Sailer in Taki's: How Seriously Should Whites Take the Ever-Increasing Racial Hate Directed at Them in the Press?
Search Text Case Sensitive Exact Words Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
From my new column in Taki’s Magazine:
Feud for Thought
Steve SailerSeptember 01, 2021
How seriously should whites take the ever-increasing levels of racial hate expressed toward them in outlets such as the New York Times and Washington Post?
Perhaps the fad over the past eight years to express fear and loathing of “whiteness” (i.e., whites) will always be more bark than bite?
After all, most people find themselves angriest not at large-scale abstractions such as a race but with the individuals who get on their nerves.
Read the whole thing there.
Follow @steve_sailer
Racial hatred of whites in the media definitely leads to “open season” racial violence against whites in the streets.
https://cwbchicago.com/2021/08/two-men-are-beaten-and-robbed-in-the-middle-of-state-street-as-people-walk-by-drive-past-and-twerk-up-a-storm-video.html
Those "stop the violence" rallies organized by Black folks are genuine enough, but they're also hamstrung by a likewise genuine double-mindedness about law enforcement. When LE is stringent, it's "racist"; when LE is lax, it's also "racist". Bloody damned mess it is, and few mainstream journalists are allowed to point up the contradictions in Black political thinking.
Deep-sixed.Replies: @Richard B
This has been a fairly violent summer in my small town, but the vast majority of the violence has been colored on colored. The one attack of a colored against a White involved some kind of pervious altercation, probably drug related.Replies: @JimDandy
I will enjoy your Takimag column later on, but for now I’ll answer with: We should breath a sigh of relief that this is all out in the open now. We should be clear now on who are our enemies. We don’t have to keep arguing against them with our White logic and keep wondering why “they just don’t get it!”
Steve asks, “How seriously should whites take the ever-increasing levels of racial hate expressed toward them in outlets such as The New York Times and Washington Post?”
My answer, “Hope for the best, plan for the worst.”
You make some good points in your Taki piece; my planning assumptions are that, most folks are indifferent, and don’t pay much attention to these hate-rants at legacy media outlets like the Times and Post. Has always been that way. But, when the cold wind blows, mobs have a way of attracting the indifferent, like a snowball rolling downhill.
“In summary, people mostly hate other people they know.” Yes, familiarity breeds contempt.
“This will all end in tears.” Yep.
The time to take it seriously has come and likely gone. Now,I’m all for increasing awareness among the future slave class, but contra Achmed upthread, it may seem like it’s out in the open now, but 3/4ths of the population are brainwashed. They don’t see these things the way we do. Not at all.
Steve writes, fore and aft:
The above article in New York magazine:
Self-identified “progressive, liberal” NYM commenter pretty much gets it (bold emphasis added) :
You rarely see blacks portraying criminals on TV in anything like the proportion of their responsibility for real-world crime, outside of The Wire. We watched Demolition Man (1993) recently and my wife was startled that the bad guy--a really bad guy--was played by Wesley Snipes.
We also watched Guy Ritchie's Snatch (2000), about several different criminal groups--generic gangsters, Russian mobsters, gypsies, and black criminals--double- and triple-crossing each other. Naturally, conditioned by today's conventions, we assumed that the goofy black criminals would outsmart everyone. SPOILER ALERT: They do not. I thought, "Wow, you could do that back then."Replies: @Jim Christian, @Lurker, @anarchyst, @Matttt
Ted Lasso is basically the same trite, we'll have our characters act like cartoons for 20 minutes and then expect you to treat their contrived isolated personal problem as deeply serious that you might remember from Bill Lawarence's other show, Scrubs. He just adds lots of reddit-tier stereotypes about Britain in there. (Even to the point that the foreign players don't come from the right countries, the goalkeeper is a Quebecois and the main foreign player is Mexican)
But the author misses the point. In the first episode Ted has a realistic panic attack when he realises optimism isn't a substitute for knowing what you're doing and we learn his normal, down to Earth wife can't live with him anymore and divorces him and he becomes estranged from his young son. His character also had an alcohol problem.
But the people who watched the show are too stupid to see this and so think Ted is a hero and think this fiction depiction of the world is reality. So the writers got the message and removed all the suggestions about people like Ted being in denial and the show a fantasy where real conflict doesn't exist. It's not to say a lack of empathy doesn't cause conflict but plenty of irreconcilable conflicts aren't about a lack of empathy, they're about fundamental irreconcilable interests. The show just pretends that the constellation of 'right' and 'wrong' set forth from Hollywood isn't rooted in it's own interests and denial of other interests.
And, I think, the show is popular because some women feel validated by seeing 'Ted Lasso' pretend that male stoicism is just silly and there's nothing wrong with their inability to be stoic. Female opinion writers who don't like, let alone love, their husbands anymore often write about women performing grueling 'emotional labor' for the men in their lives whilst simultaneously complaining about male stoicism. It's actually male stoicism and not making their problems problems for others, even when it hurts them individually, the real 'emotional labor' that makes the world go round.Replies: @Matt Buckalew
The fate of the intellectual, who by definition is the one who’s – role – it is, to get on people’s nerves****.
**** get on people’s nerves with arguments, that is, with differentiations, with critique (Kant) – that’s at least what Jürgen Habermas concludes while making this rather self-ironic definition of the intellectual as the one who gets on people’s nerves. – According to Sigmund Freud, this rather unpeasant aspect of actually being a public intellectual might well be an athropological constant – and transcend the racial barrier quite easily.
https://cwbchicago.com/2021/08/two-men-are-beaten-and-robbed-in-the-middle-of-state-street-as-people-walk-by-drive-past-and-twerk-up-a-storm-video.htmlReplies: @HammerJack, @JackOH, @El Dato, @anon, @Chris Mallory
Fairly ordinary footage here in the ex-USA. Fringe websites may carry it, but Goodwhites know better than to visit fringe websites. Goodwhites (which are the vast majority) won’t even permit violent crime to be mentioned in their presence, except in the rare case when it’s white-on-black, when the MSM and the FBI will be out in force, the President will be heard from, and cities are burned and looted.
So what are you looking at, white boy? I’d say you’re looking at your future, but it’s already here. And it won’t be carried on the 11 o’clock news.
The persecution will not be televised.
Work out what the competition is over. Realise it is mostly over ego validation and then act appropriately. You can’t win if you don’t get the nature of the conflict. Pretending it is a life and death struggle is embarrassing.
“This will all end in tears.”
Nah, cholera.
Most of us work instead at something more equivalent to the Scranton office of Dunder Mifflin.
Twice I’ve seen black men, evidently fans of The Office, wearing Dunder Mifflin t-shirts. Both times I initially flash-read it as Dindu Nuffin.
As seen from Friedrich Nietzsche’s Übermenschen-perspective, such tears would make for a perfect reason for a big laugh.*****
Would I recommend looking at all this through the late Friedrich’s round little glasses? – Every once in a while – in homeopathic doses – for therapeutic reasons: Yes.
PS
Remember (Steve Bannon) – The biblical God does not laugh at all. And Sigmund Freud did not laugh much either.
***** I laugh about your fee will and about your unfreee will too: Delusion is for me, what you call free will, because there is no free will.”
„Ich lache eures freien Willens und auch eures unfreien: Wahn ist mir das, was ihr Willen heißt, es gibt keinen Willen.“
– Friedrich Nietzsche: Nachlass, Summer 1883, 13 [1-36], Zarathustras heilige Gelächter – Zarathustra’s holy laughters.
Interesting. Would you say that Holocaust museums are risibly mawkish?
The openness of the anti-White agenda is a good thing. Far more damage was done back in the 60s and 70s (through “civil rights”, forced integration, affirmative action, forced bussing, etc) under the guise of color-blind civic nationalism.
Good, honest hatred is easier to understand. No hiding behind smiles.
Where you been, bro? Tears been flowing for decades. Actually, as our people are starting to realize what time it is, I’m hopeful.
Steve keeps trying to find other reasons that non-whites and Jews attack whites beyond the obvious. It's about the money. Or it's about old high school feuds. Or it's about getting some fame. Or it's about white accomplishments in the past. And sure, all of those come into play, but they're not the true source of the attack on whites.
Steve simply can't accept that other races are tribal. They first and foremost hate us because we're white. They want us as helots in our formers lands because we're another tribe, not because they had a tough time in high school.
Steve refuses to accept this because it's so distasteful to him, same as Murray. This cause their normally keen logic to fail them. It's actually pretty interesting to watch.Replies: @Pierre de Craon, @TWS
The 3d and 4th were anything but color blind. The first is a misused term, but it encompasses things that actually are color blind and do not incorporate the 2d, 3d, or 4th items.
“In the 1970s, George Steinbrenner bought the Yankees and adopted a new no-publicity-is-bad-publicity policy of feuding in the tabloids with his manager Billy Martin and star players Reggie Jackson and Thurman Munson.”
The template for Steinbrenner was Charles Finley, owner of the OAK A’s. More so than Steinbrenner, most of the A’s players literally hated Finley, with many of the feuds between them reported in the newspapers of the time. The true team of the ’70’s decade was not the Yankees but the A’s, due in large part to them winning 3 consecutive WS. While Steinbrenner had a few defenders in the clubhouse, nobody, but nobody, defended much less personally cared for Charles Finley.
Two factors were working during this time of the late ’60’s early ’70’s. Society was changing (Vietnam, counter culture) and the publishing of Ball Four in 1970. The irony was that Jim Bouton was basically on his own in the early ’60’s NY team as an oddity, oddball, basically a harmless gadfly.
The A’s changed that. Perhaps no owner (not even Steinbrenner to that extent) went out of his way to nearly consciously piss off his own players in every single possible way.
And yet OAK won 3 consecutive WS, a feat which wouldn’t be repeated until NY’s 1998-2000.
“celebrated in Life magazine in 1958 as “The Organization Men of Baseball,” the sporting equivalent of IBM’s white-collar minions in button-down shirts:”
“How can you root for US Steel?” Was the epithet used vs NY fans during that era. Also it was a largely all white team that won during ’50’s and ’60’s while MLB was rushing to integrate.
Just imagine if Jim Bouton had become a historian, and had written a book called "Balfour" in the same puckish tone.
Non-whites need to be taught to channel their anti-white non-racist love (racist anti-white hatred) towards other non-whites for being insufficiently anti-whitely non-racistly white hating. Or something.
The above article in New York magazine: Self-identified “progressive, liberal” NYM commenter pretty much gets it (bold emphasis added) : Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Goddard, @Altai, @AceDeuce
That was an excellent post (under the [MORE]) but I take issue with the statement “the same way its the fault of black men for taking roles as criminals in film and TV and perpetuating stereotypes.”
You rarely see blacks portraying criminals on TV in anything like the proportion of their responsibility for real-world crime, outside of The Wire. We watched Demolition Man (1993) recently and my wife was startled that the bad guy–a really bad guy–was played by Wesley Snipes.
We also watched Guy Ritchie’s Snatch (2000), about several different criminal groups–generic gangsters, Russian mobsters, gypsies, and black criminals–double- and triple-crossing each other. Naturally, conditioned by today’s conventions, we assumed that the goofy black criminals would outsmart everyone. SPOILER ALERT: They do not. I thought, “Wow, you could do that back then.”
Then we began to move to the current paradigm. Always dignified, competent, put-upon and certainly not criminal.Replies: @Barnard, @Dennis Dale, @Hibernian, @Art Deco
I wonder how many aware whites saw this movie in the same way I did.
That being said, I did regret the movie portrayal loss of incidental innocent lives in the movie...
But nobody pays attention to local news these days....
Oh Woodward and Bernstein were propagating the narrative alright, just not the narrative of then-serving President.
It’s already tears, and it’s not ending soon, no, it’s just getting started.
Steve Sailer:
“Thus, the upper reaches of society have been egging on everybody who isn’t a straight white male to dredge up and dwell on ancient memories of social unease in middle and high school.”
But Steve Sailer, high school IS traumatic. Kids are awful anywhere in the World, but in the U.S it’s even worse because America has a very extreme winner/loser mindset and type of Society where if you aren’t talented or accomplished even as a teenager, you are trash. Think the nerd who gets stuffed in lockers, beaten up and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew, while the school’s captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town’s Golden Boy.
The way Society is organized at it’s most fundamental level IS unfair, a disgusting and vile Darwinian hell hole that causes enormous amounts of Human pain and suffering. We should be striving to elevate ourselves from our animal-like Nature, and not to celebrate it.
So a guy is better than me just because he has bigger muscles, a deeper voice and a squarer jaw? What kind of BS is that? I think those traits are objectively inferior, and the guys that have that just have them. They haven’t striven at all for them. They just lucked out. So how are they “winners” if there was no effort involved except having the right parents?
Society as it is is cruel, anachronistic, irrational, a bunch of de-humanizing institutions that exist for a Darwinian economic/coporate imperative and must be torn apart and rebuilt from scratch.
Chad Thundercock ruined my teenage years, and I want all of Society to pay for it.
Common enough, but one might wager < 10% of the male population.
and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew,
Every house has different rules.
while the school’s captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town’s Golden Boy
Mythological creature.
Yes, school is ghastly, in part because high school students are seldom learning a serious trade. Why should the dynamics of high school regulate adult life? And why should the imagined pasts of people do so?Replies: @Elli, @3g4me, @anarchyst
Society doesn't have a problem, you do. Deal.Replies: @Anonymous
Many times these "groups" are sanctioned by the schools themselves, being "jocks" or other "protected" groups. School officials quite often "look the other way" and don't want to be bothered. If the bullied student fights back, HE is quite often punished by the "system".
The case of football jocks murdering a "goth" youth and getting away with it "just because they could" actually occurred in Amarillo Texas. These "jocks" repeatedly harassed and eventually murdered this "goth" student. When the case came to trial, the "jocks" were acquitted because "the big football championship game was scheduled for the following week and their "star players" were needed to assure a win for the school". As "football" is next to "mom and apple pie" in Texas, the jurors' decision was not a surprise. Texans take football so seriously, many high schools have facilities that rival professional sports teams.
A few years later, the ringleader of the bullies was jailed for another offense.
Bullies need to be beaten to within an inch of their lives. Permanent irreversible paralysis would be a plus.Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous
Lol!
Perfect.Replies: @Rockford Tyson, @Anonymous
Your "understanding" of American high schools is based on watching teen movies&sitcoms from the 90s.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxyRAsaSNrM
I'm going to tell you a secret. Nobody was stuffing kids in lockers back in the 90s. Except on "Boy Meets World" and "Family Matters."
The Holocaust was a life and death struggle and I found the museum I visited both shocking and moving.
I cringe that you would make some equivalence here.
On the other hand, the proliferation of Holocaust museums and memorials is quite embarrassing too. My eyes have a tendency to roll when I read about the construction of another one.
The Holocaust, an extremely high stakes event, is often, though not only, now used as a prop in a relatively low stakes conflict. The first conflict was WW2. The contemporary one is the “culture war.”
You might adroitly use hyperbole to your advantage by comparing the two, but don’t come to actually believe your own sensationalism.
If you come to believe that you’re facing a Holocaust you sound like a PMS’ing teenage girl who screams that not being allowed to a party is “the end of the world.” You destroy your credibility and potential for considered and appropriate action. You will, therefore, lose.
Of course, I am wasting my time, probably. You no doubt believe your own emotional incontinence. So much so that you can’t even see how it is all hysteria. You likely think that it is “hard and rigorous fact-based analysis”, even though your own life choices and actions, not inactions, surely belie your self-gratifying beliefs.
Being extremely low in so-called “dark triad” traits, which I don’t see as “dark” as my favourite people tend to have them, I find ego validation and people’s endless quest for it to be a bit alienating. I am also afraid of other people’s fears, though I think for good reason, but at least I know enough to take them seriously and even to appreciate those traits. And when I say “fears” I mean what underlies the ones they literally identify. You now need to do the same for yourself.
Take the issue of black people looking great in adverts and white men being made to look bad. You can continue to pretend that this is some prelude to a Holocaust and that is why you are so hurt and worried. You might even be pretending so much that you won’t even admit that you are hurt. Or, you can admit that this mal-representation hurts your ego and thereby both understand yourself better and the situation. It is ok to feel invalidated by mean adverts. Everyone experiences this type of thing. It isn’t the end of the world, but it isn’t “nothing” either. You are worthy of having your feelings addressed, though you can’t expect others to do so if you won’t even begin to address them yourself. It you pretend that you’re actually a super serious fighter and resister against a global conspiracy to eradicate you and your kind, rather than owning your own sh*t, you will fail and fail and fail.
If this is all a bit much, take a breath and ask yourself how you feel. Wise action follows seeing yourself and your position as it is, not as will most inflate your ego, though ego inflation is a common human need. The practical benefit of “wise action” in a “culture war” would be to actually start winning. You certainly aren’t going to win by pretending to fight the last war from over 70 years ago, even if it makes you feel more important and serious and all the things you want to see in yourself.
TL response word count: 600.This you? Huh. You’re the first woman ever to be unsatisfied by my hard and rigorous
fact-based analysis
You people have been getting a lot of mileage from something that you claim happened 70 years ago .Replies: @3g4me
The first time a black told me that blacks planned on killing all the White people was in 1972.
The first time I got arrested for being assaulted by a black, was in 1988.
The first time an employer told me he would never hire me, because I was White, was 1990.
Even the UN page on genocide covers the various tactics being used against Whites.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
Guess I’m a lousy Good White because I love WorldStarHipHop! Especially when blue state anyone is beaten by blacks. The whites who are still in close contact with blacks have it coming. Sometimes they try to play the “I support BLM” card as they’re being beaten. Hilarious!
The video "gave proof through that night, but their signs are still there. Oh say do those neighbors' stupidity yet reign ...".
I don't know any more details, because we don't see any reason to be very friendly.. on account of the idiotic BLM signs.
Well, the other side sees ego validation as a life and death struggle, so we don’t have to pretend.
I believe the latter is categorically more hysterical and far less likely to be effective.Replies: @bomag
“Racial hate” is a head fake. The anti-white rhetoric is squarely aimed at America as founded. Recall the Smithsonian graphic (Removed from the Smithsonian site, but discussed, e.g., at
https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rational-thinking-hard-work-are-white-values-1518333) Virtually everything on there is what makes America unique and allows someone to be successful in America.
Obviously there are some very impressionable dim bulbs out there, and the usual common-sense precautions apply (paging John Derbyshire), but the main counter-project ought not to be “stop the racial hatred”, but “stop demonizing what makes America great”
(I’ve hearkened back time and time again to a popular farming manual from c.1910. In discussing farm labor, the author mentions “Negroes” and Hungarians in the same breath. Have the Italians, Hungarians, or Irish gotten any lighter (now, there’s an iSteve piece waiting to be written lulz)? No, they have assimilated and taken on the traits that have propelled them to success in this country. Despite all the Megaphone Chicken Little-ing about “White Supremacy”, I think people get this, witness the increased “BIPOC” support for Trump in 2020))
The concept of envy — the hatred of the superior — has dropped out of our moral vocabulary. The idea that white Christian civilization is hated more for its virtues than its sins doesn’t occur to us, because it’s not a nice idea. Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of western power long after colonialism, imperialism and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. Superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call “minorities.”
You rarely see blacks portraying criminals on TV in anything like the proportion of their responsibility for real-world crime, outside of The Wire. We watched Demolition Man (1993) recently and my wife was startled that the bad guy--a really bad guy--was played by Wesley Snipes.
We also watched Guy Ritchie's Snatch (2000), about several different criminal groups--generic gangsters, Russian mobsters, gypsies, and black criminals--double- and triple-crossing each other. Naturally, conditioned by today's conventions, we assumed that the goofy black criminals would outsmart everyone. SPOILER ALERT: They do not. I thought, "Wow, you could do that back then."Replies: @Jim Christian, @Lurker, @anarchyst, @Matttt
Boyz In The Hood outlines their murderous depravity pretty well, now that you point out dramatic examples blacks followed in the past. I’m there are many more.
Standard Boomer take. “As long as I’m dead and gone by the time my grandchildren are turned into helots, and I can receive my govt giveaways in the meantime, then it won’t be that bad.”
Also did a CTRL-F for “Jews” in the article. Zero hits. They’re the ones pushing this stuff. Why not mention that?
How Seriously Should Whites Take the Ever-Increasing Racial Hate Directed at Them in the Press?
Cancel your subscription, let the outlets die. (Some of them will be taken over by Chinese agents or be the toys of malevolent people like Soros and Bezos who will use them to push propaganda and not much care about the losses, natch).
Where you need to resist is in schools, workplaces, and electoral campaigns.
Even being one of the very best yeoman farmers won't bring you much power, as I think the blog writer here would support.Replies: @peterike
The next phase is either surrender or quietly (at first) forming our own communities. As you can see from the comments around here, most successful whites will choose the former as they can protect themselves from the ravages of what's coming and because many will simply marry into the cream of other successful groups, such as Asians and Indians. These people also simply lack much group/ethnic loyalty so what's it to them if other whites are turned into helots. Not their people, not their problem.
But some whites will push back and choose the latter. Our ability to succeed is questionable at best, but for those whites, like me, who do feel a kinship with our own people, it's worth a shot. We all die so we might as well die trying.
Democracy is always a tough system to maintain. Democracy in a multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-culture society is doomed to fail.Replies: @Hi There
Steve,
Why can’t more people understand that much of the opinion and coping mechanism of whites toward blacks comes out of the personal experiences of whites while in school, the military, or entry level jobs. How many blue collar and middle class white have had to deal with a young Jamal or DeMarkus in their junior high or high school class who was sexist, racist, homophobic, attention seeking, totally disinterested in learning, and a bully. Yet, whites are not allowed to ever discuss how much they hated being in class with DeMarkus and how much the establishment catered to DeMarkus instead of catering to the white and Asian students who wanted to learn.
Elite whites deal with the DeMarkus issue by sending their children to elite private school and universities who find subtle ways to show DeMarkus the door when the elite parents get upset. Yet, middle class whites learn to deal with the DeMarkus issue by trying not to hire blacks, avoiding workplaces with too many blacks, and avoiding businesses and neighborhoods with too many blacks.
The ordeal that us white students had to go through was harrowing, to say the least. White students did not use the restrooms, as a “beatdown” by multiple blacks was usually the result.
Blacks never fought one-on-one, the “pack mentality” was evident then as is today.
Any attempts by whites to defend themselves was met with indifference, and even outright hostility from the black school officials. You see, even then, blacks were not "responsible" for their behavior.
Blacks did not want to learn, the same situation that still exists today. Even then, blacks were disruptive. You see, just as is the case today, excelling at education is “acting white” and is frowned upon by fellow black “students”. Most of the teachers just shrugged their shoulders, let the disruptions go on until the next class period.
Almost all teachers were deferential to blacks, although there were a few good teachers who tried to carefully shield their white and asian students (us) from predatory blacks, giving us additional attention and coursework, knowing that we would excel in spite of the, violent, raucous atmosphere.
Anywhere blacks go, they destroy…Replies: @Nicholas Stix
Cancel your subscription, let the outlets die. (Some of them will be taken over by Chinese agents or be the toys of malevolent people like Soros and Bezos who will use them to push propaganda and not much care about the losses, natch).
Where you need to resist is in schools, workplaces, and electoral campaigns.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @Citizen of a Silly Country
Agreed. The media environment is ultra-competitive. It is actually harsher than the Jeffersonian ideal due to also being a plaything for the rich. Government schools are a monopoly. If you want power, try to control the monopoly.
Even being one of the very best yeoman farmers won’t bring you much power, as I think the blog writer here would support.
https://cwbchicago.com/2021/08/two-men-are-beaten-and-robbed-in-the-middle-of-state-street-as-people-walk-by-drive-past-and-twerk-up-a-storm-video.htmlReplies: @HammerJack, @JackOH, @El Dato, @anon, @Chris Mallory
JimDandy, yes, of course, you’re right. There’s a thread within Black Supremacism and White liberalism that quietly has it that Black violence, both wholesale (rioting) and retail (assaults and robberies), has a sort of quasi-legitimacy and quasi-justification as political expression, a sort of bullshit “restorative justice”.
Those “stop the violence” rallies organized by Black folks are genuine enough, but they’re also hamstrung by a likewise genuine double-mindedness about law enforcement. When LE is stringent, it’s “racist”; when LE is lax, it’s also “racist”. Bloody damned mess it is, and few mainstream journalists are allowed to point up the contradictions in Black political thinking.
Contra the progressive cry that society is centered around systems designed to benefit whiteness, much of what has made our society go over the last 60 years is whites willingness to put the concerns and demands of others higher up the priority list than their own. What happens when a critical mass of whites decide they are done with this arrangement? Whites acting just as self-interested as blacks means a substantially different culture and allocation of resources.
Where does such a place exist? Maybe Hungary, Russia, Poland, or Israel? I don't know. Nowhere else I can think of. As Lawrence Auster wrote,
The latest FBI report on hate crime is out. The big takeaway from the BBC’s coverage is that whites are underrepresented among known perpertrators. Hispanics don’t even rate a mention. Disgraceful pro-white propaganda!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-58402839
The upshot is Steve thinks things got bad for White people around 2013. Apparently, everything was awesome prior to that. Huh?
Those who have no racial loyalty (which is most HBD pundits) simply don’t notice certain things. Use them for whatever value you can get but be cautious.
If some guy gave up his citizenship and declared himself a “world citizen”, you’d keep that in mind. So, how do you view someone who walks away from their racial identity.
Steve is not pro-white; he's anti-anti-white. Like Murray, Steve wants everyone to embrace and enjoy the rich bio-diversity of the human race all while ignoring race, at least on an individual basis. That men as bright as Murray and Sailer can't see the flaw in their thinking shows how blinded they are. Cognitive dissonance of this level takes some serious brains.
Btw, I noticed that Steve never addressed the Z-Man's critique of Citizenism a week or two ago. Probably for the best. Defending the indefensible against someone who can match your debating skills isn't a great idea.Replies: @Bill Jones, @3g4me, @James N. Kennett, @ATBOTL
**** get on people's nerves with arguments, that is, with differentiations, with critique (Kant) - that's at least what Jürgen Habermas concludes while making this rather self-ironic definition of the intellectual as the one who gets on people's nerves. - According to Sigmund Freud, this rather unpeasant aspect of actually being a public intellectual might well be an athropological constant - and transcend the racial barrier quite easily.Replies: @kihowi
But that’s never how it works. Intellectuals are people who repeat popular superstitions back to the middlebrow masses with such an intimidating vocabulary that they think “wow he’s a genius and he agrees with me, I must be right!”.
Intellectuals who come out with unpleasant thoughts are never called that, they’re liars or kooks or conspiracy theorists. There’s no such thing as telling people what they don’t want to hear and profiting from it.
No, they're not. Much energy in the word-merchant class is devoted to developing arguments that things are not as ordinary people perceive them.
Nah, cholera.Replies: @JMcG, @El Dato
This gives me an idea. We should start a pool, like a Dead Pool. We bet on the year and month that cholera reappears in the USA. Or perhaps the year and city.
New Orleans, September 2021.
Intellectuals are people who repeat popular superstitions back to the middlebrow masses with such an intimidating vocabulary that they think “wow he’s a genius and he agrees with me, I must be right!”.
No, they’re not. Much energy in the word-merchant class is devoted to developing arguments that things are not as ordinary people perceive them.
https://cwbchicago.com/2021/08/two-men-are-beaten-and-robbed-in-the-middle-of-state-street-as-people-walk-by-drive-past-and-twerk-up-a-storm-video.htmlReplies: @HammerJack, @JackOH, @El Dato, @anon, @Chris Mallory
Nice white Ladies in the editorial rooms will not let this Black Love Misfire burn the retinas of innocent whites. What will people think?!
Deep-sixed.
Cringe! I cringe in your general direction!
Well now, Mr American. Have you been suitably put in your place by Ms Fellow White Person?
Or shall we taunt you a second time?
Nah, cholera.Replies: @JMcG, @El Dato
5.56mm tears.
So your argument is that open and widespread anti-Semitism in the public arena was not a contributing factor in the occurrence of the Holocaust?
What’s more hysterical? Being served gross food and screaming that it is gross and how terrible it is that it isn’t delicious, or being served gross food and super seriously telling everyone that it is a conspiracy to poison you and eradicate your bloodline?
I believe the latter is categorically more hysterical and far less likely to be effective.
Hysterical doesn't mean wrong. Hyperbole doesn't mean the underlying point is wrong.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
“After all, most people find themselves angriest not at large-scale abstractions such as a race but with the individuals who get on their nerves.”
There are many people who didn’t seriously “get on the nerves” of family and friends until they wound up on the opposite side of the abstractions. Well, okay, maybe they were “on the nerves” sometimes, but they had the admiration, love, and respect. Then along came the deplorables/derangement syndrome, the abstractions, and that magnified a normal level of “on the nerves” into great anger. In sum, the two parameters (1. bothersome traits to begin with; and 2. the abstractions) are related, in a way that is additive or maybe even multiplicative.
They better take it pretty seriously and lots of them are. The now well-documented “flight from white” illustrates this. I hope Steve is right and this will all fizzle out. I fear Andrew Anglin may be right and it may be about to get much worse. We already have a cop being declared a hero for shooting an unarmed small white woman who was no threat to him or anyone else. He even boasts of saving “countless lives” by doing so. Next step (probably already being planned by deep staters) will be a large scale massacre of “deplorable” whites and the giving of medals to those who carry out the massacre.
Again, familiarize yourself with my comment history. It’s not “some equivalence”, it’s fair warning. I’m a sporting gentleman, if I do say so myself. 😉
Let’s go to the tape:
JIE initial post word count: 10.
TL response word count: 600.
This you?
Huh. You’re the first woman ever to be unsatisfied by my hard and rigorous
fact-based analysis
1st don’t pay subscriptions to any msm outlet. Then talk about organizing.
The racial bile is an attempt to distract from the fact that American blacks simply don’t pull their weight. You’d have to be pretty stupid to be distracted but then plenty of people are.
“This will all end in tears.”
Coming from Steve, this is some John Derbyshire level of doom.
“The growing anti-white racism works by giving some superficial coherence to nonwhites’ nearly random junior-high interpersonal resentments.”
K-12 school forces children to participate in a kind of useless society; it’s unhealthy and unnatural, and children remember it for the rest of their lives. The destruction of the family has turned school into a tribal family with thousands of kids.
Honoring Lenin, who is quoted as saying “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted”, everyone wants to control the school system. It’s a horror show.
So let’s get rid of it, and go back to having small families with decent moral values…
Ha ha, I do carry on. Never happen. We’re fucked.
Since the end of Segregation over 500,000 European-American Gentiles have
been raped and/or murdered by blacks. Why? Endless white-bashing has
incited a race prone to over-reaction and violence. I grew up in a 100%
European-American Gentile community. People left their doors unlocked
and could venture out at night without fear of crime.
What planet are you on, Steve?
Seems to me that Mr. Sailer, unusually, got off his track this time. I was looking for his view on how serious I, as a white man, should take all the anti-white propaganda. (I tend to take it very seriously, as it seems to me to be a still-rising wave that has broad and powerful support.) But his discussion is divagatory and his ending ambiguous.
It hasn’t even begun yet.
What? I should stop my research in killer synsects and neural-pattern targeting weapons?
Nah, it’s just that the last half of the 20th century has somehow sustained the fantasy in “The West” that “life and death struggles” are actually rare and can be managed by media talk. Apparently history lessons are really low quality and nobody remembers a few very close shaves with the all-out nuclear exchange. Or maybe “the Holocaust” has hoovered up all capacity at proper context setting like a gigantic Karmic Tick.
We might be wrong and our technological toys might make things worse quickly.
Everybody better behave.
"Conflict" will continue, but the way it will be fought will reflect what it is fought over. Go up Maslow's hierarchy and you will see what remains scarce. People won't be motivated to fight over what does not; but a fight over higher order needs is exactly what we see all around us. It is one of ego validation, "representation" and passive aggression. You may wish it were more "serious" or you may lament that you are personally unequipped to compete in this world, but the facts of the situation remain. Recognise what has happened, what is going on and act accordingly.
Or, you know, don't, and keep pretending that some apocalypse will come along and suddenly all of your serious manly skills will become crucial. It didn't work well for the Luddites but who knows?
I suppose in the meantime you can mutually backslap on Unz in a joint venture fantasy, but I personally would prefer you guys engage in a realistic way. The culture is becoming increasingly unbalanced in your absence, while you prepare in your bunkers for a doomsday which will never come.
Ever wonder why history is fixed at Emmet Till and the Holocaust? Because that is the last time the stakes were actually high In the developed world. Ever wonder why progressives use the language of therapy? Because that is what they are doing through politics. Ever wonder why educated, important people seem so unserious? Because they are dealing with unserious conflicts due to a lack of serious ones. Ever wonder why a 20 year war in the middle of nowhere which no one actually cares about that was less dangerous than an average mountain climbing expedition is considered apocalyptic, or Jan 6th is considered an "insurgency"? Because they are the biggest things around.
Be grateful you get to live in a time when we have the luxury to be frivolous and, if you want to fight, recognise the nature of the fight you are in, or else, keep losing.
Think of it like The Last Samurai. It is sad to give up all of that honour and glory, but the world has moved on. The Samurai may be a more romantic figure than the infantry grunt, just as the hard men of Unz may be more romantic than a blue-haired passive aggressive feelings ninja, but realism is about recognising what works, not fantasising that the past will return and going down in one last but irrelevant charge.
"Politics is now silly and this is fun" is both the lowQ and HighQ response. Meanwhile the midwits are all seething that everyone must now get super serious.
Remember when the Dissident Right kind of knew this and actually had some success? That was cool. Unfortunately they started to get high on their own supply of hyperbole and lost track of reality.
People living in reality tend to succeed when they want to. People living in a fantasy don't. Think of failure as a clue that something in your perception is wrong.
Sometimes you have to risk letting go of a fantasy and getting your feelings hurt in the process to reorganise and actually be effective. No pain, no gain can apply to psychology too.
And with this comment, because I am clearly pushing on a door welded far too tight, I am out. Unless perhaps I see some sparks of awareness begin to fly here. Thanks to all and I am very happy to have developed this understanding further. I should really have plumped for a Seven Samurai analogy instead of a Last Samurai one. It is such a beautiful film and the Seven Samurai were such amazing people, I love them all, but their assumptions and skills belong to a history that thankfully no longer exists. Peasants don't need to hire protection from brigands in the developed world and there isn't going to be an apocalypse or genocide or hot civil war or invasion. The reasons those happened in the past no longer mean anything.Replies: @Too Long Didn't Read, @Ben tillman, @Chrisnonymous, @Mr Mox, @William Badwhite
https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rational-thinking-hard-work-are-white-values-1518333) Virtually everything on there is what makes America unique and allows someone to be successful in America.
Obviously there are some very impressionable dim bulbs out there, and the usual common-sense precautions apply (paging John Derbyshire), but the main counter-project ought not to be "stop the racial hatred", but "stop demonizing what makes America great"
(I've hearkened back time and time again to a popular farming manual from c.1910. In discussing farm labor, the author mentions "Negroes" and Hungarians in the same breath. Have the Italians, Hungarians, or Irish gotten any lighter (now, there's an iSteve piece waiting to be written lulz)? No, they have assimilated and taken on the traits that have propelled them to success in this country. Despite all the Megaphone Chicken Little-ing about "White Supremacy", I think people get this, witness the increased "BIPOC" support for Trump in 2020))Replies: @Neuday
But they aren’t simply demonizing “what makes America great”, they’re also demonizing what makes England, Ireland, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, France, Sweden, Germany great. Notice the pattern? It’s not anti-America; it’s anti-White, and anti-White (Western) Civilization. They hate us, our ancestors, and what we’ve built. Why? J. Sobran knew in 1997:
The concept of envy — the hatred of the superior — has dropped out of our moral vocabulary. The idea that white Christian civilization is hated more for its virtues than its sins doesn’t occur to us, because it’s not a nice idea. Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of western power long after colonialism, imperialism and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. Superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call “minorities.”
Check out the 2020 spike. War on whitey can be quite lucrative.
Good, honest hatred is easier to understand. No hiding behind smiles. Where you been, bro? Tears been flowing for decades. Actually, as our people are starting to realize what time it is, I'm hopeful.Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Art Deco
Steve’s arguments and writing are becoming more and more convoluted (as this post clearly shows) due to his unwillingness to accept a basic reality: They hate us and want our people destroyed.
Steve keeps trying to find other reasons that non-whites and Jews attack whites beyond the obvious. It’s about the money. Or it’s about old high school feuds. Or it’s about getting some fame. Or it’s about white accomplishments in the past. And sure, all of those come into play, but they’re not the true source of the attack on whites.
Steve simply can’t accept that other races are tribal. They first and foremost hate us because we’re white. They want us as helots in our formers lands because we’re another tribe, not because they had a tough time in high school.
Steve refuses to accept this because it’s so distasteful to him, same as Murray. This cause their normally keen logic to fail them. It’s actually pretty interesting to watch.
So many words just to say “Jews good, whites bad”
Yep.
Good, honest hatred is easier to understand. No hiding behind smiles. Where you been, bro? Tears been flowing for decades. Actually, as our people are starting to realize what time it is, I'm hopeful.Replies: @Citizen of a Silly Country, @Art Deco
through “civil rights”, forced integration, affirmative action, forced bussing, etc) under the guise of color-blind civic nationalism.
The 3d and 4th were anything but color blind. The first is a misused term, but it encompasses things that actually are color blind and do not incorporate the 2d, 3d, or 4th items.
"Thus, the upper reaches of society have been egging on everybody who isn’t a straight white male to dredge up and dwell on ancient memories of social unease in middle and high school."
But Steve Sailer, high school IS traumatic. Kids are awful anywhere in the World, but in the U.S it's even worse because America has a very extreme winner/loser mindset and type of Society where if you aren't talented or accomplished even as a teenager, you are trash. Think the nerd who gets stuffed in lockers, beaten up and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew, while the school's captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town's Golden Boy.
The way Society is organized at it's most fundamental level IS unfair, a disgusting and vile Darwinian hell hole that causes enormous amounts of Human pain and suffering. We should be striving to elevate ourselves from our animal-like Nature, and not to celebrate it.
So a guy is better than me just because he has bigger muscles, a deeper voice and a squarer jaw? What kind of BS is that? I think those traits are objectively inferior, and the guys that have that just have them. They haven't striven at all for them. They just lucked out. So how are they "winners" if there was no effort involved except having the right parents?
Society as it is is cruel, anachronistic, irrational, a bunch of de-humanizing institutions that exist for a Darwinian economic/coporate imperative and must be torn apart and rebuilt from scratch.
Chad Thundercock ruined my teenage years, and I want all of Society to pay for it. https://youtu.be/E6_Y77q1PqkReplies: @Art Deco, @Art Deco, @anarchyst, @Old Prude, @anon, @JohnnyWalker123
Think the nerd who gets stuffed in lockers, beaten up
Common enough, but one might wager < 10% of the male population.
and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew,
Every house has different rules.
while the school’s captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town’s Golden Boy
Mythological creature.
Yes, school is ghastly, in part because high school students are seldom learning a serious trade. Why should the dynamics of high school regulate adult life? And why should the imagined pasts of people do so?
https://www.foxnews.com/us/what-happened-affluenza-teen-ethan-couchReplies: @Art Deco
Because people grow old but most never grow up. And because certain special people are well known for holding grudges over centuries. Because they're petty and insular and everyone they know shares their opinions. And because they are taught hate from a young age and it's constantly reinforced by the media and social institutions they've taken control over.
And because people like Sailer lend credence to the theory that holding high school grudges is a legitimate thing, because confronting the reality of racial and tribal hatred makes him and most of his readers terribly uncomfortable.Replies: @Art Deco
...actually occurred in Amarillo Texas. A "goth" youth was mercilessly bullied and eventually murdered by a high school football team captain "just because they could". The football jocks were "the cream of the community" while the "goth youth" was born on "the wrong side of the tracks", when the case came to trial, the jury acquitted the football jocks. You see, the school championship game was the following week and the jury could not afford to see their "star players" in jail. So much for "justice"...Replies: @Art Deco
"Thus, the upper reaches of society have been egging on everybody who isn’t a straight white male to dredge up and dwell on ancient memories of social unease in middle and high school."
But Steve Sailer, high school IS traumatic. Kids are awful anywhere in the World, but in the U.S it's even worse because America has a very extreme winner/loser mindset and type of Society where if you aren't talented or accomplished even as a teenager, you are trash. Think the nerd who gets stuffed in lockers, beaten up and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew, while the school's captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town's Golden Boy.
The way Society is organized at it's most fundamental level IS unfair, a disgusting and vile Darwinian hell hole that causes enormous amounts of Human pain and suffering. We should be striving to elevate ourselves from our animal-like Nature, and not to celebrate it.
So a guy is better than me just because he has bigger muscles, a deeper voice and a squarer jaw? What kind of BS is that? I think those traits are objectively inferior, and the guys that have that just have them. They haven't striven at all for them. They just lucked out. So how are they "winners" if there was no effort involved except having the right parents?
Society as it is is cruel, anachronistic, irrational, a bunch of de-humanizing institutions that exist for a Darwinian economic/coporate imperative and must be torn apart and rebuilt from scratch.
Chad Thundercock ruined my teenage years, and I want all of Society to pay for it. https://youtu.be/E6_Y77q1PqkReplies: @Art Deco, @Art Deco, @anarchyst, @Old Prude, @anon, @JohnnyWalker123
The way Society is organized at it’s most fundamental level IS unfair, a disgusting and vile Darwinian hell hole that causes enormous amounts of Human pain and suffering.
Society doesn’t have a problem, you do. Deal.
Ok, I’ll bite.
New Orleans, September 2021.
The above article in New York magazine: Self-identified “progressive, liberal” NYM commenter pretty much gets it (bold emphasis added) : Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Goddard, @Altai, @AceDeuce
Stop watching and talking about television. TV sucked when whites dominated. It’s an order of magnitude worse now. Just cut the cord and set your TV set out with the garbage, where it belongs.
” You certainly aren’t going to win by pretending to fight the last war from over 70 years ago, even if it makes you feel more important and serious and all the things you want to see in yourself.”
You people have been getting a lot of mileage from something that you claim happened 70 years ago .
Why can't more people understand that much of the opinion and coping mechanism of whites toward blacks comes out of the personal experiences of whites while in school, the military, or entry level jobs. How many blue collar and middle class white have had to deal with a young Jamal or DeMarkus in their junior high or high school class who was sexist, racist, homophobic, attention seeking, totally disinterested in learning, and a bully. Yet, whites are not allowed to ever discuss how much they hated being in class with DeMarkus and how much the establishment catered to DeMarkus instead of catering to the white and Asian students who wanted to learn.
Elite whites deal with the DeMarkus issue by sending their children to elite private school and universities who find subtle ways to show DeMarkus the door when the elite parents get upset. Yet, middle class whites learn to deal with the DeMarkus issue by trying not to hire blacks, avoiding workplaces with too many blacks, and avoiding businesses and neighborhoods with too many blacks.Replies: @Dennis Dale, @anarchyst
Some people go weeks without seeing a DeMarkus anywhere but on tv sportsball. So he thinks DeMarkus is not so very different from him, or that DeMarkus can be civilized. In between the action commercials present DeMarkus as the sensible neighbor over the fence.
Sportsball, which should be an inspiring example of different people working together, is a disaster for that reason. The only antidote for sportsball’s big lie is contact with DeMarkus.
People get along on the ground well enough before political demagogy interferes (but it always interferes)–except for blacks. Cue John Lennon “Imagine there’re no negroes, it’s easy if you try…”.
But asking “how bad will this get”? is nuts. It’s intolerable now; it was bad enough twenty years ago. It’s like asking if this fall from a tall building is going to end badly. I mean, we’re okay right now aren’t we? The air’s fine out here.
And beside all this, it isn’t a question of fairness to them, but to ourselves. We deserve better. Period.
You rarely see blacks portraying criminals on TV in anything like the proportion of their responsibility for real-world crime, outside of The Wire. We watched Demolition Man (1993) recently and my wife was startled that the bad guy--a really bad guy--was played by Wesley Snipes.
We also watched Guy Ritchie's Snatch (2000), about several different criminal groups--generic gangsters, Russian mobsters, gypsies, and black criminals--double- and triple-crossing each other. Naturally, conditioned by today's conventions, we assumed that the goofy black criminals would outsmart everyone. SPOILER ALERT: They do not. I thought, "Wow, you could do that back then."Replies: @Jim Christian, @Lurker, @anarchyst, @Matttt
There is a liberal myth that film & TV used to depict blacks as criminals. There little evidence for this. At one time they were rarely depicted at all and if they were, it was as amusing but harmless characters.
Then we began to move to the current paradigm. Always dignified, competent, put-upon and certainly not criminal.
Well said that man. You ought to have your own blog.
Yep. Steve’s dislike of other tribes hammering whites doesn’t come out of a loyalty to whites but to a loyalty to his brand of colorblind civic nationalism, aka Citizenism.
Steve is not pro-white; he’s anti-anti-white. Like Murray, Steve wants everyone to embrace and enjoy the rich bio-diversity of the human race all while ignoring race, at least on an individual basis. That men as bright as Murray and Sailer can’t see the flaw in their thinking shows how blinded they are. Cognitive dissonance of this level takes some serious brains.
Btw, I noticed that Steve never addressed the Z-Man’s critique of Citizenism a week or two ago. Probably for the best. Defending the indefensible against someone who can match your debating skills isn’t a great idea.
Sailer has been refusing to recognize tribal reality by remaining in California all these years. When they finally come to his neighborhood or his home, will he then open the door and say "Come, let us embrace as brothers"? Those who make light of the White hatred being spewed on the airwaves and in print are certainly quick to attribute that same 'hate' as a major warning factor in the 1930s. Those who ignore or minimize the White hate now will pay the price, or ensure their children do. Because despite their normalcy bias, yes, it WILL come to 'your' neighborhood. It will happen to YOUR children. Just like all those who've had serious medical reactions to the clot shot, they'll cry "Why didn't anyone tell me?" Plenty have told and warned, but the fools never want to hear or see. They're too busy booking cruises and returning to 'normal.'
It's pathetic to see someone as perceptive as Steve Sailer doing a sputtering "it does not compute" routine when his theory is shown by events to be wrong.
There’s a Demotivator for that:
https://despair.com/products/strife
Boyz in the Hood was released in 1991, New Jack City in 1991, Menace 2 Society in 1993 … that was then. You also had Newsweek publishing a cover story about racial differences in IQ and the publication of Charles Murray’s The Bell Curve. Peter Brimelow described the period as a brief “interglacial” during which racial topics could sometimes be discussed honestly in the mainstream media, but the subsequent clamp-down has been much more extreme than it was before, especially in the last ten years. You don’t see blacks portrayed as vicious street thugs in media today, outside of rap music, where that behavior is celebrated.
Blacks around here are easy to get along with. Strong whites who aren’t going anywhere will do that.
And of course it's had such an effect that ghoulish jews like Jennifer Rubin are now gleefully spilling their spaghetti over how much ethnic cleansing these policies have churned out in terms of lowering white birth rates through dispossession, marginally higher miscegenation rates through propaganda and making as many white men as possible into sexually invisible losers and so on.Replies: @Desiderius
Did white South Africans take the threats of black South Africans seriously?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rrjm2KpGSg
https://cwbchicago.com/2021/08/two-men-are-beaten-and-robbed-in-the-middle-of-state-street-as-people-walk-by-drive-past-and-twerk-up-a-storm-video.htmlReplies: @HammerJack, @JackOH, @El Dato, @anon, @Chris Mallory
Context: two white guys beaten and robbed and then the women started twerking….
Best reddit response:
link
The familiar anti-white media messages would be strictly forbidden if they were anti-Jewish – because of the Holocaust – so the comparison is not completely inappropriate.
There is no chance that anyone will be setting up concentration camps or death camps for white people. However, other modes of genocide are conceivable. In Rwanda, the Hutus were warned “The Tutsis are coming back to take over the country! Go out and kill as many as you can before they can kill you!” The result was 100 days of slaughter with 800,000 dead.
Comparison with the BLM protests shows how such a scenario might play out in the USA. The slaughter would be accompanied by looting, arson, and no-go areas for the police. The media would describe it as “mostly peaceful protests”. By the tenth day the authorities would realize that something was badly wrong, and begin a crackdown. By then there would be 80,000 dead – a small number compared to the Holocaust, but (following ICC judgements concerning Bosnia) large enough to be considered genocide.
Given the tone of much of the anti-white content, it is reasonable to conclude that some of its writers would consider such a slaughter to be “a good start”. It would be difficult to avoid the charge that the killing, and the advocacy for it, had taken place with the collusion of the authorities.
The future of the USA is a fairly peaceful transition to something like the 25% white Los Angeles of 2021 aka Brazil with Nukes. As Steve will tell you, there are some downsides but it’s still pretty cozy.
The most likely murderous race riots in the USA are black on Asian and mestizo hispanic on black. But they aren’t likely either.Replies: @Hi There
Not just any girl, but Briseis, a woman Homer suggests was as beautiful as a goddess, described later by Byzantine poet John Tzetzes as:
“Tall and white, her hair was black and curly;
she had beautiful breasts and cheeks and nose; she was, also, well -behaved;
her smile was bright, her eyebrows big….”
Which kind of aligns on a point or two to what the black Brearly grad referred to in her or his resentful perception of what is requisite for White privilege.
You rarely see blacks portraying criminals on TV in anything like the proportion of their responsibility for real-world crime, outside of The Wire. We watched Demolition Man (1993) recently and my wife was startled that the bad guy--a really bad guy--was played by Wesley Snipes.
We also watched Guy Ritchie's Snatch (2000), about several different criminal groups--generic gangsters, Russian mobsters, gypsies, and black criminals--double- and triple-crossing each other. Naturally, conditioned by today's conventions, we assumed that the goofy black criminals would outsmart everyone. SPOILER ALERT: They do not. I thought, "Wow, you could do that back then."Replies: @Jim Christian, @Lurker, @anarchyst, @Matttt
I liked “Law Abiding Citizen” and was rooting for Clyde Alexander Shelton (Gerard Butler’s role) against the black prosecutor (Jamie Foxx) and “the whole diseased temple” that Shelton declared that he would bring down.
I wonder how many aware whites saw this movie in the same way I did.
That being said, I did regret the movie portrayal loss of incidental innocent lives in the movie…
What a bunch of bs. Critical race theory is an attempt to subdue and replace Whites. Kirn is a collaborator, a coward, or an idiot.
Tell Robin Pigeonchest and Ibrahm X. Shakedown that they ain't no monetizins goin's on heah!
There have already been attacks and deaths based on the ego problem. Talking nicely to someone who feels justified in hurting you for being white is pointless.
Then we began to move to the current paradigm. Always dignified, competent, put-upon and certainly not criminal.Replies: @Barnard, @Dennis Dale, @Hibernian, @Art Deco
I remember watching a show, I can’t remember which one, in the late 80s or early 90s with my parents and the initial setup made it look like the black character was the killer. My dad commented, “they won’t make the black guy the killer, these shows never do that.” He was right.
Can anybody tell of a TV drama in which the black accused/defendant was the Bad Guy?Replies: @Dennis Dale, @JMcG, @Elli
From Moby Dick:
What is it that in the Albino man so peculiarly repels and often shocks the eye, as that sometimes he is loathed by his own kith and kin!
It is that whiteness which invests him, a thing expressed by the name he bears.
The Albino is as well made as other men—has no substantive deformity—and yet this mere aspect of all-pervading whiteness makes him more strangely hideous than the ugliest abortion.
Why should this be so?
Hello coping my old friend…
It's like signaling you have no problem with immigration because you're not a loser who might be affected, or, you don't concern yourself with interracial marriage because only the sexually inferior would.
I don't believe you (unless you're in Boston), but so what?Replies: @Desiderius
Slightly off topic:Bruce Springsteen…who openly desires the Demographic Death of the Native White Working Class….spent most of his Rock Star career making out with a large sweaty Negro Male on stage….think about it…And this White Boomer Culture…..
Then we began to move to the current paradigm. Always dignified, competent, put-upon and certainly not criminal.Replies: @Barnard, @Dennis Dale, @Hibernian, @Art Deco
I remember being puzzled by this charge decades ago as a teenager. Watching all that tv I thought blacks were all police captains, judges and high school principals.
"Thus, the upper reaches of society have been egging on everybody who isn’t a straight white male to dredge up and dwell on ancient memories of social unease in middle and high school."
But Steve Sailer, high school IS traumatic. Kids are awful anywhere in the World, but in the U.S it's even worse because America has a very extreme winner/loser mindset and type of Society where if you aren't talented or accomplished even as a teenager, you are trash. Think the nerd who gets stuffed in lockers, beaten up and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew, while the school's captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town's Golden Boy.
The way Society is organized at it's most fundamental level IS unfair, a disgusting and vile Darwinian hell hole that causes enormous amounts of Human pain and suffering. We should be striving to elevate ourselves from our animal-like Nature, and not to celebrate it.
So a guy is better than me just because he has bigger muscles, a deeper voice and a squarer jaw? What kind of BS is that? I think those traits are objectively inferior, and the guys that have that just have them. They haven't striven at all for them. They just lucked out. So how are they "winners" if there was no effort involved except having the right parents?
Society as it is is cruel, anachronistic, irrational, a bunch of de-humanizing institutions that exist for a Darwinian economic/coporate imperative and must be torn apart and rebuilt from scratch.
Chad Thundercock ruined my teenage years, and I want all of Society to pay for it. https://youtu.be/E6_Y77q1PqkReplies: @Art Deco, @Art Deco, @anarchyst, @Old Prude, @anon, @JohnnyWalker123
You make many good points. Those who are bullied incessantly can take it one of two ways. One way is to attempt to avoid confrontation (difficult, but doable) and the other way is to fight mercilessly against the bully. One-on-one confrontations are often successful, but many times bullies are part of a group, which makes it much more difficult to resolve the situation.
Many times these “groups” are sanctioned by the schools themselves, being “jocks” or other “protected” groups. School officials quite often “look the other way” and don’t want to be bothered. If the bullied student fights back, HE is quite often punished by the “system”.
The case of football jocks murdering a “goth” youth and getting away with it “just because they could” actually occurred in Amarillo Texas. These “jocks” repeatedly harassed and eventually murdered this “goth” student. When the case came to trial, the “jocks” were acquitted because “the big football championship game was scheduled for the following week and their “star players” were needed to assure a win for the school”. As “football” is next to “mom and apple pie” in Texas, the jurors’ decision was not a surprise. Texans take football so seriously, many high schools have facilities that rival professional sports teams.
A few years later, the ringleader of the bullies was jailed for another offense.
Bullies need to be beaten to within an inch of their lives. Permanent irreversible paralysis would be a plus.
The girls were all in love with him of course.Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous
You rarely see blacks portraying criminals on TV in anything like the proportion of their responsibility for real-world crime, outside of The Wire. We watched Demolition Man (1993) recently and my wife was startled that the bad guy--a really bad guy--was played by Wesley Snipes.
We also watched Guy Ritchie's Snatch (2000), about several different criminal groups--generic gangsters, Russian mobsters, gypsies, and black criminals--double- and triple-crossing each other. Naturally, conditioned by today's conventions, we assumed that the goofy black criminals would outsmart everyone. SPOILER ALERT: They do not. I thought, "Wow, you could do that back then."Replies: @Jim Christian, @Lurker, @anarchyst, @Matttt
If you watch entertainment TV or movies, you would get the impression that blacks are heroic geniuses, although black men on TV seem to be a little effeminate. On the other hand, if you watch local news, you would see almost every day a mugshot of a dead-eyed, many times slack-jawed (lower lip hanging down) young black male with a funny name who (allegedly) committed some unbelievably stupid act of violence.
But nobody pays attention to local news these days….
Why can't more people understand that much of the opinion and coping mechanism of whites toward blacks comes out of the personal experiences of whites while in school, the military, or entry level jobs. How many blue collar and middle class white have had to deal with a young Jamal or DeMarkus in their junior high or high school class who was sexist, racist, homophobic, attention seeking, totally disinterested in learning, and a bully. Yet, whites are not allowed to ever discuss how much they hated being in class with DeMarkus and how much the establishment catered to DeMarkus instead of catering to the white and Asian students who wanted to learn.
Elite whites deal with the DeMarkus issue by sending their children to elite private school and universities who find subtle ways to show DeMarkus the door when the elite parents get upset. Yet, middle class whites learn to deal with the DeMarkus issue by trying not to hire blacks, avoiding workplaces with too many blacks, and avoiding businesses and neighborhoods with too many blacks.Replies: @Dennis Dale, @anarchyst
It was just as bad in the 1960s. In fact, Detroit’s public high schools had “black students unions” that were successful in getting the American flag removed from the front of the schools and replacing them with “black nationalist” flags.
The ordeal that us white students had to go through was harrowing, to say the least. White students did not use the restrooms, as a “beatdown” by multiple blacks was usually the result.
Blacks never fought one-on-one, the “pack mentality” was evident then as is today.
Any attempts by whites to defend themselves was met with indifference, and even outright hostility from the black school officials. You see, even then, blacks were not “responsible” for their behavior.
Blacks did not want to learn, the same situation that still exists today. Even then, blacks were disruptive. You see, just as is the case today, excelling at education is “acting white” and is frowned upon by fellow black “students”. Most of the teachers just shrugged their shoulders, let the disruptions go on until the next class period.
Almost all teachers were deferential to blacks, although there were a few good teachers who tried to carefully shield their white and asian students (us) from predatory blacks, giving us additional attention and coursework, knowing that we would excel in spite of the, violent, raucous atmosphere.
Anywhere blacks go, they destroy…
Do you know of any published accounts of this sort of thing?Replies: @anarchyst
Twice I've seen black men, evidently fans of The Office, wearing Dunder Mifflin t-shirts. Both times I initially flash-read it as Dindu Nuffin.Replies: @Gary in Gramercy
So did they.
This is the original “cope” and it’s been essential in leading us along this path. Whites confronted with the specter of black physical superiority feel the need, like Uncle Toms, to prove they are an exception.
It’s like signaling you have no problem with immigration because you’re not a loser who might be affected, or, you don’t concern yourself with interracial marriage because only the sexually inferior would.
I don’t believe you (unless you’re in Boston), but so what?
I just read your column, Steve. It was entertaining while making a number of good points (conjecture, but I agree) as usual. You had to write 1/2 the column on baseball, haha! I gotta say, stupid old man or not, if Casey Stengel managed the Amazing Mets of ’69, then that’s all she wrote – he’s a NY City god.
Let me put in a couple of snide remarks, if iDeplorable will allow me some leeway here. (Nothing? OK, then:)
You will be SO RELIEVED to read, BB grad, that a shapely tight ass and a flat belly will substitute for all 4 of those items you may lack. Ask any swinging Dick … Tom, or Harriet.
For me, it went “when are you expecting the flood?” See, we wore some hand-me-down pants, and sometimes they ended at those knobs at my ankles. It took me a month or two to get it – well, I had to ask another kid finally – but I could look back a couple of years later and admit “that’s a freakin’ good one! I am so stealing that.” Perhaps that kind of attitude could come back in vogue again… OK, not Vogue, the magazine, because women will NEVER EVER appreciate that kind of humor.
“Does this dress make my ass look fat?” “Sure, but just turn 45 degrees to the right. OK, it’s fine now. You’re good.”
Steve,
Do you think the Iliad is just the only surviving example from a whole culture of songs about rage and fighting? Bronze Age Rap?
This hatred so liberally dispensed with in countries with an absolute majority, the rights of which are secured by birthright through a long chain of generations, of people belonging to the White Race has to be taken very seriously.
About as seriously as whites in South Africa are now taking it. It’s a matter of life and death and only a fool will not take it seriously.
The above article in New York magazine: Self-identified “progressive, liberal” NYM commenter pretty much gets it (bold emphasis added) : Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Goddard, @Altai, @AceDeuce
Ted Lasso is really popular with women with BPD on Twitter, the cohort of the terminally-online which seems to get everything it wants today, which makes it fascinating to me.
Ted Lasso is basically the same trite, we’ll have our characters act like cartoons for 20 minutes and then expect you to treat their contrived isolated personal problem as deeply serious that you might remember from Bill Lawarence’s other show, Scrubs. He just adds lots of reddit-tier stereotypes about Britain in there. (Even to the point that the foreign players don’t come from the right countries, the goalkeeper is a Quebecois and the main foreign player is Mexican)
But the author misses the point. In the first episode Ted has a realistic panic attack when he realises optimism isn’t a substitute for knowing what you’re doing and we learn his normal, down to Earth wife can’t live with him anymore and divorces him and he becomes estranged from his young son. His character also had an alcohol problem.
But the people who watched the show are too stupid to see this and so think Ted is a hero and think this fiction depiction of the world is reality. So the writers got the message and removed all the suggestions about people like Ted being in denial and the show a fantasy where real conflict doesn’t exist. It’s not to say a lack of empathy doesn’t cause conflict but plenty of irreconcilable conflicts aren’t about a lack of empathy, they’re about fundamental irreconcilable interests. The show just pretends that the constellation of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ set forth from Hollywood isn’t rooted in it’s own interests and denial of other interests.
And, I think, the show is popular because some women feel validated by seeing ‘Ted Lasso’ pretend that male stoicism is just silly and there’s nothing wrong with their inability to be stoic. Female opinion writers who don’t like, let alone love, their husbands anymore often write about women performing grueling ’emotional labor’ for the men in their lives whilst simultaneously complaining about male stoicism. It’s actually male stoicism and not making their problems problems for others, even when it hurts them individually, the real ’emotional labor’ that makes the world go round.
How seriously should I take anti-white rhetoric? Here are the practical consequences for me so far:
I keep my mouth shut at work and with my neighbors on political issues. I used to argue politics with people.
I did not vote in the recent elections for mayor/city council. I could not find even one candidate who met the minimum qualification of lesser of evils.
Crime has become an issue in my neighborhood in the past 2 or 3 years. We now have lots of homeless, petty back yard thefts, and a woman was shot on the street at one in the afternoon during a robbery only 6 blocks away from my house. Unthinkable a few years ago.
I cannot find a school that will give my child a real education, even if I pay extra for it.
The public issues of greatest importance to my and my child’s future – guns and butter – cannot be seriously discussed, because we have to have idiotic debates about race. And the guns and butter policies of our elites are against my interests.
Immigration is changing the people around me. Going forward it will be increasingly difficult to move the debate off race and on to guns and butter. Immigration guarantees that race will be the only political issue.
Laws matter. Politics matter. Bad politics changes your workplace, your school, your street.
"Thus, the upper reaches of society have been egging on everybody who isn’t a straight white male to dredge up and dwell on ancient memories of social unease in middle and high school."
But Steve Sailer, high school IS traumatic. Kids are awful anywhere in the World, but in the U.S it's even worse because America has a very extreme winner/loser mindset and type of Society where if you aren't talented or accomplished even as a teenager, you are trash. Think the nerd who gets stuffed in lockers, beaten up and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew, while the school's captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town's Golden Boy.
The way Society is organized at it's most fundamental level IS unfair, a disgusting and vile Darwinian hell hole that causes enormous amounts of Human pain and suffering. We should be striving to elevate ourselves from our animal-like Nature, and not to celebrate it.
So a guy is better than me just because he has bigger muscles, a deeper voice and a squarer jaw? What kind of BS is that? I think those traits are objectively inferior, and the guys that have that just have them. They haven't striven at all for them. They just lucked out. So how are they "winners" if there was no effort involved except having the right parents?
Society as it is is cruel, anachronistic, irrational, a bunch of de-humanizing institutions that exist for a Darwinian economic/coporate imperative and must be torn apart and rebuilt from scratch.
Chad Thundercock ruined my teenage years, and I want all of Society to pay for it. https://youtu.be/E6_Y77q1PqkReplies: @Art Deco, @Art Deco, @anarchyst, @Old Prude, @anon, @JohnnyWalker123
Is that you, Stan Adams? High School sucked. No doubt. But that was a long time ago. Who carries those kind of memories as grudges? Looking back is such a bleak waste of time. If iSteve is right, and the elites are acting on resentments from junior high school, then that’s ANOTHER reason they deserve no respect.
Two things can be equally true.
Tell Robin Pigeonchest and Ibrahm X. Shakedown that they ain’t no monetizins goin’s on heah!
if today’s “journalists” were tried by the same standard as julius streicher, they’d be hanged. and streicher had the lowest IQ of the nuremberg defendants.
I agree that NYT + WaPo do express racial hate towards white people. It is despicable.
But what are you going to do? Don’t read NYT and WaPo; or at least don’t let make you miserable. You won’t live forever. Try and enjoy your life as much as you can. Don’t let the haters pull you down.
Vote in your interests. Get involved in activism if you can. But take your own life into your own hands, no matter what.
Also, don’t worry: if there’s a solution, do the solution rather than worrying. If there’s no solution, then there’s no point in worrying.
If it could happen (allegedly) to Jews, it could happen to Whites.
Let me put in a couple of snide remarks, if iDeplorable will allow me some leeway here. (Nothing? OK, then:) You will be SO RELIEVED to read, BB grad, that a shapely tight ass and a flat belly will substitute for all 4 of those items you may lack. Ask any swinging Dick ... Tom, or Harriet. For me, it went "when are you expecting the flood?" See, we wore some hand-me-down pants, and sometimes they ended at those knobs at my ankles. It took me a month or two to get it - well, I had to ask another kid finally - but I could look back a couple of years later and admit "that's a freakin' good one! I am so stealing that." Perhaps that kind of attitude could come back in vogue again... OK, not Vogue, the magazine, because women will NEVER EVER appreciate that kind of humor.
"Does this dress make my ass look fat?" "Sure, but just turn 45 degrees to the right. OK, it's fine now. You're good."Replies: @kaganovitch, @the one they call Desanex
if Casey Stengel managed the Amazin Mets of ’69, then that’s all she wrote – he’s a NY City god
Nah, by then Gil Hodges was manager of the Mets.
Ted Lasso is basically the same trite, we'll have our characters act like cartoons for 20 minutes and then expect you to treat their contrived isolated personal problem as deeply serious that you might remember from Bill Lawarence's other show, Scrubs. He just adds lots of reddit-tier stereotypes about Britain in there. (Even to the point that the foreign players don't come from the right countries, the goalkeeper is a Quebecois and the main foreign player is Mexican)
But the author misses the point. In the first episode Ted has a realistic panic attack when he realises optimism isn't a substitute for knowing what you're doing and we learn his normal, down to Earth wife can't live with him anymore and divorces him and he becomes estranged from his young son. His character also had an alcohol problem.
But the people who watched the show are too stupid to see this and so think Ted is a hero and think this fiction depiction of the world is reality. So the writers got the message and removed all the suggestions about people like Ted being in denial and the show a fantasy where real conflict doesn't exist. It's not to say a lack of empathy doesn't cause conflict but plenty of irreconcilable conflicts aren't about a lack of empathy, they're about fundamental irreconcilable interests. The show just pretends that the constellation of 'right' and 'wrong' set forth from Hollywood isn't rooted in it's own interests and denial of other interests.
And, I think, the show is popular because some women feel validated by seeing 'Ted Lasso' pretend that male stoicism is just silly and there's nothing wrong with their inability to be stoic. Female opinion writers who don't like, let alone love, their husbands anymore often write about women performing grueling 'emotional labor' for the men in their lives whilst simultaneously complaining about male stoicism. It's actually male stoicism and not making their problems problems for others, even when it hurts them individually, the real 'emotional labor' that makes the world go round.Replies: @Matt Buckalew
I bounded after the first episode because I was disappointed that they had completely abandon the premise of the original spots on which the show was based. In those lasso was a hot shot American football coach who retained his self confidence in the face of his ignorance of soccer because he was in fact a good coach just in a different sport. Made no sense to make him into an optimistic loser. I feel like the show is just therapy for Jason seidekus after his wife left him.
I keep my mouth shut at work and with my neighbors on political issues. I used to argue politics with people.
I did not vote in the recent elections for mayor/city council. I could not find even one candidate who met the minimum qualification of lesser of evils.
Crime has become an issue in my neighborhood in the past 2 or 3 years. We now have lots of homeless, petty back yard thefts, and a woman was shot on the street at one in the afternoon during a robbery only 6 blocks away from my house. Unthinkable a few years ago.
I cannot find a school that will give my child a real education, even if I pay extra for it.
The public issues of greatest importance to my and my child's future - guns and butter - cannot be seriously discussed, because we have to have idiotic debates about race. And the guns and butter policies of our elites are against my interests.
Immigration is changing the people around me. Going forward it will be increasingly difficult to move the debate off race and on to guns and butter. Immigration guarantees that race will be the only political issue.
Laws matter. Politics matter. Bad politics changes your workplace, your school, your street.Replies: @Anon, @guest007
Isn’t immigration more important than “guns and butter”?
But why do our elites want immigration and race war in the first place? Why do they want to get rid of
Americans? They are doing this so they can rob the whole world blind.
Race and immigration are means being used to get money and power, to stop an American debate about money and power.
Follow the money. It's always the money. Mind you I like money myself, but I don't like crooks.
https://cwbchicago.com/2021/08/two-men-are-beaten-and-robbed-in-the-middle-of-state-street-as-people-walk-by-drive-past-and-twerk-up-a-storm-video.htmlReplies: @HammerJack, @JackOH, @El Dato, @anon, @Chris Mallory
Notice most of these “open season” attacks happen in places where White males do not regularly carry firearms upon their person.
This has been a fairly violent summer in my small town, but the vast majority of the violence has been colored on colored. The one attack of a colored against a White involved some kind of pervious altercation, probably drug related.
Cancel your subscription, let the outlets die. (Some of them will be taken over by Chinese agents or be the toys of malevolent people like Soros and Bezos who will use them to push propaganda and not much care about the losses, natch).
Where you need to resist is in schools, workplaces, and electoral campaigns.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa, @Citizen of a Silly Country
We’re not voting our way out of this. For whites, that ship has sailed.
The next phase is either surrender or quietly (at first) forming our own communities. As you can see from the comments around here, most successful whites will choose the former as they can protect themselves from the ravages of what’s coming and because many will simply marry into the cream of other successful groups, such as Asians and Indians. These people also simply lack much group/ethnic loyalty so what’s it to them if other whites are turned into helots. Not their people, not their problem.
But some whites will push back and choose the latter. Our ability to succeed is questionable at best, but for those whites, like me, who do feel a kinship with our own people, it’s worth a shot. We all die so we might as well die trying.
Democracy is always a tough system to maintain. Democracy in a multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-culture society is doomed to fail.
As for "group/ethnic loyalty" and "kinship with our own people"... World history is filled with white groups in Europe hating and killing each other, black tribes in Africa hating and killing each other, etc. Most people have some ethnic loyalty and ethnic attachment, but ultimately they act in their own selfish interest. Most normal white people, even white nationalists, would side with a black/hispanic/asian person who is nice to me over a white person who is not.
His DUI has completely dropped off the radar. The fact that it occurred in a notorious gay hook up spot was never even mentioned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_Guerrero_(baseball)
“In September 1999, Guerrero was arrested for trying to buy 33 pounds of cocaine from an undercover agent. In June 2002, he was acquitted of drug conspiracy charges after his attorney argued his client’s intellect prevented him understanding the full implications of the alleged drug deal. Hirsch detailed a portrait of the former major league All-Star, referring to his lack of education and inability to perform simple everyday tasks.”
I too would like to have the legal unaccountabilty of a low IQ. Is there some uncheatable test I could take to prove how dumb I am?
It’s death by a thousand cuts for white Americans
Add the vaccine to the list
Dunno if it’s as much as 3/4ths, no reason to dispute it though.
Spending 5 min on Linked In or one’s company’s Slack channel now is ample evidence for an army out there of OfficeSpace/Wernham Hogg pink collar soldiers eager to impose their womanly ways on the heathen (masks, emoji, personal statements, etc.) and not pay attention to any old-fashioned business functions.
Again, it’s just an online army, but gives me pause. Wouldn’t want to have to evacuate South Lake Tahoe, let alone New Orleans, with 2021 prevailing standard of infrastructure.
Then we began to move to the current paradigm. Always dignified, competent, put-upon and certainly not criminal.Replies: @Barnard, @Dennis Dale, @Hibernian, @Art Deco
I don’t remember any Black criminals in either the old or the New Perry Mason series. NYPD had a Black cop among the trio of detectives but I don’t remember any Black perps.
That show has been around so long that the original junior (black) prosecutor (Richard Brooks), subordinate to the starring Michael Moriarty ADA, has played a retiree on TV.Replies: @Art Deco
The title and entire precept of this post is ridiculous, as if “whites” are are capable of acting as an entity and exhibiting tenets of agency such as analyzing what certain phenomenon mean for “their” future. May as well ponder how seriously cattle should take their ever increasing proximity to the slaughterhouse for all the ability whites have to consider let alone affect their own destiny as a race.
Face it whites. There is no escaping the inevitable. The vast majority of your coethnics are either incapable of seeing what’s coming or downright welcome it. The few who do see it as are powerless to do anything about it as any of you reading this right now. Even in the extraordinarily unlikely event that whites suddenly developed a form of agency and decided to reject the social programming that at this point is several generations deep, any form of resistance they could muster would quickly be coopted and defenestrated by one of several layers of pied pipers, of which the Donald Trump type is just the most proximal. Soon enough the demographics of the general population and of the state/non-state power structure will be so heavily tilted against whites that even a legitimate resistance movement on the parts of the whites would be easily crushed and brutally punished.
Whites are heading for a future of being a slave caste, that’s ultimately the entire point of the campaign to dehumanize them and exclude them from positions of power that’s already well underway. I’d feel more sorry for them if they didn’t bring it all upon themselves by displaying an unforgivable level of cuckery
Ouch and lol.
But I still say it’s shitty public taste that keeps me obscure.
Nothing remotely like this has happened even in Sweden and 80% black SA. No way it would in the USA, with whites highly armed and paranoid, even in the distant future.
The future of the USA is a fairly peaceful transition to something like the 25% white Los Angeles of 2021 aka Brazil with Nukes. As Steve will tell you, there are some downsides but it’s still pretty cozy.
The most likely murderous race riots in the USA are black on Asian and mestizo hispanic on black. But they aren’t likely either.
LA has a large hispanic population. many hispanics who have light skin and could visibly pass as white choose not to identify as white in today's anti-white climate, which I can't blame them for.Replies: @Pixo
It’s a dumb take, because CRT is there to provide academic legitimacy and grease the skids for anti-white race laws and policies to be implemented and/or expanded. How much sense does it make for any non-white foreigner crossing the border to automatically be a person the government decides gets to be the winner in life while you get to be the loser via things like affirmative action? Zero unless you use CRT which is anti-white attack ideology coupled with weirdly selective historical narratives about things like slavery to buttress the claims for why all of the anti-white race law and policy is “needed” and “good” and whites “deserve it.”
And of course it’s had such an effect that ghoulish jews like Jennifer Rubin are now gleefully spilling their spaghetti over how much ethnic cleansing these policies have churned out in terms of lowering white birth rates through dispossession, marginally higher miscegenation rates through propaganda and making as many white men as possible into sexually invisible losers and so on.
It undoubtedly was. However, it does not mean that an open and widespread critique of Jewish role in public life (which may or may not be driven by naked anti-Semitism) necessarily leads to the Holocaust.
My answer, "Hope for the best, plan for the worst."
You make some good points in your Taki piece; my planning assumptions are that, most folks are indifferent, and don't pay much attention to these hate-rants at legacy media outlets like the Times and Post. Has always been that way. But, when the cold wind blows, mobs have a way of attracting the indifferent, like a snowball rolling downhill.
"In summary, people mostly hate other people they know." Yes, familiarity breeds contempt.
"This will all end in tears." Yep.Replies: @J1234
Tellingly, I heard that phrase in a Smith and Wesson ad on the radio the other day. Folks might respond, “A Smith and Wesson ad…on the radio??” Yeah, I was surprised, too. Then again, maybe I shouldn’t be.
Anyway, for many decades, the anti-white sentiments I would hear conversationally would almost always come from whites, usually with regards to music. My job would put me in close contact with musicians, and a hell of a lot of them seemed to think they were some version of Stevie Ray Vaughn, and would cop an “I’m jus’ a white boy wif da blues” attitude to prove it. Even Ted Nugent used to talk about expunging the whiteness from himself, or something like that. (I don’t think he does that anymore.)
It was all laughable, but I got sick of hearing that stuff after the ten thousandth time. Very few people took them seriously back in the day – it was recognized as a style thing by most – but if those guitar playing morons were parents, their children almost certainly took them seriously.
Casey Stengel would sometimes direct a clubhouse bawl-out to one of his stars, although the player who actually had failed to hustle or whatever was a non-star. I assume everyone understood that a misdirection was being used. This sort of reminds me of how Biden blames Trump for the debacle, rather than the people who actually failed to hustle.
Here’s a South African guy that can maybe shed some light on that . BTW I don’t believe there was the level of openly violent rhetoric directed at White people there that we have here . At first
Oh, yeah, thanks K. (I know I should have looked that up. So sorry, people.)
Even being one of the very best yeoman farmers won't bring you much power, as I think the blog writer here would support.Replies: @peterike
And yet somehow they find ways to fund endless woke crap that loses money.
That’s by and large our dear host you characterize here, isn’t it?
Even more serious than that is the following sentence of mine: I look upon Mr. Sailer as an intellectual in exactly the way, Dr. Habermas describes those rare birds – as I explain in my comment you are here referring to.
America 2021
DEAD SOULS
Steve’s Russian Readers understand the reference
The White Working Class are now defenseless Serfs at the mercy of the Tata Institute Graduates and their US born Hindu Brahman Geneline…
"celebrated in Life magazine in 1958 as “The Organization Men of Baseball,” the sporting equivalent of IBM’s white-collar minions in button-down shirts:""How can you root for US Steel?" Was the epithet used vs NY fans during that era. Also it was a largely all white team that won during '50's and '60's while MLB was rushing to integrate.Replies: @njguy73, @The Germ Theory of Disease
And when free agency went into effect, the A’s were devastated since everyone wanted to go elsewhere. Bando, Rudi, Fingers, Tenace, Campaneris, all signed with other teams.
Ya know, comparing my last post against this site’s current attention-leader, Fred Reed’s latest masturbatory trolling screed, I don’t feel at all inferior. Weird.
Usta was I lived in an older part of a town that was developed years ago, and in time a problem with the sewers had occurred. The city did a lot of dabbing with fancy trucks, but then got serious and built what's called a "lift station". Basically it takes in sewage and pumps it uphill a little bit, so that downhill flow to the sewage treatment plant is assured. Yeah, it's more complicated than that, but that's close enough.
It stunk. Driving or walking by one noticed a definite odor. Quelle suprise! Who would expect that?
Well...a teenaged neighbor got into whining in public about how when he drove down that certain street it got all stinky in his car and took a while to clear out and it stinks bad and whine, whine, someone should do something.
One day, I pointed out the obvious solution: "Don't drive down that street. Just drive another way. Problem solved."
Here ends the parable.Replies: @vinteuil, @Dennis Dale
Here’s a good rundown on what an anti-white future looks like. I don’t expect anyone to fully read this digest of criminal events that occurred in ONE MONTH in New York City, but do scroll down (and down and down) and get a sense of it. And this is in a place that not long ago was touted as the safest big city in the world. But a few years of a lunatic white-hating white mayor and an equally white hating city council, and this is where you are. This isn’t even the beginning. It’s just the beginning of the beginning.
Also, much of this is black-on-black violence. But that’s how it starts. Increasingly blacks are figuring out they’re now allowed to prey on whoever they want, with few consequences for the most part if they stop short of murder.
They should hold public readings of this blog post, like they do when people get up and read all of Ulysses.
https://impunitycity.com/2021/08/26/new-bad-days-87-the-summer-of-blaz-strike-1-teen-gangbangers-die-from-reciprocation-assassinations-more-gangbangers-assemble-in-indiscriminatory-mass-shooting-of-rivals-and-bystanders-man-pursues/
I’d say you’re looking at your future, but it’s already here. And it won’t be carried on the 11 o’clock news.
The persecution will not be televised.
It's like signaling you have no problem with immigration because you're not a loser who might be affected, or, you don't concern yourself with interracial marriage because only the sexually inferior would.
I don't believe you (unless you're in Boston), but so what?Replies: @Desiderius
I’m just doing the Peter Lynch thing of crediting what I see in front of my face. When I was growing up we looked down our noses at this part of town but we were wrong. The neighborhood of globocorporate transients where I grew up (we don’t even have high school reunions) has gone significantly downhill while this Catholic working class neighborhood that’s been about half black for fifty years is thriving. One neighbor has been here for five generations as have all his friends and on the other side is a retiree from Fresno that chose to move here. Now the street is white but the streets where the blacks live mow their lawns just as much (everybody does).
The black moms correct their kids grammar at the playgrounds and the only BLM march was a bunch of rich white protestant dorks. The fancy houses have even taken down their stupid In This House rainbow signs.
Are these people in any way related to the folks who made Over-The-Rhine uninhabitable by civilized people...for years? The folks who rioted in OTR and around downtown for days, back in 2001, creating a proto-BLM style festival?
Just asking.Replies: @Desiderius
"Thus, the upper reaches of society have been egging on everybody who isn’t a straight white male to dredge up and dwell on ancient memories of social unease in middle and high school."
But Steve Sailer, high school IS traumatic. Kids are awful anywhere in the World, but in the U.S it's even worse because America has a very extreme winner/loser mindset and type of Society where if you aren't talented or accomplished even as a teenager, you are trash. Think the nerd who gets stuffed in lockers, beaten up and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew, while the school's captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town's Golden Boy.
The way Society is organized at it's most fundamental level IS unfair, a disgusting and vile Darwinian hell hole that causes enormous amounts of Human pain and suffering. We should be striving to elevate ourselves from our animal-like Nature, and not to celebrate it.
So a guy is better than me just because he has bigger muscles, a deeper voice and a squarer jaw? What kind of BS is that? I think those traits are objectively inferior, and the guys that have that just have them. They haven't striven at all for them. They just lucked out. So how are they "winners" if there was no effort involved except having the right parents?
Society as it is is cruel, anachronistic, irrational, a bunch of de-humanizing institutions that exist for a Darwinian economic/coporate imperative and must be torn apart and rebuilt from scratch.
Chad Thundercock ruined my teenage years, and I want all of Society to pay for it. https://youtu.be/E6_Y77q1PqkReplies: @Art Deco, @Art Deco, @anarchyst, @Old Prude, @anon, @JohnnyWalker123
Chad Thundercock ruined my teenage years, and I want all of Society to pay for it.
Lol!
Perfect.
The only film I can think of in which the black character turned out to be guilty was Just Cause (1995). Sean Connery played a crusader against the death penalty whose black client actually did it.
Can anybody tell of a TV drama in which the black accused/defendant was the Bad Guy?
One, castrated because of a white girl's false rape accusation, took revenge as did his adopted son.
One, a music promoter who killed black girls.
There was a black soldier who falsely confessed to being a killer in order to open an investigation into the disappearance of homeless people including his sister. The killers were white.
There was a kidnapping ring that conspired to imprison women as slave wives, black and white perps, black and white victims, races matched.
Even the liberal-minded person I watch this stuff with knows that the producers shy away from black bad guys. "Well, it's not the black guy..."
Whatever is going on there, bottle and mass produce it.
Can anybody tell of a TV drama in which the black accused/defendant was the Bad Guy?Replies: @Dennis Dale, @JMcG, @Elli
And to get there they had Blair Underwood’s character castrated by rednecks.
Oh, yes.
Remember that exchange between Hannibal Lecter & Agent Starling:
Replace “covet” with “hate” and you’ve got a truth worthy of becoming a copybook heading. We begin by hating what we see every day.
Steve obviously tends more towards hotter media, like the sportsballs and movies, but even having never read Moby Dick I’m sure he’s at least familiar enough with the work of Melville’s New English mancrush Nathaniel Hawthorne to fully appreciate this one: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/10/new-puritans-mob-justice-canceled/619818/
been raped and/or murdered by blacks. Why? Endless white-bashing has
incited a race prone to over-reaction and violence. I grew up in a 100%
European-American Gentile community. People left their doors unlocked
and could venture out at night without fear of crime.
What planet are you on, Steve?Replies: @epochehusserl
do you have a source for that?
"celebrated in Life magazine in 1958 as “The Organization Men of Baseball,” the sporting equivalent of IBM’s white-collar minions in button-down shirts:""How can you root for US Steel?" Was the epithet used vs NY fans during that era. Also it was a largely all white team that won during '50's and '60's while MLB was rushing to integrate.Replies: @njguy73, @The Germ Theory of Disease
“and the publishing of Ball Four in 1970.”
Just imagine if Jim Bouton had become a historian, and had written a book called “Balfour” in the same puckish tone.
Fred Reed
Usta was I lived in an older part of a town that was developed years ago, and in time a problem with the sewers had occurred. The city did a lot of dabbing with fancy trucks, but then got serious and built what’s called a “lift station”. Basically it takes in sewage and pumps it uphill a little bit, so that downhill flow to the sewage treatment plant is assured. Yeah, it’s more complicated than that, but that’s close enough.
It stunk. Driving or walking by one noticed a definite odor. Quelle suprise! Who would expect that?
Well…a teenaged neighbor got into whining in public about how when he drove down that certain street it got all stinky in his car and took a while to clear out and it stinks bad and whine, whine, someone should do something.
One day, I pointed out the obvious solution: “Don’t drive down that street. Just drive another way. Problem solved.”
Here ends the parable.
I keep my mouth shut at work and with my neighbors on political issues. I used to argue politics with people.
I did not vote in the recent elections for mayor/city council. I could not find even one candidate who met the minimum qualification of lesser of evils.
Crime has become an issue in my neighborhood in the past 2 or 3 years. We now have lots of homeless, petty back yard thefts, and a woman was shot on the street at one in the afternoon during a robbery only 6 blocks away from my house. Unthinkable a few years ago.
I cannot find a school that will give my child a real education, even if I pay extra for it.
The public issues of greatest importance to my and my child's future - guns and butter - cannot be seriously discussed, because we have to have idiotic debates about race. And the guns and butter policies of our elites are against my interests.
Immigration is changing the people around me. Going forward it will be increasingly difficult to move the debate off race and on to guns and butter. Immigration guarantees that race will be the only political issue.
Laws matter. Politics matter. Bad politics changes your workplace, your school, your street.Replies: @Anon, @guest007
As race/ethnicity/gender become the flash points of politics, the paleocons will get the foreign policy that they want (semi-isolationist Jeffersonianism) but not for the reasons that they want. The reason the Paleocons will win on foreign policy is all of the minorities will see every dollar spent of defense, foreign aid, international adventures is a dollar that cannot be spent on welfare, healthcare, and make work government jobs.
You can see this at work in Canada, which because of its large Sikh and Tamil populations, finds itself frequently quarrelling with India and Sri Lanka.
The black moms correct their kids grammar at the playgrounds and the only BLM march was a bunch of rich white protestant dorks.
Are these people in any way related to the folks who made Over-The-Rhine uninhabitable by civilized people…for years? The folks who rioted in OTR and around downtown for days, back in 2001, creating a proto-BLM style festival?
Just asking.
The Zion Pigs are LOSING.
They only get shrill and aggressive when they are going to LOSE.
The premature “celebrations” of the end of White Supremacy did it.
Hah! We outnumber the enemy by a factor of 30 to 1.
3 to 1, is a certain victory. The morale to the material is 3 to 1.
Both those numbers and morale will be on our side.
Rodents only become aggressive when their backs are to the wall.
These rats are feeling the heat. The Cat in the Hat is back.
Agamemnon, however great a warrior, was a mediocre leader.
BTW, the whole thing was about a girl. Absolute silliness. You look at really stupid shit like the 100 Years War and at least it’s about land.
Civilization requires reigning in sexual competition and female sexual promiscuity. If paternity is assured and productive men can find quality mates, then while men compete, they can do it in productive endeavor. They can stop simply fighting and mate guarding, and can also–sexual norms enforced, paternity assured–cooperate as well and build cool stuff.
If you look at Euro history, lots of unnecessary war and death. But none of it over women. It’s over land and lineage–who gets to rule and pass that on to their son.
Of course, now Western “elites” have drunk the minoritarian kool-aid and are doing something far more disastrous than unnecessary war and death. They are aiding and cheering on the destruction of their people’s lineage.
I was figuring to talk about that Aristotelian secondary substance, whiteness, in contrast to primary particular instances of white, and whether the universal whiteness exists outside the mind in reality, or in the mind as conception, or neither, as mere breath of the voice or pixels of virtual wind, but then saw that the article is about baseball, and want to add that in that era, the Tigers were the only team to have an edge on the Yankees, and would come out with a roar regardless of pay. Remember that game with 13 home runs altogether from both sides? Pat Mullin had been sitting out the season until Al Kaline began to fade and got benched, so he came out with three homers and a single in four at bats. I believe that each player was white. Is this all a showing of essential whiteness? Did I just burn your time or you mine?
Let me put in a couple of snide remarks, if iDeplorable will allow me some leeway here. (Nothing? OK, then:) You will be SO RELIEVED to read, BB grad, that a shapely tight ass and a flat belly will substitute for all 4 of those items you may lack. Ask any swinging Dick ... Tom, or Harriet. For me, it went "when are you expecting the flood?" See, we wore some hand-me-down pants, and sometimes they ended at those knobs at my ankles. It took me a month or two to get it - well, I had to ask another kid finally - but I could look back a couple of years later and admit "that's a freakin' good one! I am so stealing that." Perhaps that kind of attitude could come back in vogue again... OK, not Vogue, the magazine, because women will NEVER EVER appreciate that kind of humor.
"Does this dress make my ass look fat?" "Sure, but just turn 45 degrees to the right. OK, it's fine now. You're good."Replies: @kaganovitch, @the one they call Desanex
When I was a kid, I got some hand-me-down shoes from a cousin. I really liked the shoes, and wore them to school. One day, some older boys ridiculed me for wearing bowling shoes to school. Never having gone bowling, I didn’t know they were bowling shoes.
living wellbowling cheapSociety doesn't have a problem, you do. Deal.Replies: @Anonymous
First of all, DUMMY, it’s not only my problem, but the problem of millions of young men. Chads are less than 5% of the high school population. Those top 2-3% of guys get all the glory, all the girls and still get treated like royalty by school administration. Second of all, my problem is ALL the problem I care about. I have no personal interest in the continuation of a Society that doesn’t care about me and my well-being. So FY!
Something that surprised me is how much you can transform yourself by lifting weights. You can fully transform yourself, other people start admiring you and your self-esteem will rise through the roof.
Then we began to move to the current paradigm. Always dignified, competent, put-upon and certainly not criminal.Replies: @Barnard, @Dennis Dale, @Hibernian, @Art Deco
I think from about 1970 to 1995 it wasn’t uncommon to see blacks depicted as rogues or criminals. Films such as Superfly or Straight Out of Brooklyn or television programs like Hill Street Blues.
Deep-sixed.Replies: @Richard B
As they will be, sooner than later.
Many times these "groups" are sanctioned by the schools themselves, being "jocks" or other "protected" groups. School officials quite often "look the other way" and don't want to be bothered. If the bullied student fights back, HE is quite often punished by the "system".
The case of football jocks murdering a "goth" youth and getting away with it "just because they could" actually occurred in Amarillo Texas. These "jocks" repeatedly harassed and eventually murdered this "goth" student. When the case came to trial, the "jocks" were acquitted because "the big football championship game was scheduled for the following week and their "star players" were needed to assure a win for the school". As "football" is next to "mom and apple pie" in Texas, the jurors' decision was not a surprise. Texans take football so seriously, many high schools have facilities that rival professional sports teams.
A few years later, the ringleader of the bullies was jailed for another offense.
Bullies need to be beaten to within an inch of their lives. Permanent irreversible paralysis would be a plus.Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous
It’s not only the bullying. That’s bad enough. It’s also the fact that girls look at Chad Thundercock’s 22″ biceps and strong jaw and they swoon. Chad Thundercock did nothing to deserve his height, his muscularity and strong jawline. He was just born with the genes for that. Even his muscles requires almost no effort. I could train util the end of times and my biceps would never be even half the size of Chad’s.
The fact that they get to bully is already bad enough. Then, to get to watch him French kiss the blond bimbo, while I only get to date my hand, and he gets celebrated by everyone for winning a stupid ball game or wrestling match is like adding salt to my injuries.
Chad Thundercock did nothing to earn his easy life. Why does he get to touch and kiss girls, but I don’t? Because Charles Darwin said so? Well, FK Charles Darwin, and FK Society too for making the lives of the most privileged teenagers even more privileged.
High school is over for more than 10 years for me, but I still have PTSD from it, and take medication for it. People like Steve Sailer think one should just get over it, when teenaged boys have one of the highest rates of suicides of any group of people there are.
In my case, there were girls that were actually sympathetic to us "normal guys" and acknowledged me as a "nice guy". Not all girls went for the "jocks". The smarter ones actually went for us "nice guys".
The airhead girls are the ones who swooned over the "jocks". Even the airhead jock worshiper girls learned once they got on the bad side of a testosterone or steroid-addled jock ending up with a swollen lip or black eye that just maybe there was more to "nice guys" than brain-dead testosterone-addled jocks
High school was unpleasant but I learned how to handle myself.
I eventually joined the Marine Corps and ran into a (former) bully. Outranking him was fun. There was no "payback" from me but he knew where he stood...
Now, blacks were another story...more to come...
Regards,Replies: @Stan Adams
Common enough, but one might wager < 10% of the male population.
and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew,
Every house has different rules.
while the school’s captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town’s Golden Boy
Mythological creature.
Yes, school is ghastly, in part because high school students are seldom learning a serious trade. Why should the dynamics of high school regulate adult life? And why should the imagined pasts of people do so?Replies: @Elli, @3g4me, @anarchyst
The mythological creature is Ethan Couch. Probation and private troubled kid school for the deaths of four people, ultimately two years in jail for probation violation. The affluenza kid.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/what-happened-affluenza-teen-ethan-couch
That’s exactly right. And if current events isn’t enough, this ought to make it crystal clear.
https://www.unz.com/book/douglas_reed__the-controversy-of-zion/
Common enough, but one might wager < 10% of the male population.
and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew,
Every house has different rules.
while the school’s captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town’s Golden Boy
Mythological creature.
Yes, school is ghastly, in part because high school students are seldom learning a serious trade. Why should the dynamics of high school regulate adult life? And why should the imagined pasts of people do so?Replies: @Elli, @3g4me, @anarchyst
@57 Art Deco: “Why should the dynamics of high school regulate adult life? And why should the imagined pasts of people do so?”
Because people grow old but most never grow up. And because certain special people are well known for holding grudges over centuries. Because they’re petty and insular and everyone they know shares their opinions. And because they are taught hate from a young age and it’s constantly reinforced by the media and social institutions they’ve taken control over.
And because people like Sailer lend credence to the theory that holding high school grudges is a legitimate thing, because confronting the reality of racial and tribal hatred makes him and most of his readers terribly uncomfortable.
Sorry your relatives stink. Not a problem for the rest of us.
And because certain special people are well known for holding grudges over centuries.
Sorry Hy Goldberg gave you a bad performance review. You might quit holding grudges.
This is what happens when you abandon the Liberals Arts to Communists and make Foucault your most cited scholar.
They just make shit up and people believe them.
Here’s a piece on under-reported race differences.
Blacks homeschooling at a two thirds greater rate than Whites?
The typical Government dependency pyramid is inverted.
https://www.axios.com/homeschooling-pandemic-critical-mass-013e4f01-c962-4e38-8cb7-8079bb597540.html
Another way to put that last sentence would be to say that they don’t dare see it, at all, let alone the way we do. Which could mean that, in fact, yeah, they do see it, clear as day. But, like people who live in crime-ridden neighborhoods, they’re well-practiced at keeping their mouths shut.
Can anybody tell of a TV drama in which the black accused/defendant was the Bad Guy?Replies: @Dennis Dale, @JMcG, @Elli
The Cosby Show.
Steve is not pro-white; he's anti-anti-white. Like Murray, Steve wants everyone to embrace and enjoy the rich bio-diversity of the human race all while ignoring race, at least on an individual basis. That men as bright as Murray and Sailer can't see the flaw in their thinking shows how blinded they are. Cognitive dissonance of this level takes some serious brains.
Btw, I noticed that Steve never addressed the Z-Man's critique of Citizenism a week or two ago. Probably for the best. Defending the indefensible against someone who can match your debating skills isn't a great idea.Replies: @Bill Jones, @3g4me, @James N. Kennett, @ATBOTL
Steve’s comment seemed to meandering in need of a goal.
You people have been getting a lot of mileage from something that you claim happened 70 years ago .Replies: @3g4me
@61 donut: Out of reaction comments, but well played sir.
Around blacks Never Relax.
When they’re in packs Expect Attacks.
Negro “teen?” Leave the Scene.
Negro rage, Do Not Engage.
Fingers on triggers protect from African-Americans.
Can anybody tell of a TV drama in which the black accused/defendant was the Bad Guy?Replies: @Dennis Dale, @JMcG, @Elli
Criminal Minds had a few episodes with black serial killers.
One, castrated because of a white girl’s false rape accusation, took revenge as did his adopted son.
One, a music promoter who killed black girls.
There was a black soldier who falsely confessed to being a killer in order to open an investigation into the disappearance of homeless people including his sister. The killers were white.
There was a kidnapping ring that conspired to imprison women as slave wives, black and white perps, black and white victims, races matched.
Even the liberal-minded person I watch this stuff with knows that the producers shy away from black bad guys. “Well, it’s not the black guy…”
Steve is not pro-white; he's anti-anti-white. Like Murray, Steve wants everyone to embrace and enjoy the rich bio-diversity of the human race all while ignoring race, at least on an individual basis. That men as bright as Murray and Sailer can't see the flaw in their thinking shows how blinded they are. Cognitive dissonance of this level takes some serious brains.
Btw, I noticed that Steve never addressed the Z-Man's critique of Citizenism a week or two ago. Probably for the best. Defending the indefensible against someone who can match your debating skills isn't a great idea.Replies: @Bill Jones, @3g4me, @James N. Kennett, @ATBOTL
@65 Citizen: Out of reaction comments but well said as per your usual. Keep the pressure on, although I don’t think it will do much good with this audience.
Sailer has been refusing to recognize tribal reality by remaining in California all these years. When they finally come to his neighborhood or his home, will he then open the door and say “Come, let us embrace as brothers”? Those who make light of the White hatred being spewed on the airwaves and in print are certainly quick to attribute that same ‘hate’ as a major warning factor in the 1930s. Those who ignore or minimize the White hate now will pay the price, or ensure their children do. Because despite their normalcy bias, yes, it WILL come to ‘your’ neighborhood. It will happen to YOUR children. Just like all those who’ve had serious medical reactions to the clot shot, they’ll cry “Why didn’t anyone tell me?” Plenty have told and warned, but the fools never want to hear or see. They’re too busy booking cruises and returning to ‘normal.’
https://www.foxnews.com/us/what-happened-affluenza-teen-ethan-couchReplies: @Art Deco
Doesn’t fit your description at all. He was given absurdly lenient treatment (1) because the Texas penal code allows it and (2) the judge in the case was a social worker in robes soon to retire. He wasn’t some admired athlete. He was a stunningly spoiled problem child the issue of loutish problem parents with more money than sense.
Because people grow old but most never grow up. And because certain special people are well known for holding grudges over centuries. Because they're petty and insular and everyone they know shares their opinions. And because they are taught hate from a young age and it's constantly reinforced by the media and social institutions they've taken control over.
And because people like Sailer lend credence to the theory that holding high school grudges is a legitimate thing, because confronting the reality of racial and tribal hatred makes him and most of his readers terribly uncomfortable.Replies: @Art Deco
Because people grow old but most never grow up.
Sorry your relatives stink. Not a problem for the rest of us.
And because certain special people are well known for holding grudges over centuries.
Sorry Hy Goldberg gave you a bad performance review. You might quit holding grudges.
I think one reason there has been such an outcry about teaching critical race theory is that it is aimed at people’s children. They might no speak up for themselves but it cuts a little closer when they come after your kids. I would also say that the time is getting closer. When someone white is willing to complain about discrimination it means a red line has definitely been crossed. That person is willing to not only declare that their identity which is prohibited but also confront some other identity group. As they say, “white people are nice until they are not”.
I’m surprised that the radio station accepted the ad. I’m sure it’s only a matter of time until such advertisements are banned just as were those for cigarettes.
You should have told them you were a Mod. The Jam made bowling shoes popular for about twenty minutes back around 1981.
However, it does not mean that an open and widespread critique of Jewish role in public life…
Does this mean that an open and widespread critique of white people will not lead to a Holocaust for whites?
Exactly!!! Everyone suffers. As a straight white male I often experience disappointments, snubs, slanders, indifferences, and the other sludge of life. I could do without them, but I consider them the background noise of life and over time it’s become easier to let them go. It was far worse in middle school and high school, when I was brainwashed that life was supposed to be like a Coke commercial. If every one of those insults is processed as, “It’s because I’m an X,” that would become lived experience, and would create a grievance personality rather than a growth personality.
A good deal of the racial reckoning could the expectations Americans learn from marketing. This might explain why the corporations all went woke.
“How seriously should whites take the ever-increasing levels of racial hate expressed toward them in outlets such as the New York Times and Washington Post?”
Not very seriously because iSteve’s opening sentence is a false premise by which he builds his case around it.
Next question.
No one is harder to compete against than someone willing to lose money and in extreme competition a lot of people will lose a lot.
You live in a fantasy. I am sorry their idiocy hurts your feelings, but no one is plotting to kill you.
Not worth going book length on this nonsense. (And my deck won't stain itself.) But the obvious:
We white gentiles do not live as a self-worshipping middle man minority tribe. We live--and survive as nations.
Jews will do their middle man minority thing ... anywhere. Köln or Kraków, New York or Nashville--and if Chinese and Indians were stupid enough to let them--Beijing or Bangalore. Jews have their tribal religion to specifically set themselves apart, and create their tribal communities in the midst of any host population.
That's not how we white gentiles roll. Yes we are more open and individualistic. But that's in the context of having actual geographic "community". Our special sauce is the benefit of our high-trust at scale that super-charges the benefit of our cooperative (neighborly) yet individualistic and often creative abilities to create optimum space--peaceful and prosperous--for human flourishing.
We simply are not some little middle man tribe like the Jews. We are not designed to live like that, and we do not want to live like that. We are frankly are superior to that--have created a much better way of life. That has accomplished much more than anyone else. So much more it's a complete joke--a blowout.
And so yeah. This is an attempted genocide--even though it doesn't involve labor camps and shooting and gassing. It's an attempt driven ideologically driven by Jews with their minority allies and their "elite" white-gentile fellow traveler kapos, to "diversify" and hence destroy Western nations and hence white gentiles as a people.
This is a stupid argument. Like saying your neighbour is trying to murder you because they are lonely and lonely people are more often serial killers.
If you can’t beat them, join them. 🙂
Something that surprised me is how much you can transform yourself by lifting weights. You can fully transform yourself, other people start admiring you and your self-esteem will rise through the roof.
Black private school alumni formed Instagram accounts
I don’t have an IG account.
If IG features @PublicSchoolKid sorts of feeds, then I want to hear about (follow!) them.
NYP reports a murder (firearm) occurred today at a NC public high screwel. Shooter still at-large.
We are in the midst of one (meaning a genocide), or at least in the midst of an attempt.
Policies that are certain to result in the extermination of the white race are in place, and no one on the Left has indicated an intent that they should ever end.
Because anyone that does is removed prior to posting. Joos are not just pushing, they are the whole reason for it.
If you aren’t trolling, you seriously need to see a psychologist and/or psychiatrist. This is not a normal thinking pattern for anyone over 25.
“Other modes” are not just conceivable. They are actually being used, especially the “preventing births within the group” mode.
Through immigration, forced internal integration, promotion of miscegenation under pain of ostracism for those who oppose it (and through the flooding of white territory with non-whites to increase the probability that a white will mate with a non-white), monetary taxation to (inter alia) pay for the children of other races, and indirect taxation (mandates that non-whites be given jobs whites should be doing, forcing parents or prospective parents to choose between a long commute and a toxic environment for their children, reduced wages due to immigration), the genocidal Left lowers the white birth rate. Before long, certainly in less than 200 years if existing policies remain in place, the birth rate will be zero.
I hope you looked on the bright side in that you wouldn’t have to pay money and reveal any possible foot odor problem when you did go bowling. That”ll show those meanies. The best revenge is
living wellbowling cheapSome nearby neighbors have not one, but two BLM signs, Jim. That didn’t stop their house from getting broken into during the daytime. I would bet a lot of money on the race of the culprits. As a matter of fact, they probably have video and know exactly what I’d bet money on.
The video “gave proof through that night, but their signs are still there. Oh say do those neighbors’ stupidity yet reign …”.
I don’t know any more details, because we don’t see any reason to be very friendly.. on account of the idiotic BLM signs.
History is not a monolith. There were huge variations in the way people lived. Warfare for land or slaves no longer makes the slightest bit of sense for developed peoples. Their governments are also not chained to an individual’s whims. There are even many better things to do.
“Conflict” will continue, but the way it will be fought will reflect what it is fought over. Go up Maslow’s hierarchy and you will see what remains scarce. People won’t be motivated to fight over what does not; but a fight over higher order needs is exactly what we see all around us. It is one of ego validation, “representation” and passive aggression. You may wish it were more “serious” or you may lament that you are personally unequipped to compete in this world, but the facts of the situation remain. Recognise what has happened, what is going on and act accordingly.
Or, you know, don’t, and keep pretending that some apocalypse will come along and suddenly all of your serious manly skills will become crucial. It didn’t work well for the Luddites but who knows?
I suppose in the meantime you can mutually backslap on Unz in a joint venture fantasy, but I personally would prefer you guys engage in a realistic way. The culture is becoming increasingly unbalanced in your absence, while you prepare in your bunkers for a doomsday which will never come.
Ever wonder why history is fixed at Emmet Till and the Holocaust? Because that is the last time the stakes were actually high In the developed world. Ever wonder why progressives use the language of therapy? Because that is what they are doing through politics. Ever wonder why educated, important people seem so unserious? Because they are dealing with unserious conflicts due to a lack of serious ones. Ever wonder why a 20 year war in the middle of nowhere which no one actually cares about that was less dangerous than an average mountain climbing expedition is considered apocalyptic, or Jan 6th is considered an “insurgency”? Because they are the biggest things around.
Be grateful you get to live in a time when we have the luxury to be frivolous and, if you want to fight, recognise the nature of the fight you are in, or else, keep losing.
Think of it like The Last Samurai. It is sad to give up all of that honour and glory, but the world has moved on. The Samurai may be a more romantic figure than the infantry grunt, just as the hard men of Unz may be more romantic than a blue-haired passive aggressive feelings ninja, but realism is about recognising what works, not fantasising that the past will return and going down in one last but irrelevant charge.
“Politics is now silly and this is fun” is both the lowQ and HighQ response. Meanwhile the midwits are all seething that everyone must now get super serious.
Remember when the Dissident Right kind of knew this and actually had some success? That was cool. Unfortunately they started to get high on their own supply of hyperbole and lost track of reality.
People living in reality tend to succeed when they want to. People living in a fantasy don’t. Think of failure as a clue that something in your perception is wrong.
Sometimes you have to risk letting go of a fantasy and getting your feelings hurt in the process to reorganise and actually be effective. No pain, no gain can apply to psychology too.
And with this comment, because I am clearly pushing on a door welded far too tight, I am out. Unless perhaps I see some sparks of awareness begin to fly here. Thanks to all and I am very happy to have developed this understanding further. I should really have plumped for a Seven Samurai analogy instead of a Last Samurai one. It is such a beautiful film and the Seven Samurai were such amazing people, I love them all, but their assumptions and skills belong to a history that thankfully no longer exists. Peasants don’t need to hire protection from brigands in the developed world and there isn’t going to be an apocalypse or genocide or hot civil war or invasion. The reasons those happened in the past no longer mean anything.
https://nypost.com/2021/08/05/cori-bush-will-pay-200k-for-private-security-but-still-wants-to-defund-police/
https://www.takimag.com/article/thank-god-for-the-proud-boys/Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
Again, thanks for adding a sane voice to the mix.
“I've had a lot of worries in my life, most of which never happened.”
The murderer’s name is Michael Leroy Byrd.
Usta was I lived in an older part of a town that was developed years ago, and in time a problem with the sewers had occurred. The city did a lot of dabbing with fancy trucks, but then got serious and built what's called a "lift station". Basically it takes in sewage and pumps it uphill a little bit, so that downhill flow to the sewage treatment plant is assured. Yeah, it's more complicated than that, but that's close enough.
It stunk. Driving or walking by one noticed a definite odor. Quelle suprise! Who would expect that?
Well...a teenaged neighbor got into whining in public about how when he drove down that certain street it got all stinky in his car and took a while to clear out and it stinks bad and whine, whine, someone should do something.
One day, I pointed out the obvious solution: "Don't drive down that street. Just drive another way. Problem solved."
Here ends the parable.Replies: @vinteuil, @Dennis Dale
Presumably, anon[331] is Fred Reed?
Usta was I lived in an older part of a town that was developed years ago, and in time a problem with the sewers had occurred. The city did a lot of dabbing with fancy trucks, but then got serious and built what's called a "lift station". Basically it takes in sewage and pumps it uphill a little bit, so that downhill flow to the sewage treatment plant is assured. Yeah, it's more complicated than that, but that's close enough.
It stunk. Driving or walking by one noticed a definite odor. Quelle suprise! Who would expect that?
Well...a teenaged neighbor got into whining in public about how when he drove down that certain street it got all stinky in his car and took a while to clear out and it stinks bad and whine, whine, someone should do something.
One day, I pointed out the obvious solution: "Don't drive down that street. Just drive another way. Problem solved."
Here ends the parable.Replies: @vinteuil, @Dennis Dale
No. Sewage, while an appropriate equivalent for Fred, is a necessity.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ogwtVdHQJg4/UB5s8WoZXKI/AAAAAAAACG0/hRqV9X4hnAo/s320/star-trek-nodding.gif
I rather doubt that the whole thing is merely silly high school playground feuds just warmed up enough to end up calling for the tacit genocide of whites everywhere throughout the west (although no doubt some writers can be pushed into amping up bad memories to help serve that cause), but maybe I’m underestimating how seriously Americans take High School (the ‘teen high school sex comedy’ being arguably the most successful propaganda depiction of what american teen life is like – seriously, I’ve seen ppl saying they wish they grew up at an American school after watching this crap).
"Conflict" will continue, but the way it will be fought will reflect what it is fought over. Go up Maslow's hierarchy and you will see what remains scarce. People won't be motivated to fight over what does not; but a fight over higher order needs is exactly what we see all around us. It is one of ego validation, "representation" and passive aggression. You may wish it were more "serious" or you may lament that you are personally unequipped to compete in this world, but the facts of the situation remain. Recognise what has happened, what is going on and act accordingly.
Or, you know, don't, and keep pretending that some apocalypse will come along and suddenly all of your serious manly skills will become crucial. It didn't work well for the Luddites but who knows?
I suppose in the meantime you can mutually backslap on Unz in a joint venture fantasy, but I personally would prefer you guys engage in a realistic way. The culture is becoming increasingly unbalanced in your absence, while you prepare in your bunkers for a doomsday which will never come.
Ever wonder why history is fixed at Emmet Till and the Holocaust? Because that is the last time the stakes were actually high In the developed world. Ever wonder why progressives use the language of therapy? Because that is what they are doing through politics. Ever wonder why educated, important people seem so unserious? Because they are dealing with unserious conflicts due to a lack of serious ones. Ever wonder why a 20 year war in the middle of nowhere which no one actually cares about that was less dangerous than an average mountain climbing expedition is considered apocalyptic, or Jan 6th is considered an "insurgency"? Because they are the biggest things around.
Be grateful you get to live in a time when we have the luxury to be frivolous and, if you want to fight, recognise the nature of the fight you are in, or else, keep losing.
Think of it like The Last Samurai. It is sad to give up all of that honour and glory, but the world has moved on. The Samurai may be a more romantic figure than the infantry grunt, just as the hard men of Unz may be more romantic than a blue-haired passive aggressive feelings ninja, but realism is about recognising what works, not fantasising that the past will return and going down in one last but irrelevant charge.
"Politics is now silly and this is fun" is both the lowQ and HighQ response. Meanwhile the midwits are all seething that everyone must now get super serious.
Remember when the Dissident Right kind of knew this and actually had some success? That was cool. Unfortunately they started to get high on their own supply of hyperbole and lost track of reality.
People living in reality tend to succeed when they want to. People living in a fantasy don't. Think of failure as a clue that something in your perception is wrong.
Sometimes you have to risk letting go of a fantasy and getting your feelings hurt in the process to reorganise and actually be effective. No pain, no gain can apply to psychology too.
And with this comment, because I am clearly pushing on a door welded far too tight, I am out. Unless perhaps I see some sparks of awareness begin to fly here. Thanks to all and I am very happy to have developed this understanding further. I should really have plumped for a Seven Samurai analogy instead of a Last Samurai one. It is such a beautiful film and the Seven Samurai were such amazing people, I love them all, but their assumptions and skills belong to a history that thankfully no longer exists. Peasants don't need to hire protection from brigands in the developed world and there isn't going to be an apocalypse or genocide or hot civil war or invasion. The reasons those happened in the past no longer mean anything.Replies: @Too Long Didn't Read, @Ben tillman, @Chrisnonymous, @Mr Mox, @William Badwhite
Warfare for land or slaves no longer makes the slightest bit of sense for developed peoples. Their governments are also not chained to an individual’s whims.
Have you discussed this with the leadership of the Taliban, or PRC President Xi?
lol @girls pretending to be adults.
"Conflict" will continue, but the way it will be fought will reflect what it is fought over. Go up Maslow's hierarchy and you will see what remains scarce. People won't be motivated to fight over what does not; but a fight over higher order needs is exactly what we see all around us. It is one of ego validation, "representation" and passive aggression. You may wish it were more "serious" or you may lament that you are personally unequipped to compete in this world, but the facts of the situation remain. Recognise what has happened, what is going on and act accordingly.
Or, you know, don't, and keep pretending that some apocalypse will come along and suddenly all of your serious manly skills will become crucial. It didn't work well for the Luddites but who knows?
I suppose in the meantime you can mutually backslap on Unz in a joint venture fantasy, but I personally would prefer you guys engage in a realistic way. The culture is becoming increasingly unbalanced in your absence, while you prepare in your bunkers for a doomsday which will never come.
Ever wonder why history is fixed at Emmet Till and the Holocaust? Because that is the last time the stakes were actually high In the developed world. Ever wonder why progressives use the language of therapy? Because that is what they are doing through politics. Ever wonder why educated, important people seem so unserious? Because they are dealing with unserious conflicts due to a lack of serious ones. Ever wonder why a 20 year war in the middle of nowhere which no one actually cares about that was less dangerous than an average mountain climbing expedition is considered apocalyptic, or Jan 6th is considered an "insurgency"? Because they are the biggest things around.
Be grateful you get to live in a time when we have the luxury to be frivolous and, if you want to fight, recognise the nature of the fight you are in, or else, keep losing.
Think of it like The Last Samurai. It is sad to give up all of that honour and glory, but the world has moved on. The Samurai may be a more romantic figure than the infantry grunt, just as the hard men of Unz may be more romantic than a blue-haired passive aggressive feelings ninja, but realism is about recognising what works, not fantasising that the past will return and going down in one last but irrelevant charge.
"Politics is now silly and this is fun" is both the lowQ and HighQ response. Meanwhile the midwits are all seething that everyone must now get super serious.
Remember when the Dissident Right kind of knew this and actually had some success? That was cool. Unfortunately they started to get high on their own supply of hyperbole and lost track of reality.
People living in reality tend to succeed when they want to. People living in a fantasy don't. Think of failure as a clue that something in your perception is wrong.
Sometimes you have to risk letting go of a fantasy and getting your feelings hurt in the process to reorganise and actually be effective. No pain, no gain can apply to psychology too.
And with this comment, because I am clearly pushing on a door welded far too tight, I am out. Unless perhaps I see some sparks of awareness begin to fly here. Thanks to all and I am very happy to have developed this understanding further. I should really have plumped for a Seven Samurai analogy instead of a Last Samurai one. It is such a beautiful film and the Seven Samurai were such amazing people, I love them all, but their assumptions and skills belong to a history that thankfully no longer exists. Peasants don't need to hire protection from brigands in the developed world and there isn't going to be an apocalypse or genocide or hot civil war or invasion. The reasons those happened in the past no longer mean anything.Replies: @Too Long Didn't Read, @Ben tillman, @Chrisnonymous, @Mr Mox, @William Badwhite
Your claim regarding Emmett Till is idiotic. The stakes were high in 1955 because of the Rosenbergs. Till’s experience has nothing to with any “high stakes” that are not infinitely higher now.
What does your happiness matter compared to this? What does your sense of connection? Or fulfilment? This is your mission. Any one who distracts you from it is one of them. You feel trapped. Obviously, you wouldn't choose this hell for yourself, who would do that? People never pick egocentric fantasies over reality. They never engage in self-aggrandising delusions to their own detriment. Or, if they do, they aren't future world-heroes, like an alternate universe Hitler, where he won, like you. You don't need to understand yourself or your motivations. You're going to fix the world. Events will see to that. I congratulate and applaud you. I tremble at what you are about to achieve.Replies: @Robert Dolan, @ben tillman
Steve is not pro-white; he's anti-anti-white. Like Murray, Steve wants everyone to embrace and enjoy the rich bio-diversity of the human race all while ignoring race, at least on an individual basis. That men as bright as Murray and Sailer can't see the flaw in their thinking shows how blinded they are. Cognitive dissonance of this level takes some serious brains.
Btw, I noticed that Steve never addressed the Z-Man's critique of Citizenism a week or two ago. Probably for the best. Defending the indefensible against someone who can match your debating skills isn't a great idea.Replies: @Bill Jones, @3g4me, @James N. Kennett, @ATBOTL
I missed that Z-Man article. Can you provide a link?
https://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=24858
Steve keeps trying to find other reasons that non-whites and Jews attack whites beyond the obvious. It's about the money. Or it's about old high school feuds. Or it's about getting some fame. Or it's about white accomplishments in the past. And sure, all of those come into play, but they're not the true source of the attack on whites.
Steve simply can't accept that other races are tribal. They first and foremost hate us because we're white. They want us as helots in our formers lands because we're another tribe, not because they had a tough time in high school.
Steve refuses to accept this because it's so distasteful to him, same as Murray. This cause their normally keen logic to fail them. It's actually pretty interesting to watch.Replies: @Pierre de Craon, @TWS
A very good outline of the situation. See also this.
Sewage, while an appropriate equivalent for Fred, is a necessity.
Ok, you’re right. You’re facing impossible odds. No one has shown more true grit than you. You are the hero to end all heroes. Your struggle is epic and you are, through your extreme fortitude, inching history away from cataclysm. It is like Dune, but bigger. Your enemies are the armies of hell. Every word you write on Unz is one more super-villain struck down. This isn’t about your hurt feelings. This is about Ragnarok. You’re not hysterical. They’re hysterical. You’re serious because you think you’re locked in a life and death struggle. Hysterical people never think they are locked in a life and death struggle. The conflict isn’t internal to you. It is the whole world stage. Only you, a few plucky comrades, and the shadowy others can see it. You are special. You are brilliant. You are a real man.
What does your happiness matter compared to this? What does your sense of connection? Or fulfilment? This is your mission. Any one who distracts you from it is one of them. You feel trapped. Obviously, you wouldn’t choose this hell for yourself, who would do that? People never pick egocentric fantasies over reality. They never engage in self-aggrandising delusions to their own detriment. Or, if they do, they aren’t future world-heroes, like an alternate universe Hitler, where he won, like you. You don’t need to understand yourself or your motivations. You’re going to fix the world. Events will see to that. I congratulate and applaud you. I tremble at what you are about to achieve.
I try to avoid your inane comments, and in the off chance that I have the misfortune of reading some idiocy from you....I marvel that you are able to combine equal amounts of stupidity, absurdity, and ridiculousness.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
FK off! Yeah, let’s pretend like bullying does not happen in schools. Let’s pretend that the administration doesn’t play favorites with the schools varsity sports team. People like you just make a horrible problem worse.
"Conflict" will continue, but the way it will be fought will reflect what it is fought over. Go up Maslow's hierarchy and you will see what remains scarce. People won't be motivated to fight over what does not; but a fight over higher order needs is exactly what we see all around us. It is one of ego validation, "representation" and passive aggression. You may wish it were more "serious" or you may lament that you are personally unequipped to compete in this world, but the facts of the situation remain. Recognise what has happened, what is going on and act accordingly.
Or, you know, don't, and keep pretending that some apocalypse will come along and suddenly all of your serious manly skills will become crucial. It didn't work well for the Luddites but who knows?
I suppose in the meantime you can mutually backslap on Unz in a joint venture fantasy, but I personally would prefer you guys engage in a realistic way. The culture is becoming increasingly unbalanced in your absence, while you prepare in your bunkers for a doomsday which will never come.
Ever wonder why history is fixed at Emmet Till and the Holocaust? Because that is the last time the stakes were actually high In the developed world. Ever wonder why progressives use the language of therapy? Because that is what they are doing through politics. Ever wonder why educated, important people seem so unserious? Because they are dealing with unserious conflicts due to a lack of serious ones. Ever wonder why a 20 year war in the middle of nowhere which no one actually cares about that was less dangerous than an average mountain climbing expedition is considered apocalyptic, or Jan 6th is considered an "insurgency"? Because they are the biggest things around.
Be grateful you get to live in a time when we have the luxury to be frivolous and, if you want to fight, recognise the nature of the fight you are in, or else, keep losing.
Think of it like The Last Samurai. It is sad to give up all of that honour and glory, but the world has moved on. The Samurai may be a more romantic figure than the infantry grunt, just as the hard men of Unz may be more romantic than a blue-haired passive aggressive feelings ninja, but realism is about recognising what works, not fantasising that the past will return and going down in one last but irrelevant charge.
"Politics is now silly and this is fun" is both the lowQ and HighQ response. Meanwhile the midwits are all seething that everyone must now get super serious.
Remember when the Dissident Right kind of knew this and actually had some success? That was cool. Unfortunately they started to get high on their own supply of hyperbole and lost track of reality.
People living in reality tend to succeed when they want to. People living in a fantasy don't. Think of failure as a clue that something in your perception is wrong.
Sometimes you have to risk letting go of a fantasy and getting your feelings hurt in the process to reorganise and actually be effective. No pain, no gain can apply to psychology too.
And with this comment, because I am clearly pushing on a door welded far too tight, I am out. Unless perhaps I see some sparks of awareness begin to fly here. Thanks to all and I am very happy to have developed this understanding further. I should really have plumped for a Seven Samurai analogy instead of a Last Samurai one. It is such a beautiful film and the Seven Samurai were such amazing people, I love them all, but their assumptions and skills belong to a history that thankfully no longer exists. Peasants don't need to hire protection from brigands in the developed world and there isn't going to be an apocalypse or genocide or hot civil war or invasion. The reasons those happened in the past no longer mean anything.Replies: @Too Long Didn't Read, @Ben tillman, @Chrisnonymous, @Mr Mox, @William Badwhite
https://nypost.com/2021/08/05/cori-bush-will-pay-200k-for-private-security-but-still-wants-to-defund-police/
https://www.takimag.com/article/thank-god-for-the-proud-boys/
As for Cori Bush, she seems like a dribbling maniac who probably only needs protection from herself. Imagine having to listen to that style of argument every day, in your own head, every time you had an opinion. Hell contains no punishment so cruel.
I don’t know who are, but assuming your username you must have been one of those Stacies that only dated muscle hunk Chads in high school. So of course you don’t care. Just being a female already gives you a privileged status, and by your tone you have all the hallmarks of a Stacy. You have never known any hardships in your life, so don’t talk to others like you know what’s going on because you don’t.
I was discussing the realities of the “developed world.” Sorry that pointing them out triggered you.
Try again, dears. This one was a total floater.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIspfWvkgzg
Yawn. The mind numblingly tedious Jewish narrative …
Not worth going book length on this nonsense. (And my deck won’t stain itself.) But the obvious:
We white gentiles do not live as a self-worshipping middle man minority tribe. We live–and survive as nations.
Jews will do their middle man minority thing … anywhere. Köln or Kraków, New York or Nashville–and if Chinese and Indians were stupid enough to let them–Beijing or Bangalore. Jews have their tribal religion to specifically set themselves apart, and create their tribal communities in the midst of any host population.
That’s not how we white gentiles roll. Yes we are more open and individualistic. But that’s in the context of having actual geographic “community”. Our special sauce is the benefit of our high-trust at scale that super-charges the benefit of our cooperative (neighborly) yet individualistic and often creative abilities to create optimum space–peaceful and prosperous–for human flourishing.
We simply are not some little middle man tribe like the Jews. We are not designed to live like that, and we do not want to live like that. We are frankly are superior to that–have created a much better way of life. That has accomplished much more than anyone else. So much more it’s a complete joke–a blowout.
And so yeah. This is an attempted genocide–even though it doesn’t involve labor camps and shooting and gassing. It’s an attempt driven ideologically driven by Jews with their minority allies and their “elite” white-gentile fellow traveler kapos, to “diversify” and hence destroy Western nations and hence white gentiles as a people.
Lol!
Perfect.Replies: @Rockford Tyson, @Anonymous
LOL.
I’ve heard ads on WIND-AM 560 by FN pushing their new 9mm FN 409 pistol; also a radio ad where they mentioned their semi-auto versions of the AR-15 and M249 SAW.
I’ve heard DSA advertising as a gun shop as well as a gun maker (FAL).
Cabelas was advertising as the place to get your “tactical gear” until they chickened out after an infamous shooting in a communist state.
I saw an ad on TV tears ago for Beretta M92 pistols (Channel 38 Chicago).
Lol, China is more a part of the developed world than the UK nowadays. Sorry that reality triggered you.
Try again, dears. This one was a total floater.
Because the strategy is to encircle China with customers of US Arms manufacturers. Make China defend their borders against state-of-the-art weaponry in the hands of people that see things… differently than Chinese authorities in East Turkestan and sell them the wherewithal to make their voices heard.
Biden is the fall guy and cipher Kamala gets in who will ok war on domestic accountability just as Obama did.
I thought you were “out.” Why do you insist on coming back in?
Are these people in any way related to the folks who made Over-The-Rhine uninhabitable by civilized people...for years? The folks who rioted in OTR and around downtown for days, back in 2001, creating a proto-BLM style festival?
Just asking.Replies: @Desiderius
No, but OTR is gentrified now and P&G dumped hundreds of millions on the projects around there so who knows? Western Hills High (Peter Edward Rose class of 1958 I think?) has been almost entirely black for half a century. That area doing better now than it ever has. Those people have roots almost as deep as the German Catholics now.
https://www.city-journal.org/html/what-really-happened-cincinnati-12172.html?wallit_nosession=1
Notice how similar the whole OTR riots of 2001 were to last year's
riotspeaceful protests, right down to the slogans, the arson, the attacks on cops, and so forth.These are your people. You really want to live with them?Replies: @Desiderius
Wrong question. Try:
How useful should whites make the ever-increasing levels of racial hate expressed toward them in outlets such as the New York Times and Washington Post?
Whites tell nonwhites they can’t possess a firearm with felonies on their record. Whites tell nonwhites they must not circumcise their daughters. Whites tell nonwhites to vax up and wear masks, often both. Whites tell nonwhites to recycle.
How are any of these not white supremacism? How are they not examples of “systemic racism”?
The problem is not that half of whites are accused of being supremacists, it’s that the other half are excused. We should take a neutral stance on whether “racism” is bad or good until the other side admits they are just as guilty.
Don’t bitch about hypocrisy, utilize it.
Well, I’ve suggested in previous comments we look at our laws, our rhetoric, our collective behaviors, etc., to see if they amount to something on the lower rungs of anti-White, and maybe especially anti-White male, genocide. Just a hypothesis to be held loosely, to be tested with caution, and to be held close to the vest.
Likewise, the final decades of Austria-Hungary may offer some vague guidance on the centrifugal effects of disparate factions working together for a common goal, in the Habsburg case, non-German ethnicities wishing to be rid of German rule.
In America 2021, I suppose one may consider multinational corporations, affirmative action beneficiaries, and White liberals as pulling away, “centrifuging”, from a commonly shared American “center”, which routinely respected bourgeois norms: married male breadwinner, traditional regard for religion and civic pieties, racial policies that recognized an informal “civil but wary” standard of conduct between Blacks and Whites, etc.
Again, just a hypothesis to be held loosely, a way of framing our situation to offer, if possible, some clarity.
OK, Sailer made a Pedro Guerrero reference in his column, so this thread is not complete without the following story.
In 1984 the Dodgers needed a third baseman, so Tommy Lasorda moved Guerrero from left field to third. Guerrero had trouble fielding there, leading to the following exchange.
TL: “What are you thinking out there?”
PG: “I’m thinking, ‘Please, God, don’t let ball get hit to me.’”
TL: “Anything else?”
PG: “I’m also thinking, ‘Please, God, don’t let ball get hit to Steve Sax.’”
https://twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/1433044419691925508?s=20
“Our” lol! As if.
My alumni magazine reminds me every month that they no longer want anything to do with me or anyone like me. My sons are not getting anywhere near such a place. If they want to be engineers they can do an apprenticeship like their great grandfather.
These are the people you are demanding we trust. Probably you were not around Cincy 20 years ago, but I know old guys who were. Some of them moved way out by 2003 when it was possible to break even selling a house. One old guy now out in the Rockies pointed this article out. You should read it.
https://www.city-journal.org/html/what-really-happened-cincinnati-12172.html?wallit_nosession=1
Notice how similar the whole OTR riots of 2001 were to last year’s
riotspeaceful protests, right down to the slogans, the arson, the attacks on cops, and so forth.These are your people. You really want to live with them?
Probably? I've lived here most of my life and always had family here. I know what happened in the riots. That was a slum, I live in a circa 1940s suburb. Since it's German Catholics I guess they've put down pretty deep roots. If we sell today we'd more than double our money in seven years. Two sales on this street in the last three years, lots of young families.
You're going on stuff that happened a generation ago.Replies: @anon
I made it only through three of your “more” paragraphs.
The first time a black told me that blacks planned on killing all the White people was in 1972.
The first time I got arrested for being assaulted by a black, was in 1988.
The first time an employer told me he would never hire me, because I was White, was 1990.
Even the UN page on genocide covers the various tactics being used against Whites.
Also, sorry, but I didn't make it past your second paragraph. I suppose if I had I would have been more empathetic and less mocking.Replies: @Mike Tre
I think Whites should take seriously immigration policies that have led to White flight, replacement, and ethnic cleansing. They should also take seriously the fact that they are scapegoated and blamed for everything, that everything is about Black, Brown, and Asian empowerment and representation and driving out and tearing down Whites, and that Hollywood is devoted to anti-White propaganda and Black, Yellow, and Brownwashing Whites out of existence.
Unless they want to lose everything and be destroyed.
Race as a large-scale abstraction? People have always divided themselves into separate races, nations, and tribes. Ethnic nationalism is human nature and natural law. White people today are incapable of goodwill for other Whites, but most Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians take race pride for granted.
I think most of this racial hatred is to condition whites to their lowly status and richly deserved punishment at the hands of The Precioussss.
The Preciousss don’t know much but they know that when they push there is no response or the regime comes down hard on any uppity whites.
This has been a fairly violent summer in my small town, but the vast majority of the violence has been colored on colored. The one attack of a colored against a White involved some kind of pervious altercation, probably drug related.Replies: @JimDandy
Concealed carry is legal in Chicago, but you’re right, I can’t imagine that many white Chicagoans carry guns.
The first time a black told me that blacks planned on killing all the White people was in 1972.
The first time I got arrested for being assaulted by a black, was in 1988.
The first time an employer told me he would never hire me, because I was White, was 1990.
Even the UN page on genocide covers the various tactics being used against Whites.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
Wow, I never knew black people had such low time preferences. 50 years and they still haven’t reached for the machetes, despite planning for so long. Good that they gave you plenty of warning though.
Also, sorry, but I didn’t make it past your second paragraph. I suppose if I had I would have been more empathetic and less mocking.
You are basically the Unz comment section equivalent of the long bearded guy standing on the street corner wearing nothing but a wooden sign with 10,000 words of text too small to read from a passing car, even though the motorists can see the unusually large amount of hair growing on the top of your big toes.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
The ordeal that us white students had to go through was harrowing, to say the least. White students did not use the restrooms, as a “beatdown” by multiple blacks was usually the result.
Blacks never fought one-on-one, the “pack mentality” was evident then as is today.
Any attempts by whites to defend themselves was met with indifference, and even outright hostility from the black school officials. You see, even then, blacks were not "responsible" for their behavior.
Blacks did not want to learn, the same situation that still exists today. Even then, blacks were disruptive. You see, just as is the case today, excelling at education is “acting white” and is frowned upon by fellow black “students”. Most of the teachers just shrugged their shoulders, let the disruptions go on until the next class period.
Almost all teachers were deferential to blacks, although there were a few good teachers who tried to carefully shield their white and asian students (us) from predatory blacks, giving us additional attention and coursework, knowing that we would excel in spite of the, violent, raucous atmosphere.
Anywhere blacks go, they destroy…Replies: @Nicholas Stix
“It was just as bad in the 1960s. In fact, Detroit’s public high schools had ‘black students unions’ that were successful in getting the American flag removed from the front of the schools and replacing them with ‘black nationalist’ flags.”
Do you know of any published accounts of this sort of thing?
And of course it's had such an effect that ghoulish jews like Jennifer Rubin are now gleefully spilling their spaghetti over how much ethnic cleansing these policies have churned out in terms of lowering white birth rates through dispossession, marginally higher miscegenation rates through propaganda and making as many white men as possible into sexually invisible losers and so on.Replies: @Desiderius
He’s saying the same thing you are.
What does your happiness matter compared to this? What does your sense of connection? Or fulfilment? This is your mission. Any one who distracts you from it is one of them. You feel trapped. Obviously, you wouldn't choose this hell for yourself, who would do that? People never pick egocentric fantasies over reality. They never engage in self-aggrandising delusions to their own detriment. Or, if they do, they aren't future world-heroes, like an alternate universe Hitler, where he won, like you. You don't need to understand yourself or your motivations. You're going to fix the world. Events will see to that. I congratulate and applaud you. I tremble at what you are about to achieve.Replies: @Robert Dolan, @ben tillman
It is entirely possible that you are the dumbest person posting on unz.
I try to avoid your inane comments, and in the off chance that I have the misfortune of reading some idiocy from you….I marvel that you are able to combine equal amounts of stupidity, absurdity, and ridiculousness.
I doubt this. The more diverse the U.S. becomes, the more foreign quarrels it will be drawn into. It will be forced to take sides in disputes where traditionally it would have remained neutral.
You can see this at work in Canada, which because of its large Sikh and Tamil populations, finds itself frequently quarrelling with India and Sri Lanka.
Also, sorry, but I didn't make it past your second paragraph. I suppose if I had I would have been more empathetic and less mocking.Replies: @Mike Tre
You have been posting here only since May, and already have over 1700 comments (20 a day!) and 166,000 words, and about 160,000 of those words have been bullshit.
You are basically the Unz comment section equivalent of the long bearded guy standing on the street corner wearing nothing but a wooden sign with 10,000 words of text too small to read from a passing car, even though the motorists can see the unusually large amount of hair growing on the top of your big toes.
https://youtu.be/JnovGuBIkJE
Many times these "groups" are sanctioned by the schools themselves, being "jocks" or other "protected" groups. School officials quite often "look the other way" and don't want to be bothered. If the bullied student fights back, HE is quite often punished by the "system".
The case of football jocks murdering a "goth" youth and getting away with it "just because they could" actually occurred in Amarillo Texas. These "jocks" repeatedly harassed and eventually murdered this "goth" student. When the case came to trial, the "jocks" were acquitted because "the big football championship game was scheduled for the following week and their "star players" were needed to assure a win for the school". As "football" is next to "mom and apple pie" in Texas, the jurors' decision was not a surprise. Texans take football so seriously, many high schools have facilities that rival professional sports teams.
A few years later, the ringleader of the bullies was jailed for another offense.
Bullies need to be beaten to within an inch of their lives. Permanent irreversible paralysis would be a plus.Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous
Anecdotal. The biggest trouble-maker at my old school was a huge blonde guy who was constantly quarrelling with the teachers, and was finally expelled for hitting one of them. His last act before leaving was to throw a brick though the headmaster’s window.
The girls were all in love with him of course.
That’s all you had to say, really. Being intimidated and harrassed is bad enough, but after having your face shoved in the dirt, you still get to watch Chad Thundercock French kissing the blond cheerleader bimbo, while you go home to your hand.
Sailer dismisses this cruelty because so many of the most “prominent” conservative figures were dumb musclebound Chads in high school, Think the Bushes, that Supreme Court idiot, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reily, etc. Being an arrogant bully Chad is in the DNA of many of these conservatives types who think that anyone smart or who complains about being a victim is a “fag” or “nerd” who deserves what’s coming to them.
This is why Steve Sailer is evil.Replies: @Art Deco, @Anonymous
Do you know of any published accounts of this sort of thing?Replies: @anarchyst
I was there and personally witnessed the American flag coming down and the black nationalist flag being raised. I’m not sure if the Detroit News or Detroit Free Press had anything to say about it. As they are both liberal rags, probably not…
https://i.ibb.co/r4HFbX5/1969-05-20.jpg
BTW, in The State of White America-2007, I recounted the Brooklyn public school, in which students and staff alike were forced to stand at attention to the separatist, black "national anthem." Except that one Irish lady staffer refused.
In Shut Up and Let the Lady Teach, Emily Sachar recounts Walt Whitman Intermediate School's principal, a racist, black incompetent named Claude Winfield, who would read something to students every morning “from our history and culture” – black history and culture.[xxxix]
Every year during Black History Month, Principal Winfield would play James Weldon Johnson's black separatist “national anthem,” “Lift Ev’ry Voice and Sing.” [xl] Years earlier an Irish Catholic teacher had refused to stand up, in spite of Principal Winfield’s orders. “That is not my anthem and I will not stand up for it, any more than I will stand for the playing of the French anthem or the Canadian anthem. Besides, what is this Black Anthem? What country is it for?” [xli]
What country, indeed?
And things have gotten much worse since 1990.
http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2013/02/afrocentrism-pedagogy-of-genocide.htmlReplies: @anarchyst
What does your happiness matter compared to this? What does your sense of connection? Or fulfilment? This is your mission. Any one who distracts you from it is one of them. You feel trapped. Obviously, you wouldn't choose this hell for yourself, who would do that? People never pick egocentric fantasies over reality. They never engage in self-aggrandising delusions to their own detriment. Or, if they do, they aren't future world-heroes, like an alternate universe Hitler, where he won, like you. You don't need to understand yourself or your motivations. You're going to fix the world. Events will see to that. I congratulate and applaud you. I tremble at what you are about to achieve.Replies: @Robert Dolan, @ben tillman
That was non-responsive and just plain stupid.
In 1984 the Dodgers needed a third baseman, so Tommy Lasorda moved Guerrero from left field to third. Guerrero had trouble fielding there, leading to the following exchange.
TL: "What are you thinking out there?"
PG: "I'm thinking, 'Please, God, don't let ball get hit to me.'"
TL: "Anything else?"
PG: "I'm also thinking, 'Please, God, don't let ball get hit to Steve Sax.'"Replies: @Steve Sailer
In 1984, the Dodgers started Guerrero at 3rd base, where he botched so many ball that it depressed him when hitting. They finally answered his calls and transferred him to left field, where his batting average went up 60 points.
For some reason, the next season they started him at third base for the first two months. On May 31, Pedro’s slugging average was .393. Then they finally let him go back to the outfield. In June and July his slugging average was a Babe Ruth-like .833 playing in Dodger Stadium in a not particularly offensive era.
There are other guys who aren’t psychologically affected at the plate by travails in the field. Dick Allen as a rookie third baseman in 1964 for the Phillies made 41 errors, but was maybe the best offensive player in the league other than Willie Mays. But Pedro wasn’t made of that stern stuff and he’d get down on himself for booting the ball.
Philadelphia achieved Immortality the hard way: First to 10,000 Losses.
Team mascot renaming could apply to them, The Phutilities.
It was cruel. I am sorry for how it made you feel, but sometimes that type of cruelty is actually love and understanding.
My experience was nothing like other commenters are reporting.
I tend to agree with you. Being the smallest (shortest) in my class, I learned to avoid the bullies by being somewhere else. I was never stuffed in a locker, but knew that those pieces of sh!t did have it out for me and others, did my best to avoid contact with them and was almost always successful. You see, brains are capable of beating brawn by sheer logic and critical thinking.
In my case, there were girls that were actually sympathetic to us “normal guys” and acknowledged me as a “nice guy”. Not all girls went for the “jocks”. The smarter ones actually went for us “nice guys”.
The airhead girls are the ones who swooned over the “jocks”. Even the airhead jock worshiper girls learned once they got on the bad side of a testosterone or steroid-addled jock ending up with a swollen lip or black eye that just maybe there was more to “nice guys” than brain-dead testosterone-addled jocks
High school was unpleasant but I learned how to handle myself.
I eventually joined the Marine Corps and ran into a (former) bully. Outranking him was fun. There was no “payback” from me but he knew where he stood…
Now, blacks were another story…more to come…
Regards,
All those miserable Saturday nights at home, watching movies (on VHS, no less) and eating pizza while the popular kids were getting drunk and swapping bodily fluids … how did I ever make it to adulthood?
It’s amazing to think how much better off I am now. I mean, now I have YouTube instead of a VCR.
Social critics such as Elliott Rodger and Seung-Hui Cho have documented the suckitude of adolescent inceldom.
Yeah, rub it in my face that you get to go to the prom and I don’t, you stuck-up preps!
https://imagesvc.meredithcorp.io/v3/mm/image?q=85&c=sc&poi=face&w=435&h=580&url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.onecms.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F20%2F2013%2F04%2Fsean-lowe-435-6.jpg
She totally has herpes, you big dumb jock!
https://blacksportsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Camille-Kostek-GRONK.jpg
I may not be popular, but I’m smarter than all of you stupid popular kids combined! I know how to code!
https://wrestlecrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Fat-nerd-at-his-computer-John-Cena-Fitness.jpgReplies: @anarchyst
I try to avoid your inane comments, and in the off chance that I have the misfortune of reading some idiocy from you....I marvel that you are able to combine equal amounts of stupidity, absurdity, and ridiculousness.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
Was it really that triggering to see yourself so described?
Common enough, but one might wager < 10% of the male population.
and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew,
Every house has different rules.
while the school’s captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town’s Golden Boy
Mythological creature.
Yes, school is ghastly, in part because high school students are seldom learning a serious trade. Why should the dynamics of high school regulate adult life? And why should the imagined pasts of people do so?Replies: @Elli, @3g4me, @anarchyst
Your comment: /while the school’s captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town’s Golden Boy/
…actually occurred in Amarillo Texas. A “goth” youth was mercilessly bullied and eventually murdered by a high school football team captain “just because they could”. The football jocks were “the cream of the community” while the “goth youth” was born on “the wrong side of the tracks”, when the case came to trial, the jury acquitted the football jocks. You see, the school championship game was the following week and the jury could not afford to see their “star players” in jail. So much for “justice”…
The defendant was not acquitted; the defendant was convicted of a lesser charge and later served five years in prison;
The victim had left high school and was two years older than the defendant;
The defendant was a juvenile with a theretofore clean record;
The killing occurred in the context of a mass brawl in a parking lot.
There was no 'school championship the following week'; the trial occurred 20 months after the incident.
The defendant was a junior varsity football player from an ordinary family; his father owned an operated an auto repair shop.
The victim was also from an ordinary family (his father currently has a retirement job as a maintenance man).
If the victim was on the 'wrong side of the tracks', it was because he'd put himself there by refusing to learn a trade, trying to earn a living as a musician, and by flipping the bird at the world with his hair and clothes.
Courts can be stunningly lax with defendants (and occasionally weirdly harsh). Too much discretion.
https://nypost.com/2021/08/05/cori-bush-will-pay-200k-for-private-security-but-still-wants-to-defund-police/
https://www.takimag.com/article/thank-god-for-the-proud-boys/Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
Let’s please not call Ann Coulter a peasant. She’s a queen.
As for Cori Bush, she seems like a dribbling maniac who probably only needs protection from herself. Imagine having to listen to that style of argument every day, in your own head, every time you had an opinion. Hell contains no punishment so cruel.
You’re just not very good at this.
https://www.city-journal.org/html/what-really-happened-cincinnati-12172.html?wallit_nosession=1
Notice how similar the whole OTR riots of 2001 were to last year's
riotspeaceful protests, right down to the slogans, the arson, the attacks on cops, and so forth.These are your people. You really want to live with them?Replies: @Desiderius
I’m demanding nothing.
Probably? I’ve lived here most of my life and always had family here. I know what happened in the riots. That was a slum, I live in a circa 1940s suburb. Since it’s German Catholics I guess they’ve put down pretty deep roots. If we sell today we’d more than double our money in seven years. Two sales on this street in the last three years, lots of young families.
You’re going on stuff that happened a generation ago.
Passive voice?
Probably? I’ve lived here most of my life and always had family here.
I once met an old guy who had lived in LA near Watts.
I know what happened in the riots.
Assuming facts not in evidence.
That was a slum, I live in a circa 1940s suburb.
So? Some parts of Minneapolis lived in nice neighborhoods with family. Did that produce a magic +5 shield against the WalMart being looted and burned down?
Since it’s German Catholics I guess they’ve put down pretty deep roots. If we sell today we’d more than double our money in seven years. Two sales on this street in the last three years, lots of young families.
Hope is not a strategy.
You’re going on stuff that happened a generation ago.
So? You saying nothing like it can every happen again?
Hope is not a strategy.
I’m an asshole and I’m getting off the internet for a few days. I feel some part responsible for the negativity here.
Probably? I've lived here most of my life and always had family here. I know what happened in the riots. That was a slum, I live in a circa 1940s suburb. Since it's German Catholics I guess they've put down pretty deep roots. If we sell today we'd more than double our money in seven years. Two sales on this street in the last three years, lots of young families.
You're going on stuff that happened a generation ago.Replies: @anon
I’m demanding nothing.
Passive voice?
Probably? I’ve lived here most of my life and always had family here.
I once met an old guy who had lived in LA near Watts.
I know what happened in the riots.
Assuming facts not in evidence.
That was a slum, I live in a circa 1940s suburb.
So? Some parts of Minneapolis lived in nice neighborhoods with family. Did that produce a magic +5 shield against the WalMart being looted and burned down?
Since it’s German Catholics I guess they’ve put down pretty deep roots. If we sell today we’d more than double our money in seven years. Two sales on this street in the last three years, lots of young families.
Hope is not a strategy.
You’re going on stuff that happened a generation ago.
So? You saying nothing like it can every happen again?
Hope is not a strategy.
This was published in the Detroit Free Press on May 20, 1969:
The above article in New York magazine: Self-identified “progressive, liberal” NYM commenter pretty much gets it (bold emphasis added) : Replies: @Harry Baldwin, @Goddard, @Altai, @AceDeuce
This NY Mag story is a trivial article about trivial things–and to point out a trivial/not so trivial thing about it, the fact that this crunt can’t bring herself to say “White men” says it all.
Yes and No. Yes, the replacement of our people through immigration is more important than economic and war issues because it destroys us as a people and robs us of self-government.
But why do our elites want immigration and race war in the first place? Why do they want to get rid of
Americans? They are doing this so they can rob the whole world blind.
Race and immigration are means being used to get money and power, to stop an American debate about money and power.
Follow the money. It’s always the money. Mind you I like money myself, but I don’t like crooks.
It should be taken extremely seriously, and should be confronted. Tucker Carlson is the only mainstream news person willing to point it out. Our White congressional representatives and senators should be calling it out as well, and doing something to stop it. If nothing is done, we will eventually be paying reparations taxes, historical wrongs taxes, and who knows what else. The last time a state sponsored hatred against a people, that group was required to wear an identifying patch on their clothing. Whites may soon be wearing a White star armband. It’s just ironic that it’s the same group who wore a yellow star and claimed “Never again” is the main group fomenting the anti-White hatred and leading the charge to destroy one of the main ethnic/racial branches of humanity.
The girls were all in love with him of course.Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous
“The girls were all in love with him of course.”
That’s all you had to say, really. Being intimidated and harrassed is bad enough, but after having your face shoved in the dirt, you still get to watch Chad Thundercock French kissing the blond cheerleader bimbo, while you go home to your hand.
Sailer dismisses this cruelty because so many of the most “prominent” conservative figures were dumb musclebound Chads in high school, Think the Bushes, that Supreme Court idiot, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reily, etc. Being an arrogant bully Chad is in the DNA of many of these conservatives types who think that anyone smart or who complains about being a victim is a “fag” or “nerd” who deserves what’s coming to them.
This is why Steve Sailer is evil.
That is the whole point. Nobody is plotting to kill anyone. What they are doing is dropping a broad hint that killing certain people would be justifiable.
In City Journal, the Wall Street Journal letters editor Elliot Kaufman discusses his investigation of the Crown Heights Riots of 1991. The article as a whole is insightful, and Kaufman has clearly gone out of his way to interview people with different viewpoints who were there in 1991. In a brief aside, he talks about the media reaction to the riots:
What a precise description of the “liberal” view – white victims of black rioters are victims “in a sense” (i.e. you really need to stretch the definition of “victim”), but they are “complicit” (i.e. they had it coming). This “liberal” worldview therefore includes both collective and hereditary guilt – but only for white people – and uses it to justify rioting, arson, plunder, beatings, rape, and murder.
So Kaufman is decent enough to say that he disagrees with the “liberal” view, even when the victims are Gentiles – but there is no doubt that he has accurately described what the “liberal” view is. If you cannot see that that view is, in modern jargon, “problematic”, you need to take a deep breath and look more carefully.
https://www.city-journal.org/crown-heights-riots-30-years-later
Whites acting just as self-interested as blacks means a substantially different culture and allocation of resources.
Where does such a place exist? Maybe Hungary, Russia, Poland, or Israel? I don’t know. Nowhere else I can think of. As Lawrence Auster wrote,
The girls were all in love with him of course.Replies: @Anonymous, @Anonymous
“The girls were all in love with him of course.”
That’s all you had to say, really. Being intimidated and harrassed is bad enough, but after having your face shoved in the dirt, you still get to watch Chad Thundercock French kissing the blond cheerleader bimbo, while you go home to your hand.
Sailer dismisses this cruelty because so many of the most “prominent” conservative figures were dumb musclebound Chads in high school, Think the Bushes, that Supreme Court idiot, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reily, etc. Being an arrogant bully Chad is in the DNA of many of these conservatives types who think that anyone smart or who complains about being a victim is a “fag” or “nerd” who deserves what’s coming to them.
This is why Steve Sailer is evil.
You've referred to five individuals. You're description of four of them is preposterous.Replies: @Hibernian
Maybe if you didn't regard the blonde cheerleader as a bimbo she might have given you the time of day. Hostility is not attractive.
And Steve Sailer is not evil. He's a dork. I suspect he's okay with that.
Sincerely,
A blonde and former a high school varsity cheerleader who had no use for pushy, arrogant chad thundercock jocks, most of whom were oil cans anyway, but really liked taciturn, intelligent, capable gearheads who raced motorcycles and grew up to be fighter pilots.Replies: @Anonymous, @Stan Adams
I don’t doubt that you were there, but you’re an anonymous poster, and you didn’t give precise info. Were you at the school that the DFP story posted referred to? If not, what was your school, and what is the closest date you can give?
BTW, in The State of White America-2007, I recounted the Brooklyn public school, in which students and staff alike were forced to stand at attention to the separatist, black “national anthem.” Except that one Irish lady staffer refused.
In Shut Up and Let the Lady Teach, Emily Sachar recounts Walt Whitman Intermediate School’s principal, a racist, black incompetent named Claude Winfield, who would read something to students every morning “from our history and culture” – black history and culture.[xxxix]
Every year during Black History Month, Principal Winfield would play James Weldon Johnson’s black separatist “national anthem,” “Lift Ev’ry Voice and Sing.” [xl] Years earlier an Irish Catholic teacher had refused to stand up, in spite of Principal Winfield’s orders. “That is not my anthem and I will not stand up for it, any more than I will stand for the playing of the French anthem or the Canadian anthem. Besides, what is this Black Anthem? What country is it for?” [xli]
What country, indeed?
And things have gotten much worse since 1990.
http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2013/02/afrocentrism-pedagogy-of-genocide.html
"Conflict" will continue, but the way it will be fought will reflect what it is fought over. Go up Maslow's hierarchy and you will see what remains scarce. People won't be motivated to fight over what does not; but a fight over higher order needs is exactly what we see all around us. It is one of ego validation, "representation" and passive aggression. You may wish it were more "serious" or you may lament that you are personally unequipped to compete in this world, but the facts of the situation remain. Recognise what has happened, what is going on and act accordingly.
Or, you know, don't, and keep pretending that some apocalypse will come along and suddenly all of your serious manly skills will become crucial. It didn't work well for the Luddites but who knows?
I suppose in the meantime you can mutually backslap on Unz in a joint venture fantasy, but I personally would prefer you guys engage in a realistic way. The culture is becoming increasingly unbalanced in your absence, while you prepare in your bunkers for a doomsday which will never come.
Ever wonder why history is fixed at Emmet Till and the Holocaust? Because that is the last time the stakes were actually high In the developed world. Ever wonder why progressives use the language of therapy? Because that is what they are doing through politics. Ever wonder why educated, important people seem so unserious? Because they are dealing with unserious conflicts due to a lack of serious ones. Ever wonder why a 20 year war in the middle of nowhere which no one actually cares about that was less dangerous than an average mountain climbing expedition is considered apocalyptic, or Jan 6th is considered an "insurgency"? Because they are the biggest things around.
Be grateful you get to live in a time when we have the luxury to be frivolous and, if you want to fight, recognise the nature of the fight you are in, or else, keep losing.
Think of it like The Last Samurai. It is sad to give up all of that honour and glory, but the world has moved on. The Samurai may be a more romantic figure than the infantry grunt, just as the hard men of Unz may be more romantic than a blue-haired passive aggressive feelings ninja, but realism is about recognising what works, not fantasising that the past will return and going down in one last but irrelevant charge.
"Politics is now silly and this is fun" is both the lowQ and HighQ response. Meanwhile the midwits are all seething that everyone must now get super serious.
Remember when the Dissident Right kind of knew this and actually had some success? That was cool. Unfortunately they started to get high on their own supply of hyperbole and lost track of reality.
People living in reality tend to succeed when they want to. People living in a fantasy don't. Think of failure as a clue that something in your perception is wrong.
Sometimes you have to risk letting go of a fantasy and getting your feelings hurt in the process to reorganise and actually be effective. No pain, no gain can apply to psychology too.
And with this comment, because I am clearly pushing on a door welded far too tight, I am out. Unless perhaps I see some sparks of awareness begin to fly here. Thanks to all and I am very happy to have developed this understanding further. I should really have plumped for a Seven Samurai analogy instead of a Last Samurai one. It is such a beautiful film and the Seven Samurai were such amazing people, I love them all, but their assumptions and skills belong to a history that thankfully no longer exists. Peasants don't need to hire protection from brigands in the developed world and there isn't going to be an apocalypse or genocide or hot civil war or invasion. The reasons those happened in the past no longer mean anything.Replies: @Too Long Didn't Read, @Ben tillman, @Chrisnonymous, @Mr Mox, @William Badwhite
Thanks!
When I was a Kid, I could sometimes watch warships from the Warsaw Pact passing through The Great Belt. We were constantly aware of the Red Danger. If you bought a Volvo or a VW transporter, you might receive a note from the government, informing you that your car was marked for expropriation in case of mobilization. Papers have come to light, showing that he former DDR were tagged with the job of occupying Denmark (or what would be left of it) when the shit hit the fan.
I’m mighty pleased it never happened. But more than forty years later, people, who should know better (and perhaps do) are still regarding Russia as The Beast lurking in the abyss, waiting to devour the Scandinavian countries when given the chance.
I always ask “Why?” when the discussion comes up. What should Russia (or any other moderately civilized country) gain by occupy a trading partner, other than endless problems from a population that would hate them with a vengeance. Russia has tried that. It was not a succes.
Again, thanks for adding a sane voice to the mix.
“I’ve had a lot of worries in my life, most of which never happened.”
Here you go.
https://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=24858
Abstraction? What ever happened to race-realism? Isn’t that supposed to be the theme around here?
Ladies and gentlemen of the commentariat, if I am not mistaken, this is Steve Sailer saying that race is an abstraction and that racial grievances are displaced adolescent piques. Have you any further need for witnesses?
“How seriously should whites take the ever-increasing levels of racial hate expressed toward them in outlets such as the New York Times and Washington Post?”
Very seriously. A few times a week, the n.y. post runs a new story on a black’s attempted murder of a White, Asian, or light-skinned hispanic in the subway. Just imagine how many stories it misses.
However, I just went back and re-read your column. You seem to leave your lede somewhere.
The question is whether incitement to racial hatred in the MSM has increased the black on white crime rate.Replies: @David In TN
There is not a place in the U.S. where blacks have not caused disruptions. Without mention where “around here” is, it is impossible to disprove. Remember, anywhere in the U.S. where blacks make up enough of the population, whites will begin moving out. The same for public schools and universities.
That was the excuse the Allies used for hanging Julius Streicher. During the war, he held no government position of more than minimal and local importance. They killed him for the newspaper he published.
Very seriously. A few times a week, the n.y. post runs a new story on a black's attempted murder of a White, Asian, or light-skinned hispanic in the subway. Just imagine how many stories it misses.
However, I just went back and re-read your column. You seem to leave your lede somewhere.Replies: @iffen
Very seriously.
The question is whether incitement to racial hatred in the MSM has increased the black on white crime rate.
"Conflict" will continue, but the way it will be fought will reflect what it is fought over. Go up Maslow's hierarchy and you will see what remains scarce. People won't be motivated to fight over what does not; but a fight over higher order needs is exactly what we see all around us. It is one of ego validation, "representation" and passive aggression. You may wish it were more "serious" or you may lament that you are personally unequipped to compete in this world, but the facts of the situation remain. Recognise what has happened, what is going on and act accordingly.
Or, you know, don't, and keep pretending that some apocalypse will come along and suddenly all of your serious manly skills will become crucial. It didn't work well for the Luddites but who knows?
I suppose in the meantime you can mutually backslap on Unz in a joint venture fantasy, but I personally would prefer you guys engage in a realistic way. The culture is becoming increasingly unbalanced in your absence, while you prepare in your bunkers for a doomsday which will never come.
Ever wonder why history is fixed at Emmet Till and the Holocaust? Because that is the last time the stakes were actually high In the developed world. Ever wonder why progressives use the language of therapy? Because that is what they are doing through politics. Ever wonder why educated, important people seem so unserious? Because they are dealing with unserious conflicts due to a lack of serious ones. Ever wonder why a 20 year war in the middle of nowhere which no one actually cares about that was less dangerous than an average mountain climbing expedition is considered apocalyptic, or Jan 6th is considered an "insurgency"? Because they are the biggest things around.
Be grateful you get to live in a time when we have the luxury to be frivolous and, if you want to fight, recognise the nature of the fight you are in, or else, keep losing.
Think of it like The Last Samurai. It is sad to give up all of that honour and glory, but the world has moved on. The Samurai may be a more romantic figure than the infantry grunt, just as the hard men of Unz may be more romantic than a blue-haired passive aggressive feelings ninja, but realism is about recognising what works, not fantasising that the past will return and going down in one last but irrelevant charge.
"Politics is now silly and this is fun" is both the lowQ and HighQ response. Meanwhile the midwits are all seething that everyone must now get super serious.
Remember when the Dissident Right kind of knew this and actually had some success? That was cool. Unfortunately they started to get high on their own supply of hyperbole and lost track of reality.
People living in reality tend to succeed when they want to. People living in a fantasy don't. Think of failure as a clue that something in your perception is wrong.
Sometimes you have to risk letting go of a fantasy and getting your feelings hurt in the process to reorganise and actually be effective. No pain, no gain can apply to psychology too.
And with this comment, because I am clearly pushing on a door welded far too tight, I am out. Unless perhaps I see some sparks of awareness begin to fly here. Thanks to all and I am very happy to have developed this understanding further. I should really have plumped for a Seven Samurai analogy instead of a Last Samurai one. It is such a beautiful film and the Seven Samurai were such amazing people, I love them all, but their assumptions and skills belong to a history that thankfully no longer exists. Peasants don't need to hire protection from brigands in the developed world and there isn't going to be an apocalypse or genocide or hot civil war or invasion. The reasons those happened in the past no longer mean anything.Replies: @Too Long Didn't Read, @Ben tillman, @Chrisnonymous, @Mr Mox, @William Badwhite
Please learn to use the MORE tag.
Also, much of this is black-on-black violence. But that's how it starts. Increasingly blacks are figuring out they're now allowed to prey on whoever they want, with few consequences for the most part if they stop short of murder.
They should hold public readings of this blog post, like they do when people get up and read all of Ulysses.
https://impunitycity.com/2021/08/26/new-bad-days-87-the-summer-of-blaz-strike-1-teen-gangbangers-die-from-reciprocation-assassinations-more-gangbangers-assemble-in-indiscriminatory-mass-shooting-of-rivals-and-bystanders-man-pursues/Replies: @JQ LLC
.While you’re correct about the abominable monster that is running NYC into the ground, I think you misunderstood my post. It’s not at all about race, it’s about government incompetence and neglect. A lot of this crime stems from poverty and systemic corruption and insouciance from the top.
Not at all. Poverty doesn't cause crime; crime causes poverty.
The next phase is either surrender or quietly (at first) forming our own communities. As you can see from the comments around here, most successful whites will choose the former as they can protect themselves from the ravages of what's coming and because many will simply marry into the cream of other successful groups, such as Asians and Indians. These people also simply lack much group/ethnic loyalty so what's it to them if other whites are turned into helots. Not their people, not their problem.
But some whites will push back and choose the latter. Our ability to succeed is questionable at best, but for those whites, like me, who do feel a kinship with our own people, it's worth a shot. We all die so we might as well die trying.
Democracy is always a tough system to maintain. Democracy in a multi-ethnic, multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-culture society is doomed to fail.Replies: @Hi There
There’s lots of fights that can be won and will be won for whites (and others) in elections. Racial reparations + punishment can be defeated at the ballot box. Public Voting against demonizing white kids in public schools; even many non-whites sympathize with that.
As for “group/ethnic loyalty” and “kinship with our own people”… World history is filled with white groups in Europe hating and killing each other, black tribes in Africa hating and killing each other, etc. Most people have some ethnic loyalty and ethnic attachment, but ultimately they act in their own selfish interest. Most normal white people, even white nationalists, would side with a black/hispanic/asian person who is nice to me over a white person who is not.
The future of the USA is a fairly peaceful transition to something like the 25% white Los Angeles of 2021 aka Brazil with Nukes. As Steve will tell you, there are some downsides but it’s still pretty cozy.
The most likely murderous race riots in the USA are black on Asian and mestizo hispanic on black. But they aren’t likely either.Replies: @Hi There
2021 LA is very nice if you can afford it. Wikipedia says LA was 50% white in 2010 and 24% other, and I bet a lot of that other population has a lot of white ancestry.
LA has a large hispanic population. many hispanics who have light skin and could visibly pass as white choose not to identify as white in today’s anti-white climate, which I can’t blame them for.
Non-hispanic whites are 28.5% of LA city and 25.6% of LA county at the last estimate. Add in Hispanics that are 90%+ european and maybe you get to 30% european.
LA isn’t expensive for a rich major world city. The housing is somewhat expensive but generally newish and well built and spacious. People compare modern LA with its peak niceness in the 60s-80s, or the even nicer OC and San Diego. But it is still overall a really nice place to live, and has very high wages for skilled people.Replies: @ATBOTL
Have you considered a Mexican wife?
That’s all you had to say, really. Being intimidated and harrassed is bad enough, but after having your face shoved in the dirt, you still get to watch Chad Thundercock French kissing the blond cheerleader bimbo, while you go home to your hand.
Sailer dismisses this cruelty because so many of the most “prominent” conservative figures were dumb musclebound Chads in high school, Think the Bushes, that Supreme Court idiot, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reily, etc. Being an arrogant bully Chad is in the DNA of many of these conservatives types who think that anyone smart or who complains about being a victim is a “fag” or “nerd” who deserves what’s coming to them.
This is why Steve Sailer is evil.Replies: @Art Deco, @Anonymous
because so many of the most “prominent” conservative figures were dumb musclebound Chads in high school, Think the Bushes, that Supreme Court idiot, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reily, etc
You’ve referred to five individuals. You’re description of four of them is preposterous.
Too bad for Dick Allen and so many good players to have been part of the Phillies organization.
Philadelphia achieved Immortality the hard way: First to 10,000 Losses.
Team mascot renaming could apply to them, The Phutilities.
And I’m equally sure the newly omnipotent CDC will figure prominently in such an action.
The first ad I’d seen for guns in the MSM (at least in recent memory) was the Henry rifle ad on TV several years ago. (I presume it was a TV ad. I’d probably seen it on youtube as I’d dumped television decades ago.) I was surprised at the time, because I don’t remember TV ads from even big companies like Remington or Winchester when I was a kid back in the ’60’s and ’70’s.
Summary:
We don’t seem to have an adequate common enemy and it is an era of decadence
Also: attempting via any means to overcome the need for a common enemy – well stop right there, that’s not even to be discussed.
Oh, and clickbait.
Clickbait, uber alles
"Tall and white, her hair was black and curly;
she had beautiful breasts and cheeks and nose; she was, also, well -behaved;
her smile was bright, her eyebrows big....”
Which kind of aligns on a point or two to what the black Brearly grad referred to in her or his resentful perception of what is requisite for White privilege.Replies: @vinteuil
The point about Briseis is not so much that she’s beautiful, as that she’s Achilles’ prize of honor – and honor is all he’s supposed to be getting out of all these nights unsleeping and bloody days of the fighting.
Nothing is won for me, now that my heart has gone through its afflictions/in forever setting my life on the hazard of battle.
That’s all you had to say, really. Being intimidated and harrassed is bad enough, but after having your face shoved in the dirt, you still get to watch Chad Thundercock French kissing the blond cheerleader bimbo, while you go home to your hand.
Sailer dismisses this cruelty because so many of the most “prominent” conservative figures were dumb musclebound Chads in high school, Think the Bushes, that Supreme Court idiot, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reily, etc. Being an arrogant bully Chad is in the DNA of many of these conservatives types who think that anyone smart or who complains about being a victim is a “fag” or “nerd” who deserves what’s coming to them.
This is why Steve Sailer is evil.Replies: @Art Deco, @Anonymous
Hi, there, 231!
Maybe if you didn’t regard the blonde cheerleader as a bimbo she might have given you the time of day. Hostility is not attractive.
And Steve Sailer is not evil. He’s a dork. I suspect he’s okay with that.
Sincerely,
A blonde and former a high school varsity cheerleader who had no use for pushy, arrogant chad thundercock jocks, most of whom were oil cans anyway, but really liked taciturn, intelligent, capable gearheads who raced motorcycles and grew up to be fighter pilots.
You’re Number 387 on this site, but you’re Number 1 in my heart, baby!
Wow … that was the best line I’ve come up with in quite a while. I’m in the zone tonight.
Fighter pilot … no, I’ve never been a fighter pilot. But I have played Flight Simulator. I managed to land my Cessna at Miegs Field without crashing. Are you impressed? (Please say you’re impressed. Please! I beg you!)
Wait - someone’s at the door. I think it’s the process server with yet another restraining order. (Sigh) It was all just a misunderstanding, I swear. Yes, I snuck into her bedroom … but she smiled at me! Every woman knows that if she smiles at a man, he owns her for life. And I can make her love me! Just wait until she hears about my vintage He-Man action figure collection!
Seriously, we’re always hearing the dreary stories of people who were unpopular and miserable in their school days. It would be nice if someone who actually had fun on occasion could tell us a few tales.Replies: @Anonymous
In my case, there were girls that were actually sympathetic to us "normal guys" and acknowledged me as a "nice guy". Not all girls went for the "jocks". The smarter ones actually went for us "nice guys".
The airhead girls are the ones who swooned over the "jocks". Even the airhead jock worshiper girls learned once they got on the bad side of a testosterone or steroid-addled jock ending up with a swollen lip or black eye that just maybe there was more to "nice guys" than brain-dead testosterone-addled jocks
High school was unpleasant but I learned how to handle myself.
I eventually joined the Marine Corps and ran into a (former) bully. Outranking him was fun. There was no "payback" from me but he knew where he stood...
Now, blacks were another story...more to come...
Regards,Replies: @Stan Adams
Ah, the halcyon days of youth.
All those miserable Saturday nights at home, watching movies (on VHS, no less) and eating pizza while the popular kids were getting drunk and swapping bodily fluids … how did I ever make it to adulthood?
It’s amazing to think how much better off I am now. I mean, now I have YouTube instead of a VCR.
Social critics such as Elliott Rodger and Seung-Hui Cho have documented the suckitude of adolescent inceldom.
Yeah, rub it in my face that you get to go to the prom and I don’t, you stuck-up preps!
She totally has herpes, you big dumb jock!
I may not be popular, but I’m smarter than all of you stupid popular kids combined! I know how to code!
I hope you didn't take offense to my labeling jocks as being steroid or testosterone-addled. That was not my intent.
If you did take offense, too bad. Get over it.
I had my own circle of friends mostly outside of high school. Yes, I did attend the prom.
Being an accomplished musician (multiple instruments) as well as being able to "repair" just about anything were pluses.
My skills, abilities and accomplishments were in great demand. I make no apologies for my younger life. High school was long before VCRs and computers.
Regards,Replies: @Stan Adams
Yes. Most people think that inciting race or religious hatred does have consequences. The commenter to whom I responded was pooh-poohing the idea that the current MSM incitement of hatred of whites would have negative consequences.
Streicher got stretched for inciting hatred. People that just get canceled these days should thank their lucky stars.
You have to understand that in any human society you would sit at the bottom of the totem pole with a mentality like this. In order to receive, you need to give, and all you can give now is misery and rage, and noone wants more of that in their lives. The first step to better yourself so that you can become desirable to people is to look inward and find out what’s wrong with you and fix it, but that requires a measure of humility, which you currently lack at the moment, judging by how you respond to random strangers on the internet. Best of luck to you.
LOL, people like you are constantly trying to blame the victim for their own suffering. Are you telling me that a handsome, 6'3 muscle athlete witha model face has a good life because of his "mentality"? Are you THAT naive?
At least Steve Sailer doesn't deny that Chad Thundercock gets the girl. He is evil, but honest. People like you, on the other hand, are just full of ST!Replies: @Polistra, @jsm
You could have trimmed everything between the first and last paragraph. Longest shaggy dog story you’ve ever wrote.
Steve keeps trying to find other reasons that non-whites and Jews attack whites beyond the obvious. It's about the money. Or it's about old high school feuds. Or it's about getting some fame. Or it's about white accomplishments in the past. And sure, all of those come into play, but they're not the true source of the attack on whites.
Steve simply can't accept that other races are tribal. They first and foremost hate us because we're white. They want us as helots in our formers lands because we're another tribe, not because they had a tough time in high school.
Steve refuses to accept this because it's so distasteful to him, same as Murray. This cause their normally keen logic to fail them. It's actually pretty interesting to watch.Replies: @Pierre de Craon, @TWS
If he accepts that then his citizenism goes down the toilet.
“A lot of this crime stems from poverty…”
Not at all. Poverty doesn’t cause crime; crime causes poverty.
What is this statement trying to say? What is it referring to?
This is The Iliad, IX 321, in Lattimore’s translation.
It looks like arbery's family is about to hit the racial ghetto lottery...cha-ching!
BTW, in The State of White America-2007, I recounted the Brooklyn public school, in which students and staff alike were forced to stand at attention to the separatist, black "national anthem." Except that one Irish lady staffer refused.
In Shut Up and Let the Lady Teach, Emily Sachar recounts Walt Whitman Intermediate School's principal, a racist, black incompetent named Claude Winfield, who would read something to students every morning “from our history and culture” – black history and culture.[xxxix]
Every year during Black History Month, Principal Winfield would play James Weldon Johnson's black separatist “national anthem,” “Lift Ev’ry Voice and Sing.” [xl] Years earlier an Irish Catholic teacher had refused to stand up, in spite of Principal Winfield’s orders. “That is not my anthem and I will not stand up for it, any more than I will stand for the playing of the French anthem or the Canadian anthem. Besides, what is this Black Anthem? What country is it for?” [xli]
What country, indeed?
And things have gotten much worse since 1990.
http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2013/02/afrocentrism-pedagogy-of-genocide.htmlReplies: @anarchyst
Yes, I was at Northeastern HS at the time and witnessed the “flag raising”…
Maybe if you didn't regard the blonde cheerleader as a bimbo she might have given you the time of day. Hostility is not attractive.
And Steve Sailer is not evil. He's a dork. I suspect he's okay with that.
Sincerely,
A blonde and former a high school varsity cheerleader who had no use for pushy, arrogant chad thundercock jocks, most of whom were oil cans anyway, but really liked taciturn, intelligent, capable gearheads who raced motorcycles and grew up to be fighter pilots.Replies: @Anonymous, @Stan Adams
“Hi, there, 231!
Maybe if you didn’t regard the blonde cheerleader as a bimbo she might have given you the time of day. Hostility is not attractive.
And Steve Sailer is not evil. He’s a dork. I suspect he’s okay with that.
Sincerely,”
Oh please, don’t pretend that you were the hot girl that goes for nerdy nice guys, because these girls simply don’t exist. Don’t pretend that the problem was my attitude, because Chad Thundercock with a much worse attitude had all girls swooning for him.
“A blonde and former a high school varsity cheerleader who had no use for pushy, arrogant chad thundercock jocks, most of whom were oil cans anyway, but really liked taciturn, intelligent, capable gearheads *who raced motorcycles and grew up to be fighter pilots.* ”
I rest my case. In other words, you went for jocks anyway. Here is newsflash, honey: taciturn, nice, intelligent guys don’t grow up to become fighter pilots.
you are the classic blond cheerleader bimbo. Here is you swooning for Chad Thundercock 10 years ago:
All those miserable Saturday nights at home, watching movies (on VHS, no less) and eating pizza while the popular kids were getting drunk and swapping bodily fluids … how did I ever make it to adulthood?
It’s amazing to think how much better off I am now. I mean, now I have YouTube instead of a VCR.
Social critics such as Elliott Rodger and Seung-Hui Cho have documented the suckitude of adolescent inceldom.
Yeah, rub it in my face that you get to go to the prom and I don’t, you stuck-up preps!
https://imagesvc.meredithcorp.io/v3/mm/image?q=85&c=sc&poi=face&w=435&h=580&url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.onecms.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F20%2F2013%2F04%2Fsean-lowe-435-6.jpg
She totally has herpes, you big dumb jock!
https://blacksportsonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Camille-Kostek-GRONK.jpg
I may not be popular, but I’m smarter than all of you stupid popular kids combined! I know how to code!
https://wrestlecrap.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Fat-nerd-at-his-computer-John-Cena-Fitness.jpgReplies: @anarchyst
Were you a jock?
I hope you didn’t take offense to my labeling jocks as being steroid or testosterone-addled. That was not my intent.
If you did take offense, too bad. Get over it.
I had my own circle of friends mostly outside of high school. Yes, I did attend the prom.
Being an accomplished musician (multiple instruments) as well as being able to “repair” just about anything were pluses.
My skills, abilities and accomplishments were in great demand. I make no apologies for my younger life. High school was long before VCRs and computers.
Regards,
I was the captain of the football, basketball, and baseball teams. I dated all of the cheerleaders … simultaneously. My devastating insults caused the suicides of ten emos, four fatties, six goths, and one principal.
(That last one wasn’t really my fault … he was standing on the roof, yelling, “I can’t take it anymore! I’ve had enough!” and I just kept yelling “Jump! Jump!” I didn’t expect him to listen to me.)
That one weekend that my parents were away … that was intense. I had to come up with a suitable excuse when their king-sized waterbed broke.
No, Dad, I didn’t have an orgy in your bedroom … it was the dog. Seriously! I swear!
Someone replaced all of your liquor with water? It wasn’t me! It was … the dog!
No, I didn’t pour Drano in the fish tank. It was … a certain canine who shall remain nameless.
Dad and Mom listened to all of my denials, shook their heads … and euthanized the dog. Pity.
(Did I mention I stole the dog from an emo?)
Arbery was a thug casing construction sites for items he could steal.
It looks like arbery’s family is about to hit the racial ghetto lottery…cha-ching!
Lol!
Perfect.Replies: @Rockford Tyson, @Anonymous
“Chad Thundercock” is just a generic name for any of those dumb, square-jawed, musclebound imbeciles that dominate the hierarchy in high school.
People like Steve Sailer deny the *truth* , that these high school experiences are traumatic and that boys that are nerds/dweebs or just overall physically not strong committ suicide as they see Chad, after just shoving their face in the dirt, French kiss the beautiful blond Stacy cheerleader, as his spit mixes with her spit. Not only is Chad Thundercock not punished for it, but he is rewarded by the hot females with their spit, tongue, boobs, etc. It’s disgusting.
Maybe if you didn't regard the blonde cheerleader as a bimbo she might have given you the time of day. Hostility is not attractive.
And Steve Sailer is not evil. He's a dork. I suspect he's okay with that.
Sincerely,
A blonde and former a high school varsity cheerleader who had no use for pushy, arrogant chad thundercock jocks, most of whom were oil cans anyway, but really liked taciturn, intelligent, capable gearheads who raced motorcycles and grew up to be fighter pilots.Replies: @Anonymous, @Stan Adams
Would you mind if I made an awkward, hilariously inept pass at you? I get a tingle up my leg every time a cheerleader acknowledges my existence.
You’re Number 387 on this site, but you’re Number 1 in my heart, baby!
Wow … that was the best line I’ve come up with in quite a while. I’m in the zone tonight.
Fighter pilot … no, I’ve never been a fighter pilot. But I have played Flight Simulator. I managed to land my Cessna at Miegs Field without crashing. Are you impressed? (Please say you’re impressed. Please! I beg you!)
Wait – someone’s at the door. I think it’s the process server with yet another restraining order. (Sigh) It was all just a misunderstanding, I swear. Yes, I snuck into her bedroom … but she smiled at me! Every woman knows that if she smiles at a man, he owns her for life. And I can make her love me! Just wait until she hears about my vintage He-Man action figure collection!
Seriously, we’re always hearing the dreary stories of people who were unpopular and miserable in their school days. It would be nice if someone who actually had fun on occasion could tell us a few tales.
Did you know that you are one of my very favorite commenters on this site? That's because you are not pretentious and just write about your life as it is and how you deal with what comes your way. You write the way friends talk among themselves. I like that.
So, no, I absolutely would not mind if you made a pass at me, and the more hilariously inept it was, the more I would laugh (with! not at you) and enjoy it.
Here's a tip: invite me to dance and while we are dancing stumble and, in an attempt to prevent yourself from falling, grab me and pull me toward you as you careen to the floor. If you plan your moves right, you can have a hand up my dress grabbing my ass and a faceful of boobage, too, all while apologizing profusely as you cop even more feels helping me back on my feet. If you tell a self-deprecating joke as you do so, I won't even be annoyed. It will just make a funny story to tell.
My mother always told me that if something embarrassing happens in public always laugh, never scowl or appear upset. If you laugh, others will laugh with you and then the incident will be forgotten, even by you.
About high school, I enjoyed it very much and have no bad memories. I suppose any number of episodes could have resulted in bad memories had I chosen to become upset about them and then dwell on them, just as in life after high school. But it's best to shrug such things off and forget about them. Nobody can make you feel bad about yourself unless you let them.
(•‾⌣‾•)و ̑̑♡Replies: @Stan Adams
I hope you didn't take offense to my labeling jocks as being steroid or testosterone-addled. That was not my intent.
If you did take offense, too bad. Get over it.
I had my own circle of friends mostly outside of high school. Yes, I did attend the prom.
Being an accomplished musician (multiple instruments) as well as being able to "repair" just about anything were pluses.
My skills, abilities and accomplishments were in great demand. I make no apologies for my younger life. High school was long before VCRs and computers.
Regards,Replies: @Stan Adams
Yes, I was the jockiest jock in all of jockdom, the undisputed king of the school.
I was the captain of the football, basketball, and baseball teams. I dated all of the cheerleaders … simultaneously. My devastating insults caused the suicides of ten emos, four fatties, six goths, and one principal.
(That last one wasn’t really my fault … he was standing on the roof, yelling, “I can’t take it anymore! I’ve had enough!” and I just kept yelling “Jump! Jump!” I didn’t expect him to listen to me.)
That one weekend that my parents were away … that was intense. I had to come up with a suitable excuse when their king-sized waterbed broke.
No, Dad, I didn’t have an orgy in your bedroom … it was the dog. Seriously! I swear!
Someone replaced all of your liquor with water? It wasn’t me! It was … the dog!
No, I didn’t pour Drano in the fish tank. It was … a certain canine who shall remain nameless.
Dad and Mom listened to all of my denials, shook their heads … and euthanized the dog. Pity.
(Did I mention I stole the dog from an emo?)
The problem is not mentality, dummy. What puts me at the bottom of the totem pole are *genetics* . Like I said before, Chad Thundercock did nothing to deserve his 22″ biceps, his massive square jaw and his symmetrical face.
LOL, people like you are constantly trying to blame the victim for their own suffering. Are you telling me that a handsome, 6’3 muscle athlete witha model face has a good life because of his “mentality”? Are you THAT naive?
At least Steve Sailer doesn’t deny that Chad Thundercock gets the girl. He is evil, but honest. People like you, on the other hand, are just full of ST!
You’re Number 387 on this site, but you’re Number 1 in my heart, baby!
Wow … that was the best line I’ve come up with in quite a while. I’m in the zone tonight.
Fighter pilot … no, I’ve never been a fighter pilot. But I have played Flight Simulator. I managed to land my Cessna at Miegs Field without crashing. Are you impressed? (Please say you’re impressed. Please! I beg you!)
Wait - someone’s at the door. I think it’s the process server with yet another restraining order. (Sigh) It was all just a misunderstanding, I swear. Yes, I snuck into her bedroom … but she smiled at me! Every woman knows that if she smiles at a man, he owns her for life. And I can make her love me! Just wait until she hears about my vintage He-Man action figure collection!
Seriously, we’re always hearing the dreary stories of people who were unpopular and miserable in their school days. It would be nice if someone who actually had fun on occasion could tell us a few tales.Replies: @Anonymous
Hi, Stan!
Did you know that you are one of my very favorite commenters on this site? That’s because you are not pretentious and just write about your life as it is and how you deal with what comes your way. You write the way friends talk among themselves. I like that.
So, no, I absolutely would not mind if you made a pass at me, and the more hilariously inept it was, the more I would laugh (with! not at you) and enjoy it.
Here’s a tip: invite me to dance and while we are dancing stumble and, in an attempt to prevent yourself from falling, grab me and pull me toward you as you careen to the floor. If you plan your moves right, you can have a hand up my dress grabbing my ass and a faceful of boobage, too, all while apologizing profusely as you cop even more feels helping me back on my feet. If you tell a self-deprecating joke as you do so, I won’t even be annoyed. It will just make a funny story to tell.
My mother always told me that if something embarrassing happens in public always laugh, never scowl or appear upset. If you laugh, others will laugh with you and then the incident will be forgotten, even by you.
About high school, I enjoyed it very much and have no bad memories. I suppose any number of episodes could have resulted in bad memories had I chosen to become upset about them and then dwell on them, just as in life after high school. But it’s best to shrug such things off and forget about them. Nobody can make you feel bad about yourself unless you let them.
(•‾⌣‾•)و ̑̑♡
Of course, when you start talking about my hands, then I start thinking about my fingers. But that’s getting a little out of bounds…
I’ve actually got a decent sense of rhythm. Even black people have complimented me on it - the ultimate form of validation in modern American society.
The question is whether incitement to racial hatred in the MSM has increased the black on white crime rate.Replies: @David In TN
Do you think the “incitement to racial hatred in the MSM” reduces the black on white crime rate?
LOL, people like you are constantly trying to blame the victim for their own suffering. Are you telling me that a handsome, 6'3 muscle athlete witha model face has a good life because of his "mentality"? Are you THAT naive?
At least Steve Sailer doesn't deny that Chad Thundercock gets the girl. He is evil, but honest. People like you, on the other hand, are just full of ST!Replies: @Polistra, @jsm
Take heart from this, then. With our society’s explicitly dysgenic policies, and the explicitly dysgenic macro trends in populations worldwide, you’ll have lots and lots of company.
Did you know that you are one of my very favorite commenters on this site? That's because you are not pretentious and just write about your life as it is and how you deal with what comes your way. You write the way friends talk among themselves. I like that.
So, no, I absolutely would not mind if you made a pass at me, and the more hilariously inept it was, the more I would laugh (with! not at you) and enjoy it.
Here's a tip: invite me to dance and while we are dancing stumble and, in an attempt to prevent yourself from falling, grab me and pull me toward you as you careen to the floor. If you plan your moves right, you can have a hand up my dress grabbing my ass and a faceful of boobage, too, all while apologizing profusely as you cop even more feels helping me back on my feet. If you tell a self-deprecating joke as you do so, I won't even be annoyed. It will just make a funny story to tell.
My mother always told me that if something embarrassing happens in public always laugh, never scowl or appear upset. If you laugh, others will laugh with you and then the incident will be forgotten, even by you.
About high school, I enjoyed it very much and have no bad memories. I suppose any number of episodes could have resulted in bad memories had I chosen to become upset about them and then dwell on them, just as in life after high school. But it's best to shrug such things off and forget about them. Nobody can make you feel bad about yourself unless you let them.
(•‾⌣‾•)و ̑̑♡Replies: @Stan Adams
Sounds like a plan. 😀
Of course, when you start talking about my hands, then I start thinking about my fingers. But that’s getting a little out of bounds…
I’ve actually got a decent sense of rhythm. Even black people have complimented me on it – the ultimate form of validation in modern American society.
Steve is not pro-white; he's anti-anti-white. Like Murray, Steve wants everyone to embrace and enjoy the rich bio-diversity of the human race all while ignoring race, at least on an individual basis. That men as bright as Murray and Sailer can't see the flaw in their thinking shows how blinded they are. Cognitive dissonance of this level takes some serious brains.
Btw, I noticed that Steve never addressed the Z-Man's critique of Citizenism a week or two ago. Probably for the best. Defending the indefensible against someone who can match your debating skills isn't a great idea.Replies: @Bill Jones, @3g4me, @James N. Kennett, @ATBOTL
The thing about citizenism is that when Steve first started talking about it, around 20 years ago, it was presented as a reasonable goal that was supposedly something that the elites could agree to prevent outcomes of social disintegration that Steve assumes elites share his dislike for. That’s how Steve talked about it, anyway. But now, we can all see that the establishment will never support citizenism and that they will continue to move in the current explicitly anti-white direction. So citizenism is an untenable approach, that can’t work and assumes that the other side will retreat and cede ground to us in the middle of a huge victory.
It’s pathetic to see someone as perceptive as Steve Sailer doing a sputtering “it does not compute” routine when his theory is shown by events to be wrong.
There is no doubt in my mind that the MSM “directs” the actions of people such as Micah Xavier Johnson. Just as I think that sites like TUR “direct” the actions of people like Dylann Roof and Robert Bowers. Restating my question, are racially motivated crimes by blacks increasing as a result of anti-white demagoguery by the MSM? For me, the answer to that question is important in answering Steve’s question.
I once heard”get good at feeling bad.” I really wish someone had experience explained in high school the reality that how you handle the problems you will continuously face determines the quality of you life. Like you I fell for the advertising image that everyone else is having a blast all day and you aren’t., what a loser!
A good deal of the racial reckoning could the expectations Americans learn from marketing. This might explain why the corporations all went woke.
You are quite the moron. The point he was making is that guys that are smart and have other talents other than being a musclebound jock get shoved in the dirt and get no girls. Dysgenics? Only if you value big muscles and physical attributes over anything else. Given your response, I assume you are a victim of eugenics, too.
I believe the latter is categorically more hysterical and far less likely to be effective.Replies: @bomag
Where does the evidence point? Our courts and legislation carry plenty of anti-White animus without admitting such. People in power cheer a little too loudly without admitting that is their agenda.
Hysterical doesn’t mean wrong. Hyperbole doesn’t mean the underlying point is wrong.
The problem is that in response many white people either deny this, because they need to feel above these relatively small matters, or they massively exaggerate it for very similar reasons.
This means that they cannot adequately represent their interests and be understood, even by each other.
Worse, the two types of responses actually end up in conflict, turning what should be an easy problem to solve into a civil war of psychological archetypes, with each polarising the other, not just politically but even spiritually.
This is all very fixable and everyone involved just needs to breath and both have the courage to look at the situation and the courage to look without exaggeration.
Easy.Replies: @Art Deco, @bomag
LOL, people like you are constantly trying to blame the victim for their own suffering. Are you telling me that a handsome, 6'3 muscle athlete witha model face has a good life because of his "mentality"? Are you THAT naive?
At least Steve Sailer doesn't deny that Chad Thundercock gets the girl. He is evil, but honest. People like you, on the other hand, are just full of ST!Replies: @Polistra, @jsm
Could it be, that while watching Chad Thundercock French-kiss the Blonde Bimbo, you were so busy wishing the blonde bimbo would kiss you, that you failed to notice the mouse-haired, four-eyed nerdette in the corner penning bad poetry about her loneliness and angst?
I have no idea what this NY mag writer is going on about–trivial is putting is lightly. Most media is just a form of navel-gazing–but debating/discussing/waxing lyric on a fictional TV program is the height of frivolity for an increasingly unserious people.
Law & Order was almost comical in its lack of black perps and the number professional/upper-middle class white perps. The story-telling was fine, but the players didn’t resemble reality in any way.
That show has been around so long that the original junior (black) prosecutor (Richard Brooks), subordinate to the starring Michael Moriarty ADA, has played a retiree on TV.
LA has a large hispanic population. many hispanics who have light skin and could visibly pass as white choose not to identify as white in today's anti-white climate, which I can't blame them for.Replies: @Pixo
I think it’s nice that about a third of Mexican Americans consider themselves racially white. But the percentage who can pass even for pure Spanish is more like 5-10%, and more like 3% as a generic white American from the midwest or south.
Non-hispanic whites are 28.5% of LA city and 25.6% of LA county at the last estimate. Add in Hispanics that are 90%+ european and maybe you get to 30% european.
LA isn’t expensive for a rich major world city. The housing is somewhat expensive but generally newish and well built and spacious. People compare modern LA with its peak niceness in the 60s-80s, or the even nicer OC and San Diego. But it is still overall a really nice place to live, and has very high wages for skilled people.
European people are far lower than 28% of LA city's population.
...actually occurred in Amarillo Texas. A "goth" youth was mercilessly bullied and eventually murdered by a high school football team captain "just because they could". The football jocks were "the cream of the community" while the "goth youth" was born on "the wrong side of the tracks", when the case came to trial, the jury acquitted the football jocks. You see, the school championship game was the following week and the jury could not afford to see their "star players" in jail. So much for "justice"...Replies: @Art Deco
The case you’re referring to occurred more than 20 years ago;
The defendant was not acquitted; the defendant was convicted of a lesser charge and later served five years in prison;
The victim had left high school and was two years older than the defendant;
The defendant was a juvenile with a theretofore clean record;
The killing occurred in the context of a mass brawl in a parking lot.
There was no ‘school championship the following week’; the trial occurred 20 months after the incident.
The defendant was a junior varsity football player from an ordinary family; his father owned an operated an auto repair shop.
The victim was also from an ordinary family (his father currently has a retirement job as a maintenance man).
If the victim was on the ‘wrong side of the tracks’, it was because he’d put himself there by refusing to learn a trade, trying to earn a living as a musician, and by flipping the bird at the world with his hair and clothes.
Courts can be stunningly lax with defendants (and occasionally weirdly harsh). Too much discretion.
Hysterical doesn't mean wrong. Hyperbole doesn't mean the underlying point is wrong.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
There is an underlying point. It is that white people are being mildly discriminated against by the state and other major institutions, along with having their feelings hurt and worth invalidated by the drivers of cultural production.
The problem is that in response many white people either deny this, because they need to feel above these relatively small matters, or they massively exaggerate it for very similar reasons.
This means that they cannot adequately represent their interests and be understood, even by each other.
Worse, the two types of responses actually end up in conflict, turning what should be an easy problem to solve into a civil war of psychological archetypes, with each polarising the other, not just politically but even spiritually.
This is all very fixable and everyone involved just needs to breath and both have the courage to look at the situation and the courage to look without exaggeration.
Easy.
Societies benefit when social practice provides encouragement for accomplishment by individuals and enterprises which produce real goods and services for the enjoyment of all. That means what John Rawls called a 'system of natural liberty' - equal liberty and careers-open-to-talents. Qualifications on that (such as collective purchase of certain services like medical care) need to minimize perverse incentives. What we've got now is the metastasis of patronage mills and routinized lying which is ruining our public institutions and damaging our private ones. The routinized lying now extends to gaslighting school children.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
A chunk of life is being able to see through exaggeration to the underlying issue.
The Left exaggerates plenty and it doesn't hurt their cause.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
You are basically the Unz comment section equivalent of the long bearded guy standing on the street corner wearing nothing but a wooden sign with 10,000 words of text too small to read from a passing car, even though the motorists can see the unusually large amount of hair growing on the top of your big toes.Replies: @Reg Cæsar
The(ir) name is the scientific appellation for a California wildflower, but it sure could pass for a Brazilian pop singer. Such as Ithamara Koorax— whose own name sounds like a jungle insect.
Non-hispanic whites are 28.5% of LA city and 25.6% of LA county at the last estimate. Add in Hispanics that are 90%+ european and maybe you get to 30% european.
LA isn’t expensive for a rich major world city. The housing is somewhat expensive but generally newish and well built and spacious. People compare modern LA with its peak niceness in the 60s-80s, or the even nicer OC and San Diego. But it is still overall a really nice place to live, and has very high wages for skilled people.Replies: @ATBOTL
Uh, that number includes Arabs, Jews, Turks, Persians, Armenians, Afghanis and persons from former Soviet countries like Uzbekistan.
European people are far lower than 28% of LA city’s population.
How useful should whites make the ever-increasing levels of racial hate expressed toward them in outlets such as the New York Times and Washington Post? Whites tell nonwhites they can't possess a firearm with felonies on their record. Whites tell nonwhites they must not circumcise their daughters. Whites tell nonwhites to vax up and wear masks, often both. Whites tell nonwhites to recycle. How are any of these not white supremacism? How are they not examples of "systemic racism"?The problem is not that half of whites are accused of being supremacists, it's that the other half are excused. We should take a neutral stance on whether "racism" is bad or good until the other side admits they are just as guilty.Don't bitch about hypocrisy, utilize it.Replies: @ATBOTL
This is classic boomer gibberish. It seems like a “Democrats are the real racists” type of sentiment, but horribly inarticulate. We should respond to anti-whiteness by saying liberals are the real racists because they want non-whites to recycle? And then what? It’s such a stupid line of thinking, the idea that conservatives can fight liberals by saying liberals are “racist.”
How did boomers get this way?
"Thus, the upper reaches of society have been egging on everybody who isn’t a straight white male to dredge up and dwell on ancient memories of social unease in middle and high school."
But Steve Sailer, high school IS traumatic. Kids are awful anywhere in the World, but in the U.S it's even worse because America has a very extreme winner/loser mindset and type of Society where if you aren't talented or accomplished even as a teenager, you are trash. Think the nerd who gets stuffed in lockers, beaten up and gets a harsh sentence for just being out at night after curfew, while the school's captain of the football team can run over a family with his muscle car while drag racing and drinking with his jock buddies, but receives only a slap in the wrist from the judge because he is the town's Golden Boy.
The way Society is organized at it's most fundamental level IS unfair, a disgusting and vile Darwinian hell hole that causes enormous amounts of Human pain and suffering. We should be striving to elevate ourselves from our animal-like Nature, and not to celebrate it.
So a guy is better than me just because he has bigger muscles, a deeper voice and a squarer jaw? What kind of BS is that? I think those traits are objectively inferior, and the guys that have that just have them. They haven't striven at all for them. They just lucked out. So how are they "winners" if there was no effort involved except having the right parents?
Society as it is is cruel, anachronistic, irrational, a bunch of de-humanizing institutions that exist for a Darwinian economic/coporate imperative and must be torn apart and rebuilt from scratch.
Chad Thundercock ruined my teenage years, and I want all of Society to pay for it. https://youtu.be/E6_Y77q1PqkReplies: @Art Deco, @Art Deco, @anarchyst, @Old Prude, @anon, @JohnnyWalker123
You obviously didn’t go to high school in America.
Your “understanding” of American high schools is based on watching teen movies&sitcoms from the 90s.
I’m going to tell you a secret. Nobody was stuffing kids in lockers back in the 90s. Except on “Boy Meets World” and “Family Matters.”
"In September 1999, Guerrero was arrested for trying to buy 33 pounds of cocaine from an undercover agent. In June 2002, he was acquitted of drug conspiracy charges after his attorney argued his client's intellect prevented him understanding the full implications of the alleged drug deal. Hirsch detailed a portrait of the former major league All-Star, referring to his lack of education and inability to perform simple everyday tasks."
I too would like to have the legal unaccountabilty of a low IQ. Is there some uncheatable test I could take to prove how dumb I am?Replies: @Jim Don Bob
Sure. Vote for the Democrats.
That show has been around so long that the original junior (black) prosecutor (Richard Brooks), subordinate to the starring Michael Moriarty ADA, has played a retiree on TV.Replies: @Art Deco
Law & Order was almost comical in its lack of black perps and the number professional/upper-middle class white perps. The story-telling was fine, but the players didn’t resemble reality in any way.
See Agatha Christie or Midsommer Murders, which are sociologically and procedurally preposterous. The writers make use of situations and characters with which they are familiar and which amuse them.
Flannery O’Connor once said she made use of black characters, but did not try to get inside their heads as she thought that was outside her skill set. I’ll wager you screenwriters are seldom people from wage-earning backgrounds. Black wage-earners, much less black lumpenproletarians, are very foreign to them.
Years ago, a man who was a historical consultant on the television drama The Young Riders offered a memoir of his experiences in Chronicles. The Young Riders was a western about Pony Express riders starring Anthony Zerbe. He said there was a great deal of resistance from the director at his efforts to add versimilitude and that he was told when he was off the set the director would fly into enraged rants about him. I think at one point he pointed out that blacks accounted for 0.6% of the population of the western half of the continent in that era so having black characters on the set was a contrivance. The history of the Pony Express is a subject so discrete that granular features of the service can be known. Evidently, they never had any women employed as riders (https://www.hhhistory.com/2016/04/pony-express-women.html). The historical consultant had his work cut out for him by the casting directors. The supporting characters included a black, a woman, a red indian, and a deaf guy (but not two Jews, a cripple, or James Watt).
One thing the BLM discourse has taught us is that white bourgeois who vote Democratic and work in word-merchant occupations are weirdly uninformed and even delusional about everyday social relations in this country and that formal schooling tends to diminish rather than enhance people’s understanding in this regard.
The problem is that in response many white people either deny this, because they need to feel above these relatively small matters, or they massively exaggerate it for very similar reasons.
This means that they cannot adequately represent their interests and be understood, even by each other.
Worse, the two types of responses actually end up in conflict, turning what should be an easy problem to solve into a civil war of psychological archetypes, with each polarising the other, not just politically but even spiritually.
This is all very fixable and everyone involved just needs to breath and both have the courage to look at the situation and the courage to look without exaggeration.
Easy.Replies: @Art Deco, @bomag
I’m not aware of anyone of note ‘massively exaggerating’ the problem. Even on these boards, the people using the phrase ‘white genocide’ are an odd minority. (Some of the other Unz writers may have more kooks on their boards than does Mr. Sailer).
Societies benefit when social practice provides encouragement for accomplishment by individuals and enterprises which produce real goods and services for the enjoyment of all. That means what John Rawls called a ‘system of natural liberty’ – equal liberty and careers-open-to-talents. Qualifications on that (such as collective purchase of certain services like medical care) need to minimize perverse incentives. What we’ve got now is the metastasis of patronage mills and routinized lying which is ruining our public institutions and damaging our private ones. The routinized lying now extends to gaslighting school children.
Societies benefit when social practice provides encouragement for accomplishment by individuals and enterprises which produce real goods and services for the enjoyment of all. That means what John Rawls called a 'system of natural liberty' - equal liberty and careers-open-to-talents. Qualifications on that (such as collective purchase of certain services like medical care) need to minimize perverse incentives. What we've got now is the metastasis of patronage mills and routinized lying which is ruining our public institutions and damaging our private ones. The routinized lying now extends to gaslighting school children.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
Yes, affirmative action, non-discriminatory mass immigration, the “white privilege” libel and all of that, are perfectly counterable from within a Rawlsian framework. It was harder to do so when the US was 90% white and many people alive could remember systematic discrimination against blacks, but now it is an open goal.
You’re right about people “of note” but political conversation is much democratised and much of the noise comes from elsewhere.
Rawls favored something he called 'fair equality of opportunity'; I think looking back over the last 50 years you can guess what that would mean if anyone tried to implement it.
Rawls himself had no time for the system of natural liberty. He did, however, have a concise way of describing the notion.
Rawls favored something he called ‘fair equality of opportunity’; I think looking back over the last 50 years you can guess what that would mean if anyone tried to implement it.
The problem is that in response many white people either deny this, because they need to feel above these relatively small matters, or they massively exaggerate it for very similar reasons.
This means that they cannot adequately represent their interests and be understood, even by each other.
Worse, the two types of responses actually end up in conflict, turning what should be an easy problem to solve into a civil war of psychological archetypes, with each polarising the other, not just politically but even spiritually.
This is all very fixable and everyone involved just needs to breath and both have the courage to look at the situation and the courage to look without exaggeration.
Easy.Replies: @Art Deco, @bomag
Claiming that exaggeration is the problem is a laughable premise.
A chunk of life is being able to see through exaggeration to the underlying issue.
The Left exaggerates plenty and it doesn’t hurt their cause.
2. The left tends to exaggerate the hurt they feel, but the right tends to exaggerate the consequences. It is hysteria versus hysteria multiplied in repression.
Left: 'commenting on my hair is traumatic, it is the ultimate oppression."
Right: "my feelings aren't hurt by you allowing gays to marry, but it means the end of Western civilisation, that technological progress will collapse, that everyone will starve and it is the end of the world."
You tell the "left" person that they're being hysterical and there is actually a chance they might agree. You tell the "right" person they're being hysterical and they go into stereotypical denial mode where they lambast you with "facts", condescension and their extreme anxiety.Replies: @bomag
A chunk of life is being able to see through exaggeration to the underlying issue.
The Left exaggerates plenty and it doesn't hurt their cause.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
1. Exaggeration is getting in the way of understanding on both sides.
2. The left tends to exaggerate the hurt they feel, but the right tends to exaggerate the consequences. It is hysteria versus hysteria multiplied in repression.
Left: ‘commenting on my hair is traumatic, it is the ultimate oppression.”
Right: “my feelings aren’t hurt by you allowing gays to marry, but it means the end of Western civilisation, that technological progress will collapse, that everyone will starve and it is the end of the world.”
You tell the “left” person that they’re being hysterical and there is actually a chance they might agree. You tell the “right” person they’re being hysterical and they go into stereotypical denial mode where they lambast you with “facts”, condescension and their extreme anxiety.
The Right has been plenty conciliatory on social issues while the Left screams ever louder about the looming apocalypse unless there is another regulation coupled to a massive spending bill.
Please name a leftist who has admitted to being hysterical.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
I remember the article in Chronicles you reference. The author was Roger McGrath.
2. The left tends to exaggerate the hurt they feel, but the right tends to exaggerate the consequences. It is hysteria versus hysteria multiplied in repression.
Left: 'commenting on my hair is traumatic, it is the ultimate oppression."
Right: "my feelings aren't hurt by you allowing gays to marry, but it means the end of Western civilisation, that technological progress will collapse, that everyone will starve and it is the end of the world."
You tell the "left" person that they're being hysterical and there is actually a chance they might agree. You tell the "right" person they're being hysterical and they go into stereotypical denial mode where they lambast you with "facts", condescension and their extreme anxiety.Replies: @bomag
Seems that it is the opposite of what you relate.
The Right has been plenty conciliatory on social issues while the Left screams ever louder about the looming apocalypse unless there is another regulation coupled to a massive spending bill.
Please name a leftist who has admitted to being hysterical.
One talks about their feelings, but projects their drama into culture. The other projects their feelings onto geopolitical events and this determines how they see it will turn out. I find the latter to be more hysterical, though, of course, very few people self-describe as hysterical and they will say righteously emotional or some other euphemism instead.
The Right has been plenty conciliatory on social issues while the Left screams ever louder about the looming apocalypse unless there is another regulation coupled to a massive spending bill.
Please name a leftist who has admitted to being hysterical.Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
The two sides talk about representation of black people on TV in different ways. One side says that the lack of black people in key roles hurts black people’s feelings, discourages them and may well contribute to their lower achievement. The other side says that white people being portrayed badly on TV is part of a scheme of genocide that will end civilisation.
One talks about their feelings, but projects their drama into culture. The other projects their feelings onto geopolitical events and this determines how they see it will turn out. I find the latter to be more hysterical, though, of course, very few people self-describe as hysterical and they will say righteously emotional or some other euphemism instead.
You've referred to five individuals. You're description of four of them is preposterous.Replies: @Hibernian
Try all five.