RSS
People are better off studying biology than political science to understand what is really going on in world affairs. So much of the West’s current problems owes to the conceit among the educated that they are above something as primal and crude as biology(except when it comes to wanton sexuality, which is celebrated as ‘liberating’). True, man must be more than biology, more than animal. But, just as there is no soul without the body, there is no man without the animal. Man is more than animal but nothing without it.
All organisms, including humans of course, are invasivist(offensive) and nativist(defensive). Some are more invasive than others, but all are invasive to some measure. Some are more nativist than others, but all organisms must be nativist to some degree.
Living organisms are not content to stay put. They like to spread out and take over more turf. If bacteria or viruses are making someone sick, they are NOT content to stick with that person. They spread out and take over other men and women. It’s like the pod creatures in THE INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS. Or the morphing organism in THE THING. These two movies are thought-provoking about the invasive nature of all living things, some more than others.
Some organisms are especially virulent and aggressive. Botanists, for example, make a distinction between the ‘exotic’ and the ‘invasive’. Exotic organisms are alien to the soil but do not upset the existing balance. They find a niche and become merely one of the many species.
Invasive species, in contrast, threaten to overturn the entire ecosystem; they grow so rapidly and hog so much of the resources that they threaten the very existence of the native species. On the human skin, a birth mark is ‘exotic’, whereas cancer cells are ‘invasive’.
This is also true of various human groups. Burmese-Americans, for instance, are mostly ‘exotic’. They take up space as just another variation of what it means to be ‘American’. Fitting in and getting along are the summation of their place in the social order. In contrast, Jews are ‘invasive’ as they’re driven by an aggressive intelligence and virulent will to take over and remake the entire system in service to their egotism and ethnocentrism. The profound effects of Jewish invasivism, direct or through its proxies, are evident in the West, Middle East, Ukraine, Russia, and etc. Of course, from the larger biological point of view, all human races are invasive as even primitive folks have driven countless species to extinction by excessive hunting and destruction of habitats.
Invasive organisms have a powerful drive to not only reproduce but propagate at the expense of other species. It’s certainly true of the human species, among the sentient creatures by far the most aggressive and expansive through war and peace. Consider the military bases in Abel Ferrara’s BODYSNATCHERS. Or the research station in Antarctica in John Carpenter’s THE THING. Why are the humans in the land of the penguins? Because to be human is to be invasive.
Indeed, THE THING is about a war between two sets of invaders: Humans vs The Thing. Both are also defenders of what they claim. Humans seek to defend their ‘new nativist’ turf in Antarctica. And the Thing tries to hold onto the humans, dogs, and other organisms it has ‘colonized’ and claimed.
Likewise, INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS is to an extent about a war between two sets of universalist-conformism. Near the end, the main character hears what sounds like a hymn, a hopeful sign of a sanctuary from the pod people, but it happens to be yet another pod colony. It suggests that the pod people represent a yet more virulent form of Christianity that sought to convert all of humanity into worshiping the same God.
There are two kinds of claimants. Of the tangible and the intangible. Those who claim land or immovable objects are claimants of the tangible. Those who claim people’s minds or systems(of a Mercurian nature) are claimants of the intangible. Nationalist power is about taking over and defending a definite piece of territory; it is tangible. Religion and Ideology are about infecting and taking over people’s minds; they’re intangible. Christianity doesn’t have to take over Chinese territory to take over Chinese hearts & minds. It only needs to infect and own the souls of converts. Finance is somewhere between the tangible and the intangible. In the end, finance has power because money can be converted into real goods and properties. But the global financial system allows massive amounts of capital to flow instantly from one part of the world to another.
In Carpenter’s movie, humans fear most the possibility that the Thing will try to spread out and take over all organisms around the world: All humans and all animals and maybe all plants too if such is possible. (The Thing could turn into a penguin or whale and then take over other sea creatures and then swim across oceans and climb up onto other continents.) So, the humans try to prevent the Thing from taking over the humans in the station. If the Thing colonizes every human, then the human-thingoids can go to other continents and colonize other humans, and then, the human species will all be Thing-ized. The cucksters of the West have been pod-ized and thing-ized by the Glob. To some degree, there seems to be a duality, an anxiety, even among the colonized or ones in the process of being colonized. Consider the character of Blair in THE THING. By far the most intelligent and thoughtful, he’s been infected by the Thing that is gradually taking over his mind and body. When he calculates the threat posed by the Thing, he seems to be in the grey zone of fearful anxiety(of what remains human) and covert triumphalism(as a manifestation of metamorphosing into the Thing).
There are two ways the Thing can take over someone. By physically overwhelming the person, killing him, and copying his DNA. Or, by infecting someone who is gradually transformed from the inside. That seems to be the case with Blair. Because he operated on the Thing, it’s possible that some of the Thingy ‘cells’ got into his skin and bloodstreams. The Thing could be incubating within him like a virus and taking over gradually.
In that moment, Blair’s mentality becomes uncertain. He feels the human emotions of wanting to defend the human species. But he also feels the Thingy ‘will’ to conquer every life form on Earth.
Among whites, some remain nationalist and resist the Glob. Some have been completely colonized by the Glob, intellectually and ‘spiritually’, even sexually via miscegenation. But there are those in a kind of limbo beset with anxiety and inner-crisis. Their natural white racial instinct tells them that globalism spells doom for the white race. But they’ve also been infected by the Glob virus that makes them feel ‘racist’ and wicked for feeling such thoughts.
To overcome their ‘evil’ side, they might choose to be extra-fanatical to push the Glob agenda. Or, they could be administered with mental-vaccinations and regain their healthy race-ist instincts. Just like there are remedies for certain diseases such as mumps, syphilis, and etc., there is a cure for Globohomostoma.
Nativism is the flipside of invasivism. One cannot exist without the other. Invasion connotes a claim. It isn’t merely wandering into new territory accidentally or arbitrarily. It’s about advancing with the purpose of making a claim upon the turf. When you invade, take over, and make a claim, it means you own it and must defend it, guard it, and preserve it.
Thus, you as the invasivist must also be prepared to play the role of the new nativist on the territory that you have conquered and claimed. If you don’t play the nativist role, other invasive elements will take it from you, and then, the whole point of your invasion would have been for naught. If you’re going to give up what you conquer, why conquer it in the first place? Why not just leave it alone? When a team wins the championship trophy, it’s understood it has to keep playing hard to keep the title. Otherwise, another team will take it.
It’s not a border crisis, it’s a plot.
It’s not immigration, it’s an invasion.
It isn’t spontaneous, it’s coordinated.Western civilization will be gone within a generation. Our grandkids will hate us.
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 26, 2023
Wolves don’t attend classes in political science, but they instinctively understand this fact of life. Wolves don’t invade another territory just for the hell of it but to take over and claim it. They mark the territory with body scents and urine. They guard it through violence and group unity. So, the invasivist(or offensivist) wolves are also nativist(defensivist) wolves. If you invade but don’t protect what you’ve invaded, you won’t keep it because other invasivist forces will take it from you. The invasivist must also be nativist to keep its bounty. It’s like the character of OLD MAN AND THE SEA is both an invasivist hunter and a nativist holder of his trophy. He invades the sea to catch a marlin, but he does everything to defend his catch from other invasivist predators. Hyenas try to guard their kill from other hyena packs, leopards, and lions.
It’s like football. The game is both invasivist and nativist. Each team tries to invade more of the other team’s yards. But invading isn’t enough. What is invaded must also be defended in nativist mode. What is taken from the Other must be guarded as Ours. Because all organisms are invasivist by nature, organisms must nativistically defend what they’ve invasively conquered.
This is true of all nations. Israel was created(or regained) by invasivism — Jews had lost it long ago to the invasivism of the Romans. Zionists arrived as invasivists and drove out the Palestinian nativists. But Zionist Israelis must now be nativist and defend what they’ve claimed for themselves. Without such nativist zeal, the fate of Israeli Jews will be that of the Palestinians(and Swedes 50 years hence due to White Nakba).
The cleverest invasivists try to weaken the nativist resolve of their enemies or targets. Thus, the invasion is made easier, as Greeks did with the Trojans with the false gift of the Wooden Horse. But once the invasion has been completed, the invasivists must turn nativist if they are to keep what they invaded and claimed.
Jews have two ways of achieving this. In the case of Israel, the formula is majority-nativism. Since Jews comprise the dominant demography of Israel, they can be straightforward nativist-nationalist in declaring THIS MUST BE A JEWISH STATE.
But Jews can never take the US, Canada, and EU in such a manner. Jews can never be the outright majority in those territories. So, if Jews promote nativism in such nations, it will only lead to white nativist consciousness, white pride, white unity, and white power… which may challenge the Jewish minority elite supremacy.
It's like watching tribal warfare in Subsaharan Africa https://t.co/xY108EbB9d
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) September 27, 2023
Border Agent on Video Telling Migrants ‘You’re All Free to Go’ as Invasion Continues on Both Borders
So, Jews cannot act like invading wolves in the West like they did in Palestine. They must operate more like viruses that penetrate the cells undetected and alter the programming from the inside. By colonizing white minds and persuading them that ‘diversity’ and ‘multiculturalism’ are the highest goods while white identity, racial consciousness, homogeneity, and nativism are the greatest evils, white organisms are rendered less nativist and lose the will to defend themselves against the invasivist Third World that seeks access to the richer West(just like predators and parasites migrate to areas where food is more bountiful).
The ‘woke’ virus fools whites into thinking that ‘Western Values’ are all about welcoming Diversity or endless invasions from the Third World.
What sound ideology would be predicated on welcoming and celebrating mass invasion? Who would be stupid enough to fall for such sham? Apparently, white folks. Jews certainly fooled whites into believing ‘gay marriage’ is the New Normal in morality. Clever Jews sure run circles around square whites(who, despite their hipster conceits, are pretty earnest and childlike).
Now, why would the invasion of the West by the non-West be good for Jews? Won’t Jews be invaded too, along with the whites? There is that danger to be sure, but Jews are banking on Diversity as insurance for themselves as the dominant minority elite. More Diversity means less unity among the goyim. It means the elites can effectively play divide-and-rule among the disunited masses. Thus, the idea is that Jewish elite power will remain secure above the fray of the squabbling non-Jews divided by diversity.
But, some may ask, what if the newcomers challenge Jewish elite power and status? Won’t they topple the Jews one day? Jews aren’t too worried about such a prospect because most immigrant-invasivists don’t have the wherewithal to rise very high. African immigrants, Muslim immigrants, and ‘Hispanic’ immigrants(the non-white ones) are mostly limited in ability. East Asians can rise higher, but they lack the spark and leadership qualities to really take over. Also, too many East Asian women have kids with whites and Jews for there to be East Asian unity.
The only people who might pose a threat to Jewish dominance are Asian-Indians, many of whom are intelligent and entrepreneurial. Also, Asian-Indians tend to stick together in sex and reproduction. And there are so many of them, and many more are being born. India now has 1.4 billion people and has surpassed the population of China. It has more people than all of Western Europe and the US combined.
A group of 'Refugees', here, grabbed a local dog, killed it, butchered it and casually BBQ it for dinner in the hotel garden.
Is this 'cultural differences'?
Well, at least we're not all speaking German, right… https://t.co/8NKhxk0Dud
— Rev'd. Tony T Adams (@MinTonyAdams) September 26, 2023
No wonder Jews are trying to forge ‘friendly’ ties with Asian-Indians and Pakistanis. Jews hope for a Zio-Indo wink-wink cooperation against white power(and against China that remains sovereign, independent of Jewish Power). Pakistanis are more useful than other Muslims because they are not Arab and thus less likely to care about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Also, Jews know that Asian-Indian elites are not a united bloc like the Chinese and other East Asians(at least in their own countries). While most Chinese feel as one people from top to bottom, no such feelings of solidarity exist among the various ethnic groups and neo-castes in Indian society. Indian elites see themselves as an ethnically distinct people who rule over OTHER ethnic groups. Because of the tensions between Indian elites and the diverse masses, the political dynamics are somewhat similar to Jews and non-Jews in the West. Jews are like the Brahmin caste that rules over non-Jews, and Indian elites are like South Asian ‘Jews’ ruling over lesser groups. So, Hindu elites and Jewish elites see eye-to-eye to some degree.
New York City’s Democrat Mayor FLIPS OUT – Channels Donald Trump in Wild Town Hall Speech
Jews also know they have an advantage that Hindus and Pakistanis lack. Jews can pass as whites(or as nonwhites or anti-whites or the main victims of whites via ‘muh holocaust’), whereas Hindus and Pakistanis cannot. So, Jews play it both ways. Jews play the Asian-Indian card against whites. Jews go to Asian-Indians and Pakistanis and say, “Look, we Jews and you Indians/Pakistanis are victim-brothers against those white supremacist racist nativist scum.” And Hindus and Pakistanis play along because they want continued access to the richer West. But Jews also curtail Hindu-Pakistani power in the West by playing to white fears and anxiety. The coded Jewish message to whites is, “We Jews ain’t Christian, but we are ‘white’ too, just like you white gentiles, i.e. Jewish power is still white power, whereas Asian-Indian power is Alien. Therefore, white gentiles should support Jews against Asian-Indians if differences were to arise between Jews and Hindus.”
Jews play it like the character in YOJIMBO and A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS. They play every side against each other. They don’t play it like the honorable Gregory Peck character in THE BIG COUNTRY who is caught between two feuding clans and valiantly attempts to resolve the conflict. In contrast, Jewish globalist-supremacists thrive on the conflicts among various groups. They are like Paul McCartney’s ‘grandfather’ in A HARD DAY’S NIGHT. A king mixer.
Anyway, those who conquer must also be prepared to defend. Otherwise, what was the whole point of all that preparation, investment, ambition, and sacrifice? I mean, imagine if Zionists went through all that trouble of invading Palestine and laboring to create Israel… just to hand it over to a bunch of Africans, Iranians, Hindus, and Chinese. Why invade something just to let others invade it? Why climb a mountain to let someone else take the credit?
To invade something means to make a claim, and once the claim is made, it has to be defended in nativist mode. Multiculturalism is a Jewish globalist mind-virus trick that fools all nations that they must NOT defend their homelands in nativist manner. Political Correctness turns the claim into a ‘blame’ of ‘white guilt’. Whites are told they must surrender to invasivism as historical redress or for some proposition pie in the sky.
Now, why would Jews promote such an agenda all over the world when they don’t for Israel? Because when all gentile nations become less nativist and defensive and embrace the cult of Diversity, they will lose the sense of unity and solidarity. And that means Jewish globalist power can more easily infiltrate and take over. Jews also use the homo-agenda to weaken the moral pride and confidence of every nation. Any nation that celebrates the perverse ‘sexual’ behavior of homos as the highest good has lost its equilibrium and bearing. Such a degenerate nation can be manipulated and subverted by any foreign power. This is why Jews are bitter about Russia’s resistance to the globo-homo-agenda, the proxy of Jewish supremacists.
Anyway, the multiculturalist experiment in the US, Canada, and EU should be studied as a cautionary tale of what happens when nations surrender their nativism. Without nativism, your nation will succumb to more invasivists who arrive and take what belongs to your people: the land, the wealth, the womenfolk, and the children too(like at Rotherham) that were claimed and defended by your ancestors.
It’s true that every nation is the creation of invasivists sometime in history. Every nation, old or young, is a land with a long history of invaders and conquerors. But those invasivists made a claim on what they’d invaded, and that meant they defended it in the mode of nativists. They, as invaders, understood that invaders can be invaded in turn by others. So, if invaders are to keep what they’ve invaded, they must turn into nativists on the land that they’ve claimed as their own.
It’s no wonder that Israel has survived over the years. Zionist invaders took the land from the Palestinians. But through brute force of the IDF, patriotic race-ist immigration policy open only to Jews, and nationalist education, Israel has preserved itself and prevented it from being invaded in turn by other peoples. The US used to be like a giant Israel for European folks. Now, it’s like a giant Palestine undergoing White Nakba.
A thug sneaks up from behind a man defending his property & pushes him down a flight of concrete stairs. He's then attacked by 5 more and nearly beat to death.
This has to stop. There needs to be medieval punishment for these thugs. pic.twitter.com/o4466AxPpe
— Dane (@UltraDane) September 26, 2023
This is why all this stuff about America’s ‘racist’ immigration policies is total BS.
Yes, it is true that white folks invaded and took the land from the Indians(and wild animals). But the whole point of invasion is to make a claim on the land you invade. Why go through all the trouble of invading(often a violent, bloody, and taxing process) if you’re not going to make such a claim? The creation and the development of America were an exciting but also agonizing process of endless toil and great sacrifices.
So, why should white folks just hand over land and legacy to other would-be invaders? This is especially bogus when whites did most of the work, whereas the new would-be invaders just come and live off the bounty of what the ancestors of whites founded and built. Whites made something out of nothing, but others just take from that something while spitting on whites(at the behest of vicious Jewish Supremacists).
It’s like a battle. Many lives are lost in the blood bath. Lots of families will never see their sons again. If one side gains territory in war, it is often at great cost in life and material. So, if territory is gained in war, it must be defended so that it won’t fall to the enemy once again. If land that was won through great sacrifice won’t be defended, what was all that sacrifice for?
The reason why so many white peoples lack nativist instinct is three-fold: (1) They had it too good for too long, and they have lost the survivalist-organismic instinct (2) Pop Culture-as-main-culture has severed their ties to history and roots. Hopeless amnesiac, they are unaware of the sweat-and-toil of their ancestors. Also Pop Culture makes them prefer other cultures, especially that of the Negro, over their own kind. It leads to jungle-hipster neo-savagery among white youths. (3) PC and ‘wokeness’ have filled whites with ‘white guilt’, so even whites with historical consciousness remember the past through the prism of white culpability as manipulated by the Jewish-controlled media and academia.
Also, Political Correctness, in cahoots with Pop Culture, made Diversity so iconic and sacrosanct that whites feel apologetic if they imagine any story or narrative that is all white and lacking in ‘diversity’. So, British TV now features blacks in the roles of white historical figures and penalizes programs that don’t feature nonwhites, especially blacks. Apparently, British History was deficient because it was too white. PC retrofits or retro-corrects history by Africanizing white heroes. It’s like the TV show that has a Negro as Lancelot in the new telling of the Arthurian tale, which is also a means to promote Afro-colonization of white wombs(ACOWW) and cuck-mindset among white males reduced to the submissive status of ‘white boys’.
History is a story of human biology.
Military history is the study of human biological aggression.
Economics is the story of human biological drive for territory and property.
Literature is human biological use of signs and words as weapons.
They are all about biology.
At their roots, all of human behavior are analogous to what happens among germs, animals, and plants.
In the end, all our science and technology is nothing more than a beehive made by bees, a kind of Death Star(of STAR WARS).
Human intellect, science, and technology allow people to do amazing things, but, as DR. STRANGELOVE demonstrates, the WHY is ultimately biological. In 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, it begins with the bone and develops into a rocket ship, and the driving force is biology.
The question is WHY do we create stuff, make stuff, innovate stuff, and etc.? This stuff may seem so amazing that it seems divorced from crude biology. But, its purpose is to serve biology: the organism’s attraction to great comfort, security, fun, pleasure, power, sex, domination.
Consider immigration. It is expounded in the highfalutin terms of the ‘proposition nation’, ‘huddled masses yearning to breathe free’, etc. But it’s just organisms seeking greener pastures, no different from a herd of deer or bison entering new territory for more grass to chew on.
Whether humans are making bows & arrows or B-52 bombers, it’s the manifestation of the same biological impulses. Everything we do and make is to serve our biological needs.
Suppose we suck out all the hormones of a group of people while leaving their mental faculties(intellect) intact. They will be equally intelligent and knowledgeable. But without the hormones to fuel emotions, humans are merely apathetic calculating machines. Without instinct and drive, they are devoid of will, agency, and compass to direct their intelligence; they either become incurious or equally curious and/or amenable to all things, i.e. passively indifferent or passively accepting of everything without discrimination. Without hormones, there is no sense of ‘us and them’. One has no greater feelings for one’s own people than for others, even those who aim to hurt one’s people.
This is why Jews promote apathetic zen-ism among whites to weaken their sense of us-and-them while Jews maintain a strong sense of us-Jews and them-goyim. (But then, even as Jews warn whites against feelings of their own identity and unity, they insist that whites must passionately favor Jews over Palestinians, Arabs, & Iranians and, of course, favor Jewish-controlled Ukraine against Russia. Jews are sneaky, whites are stupid.)
Scientists actually carried out experiments where the hormones were removed from the participants, who were left feeling comfortable numb. Even though fully awake, they felt catatonic. And everything seemed equally ‘pleasant’ in this emotion-drained state. Everything, gold or lead, seemed to be of equal value.
To a person with emotions, gold means power and wealth. His hormones drive him to fight for gold. But to a person without emotions, gold is like anything else.
If Einstein had no hormones and only intellect, he never would have bothered to discover the laws of the universe. Despite the high intelligence, there would have been no intense drive, will, and hunger. He would have been at peace with himself doing nothing. But he had emotions; animal emotions drive man to conquer, and this ‘animal’ within Einstein drove him to conquer knowledge and unlock the key to the universe and attain the forbidden fruit. And he wanted fame and recognition. So, his life was really about intelligence driven by ape emotions.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
From the YouTube video Zionism: Unmasked in 10 minutes | reallygraceful
As the video shows, Joe Biden is a confessed Zionist. And George W Bush believed “God” told him to invade Iraq.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/oct/07/iraq.usa
And Bush was clearly manipulated by militarists, neocons and Zionists using Biblical imagery and motifs.
Video Link
The irony is, God “is literally Hitler” by Zionist standards. (Actually, worse than Hitler, who was framed by Zionists for the Holocaust, when in fact Jewish bankers and oligarchs (the Cousinhood) were responsible for Marxism, WW1 and WW2.)
Exodus 32: 7Then the LORD said to Moses, “Go down at once, for your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves. 8How quickly they have turned aside from the way that I commanded them! They have made for themselves a molten calf and have bowed down to it. They have sacrificed to it and said, ‘These, O Israel, are your gods, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt.’ ”9The LORD also said to Moses, “I have seen this people, and they are indeed a stiff-necked people. 10Now leave Me alone, so that My anger may burn against them and consume them. Then I will make you into a great nation.”
So God wanted to burn the Hebrews for worshiping the golden calf. But the Cousinhood worships the golden calf (Mammon). So if one is a believer in the Torah (Old Testament) one is commanded by God to destroy money-worshiping Hebrews, no?
So when are these rich Hebrew oligarchs, warmongers, and blood profiteers, and their Zoglodyte lickspittle like Biden and Bush, going to follow God’s will and kill themselves?
Who knows? Jews associate anti-Semitism with blonde, blue eyed rightists. Still, perhaps the next attacks on Jews will come from those on the other side of the color bar and the political spectrum. One day, Negro Communists may be the anti-Semites of the future. Just a thought!
Blacks like bling. As long as Jews dole out the dough, they got the bro.
Look at South Africa. For all the anti-white rhetoric, blacks defer to the Jewish elites who have the money.
Al Sharpton used to call Jews ‘diamond merchants’. They gave him diamonds, and he’s just a ring on their finger.
And where do ((jews)) get the dough? Central bank control in White/Christian civilization. So the White Zionist and Holocaustianity retards are cutting their own throats along with everyone else’s via Black voodooists and gang-bangers, courtesy of kike golden calf voodooists and gang-bangers. But that’s not surprising, given that White Zionist retards brought in the Blacks at the behest of kike slave brokers and owners to begin with.
So we’re back to Zoglodytes and ((jews)) as the mortal enemy of sanity and Christian/Western civilization.
But yes, we are STILL reading books and studying biology !!!
Invasion Ecology 2nd Edition
Invasive Species: What Everyone Needs to Know
97% of that knowledge applies to human society. Add missing 3% – prune-faced rat Soros and his “Open Borders” project. Then add “Section 8” photos & vignettes and the picture vill be complete.
On the horizon: Jew York Times is touting “Climate Refugees”. It is too hot for 900 millions to live where they are.
The Jews have continually upped the illegal alien invasion of the USA through Bidens open borders and anti-White rhetoric. Now they are marrying the climate “crisis” with illegal alien invasion saying they can no longer live in their hot homelands and therefore are entitled to White countries ( and White woman) because the Whites made the climate hotter. It’s all a sham that is being aggressively pushed and unless it is stopped the Jews will get their way and destroy all White countries. This has to end.
Natural law dictates that stray lamb will be dismembered and consumed by the wolves
The pacified goy is a sacrificial animal whose blood is thirsted for by predators and the god of nature YHWH
You got it much better than many others. The similarities are:
Both consider themselves superior by birth, chosen by their gods to run this world; both consider other humans as lesser beings (or even non-human) that can redeem themselves by serving the Chosen.
The differences are:
Brahmins separated the economic operations from the social operations and allowed other castes this job. Usually it is the Trader castes (collectively called, “Bania”); therefore Brahmin + Bania = Jew. By this separation, the economic iniquities inflicted by the Banias are not blamed on the Brahmins. And Brahmins have never been expelled even once in these 20 – 30 centuries from any country.
Any ideology that considers some people as the Chosen of gods is bound to create resentment in others.
Not true, they had to leave over 100 villages in the Velhas Conquistas after the majority of native Goans converted to Catholicism.
The Sacrificial Lamb is the White Race!
Iy’s only going to end by force.