RSS
People who support Israel, no matter what it does, tend to hang their hats on a series of familiar arguments. Israel, they say, is the only place Jews can live in security. Critics of Israel want to eliminate Israel. The abolition of Israel would render Israeli Jews homeless (ethnic cleansing), or they would be killed (genocide). Therefore, anyone who criticizes Israel — any anti-Zionist, anyone appalled by Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians — is, by definition, antisemitic.
Let’s take these assumptions one at a time, beginning with the shibboleth of Israel as Safe Haven. “I think without Israel, there’s not a Jew in the world that’s secure. I think Israel is essential,” former President Joe Biden, a strident Zionist, said to Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu in 2023. He’s wrong. Whatever good Israel provides to Jewish people, it does not include protecting them from physical harm.
Roughly half the world’s Jews (7.2 million, three out of four Israelis) live in Israel compared to 8 million in other countries. Between 2015 and 2024, about 1,755 Jewish deaths in Israel were attributed to terrorism and armed conflict. Annualized, this comes to about 0.024% of Israel’s Jewish population (1,755 deaths out of 7.2 million). During the same period, about 24 Jewish deaths outside Israel were attributed to antisemitic terrorism or hate crimes, averaging about 2.4 deaths per year. This is roughly 0.0003% of the global Jewish diaspora (24 deaths out of 8 million).
Former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir is quoted as having said: “We Jews have a secret weapon in our struggle with the Arabs; we have no place to go.” Actually, statistics say, Jews ought to go anywhere but Israel. Jews in Israel are 73 times more likely to be murdered due to terrorism, hate crimes or armed conflict than in the diaspora. Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack skews this heavily, but Israel is much riskier even in baseline years.
Pro-Israel lobbying groups such as the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League claim that the Palestinian rallying cry “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is genocidally antisemitic because “it calls for the establishment of a State of Palestine from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, erasing the State of Israel and its people.” In this telling, “State” and “people” are one and the same — their fate, at least. Yet the ash heap of history is littered with nation-states that no longer exist, without genocidal consequences. Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, the Kingdom of Hawaii, the Republic of Texas, South Vietnam, East Germany and the Soviet Union were erased; their peoples lived on.
It is entirely possible to imagine a Republic of Palestine where Jews, Arabs and other groups live peacefully side by side, in a democracy. As Edward Said pointed out, that’s how it was for centuries in Ottoman Palestine. “Real peace,” Said wrote in 1999, “can come only with a binational Israeli-Palestinian state.”
There are counterfactuals. The invasions and annexations of Armenia, Tibet and the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic led to genocides. But those are exceptions, not the rule. The argument that the end of Israel as a Jewish state and a British-inspired settler colonial project would necessarily lead to ethnic cleansing or worse is ahistorical.
Besides, not everyone who backs the Palestinians is out to get Israel. Twenty percent to 35% of pro-Palestinian voters support a one-state solution that might effectively abolish Israel as a Jewish-majority state. Fifty percent to 60% want Israel to change its policies, with a two-state solution, ending settlements and/or improving human rights. Even if you think the fates of Israel and Israeli Jews are intertwined — and that’s a huge stretch — equating criticism of Israel with a desire for a second Shoah is unfair.
The underpinnings of political support for Israel in the United States stem from its founding in 1948, a few years after the Holocaust. To many Americans, it made (and still makes) sense to create a homeland for a people uniquely persecuted for centuries. Few gave a passing thought to the Palestinians who already lived there. Fewer still asked why people who had nothing to do with World War II should give up their land, as opposed to, say, Germany.
Whatever logic justified U.S. support in 1948 for the creation of a Jewish ethnostate has evaporated after nearly a century of apartheid, injustice, brutality and war. Israel is dangerous for Jews who live there, and it’s a toxic driver of global antisemitism everywhere else. Even if you don’t care about the Palestinians — if your only concern is for the Jews who survived the Holocaust — Israel no longer makes sense.
Ted Rall, the political cartoonist, columnist and graphic novelist, is the author of the brand-new “What’s Left: Radical Solutions for Radical Problems.”
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
What holocaust?
The one that we are supposed to believe in no matter how much evidence, or the lack of it, we discover. The one that NEVER HAPPENED.
Who cares about Jews who live there. Fairness and mutual respect between peoples is not in their vocabulary. Let them be cleared out of Palestine the same as Germans were cleared out of Hitler’s short lived and brutal Eastern (Slavonic) Empire.
No. It is unimaginable.
Look at Lebanon. How well is a cooperation among Islam, Christians, and Druze working out? It is more or less a failed state. Trying to force comity is an obviously non-viable concept. Lebanon and Syria need to be partitioned.
Palestinian Jews have suffered repeated acts of violence for decades. The October 7 genocide attack escalated that by kidnapping children. Every act of violence requires more stringent security containment of the inherently violent Jihadist threat.
Fundamental change is coming. Genocidal Hamas irreparably damaged the Gaza aquifer. There is only sufficient fresh waster to support 500-750K people. Not the full population ~2 million and growing. Islam 100% owns this problem. How are they going to fix it?
Massive desalination works are:
• Expensive to build
• Expensive to operate
• Fragile, if caught up in fighting
• Generate waste that has to be disposed if carefully
There is limited economic activity in Gaza and the UNRWA dole is ending. They cannot pay for such facilities themselves. What Muslim countries are going to sign up to support such an effort on an effectively permanent basis? I cannot think of any.
It is both easier & less expensive to support voluntary emigration out of Gaza to authentic Islamic lands with sufficient natural resources. Would Iran be interested in selling a piece of coastline?
It is entirely possible to imagine Muslim colonists leaving Judea, Samaria, and Gaza to set up a new state far away on Muslim lands.
PEACE 😇
Go and read the Kol Nidre then tell me how can these people have any place in the West.
Alternately all the Yiddistani’s could move back to their ancestral homeland: Ukraine.
Israel, even with nuclear weapons, is likely to suffer the fate of the Crusader Kingdoms of the Middle Ages. The notion of a Jewish state in the Levant is an idea whose time has come and gone.
The ancestral homeland of Judaism is Jewish Palestine. Why would Palestinian Jews leave Jewish Palestine?
The ancestral homeland of Islam is Arabia, not Palestine. Muslims do not get to squat on Christian & Jewish land in Palestine.
PEACE 😇
This is an excellent idea! Iran is a very large country. The new state of Palestinia could be allocated in the eastern side of Iran where the city of Zåhedån now resides, going south and on the western border of Pakistan for however big it is determined it must be to accommodate all 11 million Palestinians in the world. This would be similar to the Israel partitioning of 1948.
This would separate the Palestinians from Israel by a suitable distance. Plus they would have access to water from the Persian Gulf and what runs down from the north.
Perhaps this would be easiest to effect if Israel and the West neutralized the current Iran, effected Regime change and forced the small partitioning as one of the items in their treaty of surrender.
Since there will never be a Palestinian state on Israel territory, everyone should be looking at creative solutions like this.
Alternatively, since you are dumber than a rock and this idea has zero chance of ever happening, do you have any other bright ideas?
Possibly if you are imbibing some hallucinogenic drug.
Perhaps you should get together with Thomas Friedman of the NY Times for drinks and love making, since I believe you both live in the NY area. You’ll be like peas in a pod!
Here is a particularly succinct response to a recent Friedman NYT article:
The Palestinians are the actual Jews of Palestine, who converted to Islam. The Ashkenazi are mostly Italians … see Ron Unz website … oh, that is, right here.
Not so inconceivable, a member of the tribe is leading the current Ukraine to destruction … making room?
9 million Germans were killed after the war, by being force marched out of lands they had lived on for many, many years. Hardly a colony.