The people of this country have had their heads up their asses for decades. We continue to elect, re-elect, and re-re-elect dumbasses to political power that do everything they can to absolutely destroy this country from the inside out. What is the sense of throwing trillions of dollars at forever wars that waste our resources while our infrastructure, including our electrical generation capacity, is allowed to rot and crumble before our eyes? All of that in support of the defense of Israel over our own welfare. And it looks like Trump is only half-heartedly attempting to correct this on-going folly. The future belongs to China and Russia because they are not driven by the Jewish cabal that has gripped this benightd land.

Is the writing of “Hua Bin” a DeepSink (ie. CCP) creation?

$0.165/KWh in the US

Ha, in California, electricity tops out at .52/KWh, one of many reasons why business can’t leave fast enough.

“All we want is friendship and trade”

-CCP proverb

Video Link

On the other hand, in the US, a recent Paulson Institute report shows there are more graduates of Chinese universities working in top AI labs in the US (38%) than graduates from US schools (36%). If Chinese researchers educated from US schools are included, over half researchers in top American AI labs are ethnic Chinese.

In summary, as the AI war intensifies, China is strengthening each part of the AI tech stack, overcoming bottlenecks imposed by the US, and pushing for faster innovation and commercialization. In the long run, China’s advantages in human capital and energy infrastructure will give it an extra competitive edge.

It’s difficult to know what the US can do.

Probably the best option would be to abandon Empire altogether and go home. Forget about China, Israel, overseas military bases and the NWO.

North America is rich in resources and could get to work rebuilding its infrastructure reestablish its industry and let the Rest of the World do what they want.

Hua seems angry!

Make no mistake – the US declared war on China when it put a chokehold on China’s advanced chip imports in 2022.

I suppose that Hua can call it a declaration of war, if he wishes to be absurd. Meanwhile, is Hua under the impression that the United States were obliged to ship China whatever China wants, whenever China wants it?

I thought that China neither needed nor wanted American exports, anyway.

If Hua’s furious views represent the views of the Chinese state then, apparently, China has unfortunately (like the United States) become agreement-incapable.

The battle for AI adoption is really a battle for low crime. On that count the PRC is clearly ahead of USA.

Bismuth subsalicylate vs Gallium arsenide which would work better for faster chips?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallium_arsenide

As power generation and transmission is fully state-owned, China can make long-term strategic investments in its power sector, including electricity supply for AI data centers.

Yes. Unless we adapt (in so many areas) we will not compete. Simple as that.

Wait until US companies port their AI onto quantum computers. Bye-bye China. Imagine if the USA built a force shield around China blocking everything form entering or leaving the country. Russia also. Iran too.

Anyway, good story in the NYT Friday about AI:

Powerful A.I. Is Coming. We’re Not Ready.
Three arguments for taking progress toward artificial general intelligence, or A.G.I., more seriously — whether you’re an optimist or a pessimist.
By Kevin Roose
March 14, 2025Updated 10:55 a.m. ET

Here are some things I believe about artificial intelligence:

I believe that over the past several years, A.I. systems have started surpassing humans in a number of domains — math, coding and medical diagnosis, just to name a few — and that they’re getting better every day.

I believe that very soon — probably in 2026 or 2027, but possibly as soon as this year — one or more A.I. companies will claim they’ve created an artificial general intelligence, or A.G.I., which is usually defined as something like “a general-purpose A.I. system that can do almost all cognitive tasks a human can do.”

I believe that when A.G.I. is announced, there will be debates over definitions and arguments about whether or not it counts as “real” A.G.I., but that these mostly won’t matter, because the broader point — that we are losing our monopoly on human-level intelligence, and transitioning to a world with very powerful A.I. systems in it — will be true.

I believe that over the next decade, powerful A.I. will generate trillions of dollars in economic value and tilt the balance of political and military power toward the nations that control it — and that most governments and big corporations already view this as obvious, as evidenced by the huge sums of money they’re spending to get there first.

I believe that most people and institutions are totally unprepared for the A.I. systems that exist today, let alone more powerful ones, and that there is no realistic plan at any level of government to mitigate the risks or capture the benefits of these systems.
…
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/14/technology/why-im-feeling-the-agi.html

We used to have monopoly suppliers, regulated by a PUC. The good old days. Now we have armies of solar/wind scamsters, aggregators, … mountains of bullshit. End result? Instability and higher prices.

Take if for what you will:

China unveils processor ‘a million times faster’ than US rival – developers
The Zuchongzhi-3 chip vastly outperforms Google’s Sycamore chip, according to its creators

https://www.rt.com/business/614243-china-processor-faster-us-rival/

‘Wall Street’ benefits and profits from conflict and chaos, the DOW was 9000 in 2002 it was 45000 in december 2024 then crashed 20% the other day..

Somebody has been printing money like it was going out of fashion this last twenty years. our manufacturing industry has been halved. but govt jobs thrive of course, they hire more and more useless pointless useless eaters.

Traditionally industry and its support services was the wealth of a country, not any more, its the money printers, ie banksters.

20% of the economy is legitimate and has people who are willing to work for a wage and for the good of society. Or gullible enough to be willing to work for slave wages to avoid starvation.

80% is useless eaters and thieves, both financial and govt types.

“The Zuchongzhi-3 chip vastly outperforms Google’s Sycamore chip, according to its creators ”

“Chinese scientists have unveiled a new superconducting quantum computing prototype they say operates a million times faster than Google’s top quantum processors. The Chinese chip is also a quadrillion times more efficient than any conventionally built supercomputer, according to a statement issued by its creators.”

Damn! Sounds like we will have warp speed spaceships and wormholes any day now. Cold fusion anyone?

Here’s another Chinese computing invention:

China’s new silicon-free chip beats Intel with 40% more speed and 10% less energy
The new bismuth-based transistor could revolutionize chip design, offering higher efficiency while bypassing silicon’s limitations.
Updated: Mar 11, 2025 07:34 AM EST
https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/chinas-chip-runs-40-faster-without-silicon

This sounds interesting as it would improve electron flow but there is an awful lot of work required to prove that bismuth based transistors could work in production and be scaled. Plus, new manufacturing facilities would have to be constructed. So any use of this technology in the real world is probably 10-20 years away at minimum.

However, this is backward looking technology. Bleeding edge in chip design is photonic chips (using light instead of electrons) which should be significantly faster and generate minimal heat. This seems where research $$ should be deployed.

US corporations are losing money, big time, in not shipping to their prime customer, China. You Yanks whinged about trade deficits, then shut off one of your biggest exports to China. And stupidity and racist arrogance to think that the Chinese still pulled rickshaws and could not ‘innovate’, which they disproved in a few years. Build a ten foot wall, and they build a twenty foot ladder. You shot yourselves in your big mouths.

Yanks can’t accept the efforts of others. Race hatred, arrogance and contempt are the very bedrocks of Yankee Doodlism. The US and its toxic mind-worm, Israel, would rather destroy humanity than just be one of the crowd.

You Yanks are SUCH sore losers.

” … ‘ … A recent Paulson Institute report [says that the Chinese dominate US AI research] … ‘ …”

The Paulson Institute is a joke. The founder — discredited former US Treasury Secretary and Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs Henry M. “Hank” Paulson — oversaw the 2008 financial collapse that resulted in $16 trillion in financial losses and over 900,000 homes being lost to foreclosure, with at least two million Americans being rendered homeless.

Goldman Sachs profited from the financial crisis by betting against the subprime mortgage market. At the same time, it was recommending and selling subprime mortgage-backed securities to unwitting customers. Pure scumbag behavior. All overseen by Paulson, who kept saying the housing market was fine or that it would “turn around soon.”

From Wikipedia, Henry Paulson: ” … Paulson has personally built close relations with China during his career. In July 2008, The Daily Telegraph reported ‘Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson has intimate relations with the Chinese elite, dating from his days at Goldman Sachs when he visited the country more than 70 times’ … On June 27, 2011, Paulson announced the formation of the Paulson Institute, a non-partisan, independent ‘think and do’ tank dedicated to fostering a US-China relationship that serves to maintain global order in a rapidly evolving world … He was the founding Chairman of the Advisory Board of the School of Economics and Management at Tsinghua University in Beijing … In the 2010 documentary Inside Job, Paulson is cited as one of the persons responsible for the economic meltdown of 2008 and was named in Time Magazine as one of the ’25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis.’”

The Paulson Institute disregards other university rankings (including the Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities) in order to elevate the prestige of Chinese universities by relying on Nature Index, which counts the number of articles published in 145 science and health publications and then ranks universities purely based on the number of researchers involved in writing the articles. Each researcher and each article is treated exactly the same, with no consideration given to the merit of the articles or the ability of other scientists to reproduce their findings (Source: Wikipedia, Nature Index).

Naturally, Hua Bin seizes on this in order to draw inaccurate conclusions about the comparative merit of universities and pump up China’s image.

Hua Bin would have you think that over half of all AI researchers in the US are Chinese. But a quick check shows that Chinese (US born or not) only make up about 5% of AI faculty and researchers at Harvard, Stanford, MIT, Berkeley and Cal Tech. The Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) ranks Harvard as the best university in the world, with Stanford second, MIT third, Berkeley 5th and Cal Tech 8th.

Which University did you grace, troll. UP-the University of Palookaville? Keeping kidding yourself, as China sails off into the distance. Have you checked out Manus yet? So sad-not!

Naturally, Hua Bin seizes on this in order to draw inaccurate conclusions about the comparative merit of universities and pump up China’s image.

I don’t blame you….it is funny how Western media keeps suspiciously quiet about things like this.

China will soon achieve what the world has been waiting for.

Previously fusion was only able to be sustained for milliseconds.

Now China achieved 17 minutes of fusion reaction. Indefinite burn is within grasp.

Video Link

“Which university did you grace, troll?”

I already told you about my education — at your request.

I then invited you to tell me about your education, which you refused to do.

So tell me about your education. Then maybe — if you’re lucky — I’ll tell you more about mine.

“Manus.”

Oh, I’m so impressed – not.

Do you mean this?

I attended a university that is consistently ranked in the top five in the world.

Did you graduate? With a full degree? A full time minimum 4 year course?

You are unlikely to be from an arts based discipline because you thought that ancient Greeks depicted their gods as Nordics.

You are unlikely to be from a STEM based discipline because you have no knowledge of China’s advances in Fusion and Thorium

From the dismal quality of your comments, I seriously doubt that you even attended them.

“Did you graduate? With a full degree? A full time [sic] minimum 4 year [sic] course?”

Well, since mulga mumblebrain wouldn’t tell me anything about her education after I told her about mine, you will have to tell me about your education first.

“You are unlikely to be from an arts based [sic] discipline because you thought that ancient Greeks depicted their gods as Nordics.”

Their gods did have Nordic features.

“You are unlikely to be from a STEM based [sic] discipline because you have no knowledge of China’s advances in Fusion [sic] and Thorium [sic].”

Why do you capitalize fusion and thorium?

“China’s advances …”

China’s copying and faking, you mean. Nice CGI effects in that video you posted.

” … from the dismal quality of your comments …”

Said by someone who doesn’t know when to capitalize and when not to capitalize, when to put in dashes, and when to spell out numbers.

Their gods did have Nordic features.

LOL, you have already been shown ancient Greek depictions. Must we dig them up again to refresh you on your ignorance?

Why do you capitalize fusion and thorium?

For Emphasis. Why do you Obfuscate?

Said by someone who doesn’t know when to capitalize and when not to capitalize, when to put in dashes, and when to spell out numbers.

Pedantry is the FIRST RESORT of someone who has no argument.

China’s copying and faking, you mean. Nice CGI effects in that video you posted.

Resorting to copium?

Read the scientific journal entry for yourself.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666675822000650

or a PHYSICS focussed website.
https://phys.org/news/2025-01-chinese-artificial-sun-fusion-power.html

Well, since mulga mumblebrain wouldn’t tell me anything about her education after I told her about mine, you will have to tell me about your education first.

I graduated from the National Unversity of Singapore (NUS) with a BA(AS), Bachelors of Arts (Architectural Studies); and a BA, Bachelor of Architecture. The course (2 degrees) took 6 years full time.

Quid pro quo.

…typo, it should be BArch, Bachelor of Architecture.

“[Ancient Greek statues do not have Nordic features.]”

The Venus de Milo (Aphrodite) (Louvre Museum) has Nordic features. The same is true of the Discobolus (discus thrower) (British Museum); the Nike of Samothrace (Louvre Museum); Ermis of Praxiteles (Hermes of Praxiteles) (Archaeological Museum of Olympia); the Greek statuette of Neptune (Getty Museum); Laocoon and his Sons (Vatican Museum); the Victorious Youth (Getty Museum); the Marathon Youth (National Archaeological Museum of Athens) and the Apollo Belvedere statue (Roman copy of Greek original) (Vatican Palace).

The crude, non-Nordic-looking statues you presented were done at a time when the Greeks had not yet mastered the art of sculpture.

” … pedantry …”

It’s not being pedantic to expect a well-educated person to write proper English. If you made a habit of reading good books, you would not make such glaring mistakes. You set yourself up for my critique by referring to the “dismal” quality of my comments.

“I graduated from the National University of Singapore.”

The National University of Singapore is ranked 68th in the Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities.

I attended UC Berkeley (ranked 5th) during my freshman and sophomore years and graduated from UC Santa Cruz (ranked somewhere in the top 200 – no specific number given). My BA is in Philosophy and Psychology.

The Venus de Milo (Aphrodite) (Louvre Museum) has Nordic features. The same is true of the Discobolus (discus thrower) (British Museum); the Nike of Samothrace (Louvre Museum); Ermis of Praxiteles (Hermes of Praxiteles) (Archaeological Museum of Olympia); the Greek statuette of Neptune (Getty Museum); Laocoon and his Sons (Vatican Museum); the Victorious Youth (Getty Museum); the Marathon Youth (National Archaeological Museum of Athens) and the Apollo Belvedere statue (Roman copy of Greek original) (Vatican Palace).

These statues were painted when they were first made. Now they look pasty white after all the paint peeled off. Now in ignorance, you think the Greeks meant them to look paler than white.

It’s not being pedantic to expect a well-educated person to write proper English.

For an English exam paper maybe. But not for forums such as these. Dontcha know even smiley faces are acceptable? ;p

But then again, those relying on pendantry to score points wouldn’t agree.

Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities.

WTF?

Since when did Americans start quoting Chinese sources?

You really had to contort yourself to present such a skewed picture. If you keep it up, your eyes will start to get slanty.

Why don’t you quote the other two more notable uni ranking tables such as QS and Times?

……………………QS(2025)…..Times(2025)……Shanghai
NUS……………..8………………17………………….68
UC Berkeley…….12……………..8……………………5
UC SC………….393…………..196…………………151-200

graduated from UC Santa Cruz (ranked somewhere in the top 200 – no specific number given). My BA is in Philosophy and Psychology.

What happened? Couldn’t cut it at Berkeley and had to find some place less competitive?

My BA is in Philosophy and Psychology.

LOL

Was that a mail-order degree from the ‘University of Walla Walla, Washington’, or perhaps Prager U, or Bob Jones University perchance.

To dismiss China’s astounding technological advances as ‘copying and faking’ shows that you are a vicious, racist, moron and ignoramus, but we knew that already. Nothing else need be said-you condemn yourself.

The slimy, racist, toe-rag is shit scared, and mad. He’s been told all his existence that the USA is “number One’ and would be forever, because God wills it, and, now, a bunch of fucking, sub-human, non-‘White’ Chinks have gone and outdone God’s Chosen People (part III) in mere decades. It has destroyed the balance of his ‘mind’. This is the type that will finish humanity off, in a fit of rage at being bested-by their betters.

” … you think the Greeks meant to make them paler than white.”

No, I said they have Nordic features, and they do. They don’t look like monkeys. They don’t look like you.

“For an English exam paper, maybe. But not for forums such as these. Dontcha know even smiley faces are acceptable?”

I wouldn’t have objected to a smiley face. You criticized the quality of my comments. You were being the pedant. So, I pointed out six gross and inexcusable errors that you committed in just four sentences. They are the kind of errors committed by “educated” illiterates who don’t read books.

“Since when [do] Americans [quote] Chinese sources?”

Is there a law against it? I was criticizing Hua Bin, who thinks Chinese universities are the greatest. There is one Chinese source that disagrees with him – the Shanghai ARWU.

“Why don’t you quote the other two notable uni ranking tables such as QS and Times?”

I’ll do even better than that and quote five:

Berkeley: Shanghai – 5, US News and World Report – 5, UniRank -5, Times – 8, QS – 12. Average: 7.

NUS: Shanghai – 68, US News and World Report – 22, UniRank – 148, Times – 17, QS -8. Average: 53.

Santa Cruz: Shanghai 151-200 (split the difference: 175), US News and World Report – 129, UniRank – 95, Times – 196, QS – 393. Average: 198.

So, Berkeley is in the top 10, National University of Singapore is in the top 100, and Santa Cruz is in the top 200.

“What happened? Couldn’t cut it at Berkeley and had to find some place less competitive?”

What happened? Couldn’t get into a top-ten university?

I didn’t go to Berkeley because it was prestigious. I didn’t even think it was at the time. I lived in the Bay Area and didn’t want to leave Northern California. It seemed like an okay place for at least for a couple of years. I could live away from my parents but still be where I wanted to be. That’s the way most people who went there thought.

I remember reading a review of Harvard that said everyone in the world thought it was a great university — except for the people living in the Boston metro area. That’s how it was at Berkeley.

I’d say going to Berkeley was a good experience for an 18-year-old because they don’t coddle you there. It’s not like Stanford where they tell the students that they’re all amazing, precious little geniuses.

Later on, I transferred – in good standing – to Santa Cruz. I liked its major programs better than what was offered at Berkeley. It was a new UC campus, and it was small. I doubt it would have even been ranked at the time. But it was popular and harder to get into than Berkeley.

One of its attractions was that it had few graduate students, which meant hardly any teaching assistants. You were taught by professors. Another was the natural setting – a redwood forest overlooking the ocean. It was a showcase of Bay Region mid-century modern architecture designed to blend into the landscape – although that’s probably of little interest to you.

“LOL”

You’re one to laugh. Architecture is a joke major in the US. Few architects make money, and they mostly design ugly, impractical buildings.

That being said, I’m not a climber like you. I’ve never had to worry about money or a career. I’ve done what I wanted to do.

“He’s been told all [of] his existence that the USA is ‘number one’ …”

We are number one. We are militarily the most powerful. We are four times as wealthy as China on a per capita basis. We have more than 25 times as many Nobel Laureates and 15 times as many Fields medal winners. We have the world’s best universities. We are able to be self-sufficient in energy, food, and virtually everything else. People can say what they want, live where they want and do what they want.

We will continue to be number one if our most fearsome competitor is China — land of mass surveillance, social credit scores and animal torture.

China is only a little better than its mini-me North Korea — which you probably love. It’s only China’s minorities that are appealing and interesting.

Your own pathetic little vassal state of Australia is a big nothingburger. Because of cretins like you, people were dragged out of their homes and thrown into concentration camps during Covid, following China’s example. If you said anything “offensive” on the internet, you had the police knocking on your door.

When are you doing to tell us about your education? Too embarrassing? You’re the one who brought up the subject!

No-one boasts as loudly and emptily as a Yank. Your military is bloated, corrupt, and specialises in defeating mighty enemies like Grenada and the slums of Panama city. If you attack China you’ll get your arse handed to you. China will NEVER attack you-to paraphrase Napoleon, ‘Never interrupt the enemy as they are going raving mad’.
Your racist hatred of China is pretty typical of the worst type of Yank. It’s made far worse by China’s rise-they are the future, and the USA is past. Defunct. DOA. Zombieform. Best split up into seven or so independent states, and start again. You’re correct about Austfailia, a dag on the USA’s arse.

No, I said they have Nordic features,

So do bobble head indians, if the skin shade is not represented.

You criticized the quality of my comments.

Huh? Somehow you equate quality of comments with Capitalisation used for emphasis?

I am talking about the quality of the thinking and argument that goes behind those words. Clearly your thinking doesn’t go very deep, nor very wide.

So, Berkeley is in the top 10, National University of Singapore is in the top 100, and Santa Cruz is in the top 200.

LOL, try harder.
QS is the most notable, followed by Times.

I didn’t go to Berkeley because it was prestigious

Bla bla bla lots of excuses. It is evident through the poor quality of your comments that you couldn’t cut it in top uni.

…. in the US. Few architects make money,

Yeah. I was warned by my aunt who was an international businesswoman. She knew an architect in the USA who used to wait for special events at McDonalds to buy up burgers on promotion prices.

But that is the USA….you guys live on another planet. These are not my words. They come from an Aussie colleague one day at lunch. There were Brits, Aussies, Germans at the lunch table, the Aussie guy was complaining about our American colleague. He is pretty much right. Americans assume they are the best in the world, and everybody should emulate them…LOL.

Few architects make money,

Maybe so in the USA. But I retired at 45. I haven’t worked a day since. Thank goodness it is so easy to travel to other countries from where I am. I travel overseas once a month to keep entertained. One hour flight brings me to Malaysia and Indonesia. Three hours to Bangkok and Bali. Five hours to Perth in Australia, Taiwan, Southern China and India. Eight hours brings me to Dubai, Beijing, Tokyo and Sydney.

Two weeks ago I was in Chengdu China looking at pandas. In two weeks I am going to Malaysia for a gluttony trip. Next month I am going to Bangkok.

Where shall I go for my monthly trip after Bangkok? Its a toss up between Japan (yet again) or Vietnam. Deciding where to go is the hard part. Maybe you can help me decide?

Architecture is a joke

LOL, nothing can be funnier than psychology or philosopy. Combine them, and even funnier.

littlereddot to meamjojo: “I am a freelance Safari Guide …” *

littlereddot in comment #36 in this thread: ” … I retired at 45. I haven’t worked a day since.”

LOL So, you aren’t working but you are working.

” … bobble head Indians [have Nordic features] …”

No, they look like you.

” … you couldn’t cut it in a top uni.”

I was admitted to a university ranked in the top ten in the world and left in good academic standing.
You can’t say the same. I doubt you went to any university. The one thing we know about you is that you’re a liar. My guess is that you’re a shapeshifting Jew. Chinese one day, Singaporean the next; architect one day, Safari Guide the next. I can’t wait to hear your next tall tale!

“I retired at 45 … I travel overseas once a month to keep entertained.”

Sure you do.

*******************************************

* Comment #80, Jewish Plan for the Future – Take Your Land and Turn You into a Jew by Hua Bin (March 24, 2025)

** World university rankings: Average rank for Berkeley – #7. Average rank for National University of Singapore – # 53.

LOL So, you aren’t working but you are working.

People who lack intelligence are only able to interpret things literally. I am not surprised you got booted out of Berkeley.

Sure you do.

The fact that you can’t believe anyone can retire at 45 shows how far you are from that reality.

** World university rankings: Average rank for Berkeley – #7. Average rank for National University of Singapore – # 53.

1. Average according to whom? Your dubious method of cherry picking the sources? Use the top rated agency, QS.
2. You shouldn’t be quoting Berkeley your degree was not awarded from them….your degree is from Santa Cruz or whatever shithole uni that was…I can’t remember.

” … interpret things literally …”

You were caught in a lie.

Now you try to pretend it didn’t happen.

Then you add another lie, claiming I was kicked out of Berkeley. And yet another lie, claiming I don’t believe anyone can retire at 45. Just one lie after the other from you. This is typical shapeshifting kike behavior.

“Your dubious method of cherry-picking sources.”

I averaged all the different rankings. That’s not cherry-picking.

” … top rated agency, QS.”

You have no basis for claiming QS is the top-rated “agency.” It’s not an agency. It’s a business trying to get money from students and would-be students. That’s not true of the Shanghai or London Times rankings. They are much more credible than QS.

“You shouldn’t be quoting Berkeley.”

Why not? I was able to get into a university ranked in the top ten in the world – and usually in the top five – and maintain good academic standing. You weren’t able to do that.

But don’t be ashamed. Getting into a university ranked number 53rd isn’t bad – assuming you actually went there, which I doubt, because you said less than two weeks ago that you are working as a Safari Guide rather than as the architect you claimed to be.

You said in this thread, “I retired at 45. I haven’t worked a day since.”

But less than two weeks ago, you told mulga mumblebrain you were working as a Safari Guide.

So, you’re a liar. Nothing you say is credible.

” … your degree is from Santa Cruz or whatever shithole uni that was.”

If you call a university ranked in the top 200 a shithole, why shouldn’t I call 53rd-ranked National University of Singapore a shithole? If you want to play it that way, then I’m the only one here who went to a university ranked in the top ten, and usually in the top five.

So, what lies are you going to come up with next?

You were caught in a lie.

Only you would think it is a lie.

People with more brains understand it as sarcasm.

Stupid people wouldn’t understand. Thank you for displaying yet again why you couldn’t cut it at Berkeley.

littlereddot, comment #36 in this thread, April 1, 2025: “I retired at 45. I haven’t worked a day since.”

littlereddot, comment #80, Hua Bin, Jewish Plan for the Future – Take Your Land and Turn You into a Jew, March 24, 2025: “I am a freelance Safari Guide.”

Where is the sarcasm? There isn’t any.

You are a proven liar. And when you’re caught, you add additional lies.

littlereddot, comment #80, Hua Bin, Jewish Plan for the Future – Take Your Land and Turn You into a Jew, March 24, 2025: “I am a freelance Safari Guide.”

Please quote the entirety of my reply #80

You are too stupid to read the whole reply and stopped at the first sentence.

You keep proving again and again why you could not cut it at Berkeley.

“Please quote the entirety of my reply #80.”

You quote it. You say you were being sarcastic. So, go ahead and show how. I’m not going to do your work for you.

You are a liar. There is no escaping from that fact, you miserable little cretin.

Busted! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

existing plants are decades old and use updated technologies

I JUST DON’T understand …

The onus of proof is on the accuser.

You accuse me of being a liar. So you provide the proof.
You have said it is in #80. You have already gone through the trouble of finding it, noting the comment number, then specifying it on this tread. Why are you hesitating now? … Proof of my lying is so easily within reach !!!!

Even better still, since you like to cross post between threads, why not post your proof on one of the current threads where there are lots of readers?

Don’t you want to prove to lots more people that I am a liar?

Go on, if you dare.

Your own words convict you.

“I am a liar”

Exactly.

Your own words convict you.

“I am a liar”

Exactly.

Duh. First flunked out of Berkeley.
Now reverted to being 5 years old.

Berkeley had no choice but to kick you out. They knew that if they had given you a degree their reputation would have be stained forever.

Folks would be saying “This guy is a graduate from Berkeley? Wow, their standards have really reached rock bottom”.

So how many safaris are you leading this year?

Are you the head guide or just the water boy?

Didn’t you read that message? I give targets to people who want to hunt Yanks after the USA collapses, and it becomes a hunting ground for angry people from all over the world.

For example, if an angry Iraqi who lost a father during the illegal invasion of Iraq wants vengeance and to bag a Yank head trophy or two. I will search my database in the cloud and find people who in the past have expressed hatred for “towelheads”, “muzzies” that kind of thing. Those are the most deserving targets. I don’t ask for much. A token payment is enough. I do it for the sake of justice.

The collapse of USA is coming soon. Hunting season is almost here.

Do you like my business idea?

“Do you like my business idea?”

It sounds stupid, like you.