Everything is political under mass democracy. In a large, diverse democracy, perhaps everything becomes anti-white. This seems especially true in the media, and perhaps no country’s press is quite as hysterical as the United Kingdom’s. Currently, what right-wingers despairingly call the “Yookay” is undergoing a full-scale media, cultural, and political panic over a story they invented for the TV series Adolescence. At the same time, the political class ignores the actual problems they have imported.
British “soft power” was once supported by its unparalleled cultural legacy, but much like the government’s public policy, it seems that even “apolitical” British culture has become openly anti-white. For example, Doctor Who is one of the most famous exports of British popular culture. Today, the show has a political mission. In 2016, white actor Steven Moffat said the show needed more diversity, not just for outreach, but as a kind of social duty. This included putting black characters in historic settings where none existed.
The actor argued that this was a Noble Lie. “We’ve kind of got to tell a lie,” he said. “We’ll go back into history and there will be black people where, historically, there wouldn’t have been, and we won’t dwell on that. We’ll say, ‘To hell with it, this is the imaginary, better version of the world. By believing in it, we’ll summon it forth.’”
The modern UK does not seem “better” than what existed before, unless one has a truly powerful imagination. Yet this Tinkerbell version of public policy, where racial harmony is achieved if one just claps hard enough, has a powerful appeal in a mass democracy, especially one with a media-dominated culture like that of the United Kingdom.
Unlike young people in many European countries (and even in the United States), British youth are not turning to the Right. It is more comforting to believe social problems can be solved by properly managing the media, rather than admitting some conflicts are existential and ineradicable. Even moderate liberals cannot admit racial realities without calling into question the entire postwar Western order.
It is therefore not surprising that enforcing narrative control is an important purpose of many “entertainment” programs today. The central premise of progressivism is that man is perfectible; it is just a matter of finding the right management techniques. In the information age, this has led to liberal democracies embracing censorship, deplatforming, and prosecutions to prevent “hate.” If the virtual world can be managed effectively, real-world problems will not occur.
For example, if blacks do not perform well in school, the explanation is not genetic differences but “stereotyping.” Therefore, if blacks get more positive portrayals in media, they will perform better. In the real world, such thinking is fanciful.
However, those in power have not changed their minds. In a liberal democracy, the ultimate power is media power, because media shape public opinion. Social media and the internet have made it harder for elites to push a unified message on the masses. Naturally, elites want to stop this. Nothing can ever be truly “apolitical” in a democracy.
The German philosopher Carl Schmitt wrote in The Concept of the Political (1932):
The equation state = politics becomes erroneous and deceptive at exactly the moment when state and society penetrate each other. What had been up to that point affairs of state become thereby social matters, and, vice versa, what had been purely social matters become affairs of state — as must necessarily occur in a democratically organized unit. Heretofore ostensibly neutral domains — religion, culture, education, the economy — then cease to be neutral in the sense that they do not pertain to state and to politics. As a polemical concept against such neutralizations and depoliticalizations of important domains appears the total state, which potentially embraces every domain. This results in the identity of state and society. In such a state, therefore, everything is at least potentially political, and in referring to the state it is no longer possible to assert for it a specifically political characteristic.
In his excellent book The Total State (2024), political columnist Auron MacIntyre argues that this is precisely what is happening to the United States . However, it is not just a structural flaw of democracy. The racial diversity that those who rule the West have imported means that citizens have less in common. Most Western countries today do not even have a common culture. Our rulers implicitly admit this when, instead of using phrases such as “my fellow citizens,” they appeal to “our communities” — mutually exclusive tribes that must be carefully managed in a multicultural powder keg.
New South Wales Premier Chris Minns recently admitted as much. “We live in the best country in the world, but people come to Australia from all different races and religions, different countries, different cultures, because they want to live together in peace and harmony,” he said at a March 18 news conference. “You have to take steps to protect that. There can’t just be a willy-nilly, race to the bottom where civic society turns a blind eye and says ‘freedom of speech, people can say what they want.’ That’s not the case in New South Wales. We don’t have the same freedom of speech laws that they have in the United States, and the reason is that we love the country that we’ve got here and we’re going to take steps to protect what’s been built up over decades.”
If the White Australia policy had been kept in place to protect what had been built up over a century, Australians would still have what was once considered the most essential freedom of all. The same is true of the United Kingdom and Europe, where free speech has long since died. Vice President JD Vance pointed this out. Yet even this understates the threat. Multiracial societies must be united by something, and the best way of uniting a group is through a common enemy, and it is the white man who finds himself Public Enemy Number One in his own country, with racism blamed for any conceivable social problems Non-whites, regardless of their shameful behavior, remain victims.
Sam Francis memorably coined “anarcho-tyranny” to describe the increasing state repression of the (mostly white) law-abiding citizens and indulgence of non-white criminals. Lawrence Auster on his View from the Right blog defined what he called the First Law of Majority-Minority Relations: “The worse any designated minority or alien group behaves in a liberal society, the bigger become the lies of Political Correctness in covering up for that group.” Auster also framed the “first corollary” of the First Law. “The more egregiously any non-Western or non-white group behaves, the more evil whites are made to appear for noticing and drawing rational conclusions about that group’s bad behavior.”
By ignoring actual social dysfunction and cracking down on the law-abiding, the political class increases its own power, creating more problems for intrusive government to manage. It also establishes its moral claim to leadership. Politicians pose as defenders of democracy against racists, extremists, and fascists.
The problem is that this denies reality and can be taken only so far. Even many non-whites do not want to live in crime-ridden squalor. Leftists in America are still reeling from the non-white shift toward Republicans in 2024. Yet white advocates should not assume that reality always wins in the end. Mass media allow elites to invent an alternate reality that is more emotionally compelling than the real thing. Even when people know at some level they are watching a television show or movie, the emotional responses are real, and can sometimes be even more engrossing than what they experience in real life.
If a show or film is of sufficient quality, and plays upon long-established assumptions of the audience (such as the perceived moral superiority of anti-racism), it can feel “real” to the audience. Films such as Roots, Schindler’s List, and Glory have shifted public debate about race in the United States toward the political Left. In an earlier era, Birth of a Nation had such a big impact that some credit it with fueling the growth of the second-era Ku Klux Klan.
Yet these and other films at least covered events that were based in history, even if details are exaggerated for dramatic effect or skewed for political purposes. One cannot deny that black slavery was real, even if no slave was whipped for not calling himself “Toby.” However, could a regime invent a case and use it as “proof” to push repressive legislation? Could it even reverse who is considered the stereotypical victim and oppressor in the public mind? If democracies could do such a thing, it would mean they could essentially dictate policy outcomes from the top down, regardless of the facts.
Such an experiment seems to be underway in the United Kingdom with the television series Adolescence. It focuses on a 13-year-old white boy from an intact family who kills a female classmate because he has been “radicalized” by the internet. The reaction from the British press and government is extraordinary, with reporters and politicians arguing quite seriously that the show must be integrated into school curricula and that social media must be even more heavily regulated to prevent “radicalization.” Such figures seem especially to hate Andrew Tate, who is attacked by name in the show.
Progressives have long mocked religious conservatives who, in a moral panic, supposedly tell parents to prevent their children from indulging in entertainment such as Dungeons & Dragons or violent rap. Yet the message of Adolescence is clear: Parents can never let their guard down, even for a moment. Though the protagonist has a loving family, pro-masculinity influencers corrupt him while he is in his room with the door closed. The same people who would laugh at conservative Christians demanding parents throw out their children’s rap albums seem deeply concerned their teenage boy could be watching the wrong clips on TikTok.
The reaction from the press is nothing short of rapturous. State media BBC said it is being hailed as “flawless” TV. Tom Peck at The Times said it was “perfect.” Lucy Mangan at The Guardian was more restrained, calling it merely “close” to perfection. Jake Kanter at Deadline calls it “flawless.” Even Jeremy Clarkson, who has sometimes been put forward as a potential British populist champion because of his opposition to the Labour government’s agricultural policies, called it “masterful.”
One might dismiss this as marketing, except government officials seem to be taking it as a kind of documentary and a call to action. Parliament reportedly invited the writers to discuss the themes of the show with MPs. Prime Minister Keir Starmer wants it shown in schools. A female member of parliament said it shows the danger of “online male radicalization” and asks for more government control over social media. Schools should seek to teach young men about “healthy relationships,” supposedly to counter Andrew Tate’s influence. One wonders whether schools with non-white or Islamic student bodies will bother, or whether this will apply only to British children.
However, an objective analysis shows that more young women are being “radicalized” by social media than young men. This shift to extremist feminism and progressivism serves the interests of media, academia, and most governments. Therefore, it is not a threat.
In fact, the moral panic over Adolescence suggests that critics are right that social media can brainwash people, but they are worried about the wrong people. It is the liberal elites and the Great and the Good who are having a hard time distinguishing fantasy from reality.
The show itself displays the schizophrenia we often see in media with young white males. The main character is weak, self-loathing, and wets himself when he is arrested. His father (played by Stephen Graham) is meant to be the moral center of the film, but the show cannot help but take shots at him too, showing his wife to be sexually uninterested in him. White males, it seems, are violent monsters who could overthrow society at any moment, but they are also pathetic pushovers. Whites are both all-powerful and pitiable.
Meanwhile, Stephen Graham, who has mostly built his career around playing “tough guy” characters, also wants censorship. He claims he suffered “racist abuse” while growing up because he had a Jamaican grandfather, though this has not stopped him from being cast as a skinhead in the past. “What is happening to our young men these days and what are the pressures they face from their peers, from the internet and from social media?” he asks rhetorically.
Mr. Graham has referred to three cases that might have inspired the show. He cited the case of Elianne Andam as an inspiration. She was a 15-year-old black girl stabbed to death by 17-year-old Hassan Sentamu, a native of Uganda. Mr. Sentamu was recently sentenced to life in prison for the crime. He had a long history of attacking girls and carrying weapons. Unlike in Adolescence, the murderer is exactly the kind of person you think would commit such a crime, with the killing preceded by less serious but ominous acts.
Mr. Graham also cites a stabbing in Liverpool. In 2021, a young white girl, Ava White, was stabbed to death by an unnamed perpetrator (who cannot be identified for legal reasons). The victim’s mother, however, says the show is not based on her daughter’s death. Yet, in the same BBC interview, she praises the show for going after “all the dangers on social media and the bad influencers like Andrew Tate.” Because the murderer has never been identified, his race cannot be determined. Though (blurred) video footage suggests he is probably not black, it is impossible to tell if he is white or not.
Finally, Mr. Graham cites the stabbing of “Brianna” Grey. Brianna Grey was killed by a boy and a girl, the latter of whom had reportedly become “obsessed” with the victim. Yet Grey was not a young girl but a boy who had transitioned. At any other time in history, we would call this the murder of a teenage boy by a co-ed team, not an act of anti-female violence. Though media coverage of the case focused on “transphobic” rhetoric, the two murderers had made a “kill list” of other children to attack.
Thus, of the three cases that reportedly inspired Adolescence, only the Ava White case even slightly resembles what is being portrayed. Moreover, because we do not know who the murderer in that case is, we cannot even say that much with any confidence. On social media, many are pointing this out. In response, co-scriptwriter Jack Thorne has denied that the series is based on fact. “There is no part of this that’s based on a true story, not one single part,” he wrote.
Perhaps he is telling the truth. However, he wants real-life consequences to result from a show that he claims is totally fictional. He wants his preferred policy outcomes, but he does not want the responsibility of making a case based on factual information.
Jack Thorne says we need more government control over speech. “We need government to do something because they need to control the conversation on this one,” he told the BBC Breakfast audience. “I hope that means we can use this moment to provoke this Government to consider quite serious change,” he said on the BBC Newsnight program. However, now that people online are pointing out who is actually committing much of the violence in the United Kingdom, he is upset. He told The News Agents podcast: “We are not making a point about race with this. We are making a point about masculinity. We’re trying to get inside a problem. We’re not saying this is one thing or another. We’re saying this is about boys .”
Yet why should we accept his argument? “Representation matters,” we are often told, and the fact is that a white boy was identified as the face of violence against women in a show that the government is trying to use as the basis for action. Besides, why should we listen to the writer’s supposed point about masculinity when he simultaneously says the show is entirely fiction?
Not surprisingly, Jack Thorne also wants more funding from the British government for the arts. Warp Films, which produced the show, received money from the government-funded UK Global Screen Fund. We are thus in the absurd situation where actors and writers made up a story, made sure to make a white boy the enemy, and used their fantasy to lobby for more restrictions on free speech. Meanwhile, politicians and journalists are joining this totally imaginary “movement” to crack down on what was once the most essential freedom in a democracy. They made up an imaginary figure to get mad at.
What is real are the crimes that are happening now. Recently, Elm Park near London witnessed the following scene.
Earlier this week, Mohammed Sohail Farooq was sentenced to life in prison for a plot to attack a hospital where he worked as a “trainee nurse.” He was reportedly influenced by the Islamic State.
According to the Daily Express, 99.5 percent of crimes in Great Britain result in no one being jailed. Habitual criminals are among those who benefit, with those who have received more than 50 convictions having been spared jail in more than 50,000 cases since 2017. The British state cracking down on speech while refusing to prosecute real crime, even by habitual offenders, is precisely what race realists would predict.
Even the “Two Minutes Hate” against Andrew Tate makes little sense. The influencer is more popular among non-whites than whites, with more than 40 percent of blacks viewing him positively.
Nonetheless, even the parents of one of the victims of the Southport mass stabbing attack think part of the solution — in addition to more knife control — is to prevent people from seeing Andrew Tate’s content online. In reality, the Southport killer was Axel Rudakubana, a non-white with a long history of extremism known to the government. This did not stop Keir Starmer from blaming “young men in their bedrooms” viewing extremist content. Though the suspect possessed an Al-Qaeda manual and reportedly made ricin, police claim they had found “no motive.”
In the aftermath of the crime, the British state ruthlessly suppressed unrest, imprisoning British people who tweeted about the case. When one considers this reaction, it is difficult to believe the British government actually wants to stop crime and that it is not merely interested in silencing white men who could pose a political threat.
The practice of changing the racial identity of characters for fictionalized crime dramas is long established. In the British film Eden Lake (2008), a working-class group of youths terrorizes a white middle-class couple. In one notable scene, the group’s leader (a white boy) “necklaces” a non-white child by burning him alive. Of course, not only have “anti-apartheid’ activists in South Africa practiced such things, but a white child named Kriss Donald was burned alive by Pakistanis in Scotland after being beaten and stabbed 13 times. The case, which occurred four years earlier than the movie’s release, received little media attention.
One of black actor Samuel L. Jackson’s most iconic roles was A Time to Kill (1996). The film, as well as the novel on which it is based, is a vicious racial attack on whites. The movie opens when a young black girl is raped and nearly killed by two white men. When their ensuing trial appears ready to free the duo, the girl’s father — played by Mr. Jackson — guns them down, while also severely wounding a white deputy sheriff. In the father’s trial, while being cross-examined by the DA, the father shouts, “Yes, they deserved to die and I hope they burn in hell!” His heroic white lawyer confronts the prejudice of the white community and secures an acquittal, to the rage of the Ku Klux Klan.
Of course, white-on-black rapes are vanishingly rare in real life. More importantly, the real case that inspired the novel, according to author John Grisham, was the July 11, 1984, rape of two white sisters, Julie (16) and Marcie (12) Scott, by William James Harris, a black man. Presumably, the brutal rape of two white girls by a black man is not artistically compelling, so the races were reversed. This gave the audience an opportunity to celebrate a triumph against imaginary political and racial enemies.
In 1981, Anthony Jacques Broussard, a black 16-year-old, killed 14-year-old Marcy Renee Conrad, a white girl. He raped the corpse and bragged about his deed to classmates. This inspired the film The River’s Edge (1986), which critics loved. That could partly be because the murderer was transformed into a white character, played by Daniel Roebuck.
Even relatively trivial incidents can be race swapped. One of the earliest truly viral media phenomena was the 2010 case of “Epic Beard Man” in California. Thomas Bruso, an elderly but powerful white man, beat up a black man who had attacked him on a bus. A black woman who taped the fight racially abused Mr. Bruso during the confrontation, calling him “pinky” and switching quickly from urging her racial kinsmen to attack him to wanting to press charges. It is a fascinating vignette about the way race really works in America. The video went viral and inspired a movie, Bad Ass (2012). However, in the film, the hero is played by the Hispanic actor Danny Trejo, who wins fame by beating up two white skinheads on a bus. In the sequel, Bad Asses (2014), he even gets a black sidekick who wishes he could have been the first black to play in the NHL.
There are many other cases in television and movies. Steve Sailer once observed that it is very likely there have been more white murderers featured on Law & Order than there were actual white murderers in New York City. Yet fiction can shape real-world beliefs. Unless one directly confronts racial reality, it is easy to live in a fantasy world.
This provides an opening for malicious people to manipulate others. With Adolescence, we see actors, politicians, and journalists joining forces to throttle speech in the name of fighting an imaginary enemy. Worse, these same people have done little to confront actual violence in once-great Britain, especially in the case of the white girls who were victims of grooming gangs. Using one’s own fictional fantasies as real-world rationalizations for state repression may be beyond anything even the USSR attempted. Yet for those who believe misleading media can impose a new reality, the anti-white ends justify the duplicitous means. It is difficult to believe those behind Adolescence do not know exactly what they are doing. There is nothing noble about this lie.
I pray that the day shall come when we can employ the educational and propaganda organs of the state and private sector to force our enemies – and their children – to write glowing book reports of The Culture of Critique, Mein Kampf, The Concept of the Political, The Protocols and On the Jews and Their Lies in the same manner that I was forced to write glowing book reports of Schindler’s List, Sophie’s Choice, The Diary of Anne Frank, and Elie Wiesel’s Night (and countless other items of Holocaust and anti-white race communist propaganda) all forced on me and my peers under the guise of “education” and for which I had to churn out many pages of sycophantic cant so that professor Mordecai Goldschnozz-Shekelgrabber would give me an A.
Jaw-dropping!
The UK is so bad, it is maybe preferable to be a White male in South Africa.
“He who would rule the Goths must use their imaginations to accomplish it.”
Funny thing about proverbs: the truths they encapsulate usually only register AFTER the fact — as here.
Funhouse Mirror Government.
Though Andrew Tate’s critics are legion, his critics never bring up his mixed-race origins.
Actually, if Andrew Tate dropped dead tomorrow another convenient bogeyman would have to be fabricated to take his place. He is a symptom, not a cause, of life in an anarcho-tyranny society. And things will remain that way in the UK…at least until the native Brits wise up and rise up, or sharia law is finally imposed. Sadly, the latter is more likely. A country that once ruled an empire can no longer rule itself.
If British TV were on the ball, they would scuttle the obvious propaganda and give the people something really entertaining — like a cage match between Andrew Tate and Keir Starmer!
There was an Adolescence in the early 1990’s called Cracker, starring Robbie Coltrane as Fitz, a forensic psychologist who was able to get into the minds of rapists, murderers, and other toxic men because in his heart he too was a toxic man capable of rape and murder. Even Fitz admitted that the world would be a better place, though a less fun place, if it was run by his long-suffering wife, his eye-rolling daughter, and his female police colleague who repairs his bridge burnings. The series creator was Jimmy McGovern, who provided the authentic Northern working class authenticity while delivering a message about dangerous white working class males that coincidentally matched elite prejudices. An especially memorable three part cliffhanger starred Robert Carlyle as a quiet working class male who suddenly shaves his head and starts murdering Pakistanis. It was compelling viewing, everyone watched it and talked about it the next day. Fitz was full of energy and charisma, he talked about the human dark side in a way that made other TV seem sanitized in comparison. It was very very good TV, and it was also … tendentious, it had tendencies and it wanted you to come away with the same tendencies.
The media was very anti-male in the early 1990’s, and it had a monopoly. If you were a well-intentioned people-pleasing teenage boy as I was at that time, the media was telling you that you and your peers were broken like the characters in Cracker, and the way to fix yourself (and to make yourself intriguingly different as a romantic prospect) was to identify with female emotions, to share your vulnerabilities (as if other people would find that charming and interesting), to make yourself small and simpering in case your scary masculine energy intimidated a girl who was just about to unveil some previously silenced feminine wisdom that we could all have learned from. Kurt Cobain was slouching around advertising the rejection of masculinity. I read “The SCUM Manifesto” at the age of 16 and I wasn’t shocked by it – I just thought, oh, these are the men from Thelma and Louise, both pathetic and violent.
The early manosphere that I remember was the blogosphere of men who had grown up under that monopoly influence and were finally able to compare notes and explore alternatives to the media message. How has it been working out for you, is your life going as well as it should be, taking advice from women about how to be a man? We all have the catalogue of male evil, and we only have to browse a bookstore to find out about the latest way of how “not to be that guy”, but have we been educated at all about female kinds of bad behaviour, apart from a trained ideological reflex that it’s statistically no worse than men, that if you were a real man you’d rise above it, that it’s a response to male bad behaviour (indeed, one of the feminist complaints about Adolescence was that it suggested that a girl would gratuitously bully a boy from the badness of her heart, just to enjoy her social power to hurt him, when the message should have been that it was a reaction to far worse harassment she was suffering from boys). How is it working out for you in relationships and in the workplace when you’re blind to female kinds of bad behaviour? This ability to compare notes so that you’re not alone is what’s now being targeted when they talk about the evil “algorithm”, which just means putting you in touch with people who have the same interests as you do.
A co-worker raved about A Time To Kill. 30 pages into it and it was clearly ridiculous trash.
It is quite a trick, that the global oligarchs have successfully revived racial hostility to keep us at each others’ throats. The old script “all blacks are bad” doesn’t fly any more, but the new one “all whites are bad” has caught the imagination of quite a few witless bushwah liberals with too much time on their hands. Its cognate “all immigrants are bad” has similarly mesmerized some working people as they are being slowly squeezed into serfdom by these same elites.
Black people I know personally are pretty much unanimous telling me: it’s not us, not ordinary black folks, who are saying these bad things about whites.
Lenin described the situation best: in order to control the “opposition,” we must lead it ourselves.
Until Whites are willing to admit that their civilization was deliberately dismantled through the power of organized jewry, which now dominates every institution, they will continue to swing at empty air. Does anyone actually believe blacks were clever enough on their own to take over our country in the way they have with 13% of the population? Same goes for the marginalization of Whites and Christianity. It did not just happen organically.
This is, quite simply, the most concise example of liberalism I have ever seen.
“We will summon it forth.” Conjurers practicing their black arts.
We’ll share the credit with this people who contributed nothing to this enterprise while simultaneously denying credit to those who were the authors and inventors. And those of us who are doing this? Well, we contributed nothing as well, but we feel perfectly justified in giving away the property of those who did.
Don’t forget that Grisham was a democrat state senator when in his late 20s. He left Mississippi and moved to Charlottesville around 1994 so he’d be among his libtard brethren.
This simply confirms my suspicion that the UK has been doing this for much longer than the United States. I’d say as far back as the 1990s, perhaps even earlier. Prime Suspect was another popular series that ran from the early 1990s to the mid-2000s. It was in-your-face feminist and had healthy servings of what we now call woke, although the messaging was usually delivered with white protagonists back then.
At least the British know they can always fall back on their incredible cultural output from when they were white and Christian (Shakespeare, Dickens, Austen, Lewis, Tolkien, etc.). That’s pretty much what they did at the opening ceremony for the 2012 Olympics in London. Tradition is generally what Americans like to see from them anyway, even today (The Crown, a series about the late Queen Elizabeth, was very popular and lauded). Poirot, based on Agatha Christie’s stories (and starring secular Jewish convert to Anglicanism David Suchet, a fine actor), did very well on American public television.
As for young, impressionable British men: most of them probably care more about “footie” and their favorite clubs rather than any fictional series. Don’t worry, The Powers That Be have that covered, too: boys will see woke flags and messaging at their nearest football stadium (my father is a longtime viewer of the Premier League, and at match start, the LGBT flag is always prominently displayed, and LGBT armbands often worn by the players).
Yeah. At least in South Africa they understand the danger while in the UK, they can’t even talk about the danger.
If you love enough,
You’ll lie a lot.
— Tori Amos
Maybe she should have sung, If you hate White goyim enough, You’ll lie every time.
Then there’s just the fake-prestige associated with simply getting on the (((scoreboard))) for some of these chaps…
Virgins always get backstage,
No matter what they have to say.
— Tori again
https://odysee.com/@Blackpilled:b
This guy does great streams diving in the media subversion, and the US did it since they let the jew in their living rooms.
Does anyone actually believe blacks were clever enough on their own to take over our country in the way they have with 13% of the population?
I have been saying the above thing on other articles for some years now, and Unz is any evidence, then whites will never stop fixating on blacks long enough to admit it. Various nimnuls on here have accused me of being all kinds of things rather than say
HELLOOOOOO!!!!!! Just how can low IQ blacks who’s only abilities are sports, music and violence gain so much ground on their own?
Blacks cannot succeed without WHITE AND WHITE JEW SUPPORT. Period. That support leads to enablement and protection. So if 99%’er whites want to bitch and moan about ‘the colored menace’ while ignoring the pasty psychopath string-pullers behind the negro scourge, then those 99%’er whites need a have STFU enema stat and get used to their situation never improving.
There are so many Aussies (and Brits) living in the States who love to fly their flag as if it’s a rebuke to the country they prefer living in. Yet there could be no more cringeworthy groveling stooges of the Jews who totally own the ABC than Australians. Go “pub crawling” in Sydney and, if you mention anything that’s non-PC, some angry little woman will come over and “red card” you, meaning that if you don’t walk out you’ll be beaten down on the pavement by uniformed goons of the Jews and arrested. What stinking, loud-mouthed, useless cowards, just like the Brits. They’re just so bad that the Russians and Chinese are just cowering in their boots. The Brits and Aussies will take groveling servitude to the nth degree so long as they can fancy themselves sports fans. America needs to dump these loser countries who hate our effing guts as allies before they drag us down into the NWO they can’t wait to arrive.
True. Australians are now better at grovelling than Canadians and Brits. Spot on observation.
Kudos to the author for noting that that the greatest power possessed by the film media in question is the power to generate emotion.
We have identified the problem. What we need now is solutions. We have approximately four years while Trump is in office as there is no guarantee that we will get another moment like this.
So let us not waste it.
The ruling jews have merely taken advantage of White outbreeding, the opposite of inbreeding, which causes disloyalty to oneself, one’s family, race, nation, etc., and a preference for outsiders / other races.
It seems that the objective was to show ‘jazzhands’ enough, perhaps that nonsense has died out. Doubt it.
It is absolutely imperative to completely and permanently boycott the so-called “entertainment industry”.
Cancel your cable TV subscription, cancel your Netflix subscription, cancel your Amazon Prime subscription, stop going to the movies etc.
If you live in the UK, sell your TV. As long as you have a TV in your house, they will charge you a BBC fee.
As long as we keep giving them money, they will keep spewing lies.
You may boycott entertainment in your own home, but what about when your child goes to school? What is to be done about the fact that this propaganda series is now (with the backing of Prime Minister Keir Starmer) available to stream in all British secondary schools?
And the British authorities hate ninjas:
Video Link
NINJA LIVES MATTER.
Gregory Hood: “Even the “Two Minutes Hate” against Andrew Tate makes little sense. The influencer is more popular among non-whites than whites, with more than 40 percent of blacks viewing him positively.”
Of course niggers view him positively! He’s gotten rich by pimping out white women! Hilarious that Hood can’t figure that out.
The adoration of Andrew Tate by the so-called racial right is what needs to be explained. As for the left, it’s obvious that they’re drawing attention to him (and really, in a backhanded way, promoting him) because they realize — maybe some of them unconsciously — that getting rebellious white boys to idolize a mulatto who pimps out white women is actually a step in their direction. I can’t imagine a better way to kill race-consciousness in white adolescents. Otoh, for the racial right to admire and promote Tate is a mistake typical of them. Just another reason why they never get anywhere.
My impression and lessons to be learned from watching Adolescence are divergent from The Brits.
First lesson:
Never trust the police. They are not your friends. Never invite police into your house. The danger from police upon your invitation is similar to that of a vampire except vampires don’t exist, police do.
2nd Lesson:
The state’s female psych evaluator is portrayed accurately as a manipulative bitch undeserving of sympathy. So like police, never “trust” the state’s nurses, doctors nor particularly the psychiatrists, psychologists, or social workers assigned to your case. They work for their Payor. Your health, rights and welfare be damned.
Third Lesson:
Count on at least one family member will assist the police in railroading you. Usually, this family member has been dis-inhibited by their drinking in order to pull off such a disloyal, malicious stunt against family, blood. The latter action takes the form of gaslighting by that one family member and the police who know nothing about you at all.
How? South Africa have far more blacks than the UK, plus over there they want to murder the whites.
lol Trump, you mean the orange asshole threatening Iran with nukes and shit like the idiot that he is? Sure whatever you say lady. It amazes me how a lot of you STILL keep putting faith into this joker. If you can’t save your nation yourself, no one else will. Definitely not some owned Billionaire running his fucking mouth 24/7 and threatening everyone.
BBC always functioned to engender helplessness and depression to keep subservience. Corruption does not exist in U.K. it is always portrayed as ‚ something that happened‘ and no one is to blame – this is higher up the social scale whereas lower down every error is persecuted
It is top-down control society through nudge and cajole rather than German directive
A much-ignored truth. Countless experiments have shown how malleable people are.
Fact: PR, propaganda, hasbara, advertising, marketing, etc. are all powerful because emotions trump facts.
The generation of “propaganda power” stems from:
(1) repeating messages, even if lies;
(2) censoring all doubts, rebuttals, counter-arguments, etc.’
(3) telling stories, not reciting facts;
(4) openly punishing dissenters; and
(4) using emotions, not thoughts, to move people to act.
For example, literally hundreds of popular articles, blockbuster movies, and talk shows have promoted the myth of the Holocaust. At the same time, there has not been (to my knowledge) 1 (O-N-E !) conference at Harvard discussing the so-called Shoah or proving the existance of a single humans-killing gas chamber.
Also, where are the “diverse” films showing evil Zionazis holocausting Palestinians?
Why are no ADL liars in jail?
Why isn’t AIPAC registered as the media mafia/political powerhouse of Jewsrael?
Why do no Juden lose their jobs for being “antiteutonic”?
Modern media are more powerful than bombs, yet Whites, Palestinians, men, and other groups refuse to master it.
Ijits!
Fact: White males are being demonized in the UK.
Fact: White males refuse to unite and fight as White males.
Fact: Ergo, White males are not that upset about being attacked. They’re just blowing smoke out their fundaments.
FFS, get real!
Why not also suggest that people give up their cars and live like the Amish?
How about urging folks to avoid all fast-food places, too?
Bettter yet, why not go full femtard and ask people to “manifest” better lives?
Jesus H. Keerist! It never dawns on lame-ass male jamokes to unite and fight fire with fire.
Fact: For the past 60 years, feminists have attacked boys nonstop. Adult men responded…not by protecting boys…but by pounding their own puds to porn, drinking beer, and losing their stool watching Their Team play sports.
What useless turds! They sacrificed their sons for vag.
Honorless curs all.
If I were Medvedev and read this, I’d wonder if the UK is worth nuking or of it is actually more gratifying to watch it agonise in self-inflicted disease.
You really cannot hate these people enough. You think you can but you absolutely cannot. They are quite frankly the scum of the earth and possibly universe.
Adolescence creator Jack Thorne responds to false Jewish claims circulating online — Speculation about his identity arises amid Adolescence’s success and ongoing online debate
I don’t think the ‘success’ of the series is the main reason there is ‘speculation about his identity’, but I guess ‘Britain’s biggest Jewish newspaper’ didn’t want to go there, because they don’t mention anything about the reason for the ‘ongoing online debate.’
When lies abound and are allowed to linger through decades into centuries, extreme unease will erupt as violence.
Seek ye therefore the truth.
“I am the way, the truth and the life.”
Darwin has destroyed our culture.
Andrew Tate must have gone up in the world if they’re making propaganda series against him. Is he the new Osama Bin Laden?
Al Qaeda and ISIS are constructs of western intelligence agencies. Maybe don’t bring those up, they make your case appear weaker.
Again, the larger issue has been ignored, even within a critical article tackling the issue. What has happened throughout western societies, is jews, who were part of the coalition that won WWII, are working a vast social program called ‘NEVER AGAIN” which entails that no homogenized society like NS Germany, can ever rise again to challenge their collective power. The author needs to realize that jewish power is not based on a higher IQ or managerial skill set, but simply because THEY ARE HOMOGENIZED AS A GROUP and we are not. Jews live in a one-for-all system, while we live in an everyman-for-himself system. It just cannot work. Once you escape the brainwashing, you see this multicultural TOSSED SALAD that jews have created is a WEAPON that is being used to checkmate EVERYONE in it. It’s called pillarisation, and it has been weaponized.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pillarisation
Irrespective of what your personal preferences are, your outside world has been weaponized by jews, against you, to facilitate their control over all of us, and this needs to be acknowledged and then reversed very quickly before it’s too late. Couple this with a massive economic collapse and we decent into a nightmare.
If you honestly do the research, NS Germany was right about the jews, and just about everything else. This is an endless war planet, and war is the father and king of us all. They called it the “eternal struggle.” Maintaining order and stability is paramount to everything else, and these weaponized multicultural systems today, where everyone hates everyone else, is a national security threat to everyone living in them.
1.) More blacks… have you been to London recently? Not many White faces in the crowd anymore. 2.) In the UK they want to murder Whites also! In fact they want to do that everywhere they are!
-Rooster
Anglos are natural feminists.
Enforced by mainly white cops from what I see. As in the US, big-city cops have proved themselves the armed and uniformed goons of the white-hating political machine paying their salaries. If the shtf these cowardly whores who took a knee to George Floyd and the rioters while beating down whites will be last seen fleeing town dressed as women.
Whites will never abandon Hollywood and New York, that is, ‘the entertainment industry.’
Nor will they ever ‘rise up.’
Why? Don’t ask me. I’m tired of trying to ‘figure it out.’
The sacrifice of a white child now and then is a small price to pay for a good flik.
“In a large, diverse democracy, perhaps everything becomes anti-white.”
A street-shitter, i.e. an Indian of the 7-11, Dunkin Donuts kind, told me a few years back that his country, India, was a large, diverse democracy in which the majority, the Hindus, were the target of all minorities. According to him, the Muslims constituted the Blacks, Zoroastrians and Jains were the Jews (he discounted the native Jews of India as an insignificant and negligible force) the Christians were the Latinos, the Sikhs were the Asians, the Buddhists were the Chinese and the South Indians were the secular Hindus who worked against the Hindu Dharma though they’re ironically very religious and the Dalits (the Untouchables) who hated all those who were not of their own kind.
And the reason he told me this, again according to him, was that he loved America, his new home, and didn’t want to see the White Christians being picked on by everyone else, as his people were, and reduced to non entities in their own land.
Fast forward and I see what he meant by that warning!
The shit will never hit the fan, Dan.
Whites will die not with a bang but a whimper.
The average Brit (and Aussie) male— especially SAS types— have gone all in with Jewraine. I understand that a lot of limeys have gone to their grave in Jewraine.
In the recent NYT article about how the U.S. was doing all the targeting and guidance for the Jewraine military, British SAS officers provided protection to Jewraine military officers including when they traveled to Wiesbaden to meet with NATO officers.
The West, particularly the Anglosphere, has become the Shabbos goy of Satan.
Great comment, Mr. Gruskos! People complain about the ridiculous blackety-black etc. in the movies and on TV, yet still go to the movies and still pay for TV! I disconnected from all that crap 26 years ago. (Yes, we still have a screen to watch DVD movies, but even for that, it’s been years.)
The Peak Stupidity blog has maybe 100 posts on the force-feeding of TV (gyms, waiting rooms, etc.), the agenda served by it, and even a dozen or so fun posts on Jim Rockford under our TV, aka Government Media topic key. If you want a sample, from over 8 years ago, this post describes my experience with a cable-TV salesman on the porch one day. It’s not often that salesmen walk off the porch on their own, with no prompting, heh!
Oh, and there are occasional posts about Telenovellas are Hell and then bikini weather girls out of Chile. I still remember the forecast for that one day in ’13 even.
Whites supported The 1964 Civil-this-will-not-result-in-quotas-or-anti-white-Rights Act and we got Systemic- anti-white- male racism which is good according to our brave MAGA men
To get some indication of how profound a change that made to America , try to imagine The ZOG of Trump talking about a plan to repeal The Civil Rights Act
There’s a better chance that Trump and his cabinet will call Bibi a bitch and tell him to go f himself
I’ve heard about all that (incl, Mr. Gruskos mention of having to pay for TV just due to owning one in the UK).
a) Homeschooling or Christian schools.
b) De-program him daily.
c) Don’t just throw out your TV – what’s the fun in that? Take it to your outdoor range and shoot it with .38 hollow points. Oh, wait, the UK. Nevermind!
d) Get rid of Kier Starmer. He’s an Orwellian evil bastard.
I full heartedly support a nigger acting as Henry 8th with the addition of nigger wives.
However, I also support a White Man acting as Shaka zulu with his scores of Kraal whores all white.
I see there was some movie starring Violla Lawrence as an African general. I never heard of such a thing. Well, I tell a lie ! The last General was Idi Amin who rose from a mess hall sergeant to General in just a few weeks. He had so many decorations and medals that he walked crooked, with a definite lean to the left side.
He must have been really talented but then he became the King of Scotland. Outstanding !
You Crackers did not know that the negro built Buckingham Palace, Notre Dame Cathedral and even the Pyramids, the “Fareohs” being niggers themselves. They even sailed across the Atlantic in canoes 40,000 years ago and that is why the indigenous folk are all dindoos !
The black man, as useless an article as God ever created, has an uncontrollable urge to be descended from a “somebody” and be a “somebody”. The result is the more he/ she embarks on this nonsense the more stupid it becomes and the more idiotic (if that is at all possible) he looks.
Anyway, here is the proof that North American tribes were all negroes. Its on Jootoobe so it must be true.
https://youtube.com/shorts/CcIGUTFFvxw?si=F8RGOzIiAWolYnZg
The street shitter was obviously making excuses for why his country is a shit-hole. In his mind, “The other guy” is always to blame. How convenient, it doesn’t require him to change himself.
As for whether Unz readers from the USA similarly make the same excuses, I leave it to them to decide.
Historically speaking and even today, white men have an intense propensity to violence. The fact remains no one on earth has murdered as many human beings as white men have. No place on earth has a history do near constant warfare the way Europe does from The fall of Rome to the end of ww2. Given that track record, concern is warranted.
The fact is the British let themselves be dragged into 2 world wars at the behest of Zionism which destroyed their empire. They continue to blindly believe every lie the Zionists tell them which is the exact reason for the decline of their country and the shorty state of their economy. You get what you deserve and the British more than anyone else deserve just this and even worse
Home-school.
We were once homogenized as a group – when we were all Christian. In the past, jews always worked as a tribal collective, yet they were also always marginalized and demonized by Christian society. There was a power within White culture that recognized their evil and restricted their access. That power was the Christian faith. What R.R. Reno calls the “post-WW2 consensus” was start of the real fall from Christianity. We see the real drop in Christian identity at this time, and yes, the jews were behind this, much to their advantage.
So, more is needed than merely a political or factual awakening – we need a spiritual awakening. But here the “Men of Unz” often fall short, as they can be virulently anti-Christian. Ironically, this is 100% what the jews most want. Without a spiritual force to counteract the jewish state, there is no hope for Whites and the west.
How the West was won. Anglo stupidity. With a U.S. topping off. And now we are all Moses followers.
If you package poison in a deceptive way, a lot of people will drink it. That is how civil rights and other things were pushed through so easily. How else would White civilization be so easily conned into believing that low IQ, violent blacks are just like White people. It’s still being done today. Just for fun, sit down and watch television for a few hours each night to view the commercials and see that probably 75% of the characters are blacks who behave just like civilized White people, in fact better!
The fact that the massive deception in TV commercials is not discussed on a large scale is 100% proof of how Whites have been conditioned to accept the most absurd presentations as truth.
We’ll…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emory_Tate
Hey, I’m sure there are a ton of rayciss honkers in Florida, who ain’t EVER moving to Montana.
LMAO!
Bro, it amazes me too.
Let me say it again; Donald Trump is a con-man a fraud and a pathalogical liar. He has been proving it since the USFL and Atlantic City. That is going on FORTY-FIVE years now. What else do you need to see? It is truly astonishing.
I’m sorry to say that you are correct. This is also what I see around me.
The future is quite grim and dark.
Good morning, Achmed!
While .38 hollow points are wonderful, especially for a snub nose revolver, the .357 packs a bit more punch and, in my opinion, would be more effective when hunting televisions…
Video Link
I otherwise agree with your comment and wish you a happy April Fool’s Day! ☮
First off, there’s no such thing as christianity, and your either a dark age fool or a jew. I’d call your attention to all the warring schisms within these abrahamic psyops. Start with the 30 Years War, and go from there. Bottom line is your jewop called christianity was designed by jews to create the false worldview that has resulted in the downfall of western man since collapse of SPQR, which incidentally was caused by your christianity. Read up on the three jew wars that Romans were forced to fight against these subversive psychopaths. Throughout known history, there have only been two groups that have defeated the jews: SPQR and NSDAP. We need the latter here in the US…right now.
Besides, with your christianity comes niggers and spics. FUCK YOUR CHRISTIANITY FOOL!
Christianity is not for the intelligent, scientific, educated white man. It is only for the monkeys.
☮
[Steven Moffat] argued that this was a Noble Lie. “We’ve kind of got to tell a lie,” he said. “We’ll go back into history and there will be black people where, historically, there wouldn’t have been, and we won’t dwell on that. We’ll say, ‘To hell with it, this is the imaginary, better version of the world. By believing in it, we’ll summon it forth.’”
“By believing in it, we’ll summon it forth.”
Classic jew-think, classic Kabbalah, classic Clown World, right here, right now and illustrated.
Excellent article.
News about England and Europe is often too painful to look at for a white guy living in darkest Africa. LOL?
There is also a UK movie called “Eden Lake”. Heavily promoted and mainstream.
It has a very attractive white couple who want to get away from it all for a romance weekend go to a resort town.
There either one or both of them are brutally stalked, tortured and murdered by……
A gang of white teenagers. Even the white parents are evil.
And, of course, The Guardian breathlessly extols the horror of it!
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/oct/29/eden-lake-the-film-that-frightened-me-most
The old script that all blacks are bad does not fly anymore.
It flies with me.
https://youtube.com/shorts/Vb0q-26_6M4?si=Jkw1loPF_D7CkRHW
Antiteutonic — I love it! I plan to use it. Thank you.
Yup
The People and Forces that promote this anti White hysteria are fully aware of how corrosive and damaging the policies and opinions they promote. That’s the whole point. The REAL promoters/advocates of the War on White People are extreme Racists; they have a bitter, venomous HATRED of White Peoples and their Countries. And destruction is their Main Goal. Running a close second in the Objective list of those who endorse this Hate filled Racism against Whites is to allow the Elites to impose more and more controls/restrictions on the White Peoples in the Countries the ‘Woke’ infest.
The reason why so many Whites around here have become ‘anti-Christian’ is because the Christian churches have become so anti-White in recent generations. Sadly, most of ‘our’ churches were long ago infiltrated and subverted by Jews, Masons and their dupes.
Fun video, Adam, thanks! (It’s just not the same with flat screens – no glass.)
Well, we used up a box and half of .38 hollow points shooting targets recently, but that was a stupid mistake. Our sacrificial OSB board took too much of a sacrifice, and because I hadn’t bought that caliber in maybe 15 years, I didn’t realize we were spending a buck a shot! Yikes!
Today, it’ll be just the .22s, rifles and pistols.
Oh, that guy’s shotgun is in beautiful shape!
Too bad Eden Lake is not a real place with time-shares. We’d probably get a great deal on it what with everyone else being scared shitless and all by the White kids, who we’d probably end up chatting with about Trump, drinking a few beers, and firing off some rounds off with. (But not .38 hollow points!)
Oh, and I’d never heard of this TV show until commenter/blogger E.H. Hail linked us to a SteveSailer.net post about it on Open Thread 2. Is that a bad thing? I think not.
At least they’re open about it in South Africa… you have fair warning of what to expect and a chance to defend yourself.
“…there have only been two groups that have defeated the jews: SPQR and NSDAP. We need the latter here in the US…right now.”
What’s going to defeat the jews is awareness, which is happening right now. And the more that jews try to undermine that awareness process, fight against it, the more people wake up.
If you put Christianity alongside that awareness process, now you’ve got something.
And don’t try to tell me that jews are not deathly afraid of Christianity, because they are. Witness how they attack anyone who dares mention that “Christ is King”; they are absolutely beside themselves in fear and anger.
In their pursuit of making the U.S. safe and comfortable for themselves, they have absolutely destroyed the country, and they know this. Everybody else is realizing this too. That’s why there’s a mad dash to oust the Palestinians once and for all and create a greater Israel. The dual citizens will want a country to go home to. Gee, how many countries have they destroyed now?
“Christianity is not for the intelligent, scientific, educated white man. It is only for the monkeys.”
But monkeys are what we have right now: impulsivity, cheating, stealing, lying, entitlement, distracted by shiny thing, warring, etc. And who cares about intelligence! I’ve met many a so-called intelligent, educated man who couldn’t think their way out of a box.
It’s wisdom we should be seeking. How is your wisdom doing?
Let me stop you right there.
We need to stop believing propaganda bullshit.
This starts with the young and home schooling.
The trivium and a real classical education allows the BS to be properly categorized upon input.
Covid and trans / gay/ pedo school systems has already been a blessing in disguise. Millions of children across the west stayed home. Thousands or tens of thousands got a superior education as a result.
Keep up this momentum, home school your children, provide them with the tools to survive the upcoming conflict.
Colonialism was a disaster.
The sins of the father is going to plague White people globally for infinity…
Should have never happened.
Regarding the linked article to the quote “ calling into question the entire postwar Western order” , Return of the Strong God’s (https://www.amren.com/commentary/2019/11/white-identity-is-not-perverse/):
And what was the sword of the religio-political dominionist global monarchist egregore used against our race, families and nations?
Not Peace but a Sword (Matthew 10:34-37, Micah 7:1-6; Luke 12:49=53)
34Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.
35For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.
36A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’
3.7Anyone who loves his father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me..
Psalm 64:1-9
1 Hear, O God’s (elohim: a plurality of God’s, not YHWH), my voice of complaint; preserve my life from dread of the enemy.
Hide me from the scheming of the wicked, from the mob of workers of iniquity,
3who sharpen their tongues like swords and aim their bitter words like arrows, ambushing the innocent in seclusion, shooting suddenly, without fear.
5They hold fast to their evil purpose; they speak of hiding their snares.
“Who will see them?” they say.
They devise injustice and say,
“We have perfected a secret plan.”
7But the (strong) God’s (elohim, plurality) of our nation’s and race) will shoot them with arrows; suddenly they will be wounded. 8They will be made to stumble, their own tongues turned against them.
All who see will shake their heads.
Then all mankind will fear
and proclaim the work of the God’s (elohim)
so they wisely consider their doing.
Home schooling is the ultimate self-defeating capitulation: instead of fighting to reclaim control of the public education system, opt for having kids taught at home by ignorant parents.
It is rather evident that Labor saw Trump’s win and how younger males (especially and including but not limited to whites) became politically active and lurched significantly to the right. They don’t fear girls getting stabbed (the typical victims deserve it in their worldview). They fear the native British organizing politically and to the right with the added participation of formerly politically inert males. Therefore they need to stigmatize this rising consciousness.
You will also notice that the piece of fiction Adolescence has moved the political and public attention away from the intergenerational, decades long, government sanctioned Pakistani Rape Gang scandal.
Two birds, one stone.
Nah, it is saving our children. Maybe you don’t have any? You talk like a keyboard warrior instead of someone with skin in the game. I’m all for ‘fighting the system’ but we need to preserve our next generation to not become libtards.
Besides, you don’t ‘save the schools’ when we have our delightful multi-cultural mix. ‘Save the schools’ is more of a 50-100 year plan. After all, the left started the dismantling of education back in the 60s. So, till that gets done, we should save our children, and the best way to do this is via homeschooling. BTW, that is also how we preserve our families and increasing our fertility rate.
True to a large extent. Christians need to purge themselves from such subversives. But those who dismiss Christianity as the solution are doomed to double-down in the intentions for the jews. CF the idiot who replied to my earlier post.
How much abuse shall The White Race suffer before becoming violent enough to lash out?
I don’t know, we’re too fucking “nice, kind, tolerant, and non-tribal”, but there are many of us that are sick of this shit. Also, our hatred for those responsible, as well as their imported pets, is ready to blow, and when it does, nobody gets pass.
Every thought in your little brain has been crafted by the jews.
Ask yourself: What do the jews most desperately fear and hate? Ans: Christianity – always have, always will. That is because they are smart enough to know that Christianity is the only real threat to their plan, precisely because it offers a spiritual solution. LOL just ask them, they will say it very clearly.
Then a dope like you comes along, trying to convince everyone that this greatest enemy of the jews is actually a silly illusion, a psyop, a fraud. And all the jews are laughing at you, my dear, and rubbing their hands together with an eerie smile on their faces.
You have been played. And now for decades you have been this wreathing, lonely, angry, bitter old fool, trying to convince yourself that the Christianity that you once loved has always been false, and that if only everyone believed in Science (lol!) and the jewish Enlightenment then everything would be OK. You don’t have much more time left, sir, to figure this out.
Shocking, isn’t it? Until you think “crimes” could include shoplifting, driving infringements, walking on the grass, littering, and so on.
It goes back further, in the 80’s many London local authorities like Hackney and Brent were labelled looney left.
They famously even banned black bin bags claiming they were racist.
We laughed at them in the 90’s looking back at these crazy people, little did we know it was just a teaser, they would literally take control of the west in the noughties
James of Africa,
I have always appreciated your balanced and objective views.
I also gather that you live in South Africa. It is said in places like this forum that Whites are being treated badly in SA by the blacks. The word “genocide” is often thrown about, but that term is often abused and I am hesitant to accept it happening in SA without substantial evidence.
Please can you let those of us who are interested know how Whites are really treated in South Africa?
Thanks.
Colonialism was inevitable. Elite assholes our ancestors didn’t vote for, decided to exploit weakness and stupidity.
The Japanese figured out the game immediately when they suddenly awoke to to the world during the age of exploration (age of exploitation).
It’s colonize or be colonised at that time.
Do the Japs feel guilt for the excesses of the Asian co-prosperity sphere? They probably don’t know about it at all.
Nope. Wishful thinking of leftists, Jews, and retards.
Should never have been defined as related to me and mine whatsoever. Whoever does is a collective-guilt believing shithead, who can take all the guilt burden onto themselves as they’re locked outside of the inevitable white countries approaching fast – and locked in with their pet niggers.
MERELY…
And things will remain that way in the UK…at least until the native Brits wise up and rise up,
************************************************
And do what? They let the govt take their guns. That’s why i don’t think this insanity is coming to america. Americans have 400 million guns and a politician who goes too far will find himself waking up to bullets going thru the walls of his house every night.
Thanks. There is a case to be made about a genocide of whites in South Africa, what is not clear is if it is happening by design or default. Some areas are pretty safe, like where I live, but there are always hellholes not far away.
There is an element of opportunism to attacks on whites, since most are soft targets, or live in isolation, like farmers. Blacks make up the majority of victims of crime, but violent crimes against whites are disproportionally sadistic, pointing to ulterior motives besides robbery(especially in the case of farmers). We don’t have the numbers to absorb the kind of damage violence inflicts on African society, and I don’ think we should have to pay in blood to be a part of such a society.
We have a gun-grabbing government that fears losing control, so buying a legal weapon for self defence is made difficult by bureaucracy. Whites do not want to end up in a black prison system. We have a Western style liberal MSM that tries to gaslights people into thinking that crime is not proportional to race, but not as bad as the UK and EU.
Whites tend to have their own schools, either through being exclusive through costs, or by language, as is the case of Afrikaans medium schools. The ANC government is introducing laws that will interfere with the rights of schools to determine their own language policy, and by controlling enrolment. Poor whites have to send their children to government schools. Wokeness and DEI are features of the SA school curriculum, whites are made into scapegoats like in many Western schools.
The flip side to this is having more personal freedom because of lax policing. Afrikaners are not faring too badly despite all these things because our culture is more exclusive, and whites tend to do their own thing in their own spaces mostly.
A British take on SA, reasonably accurate:
Video Link
Thank you for that explanation.
I am risking calling the Afrikaners/Whites in South Africa an immigrant population for I am sure there are people who will dispute this. But for the sake of discussion and comparison with other such populations, I will call them such.
I suggest that the problems that the Whites suffer in SA are similar to those other immigrant and minority population, if they happen to be doing economically better than the indigenous peoples. Relative affluence would breed resentment. The cases that come immediately to mind are Indians of Uganda and Fiji, and the Chinese in Southeast Asia.
I elaborate:
The Indians of Uganda were outright deported out of the country.
The Chinese of Southeast Asia were allowed to remain, but in many cases became second class citizens.
Those in Indonesia suffered many massacres. For decades they were not allowed to celebrate their festivals in public or even have shop signs in the Chinese language. All had to change their names to more Indonesian sounding names by law. These days fortunately things have gotten better for them.
In Malaysia, they are still virtually second class, enshrined in law. For example
1. If a Chinese (or Indian) person wants to get a government job, good luck to him. And if he is manages to get one, God help him if he hopes to be promoted. Malay persons have no such disadvantage.
2. There are race based stipulations of proportion of people appointed to managerial positions, typically minimum of 37% to be occupied by Malays.
3. Corporations are required to have 30% Malay ownership. So if you grow your company and it thrives and you wish to list it in the stock exchange, you will have to give 30% to a Malay “sleeping partner” to make that happen.
4. State run universities are made of 82% Malays, even though they make up 63% of the population. And Chinese and Indian students perform far better in the university entrance exams. This is why many Chinese and Indian students hoping for a college degree are forced to go to places like the USA and UK to get their degrees.
5 Housing developers have to set aside 30% of the units for Malays. These are usually sold far below market price in order to get rid of them.
Now that I have framed the situation in Malaysia, I can make reference to it in my next question:
As to the legal position of Whites in South Africa, are they in a worse position that the Chinese/Indians in say Malaysia?
Correct
SO I’m suppose to hate movies and not watch movies because the Jws run Hollywood? It’s not their fault that Americans are too stupid and lazy to make their own films. Everyone in other countries make, write, and direct their own movies. That’s why you don’t see any blacks and shit appearing in Korean films that Koreans have directed themselves.
Then explain why it doesn’t affect the Spanish people so much? White people are just dumb as shit. I’ve met a guy from Spain and I asked him if it ever bothered him that his people colonized a bunch of people and conquered him, he told me “Nope, we don’t let guilt affect us here at all in Spain, we aren’t like the Whites and refuse to allow our own history to negatively impact us at all. We are still a very proud people, besides it’s not like we are still colonizing anyone today.”
You are right to some extent. There are almost exact similarities like quotas, but even Chinese and Indians are legally black in SA, and are entitled to affirmative action. Whites are the only non-black entity recognised in SA law.
Add to that new laws that allow uncompensated land expropriation, and legalized hate speech. The singing of Kill the Boer has been found to be constitutionally protected speech, it’s cultural or a historic “struggle” song according to a recent judgement in a hate speech case heard in the constitutional court. The case will probably be appealed, but has been dragging on for years. In contrast, the open display of the old South African flag by whites can be considered an act of hate speech by law.
Also take in mind that African countries are generally more lawless than some of the countries you mention. Legal standing is not a guarantee of safety or of respect of rights. Mobs of squatters use their own interpretation of expropriation laws as excuse to illegally occupy land, and homeowners can be driven out of their homes by threats, violence or vandalism. The court processes to redress these situations can take years and can cost too much to be practical. Often only those with money or political connections can enjoy the full protection of the law.
It’s too complicated to blanket call whites immigrants, since the southwestern part of southern Africa was only partially populated by the time whites started settling in many cases, and even then many of the indigenous people like the San were nomadic hunter-gatherers. The majority Bantu were settled in the more fertile rainy parts and more to the east by the time the clash of civilizations started getting serious.
Tell that to Sir Isaac Newton, Johhanes Kepler, Nicolaus Copernicus, Dr. Russell Cowburn, Dr. Dean Daniel Hastings, Dr. John Lennox, Dr. Alister McGrath, Dr. William Newsome, Dr. Hugh Ross, Dr. Jing Kongis . . .
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=chrisytian+physicists&&mid=D95ADF46B42E3327BF2ED95ADF46B42E3327BF2E&&FORM=VRDGAR
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=chrisytian+physicists&&mid=D06A5517BAD27184C17FD06A5517BAD27184C17F&&FORM=VRDGAR
Nonsense,
The blacks have lineages older that manyy, perhaps most whites in this counry. For roughly 400 years plus the numbers vary, but an entire society was created predicated predominantly on the color of their skin. Consistently 23% of te population, socialized nbased on skin color. Property . . . every institution, policy, practice, thought, including faith and practice strictly inculcated how they were seen and how they were to see themselves . . .
Amazing race realists are never realistic about the consequences of that socialization and less realistic as to its consequences and what it would take to unravel the same. The race realists argument is geared only tocater to whether or not race as biology has consequences. That’s an old hat trick right out of the playbook of the 17th century, just with more sophisticated language and numbers.
Ask them to define race and they are all over the map. Latinos are a race, Asians are a race . . . allow me — no those are cultural distinctions not biological, the race realists can’t even bother to stay with so called science parameters they claim are crucial. Because race realists blow their own categories, some argue that there are chatacteristics assigned to race indentification that are purely rhetorical and or artififcial in nature. Ur=t dies not mean that cerain peoples do not have distinct biological traits and from that follows x.
But someone touting “I am a race realists” will repeat the false rhetorical posture as if that is the issue. I just had to rid my brain of two gentleman withPhd’s muckup the meaning of race in just that manner. mix cultural distinctions with color traits as if they are one in the same.
— Ohyyy veh.
Cheer up, gentlemen! You are right to say that huge numbers are still hooked into their screens. However, there are many who are speaking up and ditching their screens and speaking out against the mass migration.
If you do not know any such people, you should widen your circle of acquaintances.
There was a Catholic/Protestant Remigration demo in Belfast a week ago. British Union Jack flying in brotherly peace next to the Irish Tricolour. Whatever our theological or ethno-nationalist border squabbles this Great Replacement nonsense is something we need to stop, and we need every shoulder to the wheel, in whatever capacity you can think of.
I advise you to dispel your gloom by taking some action, however seemingly tiny or insignificant.
Do not the Tibetans and Uyghurs blame the shit eaters? It’s the same with all majorities and their relationships with minorities.
A false narrative!
North America was/is NEVER white Christians’ “own land”!!!
As I always said, the whites have this very funny mentality that “what belong to them belong to them and what belong to others ALSO belong to them.” What on Earth, or outside it, does NOT “belong” to these whites?!
It is the white who “pick on” the non-whites– including the people who rightfully own that land:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/BmPKlO3vOWY
They should blame themselves.
The following was taken from an anti-China website, which is no longer active:
Now give me evidence that the feather Indians, the Australian Aborigines, etc, had invaded Europe, and sacked London, that might give the whites justifications to take North America and Australia.
Your government was in early 2000s a client state of the US. Not very obedient, but a client state, loyal to the people running the US.
The Obama Presidency was intended to be the final triumph of the Jewish coalition, placing the Left’s government on unassailable moral grounds, as the one and only advocate of “diversity” — permanent non-White rule controlled by the US Jewish coalition.
The plan went sour because:
(a) the US banks “financialized” (stole) everything they could steal (through mortgage fraud) and everything they could borrow. This “financialization” is borrowing on future income and then spending it on present day executives so that the future income never comes into reality and the loans cannot be paid by future executives.
(b) when the borrowed money (from financialized mortgages) became obviously illusory (long before the current executives had anticipated), Obama gave enough Federal money to the banks to make up for their losses, and did so on the condition that the banks give Obama enough money to proclaim himself dictator of the US (in Obama’s “pen and phone” speech).
(c) Obama used dictatorships of the US to ensure racist domination of both UK parties.
(c) Obama proved unable to rule, so did his puppet Pres. Biden. Trump was elected.
(f) The corrupted parties in the UK were headed and staffed by Obama era racists, who determined to institute an authoritarian government in the UK, motivated by a simple desire to survive politically. Note that France and Germany and the EU went through the same sequence.
And there you are. As of today (2025-04) the EU seems likely to be peacefully taken over by the Russian Federation. Acquiescence to the takeover will be
1) Access to resources needed to remain industrialized
2) Institution of a government capable of ruling the country without destroying the country’s historic population.
This course of events has, actually, been inescapably obvious for at least a decade. Trump sees it — that’s why he’s pulling back to the Western Hemisphere (or possibly to US, Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal Zone).
If you want another “world turned upside down”, take a look at the depopulation through TFR reduction of pretty much every industrialized country in the world plus the Arab/Persian and Turkish domains. We might be on the verge of something as surprising as was the 1990 USSR collapse.
Blacks don’t like White Latinos/White Hispanics. Spanish people are White. A lot of Blacks don’t like them either.
All Whites are seen as racist and the enemy to Blacks. Colonialism is a disaster because the stain of colonialism still lingers, and whites are going to pay the brunt of it.
Apparently, “Adolescence” is a Netflix series. Netflix is known for this kind of programming, trying to push leftist themes into whatever the network sponsors. HBO is as bad if not worse in their programming. The simple choice is to refuse to be programmed.
There is a big difference depending on when the majority is economically dominant over the minority or not.
In South Africa and Malaysia. The majority are resentful of the minority populations because they feel they are more economically successful. This results in legislation/policies disadvantaging the minorities.
In USA and China it is different. The majority is more economically successful than the minorities. The result is the majority indulging, or in the case of contemporary USA over-indulging the minorities. This results in legislation/policies advantaging the minorities.
Examples:
1. During China’s infamous One Child Policy, the minorities were exempt from the one child rule.
2. In Chinese universities minorities are privileged in the entrance requirements. There are minority quotas which result in lower grades being required in the extremely competitive entrance exams to gain admission. This is to encourage the gradual raising of living standards of the minorities.
On Chinese history:
No the Tibetans blame the Manchus who conquered them and added Tibet to the Manchu Qing Empire.
The Uyghurs are thankful to the Manchus who gave them Xinjiang after they helped the Manchus drive out the Dzungars from Xinjiang. Of course Xinjiang was added to the Manchu Qing Empire.
If the Tibetans and Uyghurs have any misgivings it is because the Han tried to keep the country from falling apart after the Qing Empire collapsed, thereby closing the door on independence.
The ROC (aka Taiwan) and later the PRC consider themselves successor states to the Qing and their critical mission to keep the country from being torn asunder like was done to it during the period of European Colonisation.
Interestingly enough, the PRC allowed Mongolia independence, and act with the ROC (aka) Taiwan opposes and disavows. As you probably know, ROC claims to rule all of China, including the province they call Mongolia.
ROC aka Republic of China aka Taiwan map of China.
You may notice that in the text at the bottom, ROC claims all of the Spratleys (aka South China Sea islands). This is a claim that the PRC inherited after it defeated the ROC on the mainland.

Appreciate the detailed response. Looking at the map, one sees that China has a lot of enemies in its immediate neighborhood let alone across the world. How do you manage it?
1. That map is of Taiwanese aka ROC claims, not enemies.
2. China aka PRC has already settled most of those disputed claims, generously giving away vast tracts of its previous claims, to the chagrin of the ROC
3. I am not Chinese, so those are not my claims, neither are other claimants in those disputes my enemies.
4. I am from a region that has traded with China for 2000 years, but have never been invaded nor colonised by China. It took Europeans to travel across the world to conquer and colonise almost all the countries here. Today we see the Western malign influence lingering in the American trouble making in the South China Sea, Taiwan, Myanmar, Hongkong, Thailand, etc.
We just want MAGA also….Make America Go Away.
American movies are bad for you.
They’re bad for Americans.
They’re bad for everybody.
Who’s paying you to lie?
Why not Turks? Arabs? North African Berber slavers? The African tribes who dominated and sold their neighboring peaceful peoples to kikes and sand niggers?
Why is it whitie ONLY?
Is it because you hate white people and are grasping for straws? Anything but the truth will do, right?
I disavow your collective guilt Commie joooo bullshit.
Better enforce this “payment” in person. Draw the battle lines and see how far this collective guilt BS gets you.
Come on tough guy from a tough race.
Race war!
Put down your smartphone and fix bayonets!
Does George Soros pay for your ammo, or is it just rent and your Starbucks account?
Not all.
Idiocracy was a work of pure genius.
If you cannot understand that colonialism was a disaster for everyone involved, then you will continue to not to understand black anger.
Whites should have left blacks alone—the world would have been better off for it.
And if you cannot understand that colonialism is not strictly whites, and that you’re only targeting the white descendants of “colonizers” then you’re just doing the bidding of the jooooo.
By the way, the blacks among us have more slave owner DNA than I fucking do. My ancestors were poor and didn’t colonize anyone, you fucking halfwit.
Blacks should leave whites alone, and not start this fight – because it’s complete BS and will only result in blacks not living off of whites anymore at all and having to supply their own food stamps, welfare, purple drank coupons, and other grifts currently enjoyed.
I just don’t care what happened in the past because I didn’t do it, my ancestors didn’t do it, and you are just a weaponized retard working for greater Judea.
Found the JIDF Troll.
If “democracies” could do such a thing, it would render them powerless against the consequences of their own policies. Of course! And what could be a better sign of powerlessness than an inability to face facts and live in reality? The fantasies of the powerful are rendering them powerless against the consequences of those fantasies.
An entire society?
Blacks were virtually non-existent in North America until the early decades of the 18th century. They didn’t become a majority of the plantation economy which was itself a small though growing segment of the overall agriculture economy until the middle of the 18th century. The plantation economy was focused on overseas export and the larger segment of the agriculture economy was for domestic production and overwhelmingly the labor source was Whites. This explains why most slave states that were also almost exclusively agricultural states still had majority White populations.
The plantation economy at its peak was a short lived affair. Western Georgia and points west were still wilderness in the 1810s. All of those ‘slave states’ of plantation lore gradually came into existence over a 60 year period and then slavery ended.
Almost nobody contemplated African labor much less slavery until after Bacon’s rebellion in 1670s. And even then the presence of Africans was minuscule until circa 1715.
The entire time horizon from gradual start to conclusion of North American African slavery is 1715-1865, one hundred and fifty years. And Blacks were never an ethnic majority in even those years.
I’m far from Jewish or any involvement in Jewish things.
I’m speaking the truth.
The complete truth.
Minor sperg note: Steven Moffat is not a white actor, he’s a writer. Heavily involved in reviving Dr Who and then destroying it using blacks, gays etc.
European dude here, so pardon my broken English.
Do you really think Trump will push for that?
We had hopes as well that he is going to do something different, and then, first guy that visit office was Netanyahu and his proIsraeli rhetoric as well…
I doubt his role as a saver in his mandate, but more like a pressure relieve valve, to give people illusion of change and difference, but to keep the system alive.
I wish I am wrong.
You are correct we should have left black people alone. The U.S would be a thousand times better off without the low IQ animals around.
Nothing, recently and pop-culturally- speaking, has epitomized the uselessness of arguing with the norms, made (((their))) agenda more obvious, or exposed the hypocrisy of it all than this movie.
I haven’t seen every last national organ blow its load this hard over a TV programme since … since ever. It hasn’t been out for a month and yet the UK Government themselves simply cannot gush over it obsequiously enough or shove it in too many faces.
All this despite the appalling of lack of diversity in its lead character, which, we all know, automatically makes a movie bad and is tantamount to genocide. That’s why the Oscars changed their Best Picture criteria. What, have we all forgotten the importance of representation?!
If you go on Instagram, and I don’t recommend it, you won’t believe your lyin’ eyes how much lefties want to make out with this show, and how many teachers are refreshed that a filmmaker has finally found the gall to call out the misogyny of MEN just like the evil MALE sexpests infesting classrooms everywhere.
Point out the bullshit, as I saw some poor sap try yesterday, and just watch the loving tolerance crowd at work. SOURCE?! Of course it’s been “debunked”: the director said so, so case closed.
I wanted to just shake the little idiot, ask why the hell he was bothering, and point out that his attempt at redpilling and the attendant reaction are all part of the point. “Why so triggered, white man? Why do you CARE about one little movie?! Looks like someone needs a SAFE SPACE!”
They want to humiliate you, yes, and miscue and whatabout and all the usual tricks they pull. And as a bonus, they want their theory of “white fragility” to prove itself. I mean, what kind of wimpy little manlet would actually get upset, crying his little “white tears” as usual, in the face of nonstop provocation, hypocrisy, dehumanization, and yes — to use one of their favorite terms — “gaslighting?”
These people are such scum. They’re positively evil.
And yes, they DO hate you.