The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewHua Bin Archive
China's Underconsumption Myth
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Since COVID, the Chinese economy has been on a wobbly recovery path. A lot of stale conventional wisdom has been aired again for a fresh lease on life. One key such argument is that China has a massive underconsumption issue.

While there is some truth to the relative low level consumption vs. the US, it is hardly the whole picture. The burst of the housing bubble indeed has a knock-on wealth effect that negatively impacts consumers. Cultural factors like high savings rate (as much as 45% of income) also inhibits consumption.

Does this mean Chinese consumers are underspending? Do they suffer from enjoying less products and services compared with high spending countries like the US?

Not necessarily so. Anyone who has lived in China will tell you things (physical products) are just a lot cheaper than the US from cars to electronics to furniture to clothing and food. Services are even cheaper such as dining out, telecom services, public transport, taxi fares, food delivery, haircut, massage, etc etc.

Very importantly, Chinese consumers spend far less on big ticket service items – rental (China home ownership is over 90% compared with 60% in the US), healthcare (largely free or heavily subsidized), and education (free public education all the way through university and graduate school).

It’s not just Chinese consumers spend less to get same, they actually consumer quite a lot given the nominal per capita GDP is less than 20% of US:

  • China has the largest global retail goods sales, 20% larger than US, at dollar value without adjusting for purchasing power
  • China auto sales was 30 million units in 2023 compared with 15 million in the US
  • 13 million residential units were sold in China in 2023 (after 3 years’ negative growth) compared with 4 million sold in the US
  • China accounts for 30% global luxury goods sales, even in economic downturn, 2X of US
  • China is the largest outbound tourist country with 200 million outbound trips made a year
  • China leads the world in sales of mobile phones, LED TV, home electronics, sporting goods and a lot of other consumer goods by a wide margin
  • China consumers 1/3 of electricity generated in the world, reaching 8000 terrawatt hours last year compared with 4000 terrawatt hours for the US
  • China has surpassed the US in per capita daily calorie and protein intake
  • Chinese life expectancy is 78.6 compared with 77.5 in the US, when 18% of US GDP is in the healthcare sector and 7% in China
  • Chinese graduates over 5 million STEM college students a year verse 800,000 in the US
  • Chinese total household debt is $11 trillion vs $17.8 trillion in the US
  • Chinese total household savings is $2 trillion vs. $911 billion in the US
  • According to the Federal Reserve, 40% Americans cannot cover with $400 unexpected expense. I don’t know any comparable number for the Chinese

Based on data, I think it’s safe to argue Chinese consumers don’t underspend compared with global average or even over-consumption countries like the US. They certainly have a bigger cushion in the form of savings and much less indebted.

All said, it is true there are problems with the Chinese economy such as high unemployment for college-educated youth. I think at least part of the reason is the Chinese economy is not producing enough high-paying service sector jobs to absorb such job seekers. In contrast, there are 30 million unfilled manufacturing jobs in the country. As a result, China has the world’s highest adoption of robotics – 50% of all robots sold in the world is in China.

The US does produce a lot more service industry jobs (80% GDP) vs. China (55%). There is clearly more bankers, lawyers, accountants, consultants, insurance agents, PR specialists, stock brokers, computer programmers, real estate agents, health workers in the US. As a result, the average American consumes a lot more services offered by these professions. China produces more (manufacturing GDP at 32% GDP) than US (10%). Therefore, Chinese consumers buy a lot and the country also exports a lot.

We’ll see how each country will find the right equilibrium in their economy and the outcome of their competition in trade, technology and military spaces. Meanwhile, let’s understand the world beyond hype and simple rhetoric that seem to pervail in the mainstream media.

(Republished from Substack by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Economics, Foreign Policy • Tags: China, China/America 
The China/America Series
Hide One CommentLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Vietnam is now running an electronics net export balance of over $100B per year, China’s comparable figure is approximately $650B.

    That means on a per capita basis Vietnam is now exporting electronics at over double the intensity of China.

    The Vietnamese should be proud of what they achieved.

    Below I include a reply made by a Vietnamese to a NAFO criticizing modern Vietnam for her “mistakes”.

    [MORE]

    Sony Thang
    @nxt888
    Mar 22

    Dog, what we won was the one thing your empire feared most:

    The right to decide for ourselves.

    You speak like a servant, trained to believe that sovereignty is meaningless unless it wears your master’s clothes.

    You look at Vietnam, see trade and growth, and think: “Ah, they became one of us.”

    But we didn’t.

    We didn’t fight to be Communist.

    We didn’t fight to be Capitalist.

    We fought to be Vietnamese.

    We fought so no foreign soldier, diplomat, or banker could dictate our future again.

    That’s what your kind will never understand.

    Because you’ve never had to crawl through the mud just to be left alone.

    Because your history is one of taking, not defending.

    Of projecting power, not resisting it.

    You say “Vietnam became capitalist” like it’s some final triumph of America.

    But let me ask you:

    Did we sign that decision in a treaty at Camp David?

    Did we surrender our flag and let your Wall Street viceroys take over?

    No.

    We walked through fire, buried our children, stood over your defeated war machine, and rebuilt from the ashes.

    We entered the global market on our feet—not on our knees.

    You mistake strategy for surrender.

    Adaptation for assimilation.

    You think buying and selling means we were bought and sold.

    But we were never your colony.

    We never flew your flag.

    We never begged your mercy.

    We beat you.

    And when you left, it wasn’t because we “saw the light” of capitalism.

    It was because your empire failed to break us.

    And once we stood free, we decided for ourselves how to live.

    That’s the difference.

    You invade to control.

    We fought to choose.

    And we did.

    So no—Vietnam didn’t become what you wanted.

    Vietnam became what we earned.

    Sovereign.

    Independent.

    Unapologetically our own.

    Now tell me, Dog:

    Which one of us still needs to serve someone else’s idea of victory?

    Because from where I’m standing, you sound like a man trying to justify a leash.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Hua Bin Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings