RSS
While the grisly acts of violence carried out by Muslim lunatics call for condemnation, is there any viable way of saving Western Europe in its current state? Take France, for example. It chose Globo-Homo-Mania over Catholicism as its spiritual compass. It succumbed to ‘gay marriage’ like the rest of EU that is under Jewish Supremacist control. Also, what is secular France? Is it about philosophy, science, arts & culture, and reason? No, it’s mainly about pop culture, mostly centered on Hollywood movies and savage black jungle jivery. Pornography is the ONLY domain left for ‘free expression’, and it’s controlled by anti-white Jews. If the choice is between Jihad and Jungle, the former is better as the Muslim World is at least civilized whereas blacks turn more places into New Detroits and New Haitis.
Few years ago, popular commentator Steve Turley foolishly praised Emmanuel Macron for his sudden hard-line stance against Islam, but what exactly was the would-be Jupiter globo-boy or globoy defending? Was he reviving nationalism? No, he was, is, and always will be the same globalist. He wants more immigrant-invaders to replace real(or white) Frenchmen. He was merely denouncing certain aspects of Islam because they give a bad name to the globalist idealization of Diversity. He sought to suppress the most violent aspects of Islam only to increase mass immigration-invasion and hasten the Great Replacement, or White Nakba. “You see, apart from the few bad apples, most are good and more than welcome.”
On the occasions when the likes of Macron defend French or ‘Western’ values against ‘Islamo-Fascism’, they are not defending Europeans and their civilization. They denounce certain aspects of Islam as too conservative and antithetical to open sewage pornification of culture that they promote as ’empowering’ and ‘liberating’. It mainly means celebration of ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs and BAMMAMA or blacks-are-more-muscular-and-more-aggressive, i.e. because blacks kick white butts in sports, whites should cuck and worship blacks as the superior race of heroes who deserve to take white women. When Macron and such ilk denounce Jihad, they are merely speaking in favor of the Junglization of the white race pushed by Jewish Power, of course. And, of course, much of anti-Islamic(and anti-Arab) criticism from the mouths of globalists is really about propping up Zionism and Neocon foreign policy.
Muslim acts of beheading, cruel and grisly as they are, affect only a tiny number of people. In contrast, black ‘bewombing’ is affecting millions of white women. White women who could be using their wombs to create more white babies are now creating more blacks, the natural enemy of the white race as black males have the power to emasculate white men into a bunch of fa**oty-ass wussy-boys. Every time a white woman is ‘bewombed’, a potential white child is being pre-murdered in favor of creating a black child. A Muslim sicko beheading a 70 yr old woman is less threatening to the West than a bunch of Simon Mols ‘bewombing’ millions of white women in the EU.
If the globalists win among the Dumb Polacks, Poland will be Moland
In one respect, Jews value the presence of Muslims in the West. Sure, there are downsides. It means more attacks on Jews and their property. But this very fact makes whites side with Jews against Muslims. So, Jews get to kill two birds with one stone. By pushing for non-white mass immigration-invasion, Jews undermine white power and white majority. But because Muslims are seen as hostile to Jews, philosemitic Holocaustianity-worshiping whites become ever more protective of Jews.
Now, in a sane world, whites would be infuriated with Jews for pushing White Nakba. Whites would connect the dots and exclaim, “Jews are increasing diversity to play divide-and-rule among goyim.” But whites can’t say this because of the cult of the Holy Holocaust. Whites have been inculcated to feel that it’s ‘antisemitic’ to be critical of Jews in any way. One mustn’t believe Jews can be wicked or have hostile intentions. One must believe in JEWISH POWER KNOW BEST and LEAVE IT TO BEAVEROWICZ. Also, whites have been so brainwashed with the wonders of ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’ that they can’t say NO to mass-immigration and the Great Replacement, supposedly a ‘far right’ conspiracy-notion.
That being the case, the ONLY option for whites(anxious about excessive Diversity) is to seek a way to oppose mass-immigration that might flatter and please Jews. And that, of course, is anti-Islamism on account that Muslims are ‘Anti-Semitic’. So, the likes of Tommy Robinson doesn’t dare to say NO to more black immigration-invasion even though blacks cause the most problems in the UK. He only gripes about too-many-Muslims because… uh… they hate Jews and, of course, homos.
Goy Dog John McCain and His Jewish Master Joe Lieberman
So, never mind white identity and white interests. (Using his logic, More Muslims would be welcome if they were pro-Jewish and pro-homo.) Robinson and his crew don’t oppose mass-immigration to save historic Britain of white folks. No, they oppose certain features of mass-immigration, mostly involving Muslims, because the nasty ‘Muzzies’ purportedly hate Jews(and homos and feminists too). This is why Jews see a certain advantage in Muslim Immigration. More Muslims in the West means more whites cozying up to Jews and saying, “We want to protect you Holy Holocaust Jews from those nasty Islamo-Fascists.” Of course, Jews feel contempt for such white suckups and toadies. Jews go on pushing for mass-immigration to reduce whites into minorities throughout the West, all the while reaping the white cuckish furor about ‘muh precious Jews’. Deviously and cunningly, they play both sides. (Jews get something, Muslims get something, whites get nothing, but then cuck idiots, which is what most whites have been reduced to, don’t deserve anything.)
Jews feel entitled as quasi-gods over whites as goy subjects. Whites must make offerings to Jews. Jews take the offerings, but there’s no guarantee of gratitude and reciprocation. But then, such is the psychology of godhood. Similarly, the master doesn’t feel much in the way of appreciation for what the slaves do for him. He feels entitled to be served whereas the slaves are obligated to serve. Jews and white ‘conservatives’ are like a glutton and the cook. The cook makes lots of dishes for the glutton who gobbles up everything but pays nothing and doesn’t even leave a tip.
As far as Jews are concerned, white ‘conservatives’ who oppose mass-immigration and rag on Muslims(mainly as threats to Jews, feminists, and homos) are merely the latest variation of the Classic Anti-Semite, and Jews aren’t entirely wrong about this. White ‘conservatives’ have merely transferred their ancient distrust of the Jew as the Other onto other groups, such as Muslims. The object has changed but the psychology remains the same. To the cuckservative mind, Jews are the New Jesus while Muslims are the New Jews(stained with bloodthirst for the Holy Holocaust Jews as the Neo-Christ). Especially because the Shoah happened on European soil, ragging on ‘raghead’ antisemitism is a convenient way for whites to partly absolve their own past of Jew-Hatred: “We love and worship Jews now, and it’s the Muzzies who are the New Nazis!!”
Jews are acutely aware of the dynamics of White Psychology but also encourage it in part to foster white support for Wars for Israel. Jews loathe anti-Muslim whites as mere variants of the archetypal Anti-Semites but also value them as useful attack dogs for Zion against Muslims, now hated by white cuckservatives for the same reason Jews were reviled by the Christian West in the past: The crime of deicide, as in “Jews killed the Son of God” or “Muslims want to kill the godly folks, the Jews.”
Anglos, once the greatest conquerors and rulers, now the biggest cuck maggots.
As for Free Speech vs Muslims, there’s an argument in favor of the Muslims. They have every right to be outraged by the denigration of Islam and Muslims given the current state of Western ‘liberal democracy’. Ideally, totally unfettered speech for all should be guaranteed in a free society. If the West were genuinely committed to free speech for all, we should with free-speechers against Muslim hotheads. Back when the West stood for the right of Salman Rushdie to write a controversial book, it felt good to be on the side of free-speechers against Iran and Muslim firebrands.
But the notion that the current West is a ‘liberal democracy’ committed to free speech is a joke. Europe and Canada trample on free speech at every turn, especially to appease Jews and their two main allies, blacks and homos. Jews, once the biggest defenders of free speech(if only to have their say and gain power), are now the biggest enforcers of Censchwarzship(to hoard the immense power and wealth they’ve accumulated).
Jewish Power effectively neutralized free speech along with white identity and Christianity. So, the real dichotomy is NOT about the Liberal West that values free speech VERSUS atavistic Muslim dogmatists. The reality boils down to Muslims demanding respect for Islam on par with enforced protections for Jewish Supremacist Power, globo-homo vanity, and the Jungle Cult of the Noble Negro(and, off and on, feminist bitchery).
In the current UK where people are fined and/or hauled to prison for making a mocking tweet about Nelson Mandela, exposing the dirty machinations of Jewish Power, questioning aspects of the Shoah(as the iron-clad 6 million figure is more numerology than history), making fun of homos, and positing honest questions about racial/sexual differences, where is the commitment to Free Speech? France and Canada are notorious for fining and imprisoning people for offending Jews. It began with the criminalization of Holocaust Denial but morphed into the silencing of anyone deemed offensive to Jews(and their pet causes). Macron even supported a measure that would criminalize condemnation of Israel for its near-genocidal policies against Palestinians.
Given this context, Muslims have just as much right as the Jews, blacks, and homos(and other groups) to demand respect and call upon the state to ENFORCE the respect. Muslims are not running counter to Western Values as currently formulated and enforced. As ‘Western Values’ are now about PC, ‘wokeness’, and the Tri-Supremacism of Jews, blacks, & homos, the demands of Muslims are very much in sync with the dominant norms of ‘Western Thought’.
Even in the US, the so-called ‘liberals’ are supportive of silencing voices, censoring alternative news, and denying basic services of finance to thought-criminals. They are not for more debate, more discussion, more controversy, and more contention of opposing views. They think along doctrinal lines and insist that the ‘values’ of the Current Year are canonical and absolute. So much for ‘liberalism’. They are doctrinaires, not liberals. Notice how the ‘woke’ mobs have ritualized the chanting of slogans and ‘shaming'(or the latest reiteration of tarring-and-feathering) than thinking and speaking as individuals. And of course, Western politicians are a joke, servile like dogs and stupid like children.
Struggling to pay your bills? Don't worry politicians from both sides of the aisle are on case. pic.twitter.com/ZXq0m84Ukl
— Ivan Trumpovic 🇦🇺🇭🇷🇺🇲🇷🇺 (@QualityTweets78) May 4, 2023
In such a climate, Muslims are only conforming to the current ‘Western’ trend of demanding respect for certain groups and damning all those who don’t comply. How many people have been ‘canceled’ in the West, not least in the US, by institutions and industries, public and private, for having refused to ‘take the knee’ before the Negroes? How many people have a chance in business or politics in the US or EU were they to stand up to the power of Zion and dare name the evil of Jewish Supremacism? The new churches put up ‘gay’ flags and signs that say “All Are Welcome”, but of course, you are NOT welcome if you are a moral traditionalist and refuse to accept the ‘sodomization’ of Christianity.
In an illiberal West that worships the Tri-Supremacism of Jews, homos, and Negroes as the new holy trinity, Muslims have every right to demand that they too be included in the canon. Besides, if black violence is always excusable as a resistance against ‘systemic racism’ and if Zionist violence is always rationalized as Israeli self-defense — you see, Israel must continue bombing Syria and giving aid to ISIS Jihadis to ‘defend’ itself, the only nation in the Middle East with nukes — , why shouldn’t Muslims use violence to get what they want?
Finally, all this Jihadi business is the product of Western support of the worst elements in the Arab-Muslim world. Following World War II, the Arab World did attempt to modernize and even secularize. Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and etc. all sought modernization and some degree of secularization. While some of the regimes were repressive and cruel at times, the last thing they wanted was Muslim rule. The main reason for the Islamic Revolution(or Reaction) in Iran was due to American meddling with a coup in favor of the puppet Shah. Prior to the CIA’s dirty work, Iran had a national secular government with a real future. Gaddafi who came to power in Libya in 1969 was an unapologetic Muslim but not a hothead. If anything, he did everything to suppress Jihadi elements while modernizing much of the country; he also secured basic rights for womenfolk. Same was true of Egypt, Syria, and Iraq. The regimes there could be cruel, but they were NOT pro-Jihadi. And even Iran as a Islamic Republic didn’t support Jihadi violence but generally worke
d to suppress it. The main support for the Jihadis in Pakistan and Afghanistan came from the US and Saudis.
Indeed, Saudi Arabia and other arch-conservative Muslim states in the Gulf were the main darlings of the West. The so-called Liberal Democratic West had better relations with theocratic and/or monarchic Saudi Arabia and Gulf States than with the modernizing and secularizing Arab/Muslim nations. Whereas most secular Arab nations were friendly, if not allied, with the USSR, the arch-conservative Muslim states remained closer to the US. When Jews gained dominance in the West, the ‘Arabists’ were purged and the US foreign policy became even more hostile to secular Arab nations and friendlier with arch-conservative Muslim nations that support Jihadi violence. Jews figured Jihadis are indispensable in undermining stability in nations like Libya and Syria. When Syria was on fire, Western Europe did NOTHING to stem the flow of Jihadi types from Europe to the Middle East. European policy was “Let Muslims in Europe go to Syria and set it on fire, unleashing yet another refugee crisis leading to more mass-migrations to the West. It will please the Jews, and of course, we white cucks have no higher aspiration than appeasing Zion.”
So, much of the Muslim-bashing, especially from ‘conservative’ types, is disingenuous on so many levels. The truth is ‘liberal democracy’ is dead in the West, which is really under Jewria, Gayria, & Negria Law that are as stringent as Sharia Law. Also, Jihadis are to the Middle East what BLM and Antifa are to the West(and what the sub-nazis are in Ukraine). They’ve been recruited and funded by the proxies of the Jewish-controlled West. And, by the way, which power nudged the Muslim radicals to attack the US on 9/11? Look at the fingerprints. Zionists knew what was up and nudge-nudged the Jihadis to complete their mission. But all we get from the likes of Tommy Robinson and the Trumpkins is ‘Muh Israel’ and ‘damn those muzzies’.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Cute poster but misleading.
California was mostly empty in 1950, but the whites that were there, excluding the ones in Hollywood creating brainrot, were building freeways and airports and gobs of dwelling places.
Between 1950 and 2021 were the 1980s when Reagan and company refused to be bothered with border issues and let the huddled masses burst at the seams of the formerly Golden State.
A dead great uncle of mine owned a construction company out there and by the mid-80s came right out and said “Before, I built neat retirement villages for workers back east wanting to retire here. Now, I’m building Mexico El Norte and nobody gives a shit.”
Like Reagan, everybody only played at having a border. We’re paying the bills they racked up.
What if the trend continues and the world becomes 90 percent black, what will the author complain about then…or will someone finally shut him up by hitting him a lot. Lots of hate and vitriol in the article, how much honest factual reference and substance. Reads more like an angry racist screed than anything else, pure agitspew. Former charlie hebdo employee maybe. Garbage ‘journalism’…
A 90% black world would be completely dysfunctional and quickly self-destruct. Even you must know that. But don’t worry, the Chinese have plenty of nukes and would never allow such a thing to happen.
https://mybroadband.co.za/news/motoring/489989-south-africas-only-drivers-licence-card-printing-machine-has-broken-down-again.html
The jews have quite the chutzpah to slam sharia law when we have three-tiered justice right here in the United States. The jews have waged an unceasing war against Freedom of Assembly, Freedom of Association, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Conscience……they’ve attacked it all. It’s all part of their greater effort to destroy White America. I am positive the Founders never thought the Bill of Rights and Constitution would be overthrown as long as the country was bound as one. But the Founders never imagined Jews arriving on these shores like rats from Europe, or women pretending to be “jurists”. The country is dead. The question is: are you going to get out before it’s too late? Because make no mistake about it: a CBDC is coming, and there will be walls built to keep you in while inviting South American filth in. To paraphrase Bibi: we hate you because you refuse to be our slaves. So we must destroy you.
I would NOT change our Constitution, nor would I continue to allow Muslim immigration but I WOULD immediately ally with Iran and recognize Palestine as the legitimate ruler of AT LEAST all the Occupied Territories if not more. I would also release the remaining Gitmo detainees and relocate them to that same territory with a hefty compensation for their illegal imprisonment. Make peace with the world, deport the world. As for the Sampson Option, don’t even think about it. The consequence will be the obliteration of the Promised Land.
Craig N. wrote about the Jew war on free speech in Florida a few days ago: https://craignelsen.substack.com/p/the-ugly-ambition-of-ron-desantis
Ron was my last hope. I’m not bothering with voting on the national level again.
Deshitraeli was always a fraud. I don’t understand why otherwise intelligent people can’t spot these vermin long before they appear on the national scene. Deshitraeli is a bigger zionist fluffer than Trump. This is not a nation worth defending. And Deshitraeli is not worthy of your vote. Not that voting matters anymore in the Jewnited States of Murica.
Your dashiki is too tight. It is causing oxygen levels in your brain to deplete.
No. The American Whites wished for Protestantism to be the only legal religion in early America, Catholicism to be forbidden, and all philosophies deriving from Catholicism, non-protestant denominations or non-Christian thought to be forbidden of publication for the general public. Even the deist philosophers among the Framers wanted the texts about their own school of philosophy to be confidential for their own circle and strictly forbidden to the general public. The problem is that the young USA were extremely dependent upon Jewish money, which was then Sephardic and concentrated in the Southern Plantation States, as well as in the French interests that tipped the French government in aiding their revolutionary cause against Britain. These Jewish interests were offered a special permission for them to have synagogues and media reserved to their group. They refused and asked for all religions, including Catholicism and Islam, to be permissible and for all philosophical points of view, including occultism and satanism, to have access to the media.
1. Thanks for using “Islamo-Fascism.” I never understood why people on the right abandoned this term because it’s so helpful. When you get called a fascist by leftists, there are many things you can say, for example, “You have your fascism, and I have mine.”
2. You say, “because blacks kick white butts in sports.” Actually, in last year’s World Cup, France was the only team in the semi-finals with lots of blacks. There were two all-white teams (eventual winner Argentina and Croatia) and Morocco, which had no blacks though it might be considered non-white since the players were Arab or Berber. I think you are thinking too much of the American experience.
3. You say, “Muslim acts of beheading, cruel and grisly as they are, affect only a tiny number of people.” They have a chilling effect.
4. You say, “That being the case, the ONLY option for whites(anxious about excessive Diversity) is to seek a way to oppose mass-immigration that might flatter and please Jews.” Sadly, yes. Oddly enough, the people raising their voices the most at what is happening in the West are non-whites. Remember the Asian guy chastising some noisy black women in a college library? “Hey, this is library.” We whites could not get away with that. Likewise, in Canada there is some clueless white woman who is a politician in Toronto who wants to allow the Muslim call-to-prayer, and one of the most vociferous complainers is a guy who is obviously a Hindu.
If you aren’t allowed to say certain things, you try to use what little power you have to get things done, and if that means warning Jews about the dangers to Jews of the policies you want, then that’s what you do. I myself have warned feminists and homosexuals about the dangers of Muslim immigration by pointing out the evidence of what happens when Muslims take over, but they are hearing a hundred other voices telling them that Muslims are wonderful, so they pay no attention to me.
5. You say, “Back when the West stood for the right of Salman Rushdie to write a controversial book, it felt good to be on the side of free-speechers against Iran and Muslim firebrands.” I remember this differently. I remember thinking that Western support for Rushdie was very weak. I expected lots of demonstrations supporting him, but instead the only demonstrations were composed of those who wanted to kill him. It made me quite uneasy.
6. You say, “Muslims are not running counter to Western Values as currently formulated and enforced.” Sadly, you are right about this. The West that I grew up in no longer exists.
7. You say, “The new churches put up ‘gay’ flags and signs that say “All Are Welcome”, but of course, you are NOT welcome if you are a moral traditionalist and refuse to accept the ‘sodomization’ of Christianity.” Yes, you are right about this, too, and it isn’t just churches that use this hypocritical “All are welcome” phrase. It’s used in many places (for example, on the buses in my town).
8. You say, “When Jews gained dominance in the West, the ‘Arabists’ were purged and the US foreign policy became even more hostile to secular Arab nations and friendlier with arch-conservative Muslim nations that support Jihadi violence.” Interesting insight, thanks. Though I think most of the support for Saudi Arabia has to do with us needing their oil because our ridiculous environmentalists won’t let us pump our own.
9. You say, “European policy was ‘Let Muslims in Europe go to Syria and set it on fire, unleashing yet another refugee crisis leading to more mass-migrations to the West.’” You give them too much credit. I doubt they were thinking that far ahead.
Basically, the Primary Moral Imperative of our era is to respect the Other, and the Other includes many different people and even things. It includes women and homosexuals and minorities and trannies and Muslims and criminals and the mentally unstable and even the environment. The opposite of the Other is the One, which right now refers to supposedly narrow-minded poor whites. It is incredible that in 1960, poor whites were the focus of the left, while already by 1980, they were scorned, and now they are seen as worthy of being put into a gulag. But what this moral imperative means with respect to Muslims is that we must have open borders and let in as many as possible. This imperative is so prevalent among our elites that it is impossible to close the borders, even when we are close to being at war and even when the occasional leader who is against open borders comes along.
Anyway, as I’ve been saying as often as possible, it is too late to do anything about Muslim immigration. Due to various factors, we can expect them to be in control (no matter what the Jews want) by the end of this century, if not a lot earlier. Aside from differing birth rates – I know almost no white young people who want children – the very Primary Moral Imperative itself will make it hard for the average elite to fight against Muslims when they decide to take over. Anyone who resists will be called an Islamophobe, and now that our elites have adopted that term, how will they then fight against an Islamic takeover? They won’t.
Hey stunado, go move to a muslim country. You’ll be back here in no time.
There’s no promised land.
well france did allow the publication of this fantastic book. it’s totally awesome. if you disagree you need to be in a camp. the nazis were serious pipo. they weren’t LARPers.
jung and freud were pseudo-intellectuals…so dis-crediting…despite not being fat like mercans…always surprised by how dumb europeans are.
from an hegelian pov the bolshies and the nazis have only been negated. (the one was not the negation of the other. not exactly. and hegel’s moments were sometimes in twos.) the negation of the negation, the aufhebung, has yet to appear. as clown world becomes ever more ridiculous hegel appears ever more prescient.
one cannot defeat his enemies ultimately without eating them, in-corpor-ating them.
I don’t think you know the meaning of fascism.
If the world becomes 90% black, then any form of modern civilization will become impossible and the majority of those people would just starve to death. Of course, civilization would break down long before blacks hit 90%, but if we’re doing some kind of thought experiment, in which suddenly 90% of people in the world are black, then that is what the outcome would be. Black Africans can hardly even handle large scale farming today, and that’s with all of the logistics and industrial backbone of modern farming handled for them by non-blacks.
There is no free speech in France when it comes to saying things about Jews. Saying things about muslims is allowed since it causes strain and strife which keeps attention away from Jews bleeding the country dry. All the major financial firms in London are jewish owned, Jews own the central bank of central banks (the Bank of England) and therefore the world.
Meanwhile a generation of US Boomers are busily spending the remains of the American wealth that they inherited by completing their bucket lists criss-crossing the globe before they die.
Well, this is what they want, see? They give you too bad options and then you get to chose the less bad one. But it’s still bad.
Here we go again. Priss-Freud has some fetish with Black porn. It’s not blacks that are emasculating white men. And women fuck with Negros because these women are stupid brainwashed whores, they would fuck only Whites if that’s what the TV told them to do.
Utter nonsense. The seeds of America’s destruction were sowed not by Jews but by the establishment of a democratic system. As Plato tried to warn us over 2,000 years ago, democracies always give rise to a class of professional politicians (called Rhetoricians by him) who seek to gain power by flattering and bribing the people. This inevitably leads to a demoralised and bankrupt society.
For proof that Plato was right, look to Europe. In 1914 there was only one democracy, France, and a semi-democracy, Britain. The rest were monarchies. By 1918 all the monarchies were gone and democracy, in one form or another, reigned supreme. Within 40 years, these same democracies were already well on the path to the destruction of Europe’s entire civilization and cultural heritage; and squandering a legacy that had taken two thousand years to build.
America went over there to help the “Ayrabs” in Iraq- Libya-Afghanistan- Syria- Somolia and Yemen but whatever happened?
Human rights- democracy –and freedom and of course Total infrastructure re-builds and builds costing 6 trillion —and a million deaths??
Progress and today the war monger whinein over the Debt ceiling??
Get that Debt ceiling to 100 trillion and stop this yearly charade—ALL distracting from things in Eastern Ukraine —–things are not well for Zylenskyy forces –regardless of what Fox and CNN spew—
Kinda funny saying France cucked by leaving the catholic church, when the catholic church was and still is one giant pedophile cult that makes a mockery of the teachings of Christ.
The church priests are homos who rape alter boys and its monasteries was and may still be home to gay orgies while the church condemn gays in public life.
Anyway, reading the article and its very, very angry tone along with the accusations in it makes me wonder if the writer, Jung-Freud, got cucked by a muslim from Europe very recently and is utterly convinced that he would not have been cucked if the EU was still goose stepping and using Roman salutes.
Maryland, the third colony after Virginia and Massachusetts, was envisioned as a haven for English Catholics, so I don’t think this is true.
True but spectacular and promoted by the MSM.
Like certain diseases or substances described as “silent killers”.
They kill silently and slowly but surely and irreversibly.
https://www.eutimes.net/2010/02/another-man-knowingly-infects-40-girls-with-aids-in-poland/
Unfortunately, many young Europeans or Asians are naive, brainwashed and indoctrinated since their childhood.
They need to be taught intelligently and skilfully by their parents and families to resist and become resistant to this kind of relationship, but without being rushed.
Charlie Hebdo is a French deep state project.
Both things can be right, you know?
Jews were and are big supporters of Democracy and today they are the ones who push more for this system to be present worldwide, from Shanghai to Timbuktu.
I used to think Monarchy is better, but then one look at the current British Monarchy and it’s enough to make you puke.
I don’t know, everything seems poisoned in this modern world.
This requires some thought☹️🤔
This requires some thought☹️🤔
So, stop being brainwashed, stop using MSM, stop buying from brands pushing for “diversity” and bastardization, stop using falsely social media,
Miss Priss is showing her hangups here. Blacks only excel in basketball and American-style football. In other sports, they are pretty ordinary; in winter sports, they hardly show at all.
I’m still looking for those bigger, stronger blacks who like to beat whites up.
“Muslim Demand for Respect Is Valid in the Current Illiberal West That Has No Use for Free Speech, Individual Conscience, and Rational Justice”
No it isn’t.
Iran crowned champions in 2023 Asian Wrestling Champs
Tehran, IRNA – Iran’s weightlifting team have become champion at the 2023 Asian Weightlifting Championships held in Jinju, South Korea. At the end of the 2023 Asian Weightlifting Championships in South Korea, Iran’s national team won the championship with 635 points in the team ranking.
At the end of the 2023 Asian Weightlifting Championships in South Korea, Iran’s national team won the championship with 635 points in the team ranking.
With 631 and 608 points, Uzbekistan and China stood in second and third places respectively.
Iran’s national team scooped 2 gold, 3 silver, and 5 bronze medals in the competition.
NO Western media has reported this news. Shame on you all. They report only the constructed protest in Iran hoping for ‘regime change’. You will take this wish into your graves, one by one.
The zionist apartheid is FALLING, no report by the zionist media in the west.
lol…all the butt-hurt over someone having the temerity to tell-the-truth…in stark terms. Angry screed. Leftist slogans don’t count for “factual reference and substance.” Typical lying libtard. Claim to be something you’re the EXACT opposite of. Hypocrisy…libtard is thy name.
I loath democracy but how is monarchy better? The chances of an idiot sloth ascending the throne and destroying his kingdom could be very high. Even Napoleon learnt it the hard way after making his siblings rulers.
A benevolent dictator, borne out of darwinism is the only way and this can only happen by chance, or dare I even say…..fate!!
How the CCP managed to do it needs some understanding. Theyll be studied in the future centuries.
The monarchies of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and of most Eastern European countries were particularly subject to be a mere guise for Jewish power, in particular a contraption to grant Jewish companies royal-granted monopolies. Germany was in theory an Empire but in practice granted far more decisional power to ordinary citizens on many practical matters such as education, than France did. In France voting, as an abstract intellectual exercise, was more interesting as the political parties were multitudinous and authentically diverse but in practice it was the most centralized government of Europe where all decisions were taken top-down, never bottom-up, aping the Roman administration of old which the school system convinced nearly everyone it had been the best ever.
Even if Spain had an absolute king confirmed in his power by a restoration he consulted the population far more often than the present-day government of Spain. The Austro-Hungarian Empire together with its immediately neighbours (Mitteleuropa) — not France, which, together with its ally Russia, was feared as the epitome of a police state — was probably the part of Europe with most freedom of expression and diversity of opinions (among others there was equal space to pro-Jewish and anti-Jewish currents of thought) as well of channels of cultural expression to make a good living out of them, despite the terminally decadent character of its government and administration proper. The crumbling of the House of Habsburg, despite the latter’s corruption, proved to be the single great cultural catastrophe of WWI.
charlie hebdo the zionist rag
may it burn to the ground
Greenratt is right. Anti-semitism is a sign of sickness in society. But it’s a sickness Organized Jewry is primarily responsible for spreading. There is only one remedy to this sickness and that’s white unity.
Start to resist or cease to exist.
The minute you proclaim freedom of sexuality (or even only romance) as one of the highest conquests of modern society, blacks are bound to win over and miscegenation to be imposed and enforced at their advantage even without any further measure being pushed. Mark my words : a people that has enjoyed a sexual revolution for just one full generation growing, prospering and passing away, is no longer white even if no single subject of a coloured race is present : it is bound to grow ever darker with the generations passing by the laws of Darwin.
Those three hundred million guns and three billion rounds of ammo will come handy when the whites decide to commit suicide.
Nor does Antifa. This isn’t the time to be worrying about precision in meanings.
Free speech and Islam. How do you fit those two in the same sentence?
Every morning I get up and wipe my as with the Quran and drop it in Allah’s mouth.
No religion in history, other than Islam, has had so much money spent on its demonization. This has been going on for decades, but after 9/11 the amounts spent became staggering, probably amounting to billions of dollars. The deliberate spread of Islamophobia has run in parallel with the Anglo-Zionist military assault on Muslim countries that destroyed many counties, killed millions, and cost the US over $23 trillion. The US is heading into a steep decline as a result of the money and decades spent attacking Israel’s enemies.
Consider this: Islamophobia is promoted while anti-Semitism is suppressed.
Jewish charities among top funders of Islamophobia, says report by Muslim civil rights group
https://www.jpost.com/j-spot/article-692245
This is the price to pay for refusing to submit to Judean diktat. Muslims are standing up to the Zionists to defend their religion while Christians have surrendered.
All Muslims may hope for is that genuine criticism be based on truth, not lies. There are enough legitimate reasons to criticize Muslims without having to resort to lies or hitting below the belt by insulting religious figures, like the Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
Also, remember that some of the worst atrocities that Muslims are blamed for were in reality false flags, like 9/11, ISIS, Al-Qaida etc. If Muslims don’t commit bad enough crimes then someone else does it for them.
Almost all people who convert to Islam say that they used to hate Islam because that is what they were taught all their lives, but when they learned more about it they started liking it.
F muslims, F their respect. And as for that map of California. I live in what is supposed to be a white area. Far from it. It’s nearly 100% mexican now, no matter what official stats are.
We are now stuck with the Muslim curse in America because we chose to support the creation of the fake state of Israel in the Middle East by the UN con artists. How many Muslims did we bring here as “refugees” after we blew up their cities on behalf of the jews? We have literally created Muslim extremism and caused it to expand through our support of jews who openly seek to destroy us. How idiotic is that?
They’d all starve to death.
Yes, and wasn’t Rhode Island also something of a haven for people with somewhat different religious beliefs as well?
I come across so few boomer posts nowadays. It’s good to see you’re keeping up the fight. I think I’ll use my inheritance to see if I have anything to eat. After all, everything was given to us. We didn’t have to work for anything.
It’s always darkly funny to see people all riled up over their preferred brand of absurdity, irrationality and stupidity, as if it’s any more logical or necessary than the “evil” kinds.
To pick one of many examples, the concept of the trinity is incoherent drivel whether paired with protestant “doctrines” or catholic or orthodox “doctrines.” But yeah, thank those “right-thinking, godly” men who founded the country stood up for the RIGHT (Protestant) kind of stupid.
What I care about with other people’s religion is whether it teaches them to discriminate against me and my family, to hurt us, to subjugate us, to coerce us into joining. If not, believe the idiocy you wish to believe.
Where did you read him endorsing the drivel that is islam?
Anti-semitism, like racism, is just a phony made up term designed to make people afraid to criticize the evil and nation destroying activities of jews and blacks.
DeSantis killed the first amendment in Florida to virtue signal to billionaire Jews like Miriam Adelson so they donate generously to his presidential campaign. I’ve long said it’s only a matter of time before an anti-semitism exception is carved out of the first amendment and I believe the SCOTUS is intimidated enough by Jewish power do allow such a thing. Most cuckservatives only believe in free speech as long as one doesn’t criticize Jews and Israel.
Like Trump, if DeSantis is elected his first 100 days if not year will be spent enacting policies powerful Jews have long demanded like speech codes.
Verbal attacks against Catholics and Christians as a whole generally are allowed too.
Whites can improve relations with Muslims by engaging in anti-Semitic banter. As “People of Color”, Muslims can more safely critique the stranglehold that neocons have over U.S. foreign policy and much of Eurasia.
On the one hand I have many Boomer colleagues who are blissfully oblivious to reality and live in a bubble of American exceptionalism and will never question the system and values that have provided them such a comfortable existence.
On the other hand I know many Gen-Xer’s and Millennials who have accepted that they will likely never own a home or have any kind of “retirement income” or socialized medical care in their old age like their parents.
Neither of these groups name the Jew or understand Jewish Power.
It’s those goddam subarctic jews. When are we gonna do sumping about them?
Muhammadans don’t demand respeck like some whiney Negro complaining about being dissed or a pathetic zionist pleading for the “right to exist”, no the respect (and the fear and hatred) they have has been well earned. They have proven over and over again that they mean business; these are some highlights.
Part List: 1970 Black September hijacking, 1979 Iran hostage crisis, 1993 WTC garage, Charlie Hebdo attacks, 9/11, 2005 Muhammad Cartoons….and much more.
Ali Abunimah
@AliAbunimah
May 12
The Europeans and Americans didn’t hesitate for a second to send weapons and volunteer fighters to Ukraine for their proxy war against Russia. Why do all countries, except Iran, refuse to do the same for the just cause of Palestine?
DOWN with APARTHEID ENTITY and her SUPPORTERS
Islam is right about women.
lll
the problem is that there was NEVER a “liberal democracy” in the West/US/Europe to begin with. ANYONE who uses the words “democracy” and “freedom’ immediately outs themselves as bullshitters not worth reading.
All Muslims may hope for is that genuine criticism be based on truth, not lies.
Look at the muslim countries and what do you see? I see countries full of low IQ knuckle draggers that will kill someone if they insult their religion. It’s their religion that keeps them functioning at a low level with their prayers multiple times a day and other strictures that make little practical sense.
Muslim countries are some of the most backward on the planet full of people that can’t think for themselves, allowing some fraud from centuries earlier tell them how to live their lives.
You can’t fix stupid.
Ron White
You are an Islamophobe; Muslim brotherhood was in response to secular regimes who as noted in the article were extremely cruel to their people. Saudi Arabia was beheading Muslims brotherhood activists for opposing their corrupt regime. They were a civil rights movement of oppressed poor Muslims living under oppressive cruel regimes supported by either the soviets or the west. Freedom fighter, and they are not isis who were comprised of mostly western converts or alienated Muslims on the fringes of mental health and ignoramuses if not psychopaths. Looks to me like the US is being taken over by Latin Americans.
Is the author of this drivel aware of that fact that black Muslims significantly outnumber Arab Muslims?
I would agree with some of the points you made and disagree with others.
I would split the issue between Islam the religion and the followers of that religion, called Muslims. I would agree with what you said about the current sorry state of Muslims. I would disagree about Islam being the cause of it.
Muslims had a good run for the first 1,000 years after its founding. The religion spread to a large part of the world and there were powerful Muslim empires that were on the forefront of science and technology. For centuries Muslims were ahead of other civilizations.
The last 200-300 years have been bad. Muslims fell behind in science and technology and didn’t develop political systems that could provide good governance. Consequently, the vast majority of Muslims lands got colonized and split into 57 little countries.
Since independence Muslim countries have mostly fallen behind in development. It doesn’t help that the West has a policy of backing dictatorial, oppressive and corrupt governments. Overthrowing democratic governments in Muslim countries is a standard policy of the CIA. Examples are Iran, Egypt, Turkey, etc.
Islam the religion, on the other hand, is doing quite well. The number of Muslims has crossed 2 billion and, apart from natural increase, there are lots of people converting.
If anyone believes in God then Islam makes the most sense.
One other thing I would mention is that, apart from politics, there’s another, racial, explanation for the relative lack of success of Muslim countries.
Going back 1,000 years or more, both Islam and Christianity were bitter rivals in seeking new lands to occupy and convert. Christianity spread west and north to Europe and Russia and Islam spread east and south to Asia and Africa. Therefore, Christianity ended with more productive people and that gave it an edge.
The current situation is that because of its theological weaknesses Christianity has been rejected by many of its followers, especially in Europe and North America. Islam is theologically very robust and has kept its followers and is still acquiring new ones. So, we have the situation today of a economically successful but morally bankrupt West and an Islamic world that is struggling from the worldly point of view but is religiously strong.
I was just at a town meeting in my little town here. It was supposed to about of low income housing project and why now that it has been abandoned that the guv has a right to pull it down. Except it was never about that and every time I bring it up they start yakin ‘pollytalk’ and hardly let me speak at all.
I ask a completely reasonable, ‘Did you hire a completely independent expert with a legitmate government license to make a legitimate decision?’ Answer: ‘I dunno, maybe.’ followed by a buncha pollytalk.
Question: “Since this decision is important to all of us who live here could we have the right to go down there with doors open and look at it for ourselves with the building inspection in hand?” Answer: A whole buncha pollywoble but no answer in sight. Remind you of anybody you know?
That’s not America by the way. That’s Canada.
Lets suppose God created this beautiful Universe including this planet Earth that we all live in. He then legislated his Laws i.e. Ten Commandments, Shariah Laws etc. for its inhabitants guaranteeing life of eternity in either kingdom of Heaven or lake of fire depending on your obedience or rejection of his Laws. Everyone has a free choice to choose their path of destination.
Video Link
“Western Fiat Currency today is the main reason why America-Canada-UK -Australia are powerhouses and lesser so are France- Germany -Ukraine” advises Peter Nararro- Professor and Economist of the First Order–
What does religiously strong actually mean? What good does some religious belief system do when their environment is 3rd rate? The after life nonsense is taught by many religions as a way of cheating the believers while exalting their priestly class. It’s the same story for every religion I can think of where the priests get to mooch off their ‘flock’ of duped believers.
The most educated countries is where atheism is rising, throwing away ancient superstitions that science has debunked. It’s the most backward nations or most gullible people in advanced nations that convert from one nonsense religion to another. It’s why the catholic church spends so much time abusing Central and South America where the natives aren’t too bright. That’s where all religions find their converts or where large segments of the population are born into a system of mysticism that just feels natural to them and they largely don’t question the dogma handed to them on a plate.
The world holds two classes of men, intelligent men without religion, and religious men without intelligence.
Abu Ala Al-Maari
Can’t get a clear answer even if you cast a clean lure in the ocean. Not a chance that you can reel in even a single criminal.
“STAND FOR NOTHING….
FALL FOR ANYTHING”
Dear God. There was this Chinese goddess who showed an interest in me and I was way too afraid to take her up on it. Please forgive me.
You’re making a generalization based on the European Christian experience. Intelligence and religion don’t necessarily have to be mutually exclusive.
In Europe the Christian Church had a stranglehold on all knowledge and imposed their limited understanding of science on society. But they were wrong, and it led to a revolt which makes scientists to this day skeptical of religion.
Unlike the Bible, Islam doesn’t have scientific inaccuracies and therefore Muslims can believe in science while following their religion. Historically, in Muslim countries there’s never been tension between science and religion.
There are numerous examples of Muslims who are scientists, including Nobel laureates, who have no problem in believing in a superior intelligence that created the universe.
There’s no institutionalized church in Islam, but there certainly are priests who try to impose themselves on society. However, Islam is highly individualistic in that everyone has their own personal relationship with God and no priests are required.
To believe in a self-creating universe of such complexity is a much bigger leap of faith than to believe in a creator.
Interesting analysis, but you’re missing something: IQ and culture. Christianity inherited societies that were relatively free, intellectually curious, and orderly. Islam, as you correctly observed, spread in the wrong direction. Still, despite their lower IQs, the various Muslim countries of the world did not end up like subsaharan Africa.
I actually think that Islam’s OCD regarding daily 5 times prayer, frequent washing of face/hands, fasting etc were meant to instill impulse control. Of course, there are other factors like culture, ethnicity, geography etc… TBH religion isn’t the strongest predictor of success, it’s culture. Look at China.
Lastly, what did you mean by Christianity being theologically weak? Catholic theology is quite developed.
me so holy, me so holy
Economics is a fraudulent ‘profession’. It’s full of bullshit artists that can’t prove a damned thing. Wikipedia lists multiple ‘schools’ of economics, so you have multiple different opinions, but no actual facts. In a real profession, like engineering, 2+2 always equals 4 and there are no different ‘schools’ of chemistry, electricity, mechanical, etc because they deal in the real world not made up bullshit.
Economists are the whores that will write up any rationale for what the bankers and gov’t stooges want to do. Never listen to an economist except to hear the latest lie.
There’s an old saying : ‘What have you done for me lately?’ What muslims may have accomplished ages ago no longer holds much weight. For the last several hundred years, it’s been a backwater for intellectual accomplishment.
The muslim world is primarily full of low IQ dolts that worship an anthropomorphized unknown, just like the christians and all other religions that believe in some god. No one knows how the universe came about but religions want people to think it was some being like themselves. The pushers of religious nonsense, call them priests, con artists, etc, invented the idea of a creator being that they alone communicated with to pass on a made up god’s word on to the peasants. This was done for personal gain as is the hallmark of every con artist that’s ever lived.
Islam, christianity, hinduism, etc are all made up concepts backed by a desire to make know what cannot rationally be known in our yet primitive understanding of the laws of nature. Just like we now know the earth revolves around the sun, in some future time we may find forces, particles and yet imagined entities that can further explain our environment and ever more mysteries attributed to some god will be understood as natural processes, no god needed.
Bad idea. The reason they “don’t age well” is because they do jack shit. Am the product of a WMAF relationship. Have seen many such cases. WM husband thinks it’s the AF responsibility to clean; AF thinks it’s the man’s. Most who fall for it are closet cases.
Best case scenario is Big Brother takes control – trivially easy for me to play my WMAF parents against each other. Many of these couples end in violence.
@Jung-Freud
You are a fagot for not publishing my earlier comment. See no reason to read you articles going forward if you can’t handle free speech.
@Jung-Freud
Since you have graciously agreed to publish my comment I take back my gratuitous insult 🙂
Lastly, what did you mean by Christianity being theologically weak? Catholic theology is quite developed.
What I mean, briefly, is that the concept of the trinity doesn’t stand up to logic. It is doubtful that Jesus ever preached any such thing.
Christian theology is a blend of Judaism, Greek philosophy and Roman culture. The Judaic element consists mostly of Paul’s teachings. Of the 27 books of the New Testament, 13 or 14 were written by Paul. The four gospels were written by Paul’s disciples over 90 years after the death of Jesus. Like someone said, this religion is really Paulanity.
It can even be strongly argued that there’s no proof of the crucifixion of Jesus, let alone a resurrection. Being a Jew, Jesus would never have eaten pork. He says in the Bible that he was sent strictly for the Jews and no one else. I can go on, but the list of points is long.
Biblical scholars and professors of theology mostly dismiss most of the linchpins of Christian beliefs, like the trinity, or the historical accuracy of much of the Bible.
For scholarly discussions of this topic I would refer you to the YouTube channel Blogging Theology.
True, the doctrine goes back to Tertullian in his document Against Praxeas.
This is incorrect. The earliest gospel (Mark) is dated about 70 CE, about 40 years after the crucifixion. Paul’s influence was pagan, not Judaic. It was Paul that took the religion of Christ and made it the religion about Christ.
Nevertheless, all religions deviate from version 1.0 over time. That’s quite normal. I doubt Moses prayed with yarmulka and a talit. Likewise Islam began as Judaism for Arabs (albeit with more universal ethics). It wasn’t until the Abbasids that the religion opened up and became what it became. Christianity is still going strong in Africa and Latin America. It’s just declining in the West.
Yesterday, I placed a link in the Newslinks section of this site that asks a provocative question you may/should be interested in. Just search for my handle or ‘Chaos Theory’ to find it.
Thanks for the video. I really liked it. I love reading and watching science books and videos.
It discusses some great scientific theories. However, if it is supposed to be evidence against the existence of God then it doesn’t do that.
Watch out for some keywords and statements:
–Laws of nature
–Rules of nature
–Nature’s mathematics
–You don’t need a creator but a designer
–All complexity of the universe emerges from mindless, simple rules
All existence depends on laws of nature based on mathematics and rules like chaos theory. Furthermore, these laws and rules need to act on something physical, like sub-atomic particles. So, the laws of nature and particles have to come from somewhere. Where do they come from?
You could say that the laws of nature and subatomic particles self-generated, but we ask, how and from what? We are stuck in infinite regression, which logically is impossible.
Apart from laws and particles, there’s also the problem of consciousness. Does consciousness emerge from the above laws and particles, or is it something else? That argument is still going on.
The above is only discussing the first-mover argument—that an intelligent being initiated creation and everything after that happened by itself. I, however, believe that the creator actively participates in the creation process, but that is another discussion.
Every question you ask can be applied to your god as well. Who / what created god?
From my perspective, chaos and random events that have been shown to self organize under the right conditions are a much more likely ‘god’ than some being that also just happens to look like us.
The triumph of Islam is inevitable. It is the only religion left that has universal appeal to all races while holding onto a value system that is impossible for the Woke to penetrate. Islam understands the truth about men and women, and rejects LGBT behavior as unnatural and sinful. It rejects usury and unfair economic practices which have created the parasitic banking system. Its ritual practices work. Five times daily prayer in contrast to complete obliviousness to the spiritual life in the West. Fasting in Ramadan, which has now been proven by science to be healthy (thus the intermittent fasting craze). The pilgrimage to Mecca which brings together people of all races and allows them to worship together, trade and exchange knowledge, helping to overcome tribal conflicts and bigotry. Zakat — compulsory charity — to create a social net for the poor. Whether one believes Islam is from God, it certainly works brilliantly and better than any other religion in providing structure and community. Christianity has surrendered to the Woke and has lost all its power. It took itself off the board. Now all that will be left is Islam. You might as well convert and join the winning side. And you can have four subservient wives, so that’s not a bad deal!
A question that is worth asking is why Christianity was vulnerable to being hijacked by our Talmudist friends, while Islam successfully resisted? In think the answer is twofold. First, Christianity sees itself as an outgrowth or fulfillment of Judaism. The Jewish religion is seen as essentially correct and having legitimacy in its fundamental claim to the Chosen People. Thus you have Paul in the New Testament talking about the followers of Christ being “grafted onto the tree of the Covenant.” The tree is Judaism, and Christianity is an external graft. Thus when certain Talmudists tell Christians to obey them, there is a subconscious acceptance of their pre-existing authority.
Islam, by contrast, sees itself as the original Religion of Abraham that predates Judaism and Christianity, both of which are perceived as deviations from the original teachings of Moses and Jesus. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is seen as restoring the original religion of those teachers, which had been corrupted into these derivative traditions through erroneous teachings. Thus Islam does not inherently recognize any eternal “chosenness” to Jews, and there is a verse in the Qur’an where God tells Jacob that His covenant will not protect evildoers from among the Children of Israel. Thus Muslims don’t see Jews as having an residual authority, creating a barrier to Talmudic subversion.
Secondly, I think the need for Christianity to have God manifest in human form (which is idolatry) allows worship to be transferred from Jesus to the Jews in general. Islam is opposed to any such idolatry and as such it is impossible to seduce Muslims with human gods.
I think those two reasons explain why Christianity is down for the count and is unable to get back up. It is a structural problem based on theology that the Talmudists were able to take advantage of. Whereas they can’t get a handhold inside Islam, as there is no centralized Church to subvert. Vatican 2 castrated Catholicism under their influence. And Christian Zionism did the same to the Protestants. Both traditions had centralized churches that could be infiltrated. Islam has no central authority. So Talmudists trying to take it over would be as successful as trying to scoop up the ocean in a glass.
” Islam doesn’t have scientific inaccuracies”
It makes numerous scientifically false statements[links below].
https://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Science/index.htm
A few more articles on the topic whih
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/search?q=science+error
However, since Islamic logic holds the veracity of a statement is determined by Allah’s fiat, these are not in error even if there is no available explanation that can reconcile statements about observable reality with… observable reality. In other words, if there is an error in the Koran, or some logical contradiction, logic is to defer to Allah, not Allah to logic.
The specific errors aside [I haven’t reviewed any information about Islamic doctrine for some time], this article provides an interesting analysis of how Islamic doctrines such as fideism do not lend itself to a culture of reason. https://www.answering-islam.org/authors/roark/science_islam.html