainment, business services, education, the US economy has moved away from production to become a consumption and service based economy, i.e. the New Economy.
  • High costs in the US have made manufacturing uncompetitive. The financialization of the economy has driven costs of factors of production to such a high level that makes local manufacturing simply not competitive.

This includes high labor costs (necessary to cover the overhead costs of healthcare, housing, education, etc.), high regulatory costs, high land costs, essentially all critical input costs.

At this point, the US simply cannot produce competitive goods and merchandise even for the highly paid American workers to buy, let alone export to foreign countries. Note that the US has the highest GDP per capita among major developed economies and enjoys much higher income. If the Americans cannot afford to buy local, how can consumers in Vietnam or Cambodia or even Portugal afford such?

  • Technology and automation is another big factor behind the loss of manufacturing jobs in the US. Although redistribution of factory jobs to lower cost countries is often cited as the victimization of American workers, studies have shown more job losses are attributed to improved productivity and automation than offshoring.

Trump has identified deindustrialization and loss of manufacturing jobs as a national emergency. But he fails to understand the deeper underlying reasons and therefore is destined to come up with the wrong solutions.

Simply put, tariff will not make US manufacturing competitive. The inherent high cost of producing in the US means few low income foreigners can afford US manufactured goods even if the country has the production capacity and can export at zero tariff.

The world won’t buy from the US and balance its merchandise trade deficit even if it wants to.

The flip side is the US is very competitive in the services industry and therefore runs a large surplus there.

Global economy works on market-based principles, not the whim of a low intelligence reality show personality.

That said, for entertainment, let me hypothesize a few ways the US can balance its merchandise trade with China. Though unlikely to ever transpire, they are more grounded to economic reality than Trump’s fantasy.

  • China can stop exporting goods made by US companies in China. Between 30 to 40% Chinese exports to the US are by US companies like Apple, Tesla, GM, Pfizer, Dow Chemical. These companies manufacture in China to sell to the Chinese market and they also export to their home market and other countries, taking advantage of the lower production costs, superior supply chains and infrastructure in China.
  • China can stop the export of goods made by European, Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese companies in China to the US. This accounts for another 30% of US-bound Chinese exports. This would affect companies such as VW, IKEA, Toyota, Panasonic, SK Hynix, Samsung, TSMC, etc.
  • China can stop all export of critical minerals to the US, including rare earth, cobalt, lithium, aluminum, copper. China can also stop the export of batteries, solar panels, drones, legacy semiconductor chips, mining and processing equipment, tooling machines, etc.
  • China will mainly focus to export toys, apparel, shoes, furniture, luggage, plastics, home electronics, Christmas decors, etc. for Walmart and Amazon.
  • China can increase US imports such as F-35 fighter jets, Patriot missiles, Virginia class submarines, M1-A1 tanks, bunker buster bombs, depleted uranium munitions, etc. After all, the US is the world leader in arms manufacturing and has an unassailable competitive advantage in this field. It should be open to sell to China to balance its trade deficit.
  • China can import more Nvidia chips, Palantir surveillance software, SpaceX communication satellites, another field the US has market-competitive offerings.
  • China can import more corn, beef, chicken, soybean from the US peasants – of course, eggs are off limit. The US needs them…

The optics may be bad for the American peasants to sell agricultural goods to the Chinese peasants who make manufactured stuff and lend money to the US government. But optics be damned since we are trying to balance the trade deficit.

(Republished from Substack by permission of author or representative)
 
The China/America Series
Hide 32 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. meamjojo says:

    A good column. But you’ll have to wait for a future change in Administrations and politics here for common sense to return.

  2. QCIC says:

    The USA is still competitive in various industries with very high value-added, despite the cost challenges here. Obvious examples include aircraft engines, satellites, chip making equipment and medical equipment. I think a key goal of re-industrialization is to improve competitiveness in these sectors so they are not lost. The next goal is to bring back production in the high value-added tiers a bit lower down. Much of this tier is probably capital goods which were made in the USA as recently as ten years ago. Manufacturing of low value-added consumer items may only return based on automation. I think the US can also benefit by extending production of higher value-added consumer items, Mercedes-class cars might be an example.

    Trump and his advisers obviously know this expanded US production cannot happen without reduction in regulations, business paper work, bureaucracy and taxes. These are major reasons why US production was offshored in the first place. The relationships between unions, business and government will have to be updated as well.

  3. @QCIC

    I think the US can also benefit by extending production of higher value-added consumer items, Mercedes-class cars might be an example.

    Look at the Cybertruck. It’s a premium (judging by its price) American-made BEV but the quality just isn’t there. And Elon is supposed to be the person who knows more about manufacturing than anyone else in the world!

    There’s really only one way to bring manufacturing back to the US and that is by devaluing the dollar, among other things. But that would undermine the USD role as reserve currency, which goes against imperialist ambitions of the US government. So, either the US has to give up its empire, or it will continue to suffer from unregulated financialization of its economy and the resulting uncompetitiveness of its manufacturing. Why would anyone invest in manufacturing stuff if they can make a trillion dollars in one day doing some silly things with derivatives (and get bailed out of they go bust)? If you’re a private equity fund, why not buy out some American manufacturer in a leveraged buyout, assets strip it and move production to Asia? That’s how you make serious money and ” create shareholder value”, not by investing in expansion of manufacturing in America.

    The decline of the American empire will be good for the people and manufacturing in the long run, but it will be a difficult transition to being a normal country with its dumbed down population and chronically underfunded infrastructure. A generation of humiliation is coming. Maybe some leader will rise who will actually Make America Great Again after that.

    • Replies: @QCIC
  4. HuMungus says:

    China can stop all export of critical minerals to the US, including rare earth, cobalt, lithium, aluminum, copper. China can also stop the export of batteries, solar panels, drones, legacy semiconductor chips, mining and processing equipment, tooling machines, etc.

    How about the US either tariff the shit out of countries that relabel Chinklander goods for re-export to the US under their own “Made in Some Dumb Fuck Nation” label …. or just ban the import of some plainly not locally produced goods form those nations?

    Chinkland uses this method to avoid tariffs on probably around (and likely more) $100 billion in goods.

    Video Link
    I kind of think that these 3,521% tariffs are a step in the right direction … but only a step. LOL!!!!

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ygdv47vlzo

    US sets tariffs of up to 3,521% on South East Asia solar panels

    Some solar equipment exporters in Cambodia face the highest duties of 3,521% because of what was seen as a lack of cooperation with the Commerce Department investigation.


    Video Link

    • Replies: @Torna atrás
  5. QCIC says:
    @Anonymous534

    Difficult to argue with your points. I am hoping for a middle ground, though not because I want to perpetuate a broken system. I just think the risk of widespread chaos and death and destruction is very high in the event it collapses.

    The Rivian truck might be a better example than the Cybertruck. I have no idea if either is any good. Cadillac has brought out an upmarket car model probably targeted at hedge fund managers.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  6. SteveK9 says:
    @QCIC

    These two paragraphs make more sense than the entire article, which is as stupid as the author thinks Trump is.

  7. @QCIC

    I hope any major crisis in the West results in at least some Western countries implementing some novel economic and social policies that might seem unimaginable today but might be the best thing ever. Like expelling the Jews, browns and blacks, implementing gold standard with full-reserve banking, Whites-only open borders policy, things like that. Only a crisis could open a window of opportunity for experimentation like that. Let’s just hope we don’t get another world war in the process…

  8. HuMungus says:

    Now the impact of the trade war on China is estimated to be a hit to the economy of around 2.5%.

    Now let me toss some cold water on that number.

    China exports around $100 billion in goods to ASEAN nations for relabeling and re-exportng to the US. As shown by the recent tremendous tariffs on ASEAN sourced solar panels, the US is wise to this Commie Chink trickery.

    Adding another $100 billion in goods (granted it is a guesstimate) to the top line loss of $440 billion in Chinese goods that will no longer be exported to the US brings the total loss to $540 billion.

    Now the real jinx is the real size of the Chinklander economy. Most people examining the size of the Chinklander economy come to the conclusion that it is likely only 2/3rds of the stated value with a few outliers claiming it is only 1/3rd. Some of this fake economy comes from the fact that totalitarian regimes LOVE to heap praise on themselves by inflating economic growth by around 50% of the actual growth. Meaning that 1/3rd of any reported growth is fictional. Another sign that the Chinklander economy is smaller then stated is the real estate sector which has been in “crash and burn” mode for the past 4 years. It used to make up around 30% of the Chinklander economy and now is probably around 10% of that economy … losing a massive 20% share …. or around 5% per year for those 4 years. Something not found anywhere in Chinese economic data.

    Because of the real estate crash, it is likely that in recent years Chinkland has seen negative growth of up to 5% instead of positive growth of 5%. In other words it is already in a depression and possibly in a “Great Depression”.

    Dividing the top line $540 billion by an economy that is likely only $12 trillion gives the share of US exports to the US at a more massive 4.5% of the economy.

    Toss in a further loss of .5% as the loss of services provided by Chinkland to the US and we can round out the Chinese losing about 5% of their economy.

    The above is a minimal loss as foreign firms manufacture in Chinkland for export to nations other then the US. Losing the US market makes it very very attractive to move manufacturing out of China and many corporations will do so, adding yet more loses for the Chinese economy. Now while it is uncertain how much manufacturing those firms will move out of China, a good guesstimate is a cool $1 trillion dollars or around 8% of the adjusted Chinklander economy.

    Now many of the goods in the 5% exported to the US and the 8% of goods that will no longer be produced in Chinland overlap, so you can’t add the two numbers to get a final result. However, a reasonable reduction to a total loss of around 10% should be about right.

    Due to the trade war, Chinkland is looking at a loss of around 10% of their economy. 5% in the short term as exporting to the US will no longer be profitable and another 5% over the course of multiple years as companies move production out of China.

    The fact the foreign investment by foreign firms into Chinkland went negating in the 4th quarter of 2024 just shows that the trend toward moving foreign owned production out of Chinkland is starting to move into high gear.

    Sucks to be them!

    May future generations of Chinklanders learn to not place fentanyl into the hands that feeds them. Amen!

    • Replies: @Henry Ford
  9. Notsofast says:

    if the fire sector wasn’t bad enough, we have the fire government, which consists of fraud, incompetence, racketeering, and embezzlement. both of these enablers are leading us to the fire sale of our country. we have been so thoroughly looted as a nation, our economy has run out of things to loot and now the last assets of country, are our personal possessions and every last dollar will be vacuumed upwards, as our meager possessions are auctioned, to satisfy our creditors.

    as the last property on the monopoly board of america, is bought up, tent city america will reach its height. large herds of broken homeless, wanderers, left to their own devices. the heartless bastards will enjoy their suffering immensely, at least the nazi’s would have provided camps, or work farms, gulags if you prefer. get ready for the hoholodomor, coming to a country near you, followed by the hoholocaust. you see ukraine and palestine are predictive programing. we’re all slavs (slaves) and palestinians (philistines) now.

  10. wilrodx says:

    An absurd article that proposes a fix to the American economy by China voluntarily sinking it’s own economy and throwing the majority of it’s workers on the street and out of a job and entirely depend on it’s own consumption to maintain it’s industrial base. Including the illusion that the US GDP is the largest in the world which is really slight of hand by those that include the value of potentially for sale and unsold real estate and other unproductive activity as GDP. Also, that a small US surplus in services can offset the massive goods deficit. Since when does the service sector in the US do anything that any other country couldn’t also do for itself? Does he want the Chinese to pay American real estate companies to sell it’s houses and land or sell it’s burgers and fries or treat the health of it’s people without moving to China? Then there’s the absurdity of China even wanting to buy an F-35 or any other junk the US war machine makes and stop making the super hi-tech armaments it now makes for itself. Is this guy a real economist or just another dreamer.

  11. @HuMungus

    If China would agree to take a hundred year treasury bond interest free for all of the trade imbalances then I am confident even Trump will not have any problem’s HAHAHAHA. China what nerve of them to want real gold for their products. Don’t they understand the dollar is as good as gold ( just don’t exchange it for it ) Poor Janet Yellen was so close to convincing the Chinese to buy Treasuries, and Xi was so disrespectful to Blinken being caught on mic asking when Blinken was leaving, the nerve of those peasant Chinese, they represent the best of the best of the mighty Washington and Xi should be honored to be in the aura of their presence!!! USA USA

    • LOL: xcd
  12. HuMungus says:
    @wilrodx

    Is this guy a real economist or just another dreamer.

    Real economist???? You must be joking!!! LOL!!!!

    If he lives in China and is posting outside of China, then he most likely is a paid propagandist. You get fined by the Commies if you are a Chinese using a VPN to post outside of China.

    You actually reminded me of an old Soviet propaganda quote

    A US reporter was in Moscow and asked a local the following question

    “I can be in Washington and be able to criticize the US government all I want. How about you here in Moscow?

    the local then states “Here in Moscow, I too can criticize the US government all I want!’ LOL!!!!

    Have you ever seen Hua Bin ever criticize the Chinese government? LOL!!!!

  13. @Achmed E. Newman

    Trade War is turning into a giant pump n’ dump scheme. It’s all about generating massive daily moves in stock indices now. Everyone will get blanket pardoned by Trump before leaving office.

    Global capital is currently grossly over-allocated to the US.

    • Replies: @ltlee1
  14. @HuMungus

    Once the US economy goes into recession and US consumer spending crashes, Trump will have no leverage to negotiate any trade deals because everyone will see that the US consumer is broke.

    US trade deficits will shrink automatically from falling US consumer purchasing power. Growth models that relied on generating large net export surpluses vs the US are not sustainable.

    The free trade environment of the past 40 years have given people the wrong impression that manufactured products will always be affordable and widely available.

    • Replies: @HuMungus
  15. anon[386] • Disclaimer says:

    it’s Cournot competition in game theory….look it up.

  16. anonymous[213] • Disclaimer says:

    Chinese economist speech on tariffs and Jewish financial power by Liu Yuhui at the Ningbo Bank Private Banking Investment Strategy Meeting on April 20

    [MORE]

    Trump’s Three Miscalculations
    Beginning on April 2, Trump made a flurry of moves over ten days, making waves globally. Despite the short timeline, Trump was surprised by three [miscalculations]:

    1. First, he didn’t expect that tariffs would reach their peak within a week. What I mean by that is that the G2 (China-US) relationship experienced a trade shock, and under a short span of a week, we’ve reached a hard decoupling, which Trump most likely had not expected.

    He hadn’t expected that China would resist head-on. For American suppliers, they likely hadn’t even stocked their warehouses or prepared inventory for a months-long trade battle. He probably hadn’t expected China to stand firm against tariffs with such intensity.

    In just one week, it triggered violent swings in the global capital markets. Risk appetite volatility was unleashed at high intensity, striking directly at the soft underbelly of the U.S. economy.

    2. He probably didn’t expect that global investors would immediately pull down America’s pants 扒美国的底裤, exposing its weakness. And where is that weakness? The U.S. dollar and Treasury bonds. But these are the very foundation of America’s financial capital—they’re not to be touched.

    In past episodes of global financial turmoil, U.S. Treasuries served as a haven asset, rising rapidly, and the dollar would rise too. But this time was different: the surge in global volatility led to a rare “triple kill”: stocks, bonds, and currency all dropped together.

    Across the world, people dumped dollars and dollar-denominated assets. The credit and reserve-currency status of the U.S. dollar was threatened – this was probably Trump’s second big miscalculation.

    3. The third thing he didn’t expect: the entire Western world didn’t follow his lead. He’d assumed that by applying heavy pressure, traditional allies like Europe, the EU, Japan, and South Korea would immediately fall in line.
    But this time, no one bought it.

    At first, they may have paid lip service, saying a few nice things. But in actual negotiations, nothing materialized, and some allies even started to “beautify” 美化 China. When the U.S. proposed an “anti-China alliance,” hoping other countries would line up with it, everyone refused.

    The Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma
    Why didn’t they go along with it? The answer is simple: today’s situation is not a one-shot prisoner’s dilemma. You may know the classic version: Two thieves are caught and interrogated separately by the police, and in the end, each rats out the other for personal gain. That’s a single-round prisoner’s dilemma.

    But today’s geopolitical game is a repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Everyone is calculating: Is the short-term benefit Trump is offering worth abandoning the traditional trade rules we all follow? Can his short-term promises compensate for what I stand to lose? Everyone’s doing the math.

    They’re also thinking: how long can your political momentum last? If you [i.e., the US president] have power for only another year or so, and by next summer you become a lame duck who can’t do anything, why should I abandon widely beneficial, long-standing rules for someone with such a short political horizon? I know I won’t.

    Also, Trump’s character profile is a problem. His persona is one of turning on people without warning. In the eyes of Biden and the deep state, he’s a fickle rogue who changes his mind every other day, and the damage this causes is enormous.

    That’s why no one followed him this time, and that, too, may have surprised him. He wanted a quick, decisive victory, but didn’t expect that everything would go wrong, and everything did turn into the worst-case scenario.

    The Decline of the Dollar
    The escalating global conflict we are witnessing today reflects one significant shift: China’s growing dominance in the global supply chains over the last two decades.

    As of today, China accounts for 35% of the global supply chain. In another five years, by 2030, that figure will have risen to 45%.

    What kind of structure are we dealing with now? The combined share of the second to tenth-largest manufacturing countries doesn’t equal China’s share. That’s the global landscape.

    So China’s dominance in the supply chain is real [turns to English] POWER – [back to Chinese] you can translate that as “hegemony” 霸权. It’s increasingly incompatible with the U.S. dollar–led global wealth distribution system. The dollar can no longer sustain this distribution model, and its capacity is depleting.

    The momentum of global trade flows is drying up, and so is the momentum for reshoring them back to the U.S. It’s precisely because of this contradiction that today’s conflicts are becoming more acute. But the underlying logic of the world remains unchanged.

    An Unprecedented Ideological War Within the West
    When Trump was elected last year, I said something that went viral: Biden’s enemy is undoubtedly us, those of us whose values and ideologies oppose his. But Trump’s enemy is Biden, not us.

    What we’re seeing is just the surface. Within this broader context, we must be prepared for a sudden 180-degree reversal – and not be surprised when it happens. Because every reversal, every compromise, every sharp U-turn – they all serve the goal of helping Trump and the MAGA right-wing gain the upper hand in this historic moment of ideological confrontation in the West. That kind of reversal is entirely possible.

    Let me explain the backdrop in layperson’s terms. These days, America – and indeed the entire Western world – is undergoing an unprecedented ideological civil war. On one side, we have the political left, claiming to represent democracy, freedom, and shared traditional values. These are the so-called deep state, the Washington swamp.

    This group has been in power for nearly 70 years, or certainly more than half a century. Since World War II, the left has essentially held the stage, not just in America, but across the entire West.

    And the right? That’s the conservative force represented by Trump and MAGA. Today, the ideological clash between these two forces has become the most central conflict in the world, because it concerns nothing less than the survival of Western civilization itself. That’s how high the stakes are.

    For us in China, it’s crucial that we understand this and that we master and strategically apply this understanding.

    Inflation: The Shackles Around Trump’s Neck
    So, under this broader backdrop, we must reassess the powerful constraint clamped around Trump’s neck. You could say this shackle, as the media jokingly calls it lately, is no joke at all.

    Trump is a loudmouth. He brags about holding all the cards, all the chips. But he doesn’t realize that our response tells him directly: “All your cards are made in China.” An apt metaphor.

    Trump is an extremely shrewd dealmaker. He wrote a book back in 1985 called The Art of the Deal, where he explained – just like he does now – how to play a bad hand and still bluff your way through. Watching him from afar, we can see that some people are very good at this game.

    What’s a master strategist? Someone who can take a bad hand and play it to stunning effect, and maybe even flip the table. That’s the kind of player Trump is. But once you see through his cards, the game can’t be turned around.

    So what are Trump’s hidden cards? That powerful constraint around his neck. And what is that constraint? It’s the weakest point that most terrifies the will of capital.

    In the West, outcomes are not decided by votes or public opinion, but are rather hammered into place by the will of capital. And what terrifies capital most? Inflation.

    Inflation drives up long-term interest rates. High long-term rates trigger extreme volatility in dollar-denominated risk assets, which leads to what we call a triple kill: stocks, bonds, and currency all falling together. After that, political constraints kick in – and that’s when the trap is set. What is its most direct manifestation? Whether the right-wing capital behind Silicon Valley will abandon Trump. Because they are the main funders of MAGA.

    The Coming Desertion of Trump
    Not even one year of Trump being back in power, innovation capital has suffered a deep bear market and massive market cap losses. (These tech investors, the right wing of Silicon Valley, represent enormous wealth in the U.S. They are the elite of the financial frontier.)

    People like Elon Musk sometimes end up as the sucker, swallowing losses in silence. Musk charged ahead for two months, and Tesla’s market cap fell by 800 billion yuan. In the end, he helped Trump cut $4 billion in the fiscal budget while everyone was watching the show. Of course, other major players are losing money too.

    If the U.S. stock market stays in a bear run for a whole year, this position can’t be defended. By next summer, will they still want to fund him? He costs them too much money. In Western politics, once a political faction loses the backing of its capital patrons, the ones who represent the will of capital, it falls from power.

    Lose the midterms, and you fall into the trap of institutional constraint. Next comes brutal political retribution. The left and right in America behave like mortal enemies, with each side wishing the other were dead. Even before Trump was elected in 2023, those people were already trying to take him down.

    By the time Trump re-entered the White House, he was already carrying 39 confirmed felony indictments, which was unprecedented in American history.

    If Trump loses the midterms next year, then losing the White House four years later is nearly guaranteed. That would prove that the right-wing comeback still couldn’t gain a firm foothold, and the traditional “deep state” in Washington would return. Once restored, they would surely launch political persecution and brutal retribution against the previous wave of right-wing power without question.

    The Fed and “Jewish Financial Capital”
    Therefore, hasn’t a politician like Trump calculated this? Shouldn’t his core logic begin with this reality? Of course, he’s thinking in this direction on how to extend his power, how to hold his ground.

    To break free from this shackle, to unlock the whole thing, there’s only one key. And that key is inflation. If inflation isn’t solved, even if U.S. Treasuries collapse, the Federal Reserve might still not intervene.

    Only by unlocking inflation, and only then, can the shackle around the neck be removed. If you don’t, the Fed will just stand by and watch. It won’t cut rates. Even in a full-blown Treasury crash, the Fed may still refuse to act. And this is something that many economic analysts and researchers fail to realize.

    I’ve read a lot of reports and analyses. The biggest flaw, I think, is a lack of knowledge about Western political and civilizational history. Their understanding is biased. They treat the Fed like a purely economic decision-making body, assuming it will cut rates based on economic downturns. That’s completely unrealistic.

    Let me tell you: the Fed takes sides. You must view its decisions through the lens of today’s West-wide ideological battle between the left and the right. Only then will you understand its moves.

    Who does the Fed truly represent? It represents the interests of Jewish financial capital. And within the Western ideological landscape, Jewish financial capital is always aligned with the left, not the right.

    Why? Because the ceiling of the right wing is Hitler and Mussolini. So, how could Jewish capital ever align with the right? It’s impossible. That’s why this isn’t about who chairs the Fed.

    So don’t let media noise brainwash you; don’t fixate on whether Trump will fire Powell. Even if he does, it’s meaningless. Because the person who ends up in that seat is ultimately chosen by Jewish financial capital, not by the president.

    “Jewish Capital” Helped Defeat Harris
    So now we can understand why the Fed, even as dollar assets are being dumped and its credibility is under threat, remains hands-off. There’s a reason.

    Take the Fed’s first rate cut on September 18 last year. Professionally speaking, the U.S. economy was strong at the time, and there was no reason to cut. But the Fed went ahead and slashed rates by 50 basis points anyway; very telling. The goal was clear: to help Kamala Harris ahead of the November 5 U.S. election. But it still didn’t work.

    Because the capital behind Musk, that is, Silicon Valley tech investment class, chose sides. And in the end, they lost. History made its decision. Nothing can be done about that.

    So at this point, we must accept that the Fed has a position. Why isn’t it cutting rates now? Because Jewish capital like George Soros is actively shorting the market, they shorted Tesla heavily and made a fortune.

    Even Warren Buffett, whom we call the “God of Stocks”, represents Jewish capital [he isn’t Jewish]. Charlie Munger was Jewish [he wasn’t]. Why are they holding so much cash? There’s a reason: they are the short sellers.

    The Only Way Forward: Co-Governance with China
    So, looking at the full logic and overall picture, I once told a joke – before the trade and tariff wars even began: The only one in the world who could truly help Trump and the MAGA movement is China, the major power to the East.

    No one else can help him. Why is China the only one that can untie the knot? Because it all boils back to the master lock: inflation.

    How can the United States break free from the noose that is around its neck and alleviate inflation? China is the only place that the logic leads, and that path can be summed up in one word: gǒu 苟.

    In official documents, they describe it as finding the correct way to coexist: “coexistence and co-governance” 彼此相处之道,共存共治. Yet in internet slang, this idea can be summed up in a single character: gǒu苟: to survive together pragmatically.

    The Wisdom of the Diamond Sutra
    As for the future of the G2 (China and the U.S.), even though the conflict now seems irreconcilable, unravelling it is quite simple. In a way, the Diamond Sutra contains a line full of Chinese wisdom that speaks to this moment: “What you oppose, persists; what you accept, disappears.” Today, we are all enduring suffering. How do we dissolve that suffering? The Diamond Sutra answers:

    For the United States, this means accepting reality: accepting the historical force that has driven China’s rise, an inexorable force they cannot undo. If they accept it, we can renegotiate the global order. Pain and conflict will fade. But if they don’t, then we’ll let hard power do the talking until we find a new equilibrium.

    So everything I’ve said today boils down to this: Though the situation may appear complex, there is only one way forward. No second path.

    We must not rush, especially those of us in business, markets, or investment. Today’s environment is a rare opportunity to “pick up passengers” as China’s core assets back up. Can you grasp it? If you understand the underlying logic of this game, then you can master it. There are many opportunities; huge ones.

    For China, this is like the game of Guandan [掼蛋, a popular card game, where your team wins by running out of cards. See Wiki for rules – we’ve seen our cards clearly, and now we get to set the rules and lead the game.

    The trade war is an act of self-mutilation 自残, the US is only hurting itself

    Who is really being hurt by the U.S.-launched tariff war? The U.S. itself. Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was right to call it self-harm.

    Who is this trade war targeting and destroying? Not the value of Chinese factories, but rather the core value of American multinational capital. Look behind the scenes: Vanguard, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley – It’s all capital [that’s being sacrificed].

    By attacking your supporters, you are making them your adversaries. After that, how long can you remain in that chair? Your team ought to be asking that. What is there to be afraid of, then, if we can see this coming?

    You want science and technology to be decoupled from us? It may be done, but we have also seen where it has taken you so far: Those who try to strangulate others end up “castrating themselves” 挥刀自宫.

    Why? Because in a modern economy, technology must cycle through the market to function – it’s part of a commercial feedback loop. You need market monetization to absorb the high depreciation of tech R&D and to sustain Moore’s Law of iteration. That’s how the business loop works.

    If you can’t sustain that loop, then your tech will soon fall into a trap of obsolescence and cutoff. And we’ve already seen this in practice.

    So yes, software has consumed the world. But now, manufacturing is consuming software. China takes open-source AI software, treats it like air, then uses cheap hardware to scoop up the profits.

    We believe profits are dead, but time is alive. We’re not here to fight over scraps; we want the world. That’s our grand ambition 我不跟你抢钱; 我要的是全世界. 这是我宏大的目标.

    So if you ask me to predict how this conflict ends, It will be war that brings peace; a war that halts the war 以战止战.

    In just one week, the G2 hit max escalation – a full-blown trade shock, a hard decoupling. This is not a steady state. It can’t last.

    So in the end, there will be a deal, even if it’s temporary or partial. Because this “hard break” between the G2 is unsustainable.

    The truly strong stocks have already recovered. Where are they traded? They’re in the sectors that will birth future giants: supply chain security, data and communications security, and personnel security.

    Final Reflections

    Let me leave you with a personal word of advice. These four phrases aren’t mine: “Respond to what comes. Do not chase the future. Do not clutter the present. Leave the past behind” [物来则应,未来不迎,当时不杂,过往不留attributed to late Qing military strategist and reformer Zeng Guofan (1811-1872)].

    Don’t be overly anxious about the uncertainties of the future. Just handle the present well, and let the past be the past. History doesn’t reverse. It can’t be undone. Rely on yourself, not others. If we do our part, no one can stop us.

    At a meeting earlier this year, Foreign Minister Wang Yi quoted a line from The Smiling, Proud Wanderer [笑傲江湖 a wuxia (martial arts/fantasy) novel by Jin Yong (1924-2018)]. I found it powerful and fitting: “Let them rage like the wind – the breeze may only brush the mountains; Let them roar like the great rivers – the moon still shines on its surface 他强任他强,清风拂山岗;他横由他横,明月照大江.

    Link: https://web.archive.org/save/https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2025-04-22/doc-inetyyfe1152430.shtml

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  17. @wilrodx

    The author is a propagandist for the CCP.

    Unz has become infested with wunzmao; paid mouthpieces for the CCP. The comments section is packed with anonymous sinosuckups. Some are even stupid enough to be unpaid!

    Note that on Unz, there is NO counter perspective on China. No author column exists here to counter the CCP propaganda pushed by Bin.

    In China, no dissent is allowed. There is no western communication allowed into China which isn’t CCP sanctioned.

    Yet, Chinese and hammer & sickle eyed white monkeys are free to spout their love for the CCP anywhere in the Western world.

    There is no analog in China where a Westerner outside of China can openly and freely engage with the average Chinese person on an internet forum in China !!!

    Of course not. China is a police state.

    Massive hypocrisy. Where then is the coveted yin / yang balance which defines the Chinese universe where there is nothing but Bin, and no Yang. There’s un-natural imbalance going on which can not last.

    The CCP knows they have to maintain tight control over their population and any spark of an original idea might throw the power balance out of their favor. Mao said a spark can alight a prairie fire. Let’s piss on that spark before it even happens.

    The CCP is a gang of powermad, psychopathic paranoics. The end always justifies the means for them, and raw total perpetual power is their goal.

    For any Chinese reading this, and any idiot wunzmao, do you really want to be the type of man who would turn his own Mother in to the CCP?


    Video Link

  18. HuMungus says:
    @Torna atrás

    Once the US economy goes into recession and US consumer spending crashes, Trump will have no leverage to negotiate any trade deals because everyone will see that the US consumer is broke.

    So instead of being forced to avoid Chinklander goods due to high prices from tariffs, we will avoid them because we have no money.

    Assuming you are correct, then either way the US market for Chinklander goods is GONE!!!!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!

    US trade deficits will shrink automatically from falling US consumer purchasing power. Growth models that relied on generating large net export surpluses vs the US are not sustainable.

    Funny that! The US trade deficit kept on growing! If it takes a trade nuke for that trend to reverse then I am all for a trade nuke.

    The free trade environment of the past 40 years have given people the wrong impression that manufactured products will always be affordable and widely available.

    You mean that they weren’t affordable and widely available before 1985??? Not only were they available and affordable but of much better quality. I still have a 40 year old mini fridge that’s going strong. LOL!!!!!!!!!

  19. @QCIC

    Ultimately, if we want to look at this from the perspective of kokutai (which is really how we should be viewing it — and is how the Asian countries view it –) which is not to satisfy “the economy” or to validate the views of some fuck like Adam Smith or some Jew like Ricardo…

    The point of “re-industrialization” is not to justify some textbook view of economics, it is to re-invigorate the lives and economic prospects of the WHITE working class. Who are being decimated through “deaths of despair” and deliberate, willful, criminal, Jew-induced opioid poisoning.

    All the factories in the world won’t help the USA if they are merely staffed by low-wage illegal or semi-legal Filipinos and diabetic Guatemalans. THAT IS NOT THE POINT. The point is that the USA is (or was) a NATION, not an “economy”, and that as a nation it is explicitly an extension of the white Christian West, NOT an international conglomerate or an “idea” or whatever other poisonous nonsense the Jews will cook up next week in order to undermine and destroy the goyim.

    Re-industrialization does not matter if it is not hand-cuffed to anti-immigration, and dedicated to the actual underlying purpose of White American fertility, and healthy White family formation, and White prosperity. Which is what made all the shitstains want to sneak in here in the first place.

  20. @wilrodx

    The author is trolling thickly (-> J. Swift, A Modest Proposal) 😋

  21. ltlee1 says:

    Regardless what we think of Trump’s tariff war, the trade imbalance between China and the US is indeed substantial and unsustainable in the long term.

    1. Reminds me of an old saying (current application.)

    内无相,外无将,不得已玉帛(美金)相将,将来怎样
    天难度,地难量,这才是帝王(民主)度量,量也无妨

    2. Western nation presses love to blame their problems on China. They often denigrate China’s manufacturing as “over production.” And the accusation was then repeated by Western politicians. In reality, every company everywhere would inevitably follow the iron law of Marginal Revenue equals to Marginal Cost (MR = MC) . It naturally increases production until MR=MC to maximize profit. And reduces production if MR is less than MC, else the more it produces, the less it would get overall. So overproduction over the long term is not a real issue

    If one look deeper, the Sino-US trade relation is no difference from the trade imbalance between Saudi Arabia and a nation without energy reserve and at the same time not good at manufacturing.

    In the case of China, it is able to manufacture better with less because of its human capital and cultural capital. Important inputs to any country’s development or lack of development but often ignored by the presses as well as politicians.

    Both human and cultural capital are part of a country’s resources. Not different from oil reserve of Saudi Arabia. The latter is energy resource rich, China manufacturing talent (a combination of human capital and cultural capital) rich.

  22. ltlee1 says:
    @Torna atrás

    Global capital is currently grossly over-allocated to the US.

    And a lot of hot money will leave the US.
    In some sense the lot money leaving in drove is a matter of when, not if. The global tariff war makes the danger clear and present.

    • Replies: @HuMungus
  23. HuMungus says:

    I ran across an interesting factoid recently. With all the Chinklander lickspittles on this site pimping how China is pulling ahead of the US … here is a dose of reality.

    The JL-10 Chinese jet trainer uses Ukrainian jet engines … because somewhat improved 25 year old Soviet tech is still better then brand spanking new modern Chinese tech. ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!

    https://defence-blog.com/ukraines-motor-sich-awarded-800-million-contract-to-support-chinese-jl-10-trainer-fleet/

    Ukrainian manufacturer of jet engines Motor Sich has agreed to a record $800 million contract with People’s Liberation Army for turbofan AI-322 engine production, according to multiple reports.

    The story was first reported by Defense Express, which cited a defense industry source that stated that China is buying a batch of 400 AI-322 engines for JL-10 fighter trainer aircraft and its L-15 export version.

  24. @USA invades Israel

    Unz has become infested with wunzmao; paid mouthpieces for the CCP. The comments section is packed with anonymous sinosuckups. Some are even stupid enough to be unpaid!

    right now as i read this there are 25 comments. it must be night time in east asia, in the next 12 hours there’ll be 200 comments from cpc agents. one of em is here early see #23 and #24.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  25. HuMungus says:
    @ltlee1

    And a lot of hot money will leave the US.

    A lot of money is already leaving Chinkland! Foreign investment went negative in the 4th quarter of 2024. LOL!!!!

    Meanwhile a LOT of corporations are investing in US production …so that they don’t have to pay Trump’s tariffs. LOL!!!!

    Trump claims as much as $5 trillion in new investments have already been announced.

    In some sense the lot money leaving in drove is a matter of when, not if.

    see above

    The global tariff war makes the danger clear and present.

    also see above! LOL!!!!!

    In other news: The Chinklander plastics industry is facing DOOM as most of its feedstock comes from the US … there are no alternative sources of that feedstock … and they are now subject to 125% Chinklander tariffs.


    Video Link

  26. @arbeit macht frei

    Yankee paranoia is definitely ‘World Class’. You cannot abide other opinions, can you.

  27. @USA invades Israel

    The projection inherent in the gibbering of this racist, Yankee supremacist, troll is HILARIOUS. His family name is Hua, by the way, racist moron. Why need Unz publish the sort of hate-crazed racist bilge that infects ALL Western media, when hate-crazed, racist, gibberers like YOU are here, en bloc?

  28. @anonymous

    Good to see the Chinese understanding Jewintern power. But he errs-Jewish finance controls BOTH US parties, not merely the Democrazies.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  29. @USA invades Israel

    China very very bad. It’s gonna collapse real soon. China bad, very bad. USA really good. I hate myself bc I m Hafu. USA so so good. China imminent collapse. It’s really bad there. Please love me.

    Gordon (uncle) Chang

  30. anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    If Trump loses the midterms next year, then losing the White House four years later is nearly guaranteed. That would prove that the right-wing comeback still couldn’t gain a firm foothold, and the traditional “deep state” in Washington would return. Once restored, they would surely launch political persecution and brutal retribution against the previous wave of right-wing power without question.

    If right-wing is a stand-in for MAGA then what he writes makes sense. Even though the leader of MAGA is controlled by Jewish power, his supporters include many who don’t like Jewish power at all.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Hua Bin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings