And with April 23, 2025 Executive Order by President Donald Trump – RESTORING EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND MERITOCRACY – the march back towards eliminating anti-white racism enshrined by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 begins. Hopefully, the complete repudiation of this act (or simply ensuring white individuals are collectively protected by it).

This is why I voted for Donald J. Trump three times. Heather Mac Donald of City Journal nails it. [Trump Takes His Biggest Step Yet Toward Restoring Meritocracy: The administration’s executive order eliminating disparate-impact theory restores the 1964 Civil Rights Act to its original meaning., City Journal, April 24, 2025]:

Measured in Trump time, it took them eons to get around to it, but the White House has finally taken the most important step it can to restore meritocracy to American society: eliminating disparate-impact theory from civil rights analysis and enforcement.

Disparate-impact theory holds that if a neutral, colorblind standard of achievement or behavior has a disproportionately negative effect on underrepresented minorities (overwhelmingly, on blacks), it violates civil rights laws. It has been used to invalidate literacy and numeracy standards for police officers and firemen, cognitive skills and basic knowledge tests for teachers, the use of SATs in college admissions, the use of grades for medical licensing exams, credit-based mortgage lending, the ability to discipline insubordinate students, and criminal background checks for employees and renters. It has been used to eliminate prosecution for a large range of crimes, including shoplifting, turnstile jumping, and resisting arrest; to end police tactics such as proactive stops (otherwise known as stop, question, and frisk); and to purge safety technologies like ShotSpotter and speeding cameras from police departments.

In none of those cases has it ever been demonstrated that the disfavored standard was implemented to exclude blacks or other minorities from a position, opportunity, or right. The genius (if a diabolical one) of disparate-impact theory was that it obviated any need to show discriminatory intent on the part of a targeted employer or institution. Discrimination was inferred simply by the effect of the colorblind standard.

Disparate-impact theory preserved the hegemony of the civil rights regime long after the original impetus for that regime had all but disappeared. One would be hard-pressed today to find any mainstream institution that discriminates against blacks in admissions, hiring, or promotion. The reality, in fact, is the opposite: every mainstream institution is desperate to hire and promote as many remotely qualified blacks as possible; it is white males who are disfavored and excluded from positions based on their skin color.

If those black-welcoming institutions continued to employ a single standard of achievement, and that standard disqualified blacks at a disproportionate rate, civil rights enforcers would declare that they had uncovered yet another redoubt of white supremacy. The diversity bureaucracy in universities and the corporate world would send out the message that blacks continue to face discrimination at every turn and that they should take refuge in a victim identity.

Disparate-impact analysis was the linchpin of the “systemic racism” argument, since the only present-day proof of racism in American society is the underrepresentation of blacks in the professions and their overrepresentation in the criminal-justice system.

Meantime, the real cause of disparate impact—the yawning academic skills and crime gaps—was kept assiduously offstage.

Now all that may be changing. The presidential Executive Order of April 23, 2025, “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy,” sets out the policy of the United States to “eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible.”

To that end, it starts the process of repealing disparate-impact regulations accreted to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by subsequent administrations and requires the cataloguing of state laws that impose disparate-impact liability, among other actions.

Most momentously for law enforcement, the executive order initiates the review of federal consent decrees that rely on disparate-impact analysis (i.e., almost all of them), with the implied goal of dissolving those decrees. (A consent decree is a negotiated settlement, overseen by a judge and his representative, binding a government entity to an elaborate set of reforms.) Dissolving such decrees will not only liberate police departments from a costly yoke of superfluous red tape but will also defund the federal monitor racket, whereby monitors earn millions of dollars declaring for years on end that the overseen police department has yet to comply punctiliously with an average of 200 or so mandated reforms, often regarding paperwork.

Left-wing groups are understandably up in arms. They charge the administration with a “fundamental shift in legal philosophy.” That is true, but it was disparate-impact theory itself that constituted a radical departure from the premises of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. President Donald Trump merely restores the 1964 law to its original understanding. That pioneering legislation banned intentional discrimination only; disparate-impact theory was a judicial amendment made six years later in response to how, even in 1971, finding invidious intentional discrimination was becoming too difficult to satisfy the advocates.

The Left complains as well that Trump’s’ executive order embraces a “formalist, colorblind conception of equality.” Yes—and so does the Constitution.

In a multi-racial country, such a conception of equality without regard to race (being colorblind) should be the only way to interpret the implementation of the law. If not, you have the exact same society disparate impact mandates created in the United States to completely disregard notions of being colorblind, but interpreting every facet of American life through the lenses of a default position of systemic inequality and implicit bias in favor of whites.

Of course, simply overturning Griggs v Duke Power and Shelley v Kraemer restore Freedom of Association to the United States of America, which is precisely what disparate impact theory and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (when not applied to protect the rights of white individuals) only further enhanced the states ability to discriminate against White Americans.

Out of 301,000 people,St. Louis is 43 percent black/46 percent white.

And for the year 2024, four years after the joyous, unity-seeking Black Lives Matter movement triumphed nationwide courtesy of the ghost of George Floyd, what percent of homicides in St. Louis have a black suspect?

No.

The preceding paragraph was a simple thought experiment, since homicide data for 1924 St. Louis cannot be found online (it should be noted in 1920, St. Louis had a population of 772,897 people versus a population of only 301,578 today. But there’s a reason why the city declined by well more than half its 1925 population to today, and it represents one of the fundamental unmentionable questions (and conversations) when deciding where to purchase real estate in America.

Stan Sitwell:
“The only thing I ask is, out of the 450 homes we build, one be given to a disadvantaged family from the inner city.”

Gob Bluth:
“That’s great. So the other 449 families live in fear? Is that what we’re saying?” – Arrested Development

We know Karmelo Anthony has already admitted to stabbing to death Austin Metcalf in an altercation at a high school track meet.

For those who came in late, Anthony is a black high school who was rummaging through backpacks and duffel bags of those participating in the athletic endeavor at the track meet, when Metcalf (a white high school senior who was participating in the meet) confronted him in a tent the former individual had no business seeking shelter from the sun in.

Upon being asked to leave, Anthony unsheathed a knife – you know, a common item a high school student brings to a track meet – and stabbed Metcalf to death. The final moments of Metcalf’s life would be spent gasping for breath in his twin brother’s arms.

Anthony was arrested, and a $1 million bond was set. Well, a Help Karmelo Official Fund was started on GiveSendGo, and 13,379 people have donated a total of $451,888. Oh, and a black judge lowered the bond to $250,000 and Anthony was released from jail. That should catch you up to speed with this new addition to the story. [Karmelo Anthony living with family in $900K home in gated community, bought new car after release on bond in Austin Metcalf murder case: report, NY Post, April 16, 2025]:

The Texas teen accused of fatally stabbing a high school football star at a track meet allegedly lives in a $900,000 home with his family inside a luxurious gated community — despite requesting that a judge lower his $1 million bond because of financial difficulties, according to a report.

Karmelo Anthony, 17, is holed up with his family at the pricey home inside the gated community of Richwoods in Frisco, Texas, after he was released from jail Monday on a reduced $250,000 bond for allegedly killing Austin Metcalf earlier this month, the Daily Mail reported.

The home — where rent is estimated to be $3,500 a month — had a white Suburban, a black Acura, and a third sedan in the driveway on Tuesday, according to the outlet.

A neighbor said the family had just bought a new ride.

“He got a new car,” the resident told the outlet. “If you look at the license plate, it’s got a paper tag and it says it expires June 4.”

So much of the United States of America in 2025 is built on a foundation of lies, and the mortgage is underwater. Our entire nation was remade in a horrifying Frankenstein experiment with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 let loose upon every facet of American life, and like Robert Walton trying to get to the North Pole, we finally see the macabre results.

It’s all fake. Pitiful, really. [Much of the Black middle class was built by federal jobs. That may change.: For the last several decades, federal jobs helped Black workers find stable work with guardrails to prevent bias, but mass cuts are threatening decades of upward mobility., NBC News, February 22, 2025]:

When Francine Verdine took a job as a clerk at the Internal Revenue Service in Houston in 1983, it was supposed to be a stopgap until something better came along. She didn’t expect that 42 years later, she would look back on it as the start of a rewarding career that provided growth in various management positions, upward mobility and the opportunity to build a comfortable life for her family.

“I enjoyed my career,” said Verdine, who retired in 2019. “I had no idea when I started that I could make the money I did by the time I left. It’s sad that many others’ opportunity to have a similar career could be over.”

For decades, the federal government provided both reliable jobs and guardrails to offset systemic racial bias in hiring and promotions, offering an alternative for Black workers who might be overlooked or ignored in the private sector. They played a crucial role in helping Black workers like Verdine join the middle class and thrive. But vast cuts by the Trump administration, led by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, are threatening to close down that once-dependable path to financial stability.

The government, which has about 3 million employees, is the largest employer in the country. At least 75,000 of them accepted buyout offers and thousands were fired in the last several weeks. Many of the workers fired were either newer hires or told they were let go for subpar performance.

“The federal workforce was a means to help build Black middle class. It hired Black Americans at a higher rate than private employers,” said Sheria Smith, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252, which represents the Education Department employees.

As a part of his efforts, President Trump is angling to shut down the Department of Education, a move that will have dramatic repercussions around the country. Nearly 30% of Education employees are Black according to a 2024 report by the department.

Smith said 74 workers at the department had been let go so far, 60 of whom are Black.

At the Department of Health and Human Services, where more than 1,300 new hires were reportedly laid off, 20% of the staff was Black. And at the Department of Veterans Affairs, which recently lost 1,000 employees, 24% are Black.

These numbers illustrate how important government jobs have been and are for Black people, said Marcus Casey, a fellow in the Economic Studies program at the Brookings Institution. He said the administration’s efforts are trying to undermine the gains of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned discrimination on the basis of race and other characteristics, and of affirmative action, which began in the federal government to make the hiring and promoting process more inclusive.

“Whether it was from the post office, through direct growth of federal agencies, through the military — the government fought against the headwinds associated with the private sector,” said Casey, an affiliated scholar with Brookings’ Future of Middle Class Initiative.

Many Black people could build careers through the federal government typically because the private sector overlooked them, regardless of their qualifications, he said. “And so, the federal government has been essential to the building of the Black middle class.”

A worker at the Department of Transportation in Washington, D.C, who requested anonymity for fear of being fired, said several workers in his office have been fired for “poor performance.”

“Morale is so low,” he said. “People who should be there are gone. Everyone is nervous about the next shoe dropping.”

He said he has 16 years on the job and was planning to retire in four. “I wanted to do an even 20, maybe even 25. But I have to be honest with myself now: I don’t think I’m going to make it. Every indicator is that my head will be chopped off sooner or later. How can anyone be productive with that hanging over you?”

Undoing DEI to cut the federal workforce

The president’s sweeping changes began with ending DEI throughout the government, weaponizing it as a “destructive ideology” along the way. Countless jobs have been lost in an area that was created to develop fair hiring opportunities.

“A lot of Black people not only benefited from what they call DEI now, but the original affirmative action programs, and the veteran preferences,” Casey said. “That combination helped a lot of people get a foothold in the civil service.” These efforts, he said, “helped people get middle-class salaries and build middle-class lives with an ecosystem of race-specific businesses around Black communities.”

Verdine said it’s no secret that the government could be streamlined, but added that the way the administration is going about it is “disheartening.”

“There’s no humanity in what’s happening right now,” she said. “No organization. It’s just chaos and people being hurt.”

“He was soon borne away by the waves, and lost in darkness and distance.”

Those are the last lines of Mary Shelly’s The Modern Prometheus.

I was born decades after the passing of The 1964 Civil Rights Act, where our nation was remade and Freedom of Association designated illegal by the State. But this era is coming to an end, the lies maintaining so much of infrastructure of what was dubbed Black-Run America (BRA) unsustainable, even if simply measured economically.

What the private sector can’t provide, the public sector was forced to momentarily uplift; but under the weight of reality we’ve been told to ignore, it finally revealed itself as an uncontrollable monster, far beyond the noble ambitions of its creators.

The fate of Rhodesia and South Africa will not befall the United States of America. Slowly, the road forward has appeared. Then, suddenly, all at once, we’ll be at the destination.

South Africa was devastated by Black Economic Empowerment, state-mandated discrimination against the white minority. Quietly, that’s what the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ushered in long ago in the USA. Kill it, Mr. Musk. Before it strangles the USA.

Jeffrey Dahmer was a serial killer. He killed people. He ate them. He raped their dead bodies, engaging in necrophilia. He admitted to all of this. But he wanted to clear the record up about one thing he was adamant he was not: a racist.

In an interview with Richard Kessler, Dahmer set the record straight. Again, he admitted to murder, cannibalism, and being sexually aroused enough to penetrate his victims dead bodies. But, he wasn’t a racist:

He also wanted to set the record straight that he was not a racist. He says that the reason for the majority of his victims being a minority was simple location. Where he lived there was high concentration of Black and Hispanic people. He stresses that is was a simple location thing, and that he hopes “I hope that can get cleared up. [How to Interview a Cannibal]

Why bring this gruesome story up? Because anti-racism is our state religion, and even a white guy suffering from mental illness, compelled to murder, eat his victims and engage in sexual activity with their dead bodies (all actions he willingly admitted to performing) found the notion of being considered a “racist” a bridge just a bit too far to cross.

Which brings us to the Covenant High School

[Nashville Police: Trans Shooter Chose Not to Attack the Public School Where She Was Bullied So She Wouldn’t Appear Racist, Breitbart, April 3, 2025]:

The transgender-identifying woman who shot and killed six innocents at a Nashville Christian school on March 27, 2023, originally planned to shoot up another school, but abandoned that plan to avoid looking racist.

A report released by the Nashville Metropolitan Police Department (NMPD) shows that in December 2018, the transgender-identifying individual begin formulating a plan to attack Creswell Middle School. She had attended Creswell during her middle school years and came away emotionally distressed.

NMPD described what she planned to do:

She drew a map from her memories of the layout of the school. In the map, she specified the locations of classrooms, common areas, and where the entrances and exits were located. She outlined how she would progress through the school, who she would target and in what sequence, and where she would commit suicide within the school once she was done. Knowing access to the interior of the school was highly restricted during school hours, she detailed an elaborate plan to enter the school without being stopped or detected so she could begin her attack with the element of surprise.

During the first six months of 2019 she continued plans to target Creswell: “Her OCD was manifest during this time with the excruciating detail she gave to the attack, including precise timelines, detailed descriptions of the clothing she would wear, and the specific route she would progress through the school. The more she pored over the details, the more convinced she was of her own success. The ‘rage storms’ that interspersed these plans also became more heated, showing Hale’s anger was reaching the boiling point.”

She brooded over her plan extensively, wanting to become a “god” as she believed the Columbine killers had done. She would follow in their steps “by killing victims nobody would forget: children.”

However, by March 2020 the transgender-identifying individual’s thinking began to change, the police report detailed:

Hale began to express doubts about targeting Creswell Middle. Her doubts weren’t necessarily about the intention to kill children, but more about the racial demographics of the school. Hale knew a large portion of the student body was black. Though she had no qualms about killing anyone regardless of specific demographical categories, she worried she might be branded as a racist, which would remove her ability to give the motive and reasoning for the attack and [instead] allow others to choose it for her once she was dead.

She continued to plan to attack Creswell until April 8, 2021, at which time she shifted her plan to the Covenant Christian school. She believed Covenant was a better target for three reasons: “(1) [It] was more geographically isolated than Creswell Middle, which she felt would give her more time to kill; (2) … being a private Christian school, she would receive more notoriety; and (3) due to the student body at Creswell Middle being predominantly black, she was afraid she would be seen as a racist…”

The threat of the racism label made her worry that the motive for the attack and narrative of it would spin out of control once she died.

So she couldn’t attacked Crewel Middle School because the enrollment there was majority black, thus her actions could be misconstrued as racist. Even when committing mass murder, she deferred to the racial norms governing polite society, so as not to be deemed a “racist” posthumously.

Mass murdering white kids was okay in her mind.

Mass murdering black kids was not okay in her mind. The racial angle of such an attack would cloud the minds of those analyzing the actions she took upon her martyrdom… thus, she remained in death a devoted follower of the dominant theology of our time. After all, she just killed white children.

One wonders if our white shooter was racially bullied by her predominately black classmates when she attended the majority black middle class she ended up not attacking (so as not to appear racist), but to ask this question is to undermine our entire racial system of checks and balances, where the concept of white privilege, implicit bias and systemic inequality dominates all manners of public and private life… even the actions of a cannibal murderer and a mass murdering transgender.

We don’t have to live this way. We really don’t.

You can just point out the reality of interracial crime and realize that 100 years ago, our ancestors in what was then a nearly 90 percent white nation had laws in place to protect the civilization white individuals collectively created from a problem that followed black people when they fled Jim Crow in the South. [National Affairs: THE NEGRO CRIME RATE: A FAILURE IN INTEGRATION, TIME Magazine, April 21, 1958]:

THEY are afraid to say so in public, but many of the North’s big-city mayors groan in private that their biggest and most worrisome problem is the crime rate among Negroes.

In 1,551 U.S. cities, according to the FBI tally for 1956, Negroes, making up 10% of the U.S. population, accounted for about 30% of all arrests, and 60% of the arrests for crimes involving violence or threat of bodily harm—murder, non-negligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. In one city after another, the figures—where they are not hidden or suppressed by politicians—reveal a shocking pattern. Items:

New York (14% Negro). Of the prisoners confined in houses of detention last year to await court disposition of their cases, 44% of the males and 65% of the females were Negroes.

Chicago (15% Negro). In 1956 twice as many Negroes as whites—1,366 to 679—were arrested on charges of murder, non-negligent manslaughter, rape and robbery.

Detroit (25% Negro). Two out of three prisoners held in the Wayne County jail are Negroes. Last month 62% of. the defendants presented for trial in Recorder’s Court were Negroes. Of last year’s 25,216 arrests resulting in prosecution, excluding traffic cases, Negroes accounted for 12,919.

Los Angeles (13% Negro). In 1956 Negroes accounted for 28% of all arrests, and 48% of the arrests for homicide, rape, aggravated assault, robbery, burglary, larceny and auto theft.

San Francisco (7% Negro). The victims in 896 of last year’s 1,564 recorded robbery cases reported that the assailants were Negroes.

Negro leaders sometimes argue passionately that arrest statistics wildly distort the comparative incidence of crime among Negroes and whites because cops are more likely to arrest Negroes for petty crimes or on mere suspicion. Protests Executive Editor Charles Wartman of Detroit’s Michigan Chronicle, a Negro weekly: “The number of Negroes booked is at least partially indicative of subconscious if not conscious racial persecution on the part of police officers.”

But inequality of treatment by the police may actually tend to shrink rather than inflate the statistics of Negro crime. Says Newsman Wartman in the next breath: “When Negroes violate social morals—sex, drinking, gambling—white cops bypass this as ‘typically Negro.’ ” Many Negro leaders protest that the police are far from diligent enough in dealing with crimes committed against Negroes—and Negroes are the victims in the great majority of Negro crimes of violence. Since Negroes, even when they are victims or innocent bystanders, are often wary of calling the police, many offenses of disorder and assault go unreported when committed by Negroes in the depths of a ghetto.

We are all afraid to say it out loud, so I’ll do it for you: Austin Metcalf was a white teenager. Karmelo Anthony is a black teenager. At a track meet in Texas, the black teenager stabbed the white teenager to death in a confrontation without provocation. Austin died in his twin brother’s, Hunter, arms.

His Name is Austin Metcalf. [Man says son was stabbed in the heart at high school track meet, died in twin’s arms: A 17-year-old student has been arrested and charged with murder in the death of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf, NBCDFW.com, April 2, 2025]:

A high school student is facing a murder charge after Frisco police say he fatally stabbed a student during a confrontation at a high school track meet on Wednesday morning.

Police confirmed to NBC 5 that they were called to Kuykendall Stadium at about 10 a.m., after a 17-year-old stabbed a 17-year-old during a confrontation.

“Despite lifesaving measures by police and fire personnel, including CPR and the administration of blood, the 16-year-old victim died,” police said Wednesday afternoon.

Jeff Metcalf spoke with NBC 5 Tuesday afternoon and said his son, Austin Metcalf, was killed when another student armed with a knife got upset after being told he was in the wrong spot.

Metcalf said his son didn’t know the student who attacked him and that Austin’s twin brother, Hunter, was nearby when the confrontation took place and not only saw his brother get stabbed but tried to stop the bleeding.

Austin, he says, was born two minutes before his brother Hunter.

The two were inseparable.

“They were twins, identical twins, and his brother was holding on to him, trying to make it stop bleeding, and he died in his brother’s arms,” Jeff Metcalf said. “I rushed up there and I saw him on the gurney and I could tell — they said he wasn’t breathing. I could see all the blood, and I saw where the wound was, and I was very concerned, so I had to find his brother, and we rushed to the hospital. And we prayed, and it’s God’s plan, I don’t understand it, but they weren’t able to save him. This is murder.”

Jeff Metcalf said his son had a 4.0, was MVP of the football team and had a bright future that included going to college.

“He was on the right track,” Jeff Metcalf said. “He was loved by many. He was a leader.”

“I’m not trying to judge, but what kind of parents did this child have? What was he taught? He brought a knife to a track meet and he murdered my son by stabbing him in the heart. The guy was in the wrong place and they asked him to move and he bowed up. This is murder,” Jeff Metcalf said. “You know what, I already forgive this person. Already. God takes care of things. God is going to take care of me. God is going to take care of my family.”

The victim’s father is left with memories, including the hunting trips the three have taken since the boys were two.

This past weekend, the trio went hunting, hoping Austin would finally get his first hog. He did, said his father.

The family has started a GoFundMe to help cover funeral arrangements and to help Austin’s brother with counseling and school.

Frisco police said they arrested and charged 17-year-old Karmelo Anthony with Metcalf’s murder. Police said Anthony’s bond has not yet been set and it’s unclear if he’s obtained an attorney to speak on his behalf.

“The Frisco Police Department grieves with all those affected by this devastating loss and extends its deepest condolences to the victim’s family, students, and staff who are experiencing unimaginable pain,” the department said Wednesday afternoon. “The department is collaborating with the Frisco Independent School District and will continue to provide any support they need during this incredibly difficult time.”

Police did not say where the stabbing took place at the stadium, but from Texas Sky Ranger, several police officers were seen investigating an area in the stands not far from the track.

A spokesperson for the Frisco ISD said the 11-5A championship district track meet, which included more than 100 students from eight schools, took place at the stadium Wednesday morning. The district said that moments after the stabbing, the stadium was immediately secured, the meet was suspended, and all students were returned to their home campuses “with expediency.”

Suburbs exist for a reason. Good schools exist for a reason. We all have learned to speak in coded language so as not to offend the delicate racial sensibilities governing proper etiquette in our increasingly multi-racial nation. But the problem TIME Magazine documented in 1958 has been the driving force behind every private decision a white family makes in determining where they will live out their public life. America’s changing racial demographics mean we are running out of lily-white suburbs for white people to cosplay as Americans in in 2025.

It’s time for the honest conversation about race we’ve refused to have for more than a century, because we fear being called a racist more than we wish to create communities where we can know our children will safely return from a track meet without being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

“Do we get to win this time?” – John Rambo, Rambo: First Blood Part II

Perhaps the five-painting series of Thomas Cole, “The Course of Empire,” was 99.9 percent correct about the cycle of a nation throughout history. Not five years ago, it seemed Washington, Jefferson, Adams and every Dead White Male who had a hand in creating, building, sustaining, and driving our nation ahead were destined for the ash heap of history, with every building or street named in their honor renamed and monument removed.

It wasn’t going to stop with just those with a connection the Confederacy.

And then, on March 27, 2025, an Executive Order was issued by President Trump with the awesomely ominous title: RESTORING TRUTH AND SANITY TO AMERICAN HISTORY.

Ominous for who/whom, though. You see, history has no side. When you win, you get to write it. [Trump wants to restore statues and monuments. Will that happen?, NPR, March 28, 2025]:

President Trump signed an executive order on Thursday aimed at “restoring truth and sanity to American history” – decrying what the order characterized as efforts to “undermine the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light.” The order calls for the removal of “divisive race-centered ideology” from the Smithsonian’s museums and research centers. It also calls on the Secretary of the Interior to restore public monuments, statues and other markers that have been removed or changed since 2020. But it’s unclear how many sites — and which ones — will be impacted by the executive order.

President Trump has called on the Interior Secretary to determine whether any memorials, statues, markers or properties that fall within the Department of the Interior’s jurisdiction “have been removed or changed to perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history, inappropriately minimize the value of certain historical events or figures, or include any other improper partisan ideology” since January 1, 2020, more than a year before Trump left office in his first term. If so, the executive order calls on the Department to reinstate any such statues or monuments. The Department of the Interior includes the National Park Service, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and nine other bureaus. The Department did not respond to NPR’s request for comment regarding the executive order.

The order also directs the Department of the Interior to ensure that any monuments, statues or memorials under its jurisdiction “do not contain descriptions, depictions, or other content that inappropriately disparage Americans past or living (including persons living in colonial times), and instead focus on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people or, with respect to natural features, the beauty, abundance, and grandeur of the American landscape.”

A national reckoning on race – and monuments to the past – grew after George Floyd was killed by police in 2020. More than 200 public Confederate symbols across the country were removed, relocated or renamed within about a year and a half, according to research by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Seth Levi, Chief Program Strategy Officer of the SPLC, says many of these removals did not take place on lands under the Department of the Interior’s jurisdiction.

Even for the objects that are on public land, it’s normally land that’s owned and controlled by municipalities or state governments. I’m not actually aware of any removals on National Park Service land,” Levi says. “There have been removals on land that’s controlled by the Department of Defense with the names of military bases, [but] it’s unclear to us how many monuments have already been removed that this would actually apply to.”

Though action from Thursday’s executive order might be limited for now, Levi says he believes the Trump administration is trying to “minimize the fact that enslavement was a huge part of our history” and that the contributions of racial minorities to American history “seem to be under threat.” He also points to SPLC data showing that historically, Confederate monuments and names on schools, roads and other sites grew in the U.S. during the beginning of the Jim Crow era and around the time of the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education, in which the Supreme Court ruled in 1954 that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional.

Thursday’s executive order comes on the heels of other changes to National Park Service websites. After President Trump’s January executive order about gender ideology declared that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female,” the NPS removed all references to transgender people from the Stonewall National Monument website. Weeks later, it had deleted websites containing information about transgender activists like Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera.

The National Parks Conservation Association, a nonpartisan group that advocates to protect national parks, issued a statement regarding Thursday’s order. “Across the country, our national parks protect vital American history, from the birthplaces of American presidents to the birthplaces of our democracy. Our parks tell stories from the civil rights movement, the Civil War, and beyond,” said Alan Spears, a senior director at the National Parks Conservation Association. “Every American who cares about our country’s history should be worried about what people, places, and themes disappear next.”

Wikipedia has a page dedicated to all the monuments and memorials toppled or removed during the George Floyd Insurrection.

Every last one of them must go back to where they once stood. Starting with the Confederate Memorial removed from Arlington National Cemetery, culminating with Monument Avenue in Richmond, Virginia being taken over by the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior. With this move, all five of the monuments to the Confederacy that were resplendently displayed on this thoroughfare and removed after George Floyd died of fentanyl overdose while in police custody can be restored.

“Restoring truth and sanity” are an interesting way to describe the terror we all lived through from March 2020 to January 20, 2025. “Two weeks to stop the spread” became an eternity, with watching the chaos and horror befall America – all in the name of black career criminal dying of a drug overdose while resisting arrest – a daily battle as to which monument of a Dead White Male would come down next.

And now, we get the opportunity to see monuments, memorials and statues toppled by the anti-white orgy of violence momentarily sweeping the nation in 2020 restored and rededicated. Not one person is alive who saw the Robert E. Lee Statue dedicated in 1890 in Richmond, Virginia, while a crowd of overzealous freaks, misanthropes and anti-white proponents of every nation destroying facet of diversity, equity and inclusion gathered in 2022 to watch it removed from its grand pedestal high above Monument Avenue. A headstone to Lee’s beloved horse was destroyed in 2023, too.

Every action by these vandals was fueled by anti-white hate, resentment and spite.

And now, we get to have a national re-recognizing of America: celebrating our past, present and future as a people. To form a more perfect union simply entails realizing those who believe in Project 1619 have no business being a part of our nation at all, for the only language they can speak is one of resentment for having no part to play in establishing, building and sustaining our nation, but only in sowing chaos and disarray.

Destabilizing our nation for their momentary gain.

History has no side. It’s written by those who win.

We will always live in the shadow of the moment Donald Trump descends the escalator of Trump Tower to announce his candidacy for the Republican nomination for President of the United States of America. For it was in that seemingly innocuous moment the bridge to the next era of Western civilization unexpectedly built. That it could only be forged by a megalomaniac who rebelled against an elite dedicated to replacing the American people with refugees from Haiti, Somalia, Honduras and Guatemala by simply stating his intention to “Make America Great Again” is a reminder you never know what’s going to happen, or how it will happen.

But once the change occurs, you remember for some strange reason lily white Minnesota was inundated with more than 70,000 Somalians, and within a generation those new inhabitants of the state convinced the kind Nordic people there to remove the white people from their state flag and replace it with one similar to a flag from a province in Somalia.

Perhaps Virginia, North Carolina, Colorado, Minnesota, Maine, Washington, Oregon, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Georgia, Texas, or California is in need of hundreds of thousands of white refugees from the black-ruled, anti-white state of South Africa? If the Federal government can use non-white refuges to disrupt social capital in previously all-white cities or heavily white states, why not infuse these states with the blood of some of the finest people on earth, who face genocide from the black-run government of South Africa? [67,000 white South Africans express interest in Trump’s plan to give them refugee status, AP News, March 25, 2025]:

CAPE TOWN, South Africa (AP) — The United States Embassy in South Africa said Thursday it received a list of more than 67,000 people interested in refugee status in the U.S. under President Donald Trump’s plan to relocate members of a white minority group he claims are victims of racial discrimination by their Black-led government.

The list was given to the embassy by the South African Chamber of Commerce in the U.S., which said it became a point of contact for white South Africans asking about the program announced by the Trump administration last month. The chamber said the list does not constitute official applications.

Trump issued an executive order on Feb. 7 cutting U.S. funding to South Africa and citing “government actions fueling disproportionate violence against racially disfavored landowners.”

Trump’s executive order specifically referred to Afrikaners, a white minority group who are descendants of mainly Dutch and French colonial settlers who first came to South Africa in the 17th century. The order directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem to prioritize humanitarian relief to Afrikaners who are victims of “unjust racial discrimination” and resettle them in the U.S. under the refugee program.

There are approximately 2.7 million Afrikaners in South Africa, which has a population of 62 million. Trump’s decision to offer some white South Africans refugee status went against his larger policy to halt the U.S. refugee resettlement program.

The South African government has said that Trump’s allegations that it is targeting Afrikaners through a land expropriation law are inaccurate and largely driven by misinformation. Trump has posted on his Truth Social platform that Afrikaners were having their farmland seized, when no land has been taken under the new law.

The executive order also criticized South Africa’s foreign policy, specifically its decision to accuse Israel of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza in a case at the United Nations’ top court. The Trump administration has accused South Africa of supporting the Palestinian militant group Hamas and Iran and taking an anti-American stance. The U.S. has also expelled the South African ambassador, accusing him of being anti-America and anti-Trump.

An official at the U.S. Embassy in the South African capital, Pretoria, confirmed receipt of the list of names from the South African Chamber of Commerce in the U.S. but gave no more detail.

Neil Diamond, the president of the chamber, said the list contains 67,042 names. Most were people between 25 and 45 years old and have children.

He told the Newzroom Afrika television channel that his organization had been inundated with requests for more information since Trump’s order and had contacted the State Department and the embassy in Pretoria “to indicate that we would like them to make a channel available for South Africans that would like to get more information and register for refugee status.”

“That cannot be the responsibility of the chamber,” he said.

Diamond said only U.S. authorities could officially register applications for resettlement in the U.S. The U.S. Embassy in South Africa said it is awaiting further instructions on the implementation of Trump’s order.

The Afrikaners deserve their homeland back in South Africa. Unfortunately, the democratically-elected black government of South Africa is inhospitable to this idea, and can never relinquish control of a nation they inherited when the Western world shamelessly turned its back on, first Rhodesia and then South Africa. But that’s the past.

It’s a new day in America. The end of Somalians resettling in our nation is now. The end of Haitian’s coming into America is happening. I, for one, welcome the Afrikaners in finding peace, serenity and a new start in the United States of America. The end of the anti-white nightmare is in sight. The collapse of the black government in South Africa will happen, but it would prudent to be as far away from the culmination of black self-rule when it happens.

The world has changed. The winds were already blowing when Trump came down the escalator in 2015. And now? The world is well aware of what’s happened since democracy came to South Africa, and with it, genocide of the Afrikaners.

Welcome to America.

Can we just admit that any time a black person claims a noose has been hanged (hung?) in their presence at work, it’s an obvious Blood Libel against White America and a hoax. It should be a Federal Hate Crime to purposely incite hatred against White people by malicious hanging a noose to play upon purported historical inequities centered around the rope and its usage against the blacks. We can call it The Bubba Wallace Act. Remember him? [No charges in NASCAR noose incident involving Bubba Wallace, AP, June 23, 2020]:

The noose found hanging in Bubba Wallace’s garage stall at Talladega Superspeedway had been there since at least last October, federal authorities said Tuesday in announcing there will be no charges filed in an incident that rocked NASCAR and its only fulltime Black driver.

U.S. Attorney Jay Town and FBI Special Agent in Charge Johnnie Sharp Jr. said an investigation determined “although the noose is now known to have been in Garage No. 4 in 2019, nobody could have known Mr. Wallace would be assigned to garage number 4 last week.”

A crew member for Richard Petty Motorsports discovered the noose Sunday at the Alabama race track. NASCAR was alerted and contacted the FBI, which sent 15 agents to the track to investigate. They determined no federal crime was committed.

The statement said the garage stall was assigned to Wallace last week in advance of the race scheduled for Sunday but held Monday because of rain. Through video confirmed by NASCAR it was discovered the noose “was in that garage as early as October 2019.”

Anti-White Hatred is omnipresent in America, because for decades it has been the prevailing currency used to advance your career in the private and public sector. The most adherents of the religion offered their undying loyalty to the coffers of this offering plate, believing professing your adamant faith and devotion to this theology would be the keys to salvation in Black-Run America (BRA).

But something strange is happening in 2025 America… what if you through a Fake Noose Party and no one came? [Allentown City Hall employee charged with planting noose at own desk, CBS News, March 24, 2025]:

An Allentown City Hall employee was charged with planting a noose at their desk in January, according to police.

LaTarsha Brown is charged with tampering with or fabricating physical evidence and false reports to law enforcement, Allentown Chief of Police Charles Roca said Monday.

“Today, we’re even more surprised to learn that it was likely fabricated by the employee herself,” Allentown Mayor Matt Tuerk, a Democrat, said.

The Allentown mayor believes the incident has helped bring the conversation over inclusion to the forefront at City Hall.

“That has helped lead conversations in City Hall about what it means to be inclusive. About what it means to respect each other’s employment, and that will continue,” Tuerk said. “I can’t even begin to comment on what would drive somebody to do something like this.”

“Yet, instead of focusing on who put it there, they are trying to turn this against her, as if she is responsible for the very act of hate committed against her,” Lopez said. “That is not just false. It is an outrageous and deliberate attempt to discredit her.”

Lopez said Brown was never offered security or protection after the incident and claimed Brown was never treated as a victim.

“City Hall did not follow any visible protocol to ensure her safety or well-being,” Brown said. “Instead, they let a hate crime turn into an attack on her character.”

You can read Lopez’s full statement below.

I am speaking today as a friend of LaTarsha Brown — someone who knows her heart, her character, and her unwavering commitment to this community.

In January, LaTarsha walked into her office and found a noose on her desk. That is a fact. From the very first moment, she was honest and transparent. She said she had touched the noose. That is also a fact. And yet, instead of focusing on who put it there, they are trying to turn this against her, as if she is responsible for the very act of hate committed against her. That is not just false-it is an outrageous and deliberate attempt to discredit her.

From the moment this happened, LaTarsha was never offered security or protection. No one asked how she could be supported. No one treated her as the victim she is. City Hall did not follow any visible protocol to ensure her safety or well-being. Instead, they let a hate crime turn into an attack on her character.

So I have to ask: What is the protocol for a situation like this? If LaTarsha were not a Black woman fighting against discrimination, what protections would she have received? Would she have been offered security? Would there have been immediate efforts to find the perpetrator, instead of making her the suspect?

LaTarsha Brown is a mother. She is a God-fearing woman. She is a dedicated public servant who has spent her career fighting for equity and justice, even when it came at great personal cost. She sits on the Allentown School Board, advocating for our children. She works for City Hall, despite facing constant retaliation for standing up for diversity and inclusion. She has an open discrimination case against City Hall-one of many, because we all know this city has a long history of targeting and silencing women of color who speak up.

This is not just an attack on LaTarsha. This is a warning to anyone in Allentown who dares to stand up against injustice. This is a smear campaign. This is retaliation.

But let me be clear: LaTarsha Brown is innocent. LaTarsha Brown deserves justice.

The people who know her, the people who have worked alongside her, the people whose lives she has touched-we are standing with her. And we will not let this city get away with yet another act of discrimination.

LaTarsha is the kind of person who, even now, would extend a hand to help the very people trying to bring her down. That is the truth of who she is. And that is why we will not allow this injustice to go unanswered.

I am calling on the people of Allentown, the media, and everyone who believes in justice to stand with LaTarsha . We will not be silent.

Yeah, the jokes over. This story barely made local news, with a Corporate Media journalists assigned to cover it just in case it turned out to be a true story of a white person placing a noose within the vicinity of a black individual to create racial intimidation by conjuring up the Ghost of America’s Lynching Past. Problem: the Ghost of America’s Lynching Present is a hoaxer, a black individual trying to Blood Libel not just White co-workers, but all of White America with the stain of racism. That dog ain’t hunting no more, as they say.

Less and less will be sympathetic stories surrounding black individuals Blood Libeling White America with a fake noose, which should have completely vanished once the Bubba Wallace story turned out to be a hoax (15 FBI agents sent to investigate the obvious hoax is overkill, don’t you think?).

This really doesn’t need any snide comments or superfluous commentary. It stands on its own. There’s no getting off this ride. There are no brakes on this train. [Australian Politician Admits ‘Free Speech’ Is Incompatible With A ‘Multicultural’ Society, Zero Hedge, March 19, 2025]:

The Premier of New South Wales tacitly admitted that in order to uphold the myth that ‘diversity is our greatest strength’, the freedom to say it isn’t must be censored.

“I recognize and I fully said from the beginning, we don’t have the same freedom of speech laws that they have in the United States, and the reason for that is that we want to hold together a multicultural community and have people live in peace,” said Minns.

The politician made the comments in the context of new hate speech laws in Australia that were rushed through off the back of a hysterical moral panic based on a completely fraudulent narrative.

The new legislation was introduced in response to a supposed terror attack plot on a childcare center near a synagogue on the outskirts of Sydney.

However, it subsequently emerged that the attack was actually a “criminal con job,” according to police, and that wasn’t politically or racially motivated at all.

“The entire operation wasn’t about mass destruction. It was a scam,” reports Reclaim the Net. “The alleged mastermind, reportedly a figure nestled deep within Australia’s criminal underworld, was running a spectacular bluff. The plan? Create an artificial crisis, let the media and politicians whip themselves into a frenzy, and then swoop in as the “hero” with inside information — possibly to negotiate a reduced sentence, distract police from other crimes, or simply revel in the chaos.

MLC John Ruddick underscored the false pretext of the hate speech laws when he told parliament, “Parliament was misinformed by the Minns government about the urgency of the bills referred to in one A, B, and C… this House calls on the Minns government to repeal the bills… and apologize for both misleading this Parliament, preventing a Parliamentary Inquiry, and further curbing free speech principles by these reactionary bills.”

However, Minns refused to respond to Ruddick’s argument and doubled down, glibly asserting that anyone who opposes draconian restrictions on free speech is facilitating “racist abuse”.

As Christina Maas points out, as with all ‘hate speech’ laws, they will inevitably be abused to silence native Australians from speaking out about the failure of multiculturalism and diversity.

“These laws will be used against dissenters. Against people who question government policies. Against critics of the ruling ideology,” she writes.

The entire Western world is held hostage by the all-encompassing power of the word ‘racist’. We are to sacrifice our rights, our liberties, our very freedoms long ago won through hardship, toil and battle by our ancestors – and so easily lost in the shadow of tyranny – all because this word is uttered to bring a full-stop to debate or conversation.

We are on the verge of sacrificing our civilization all because we must maintain the illusion ‘diversity is our greatest strength’. If maintaining the current paradigm requires the dismantling of our previously cherished rights, of what value is this greatest strength?

It should be obvious to anyone with a modicum of intelligence why our Founding Fathers signed The Naturalization Act of 1790 into law before they passed the Bill of Rights (1791) into law, giving us Freedom of Speech. You can’t have the former without establishing what constitutes a citizen/citizenry, where social capital and shared values flourish.